Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
2.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64580, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144850

RESUMO

Background and objective Sexual minorities experience large-scale mental health disparities, yet recent national data on them remains scarce. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms by sexual orientation in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States (US). Methods This cross-sectional analysis utilized data from 26,311 adults in the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Sexual orientation was classified as sexual minority (gay/lesbian, bisexual, or other non-heterosexual identity) or heterosexual. Self-reported depression was assessed using the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), and anxiety was evaluated using the seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Logistic regression models were employed to compare mental health outcomes between sexual minority and heterosexual respondents. Results Sexual minorities comprised 6.6% of the weighted sample. Compared to heterosexuals, sexual minorities were younger, more often female, unmarried, and had higher poverty despite greater employment (all p<0.001). Approximately half of sexual minorities screened positive for depression (49.0%) and anxiety (44.3%), compared to 19.5% and 16.4% of heterosexuals, respectively. After covariate adjustment, sexual minorities had over three-fold higher odds of depression [odds ratio (OR): 3.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.86-3.73] and anxiety (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.57-3.42). The prevalence was highest among sexual minority youth, with depression in 54.9-61.1% and anxiety in 49.0-59.2%, depending on income levels. Conclusions In this nationally representative study, sexual minorities demonstrated a high burden of depression and anxiety symptoms compared to heterosexuals. Sexual orientation independently predicted mental health disparities beyond other sociodemographic characteristics. Targeted interventions are recommended to address psychiatric disease disparities that disproportionately impact vulnerable sexual minority subgroups.

3.
Cureus ; 16(8): e65989, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39221363

RESUMO

Purpose Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are an increasingly prevalent class of drugs for managing overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Postmarket surveillance is essential for characterizing their risk profiles in real-world patient populations as clinical use increases. This study investigated the association of GLP-1RAs with mortality and serious adverse events (AEs) reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods A disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing FAERS data from Q2 2005 to Q1 2024 to identify AEs listing an approved GLP-1RA as the primary suspect drug. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated for mortality and serious AEs associated with each GLP-1RA compared to the combined group of all other GLP-1RAs. A signal of disproportionate reporting indicating a potential safety concern was defined as a lower bound of the 95% CI for the ROR exceeding 1.0. Results The analysis identified 287,201 AEs associated with GLP-1RAs during the study period. Disproportionality analyses revealed statistically significant elevated signals for mortality with the earliest approved GLP-1RAs: Byetta (ROR = 2.20, 95% CI: 2.06-2.34) and Victoza (ROR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.98-2.28). Significant elevated signals for serious AEs were identified with the semaglutide products Ozempic (ROR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.69-2.85), Rybelsus (ROR = 2.42, 95% CI: 2.26-2.60), and Wegovy (ROR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.22-1.39); the liraglutide products Victoza (ROR = 2.10, 95% CI: 2.04-2.15) and Saxenda (ROR = 2.21, 95% CI: 2.09-2.33); and Byetta (ROR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.08-1.14) compared to other GLP-1RAs. The newer GLP-1RAs were associated with a higher proportion of serious AEs reported in younger patients (p < 0.001) and females (p < 0.001). Conclusion This pharmacovigilance study utilizing the FAERS database identified potential safety signals of increased mortality and serious AE reporting associated with certain GLP-1RAs, particularly the earlier approved liraglutide agents Byetta and Victoza. These findings highlight the importance of proactive postmarket surveillance to characterize the real-world safety profiles of individual GLP-1RA drugs.

4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(36): e39539, 2024 Sep 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252263

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to determine adherence to national guidelines for aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activity among United States (US) adults and identify factors associated with guideline nonadherence. The 2022 National Health Interview Survey data were analyzed to evaluate self-reported physical activity among 26,494 US adults. Adherence to national guidelines was defined as engaging in ≥150 minutes moderate-intensity or ≥75 minutes vigorous-intensity aerobic activity/week, and muscle-strengthening activity ≥2 days/week. A multivariable logistic regression model evaluated associations between 24 sociodemographic and health variables with nonadherence to physical activity guidelines. Shapley Additive Explanations were used to assess the relative importance of each factor in the model. The population-weighted analysis revealed that only 24.3% of US adults met both the aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity guidelines. The regression model identified 17 factors significantly associated with nonadherence. When evaluating the relative importance of these variables, older age, lower educational attainment, and lower household income emerged as the primary determinants of nonadherence. Guideline adherence was lowest among subgroups with multiple risk factors, with only 6.5% of older adults with lower income and education meeting the guidelines. In contrast, adherence was 42.7% in younger respondents with higher incomes and educational attainment. In conclusion, physical activity rates among US adults remain below public health targets, with significant disparities among sociodemographic groups. Expanded outreach efforts targeting higher-risk populations are urgently needed to address barriers, promote physical activity engagement, and achieve health equity.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Autorrelato , Fatores Sociodemográficos , Fatores Etários
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(32): e34488, 2023 Aug 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37565865

RESUMO

The number of Americans who report dissatisfaction with their quality of life has increased over the past several decades. This study investigated social- and health-related determinants of life dissatisfaction among adults in the United States (US). We conducted a cross-sectional observational study using data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative sample of adults in the US. We analyzed the association between self-reported life dissatisfaction and independent variables including demographics, family-level information, health status and conditions, functioning and disability, health insurance coverage, chronic pain, occupational variables, socioeconomic indicators, health-related behaviors, and psychological distress indicators. Survey multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association among social- and health-related determinants and life dissatisfaction. The relative importance of each variable in the final model was determined using Shapley Additive Explanations values (0-100% scale). Among the 253.2 million civilian noninstitutionalized adults, 12.2 million (4.8%) reported life dissatisfaction. Recent psychological distress, unmarried status, poor general health, lack of social/emotional support, and lower food security were independently associated with life dissatisfaction (all P < .001). The relative importance of these variables in predicting life dissatisfaction was 39.3% for recent psychological distress, 22.2% for unmarried status, 18.3% for poor general health, 13.4% for lack of social/emotional support, and 6.9% for lower food security. Additionally, racial inequities were identified in the prevalence of these factors. Life dissatisfaction among adults in the US is associated with social- and health-related factors that are more prevalent in racial minority groups. The study findings suggest that resource prioritization should be targeted towards individuals with these factors, with particular emphasis on racial minority groups. This study aligns with US health policy initiatives and the results may help policymakers address the underlying factors contributing to life dissatisfaction among the US population.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Cureus ; 15(10): e46783, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37954822

RESUMO

Background Chronic liver diseases account for approximately 1.9 million deaths globally every year and negatively affect health-related quality of life. Early detection of liver disease may enable timely treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of liver steatosis and fibrosis in US adults with no previously diagnosed liver condition. Methods We conducted an observational, nationally representative, cross-sectional study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted from January 2017 to March 2020. Study participants were 7,391 adults aged 21 and older with no history of diagnosed liver disorders who underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) to determine liver steatosis and fibrosis. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values between 248 and 267 dB/m were classified as mild steatosis, and those over 267 dB/m as advanced steatosis. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) values between 7.65 and 13 kPa were classified as moderate/severe fibrosis, and those over 13 kPa as cirrhosis. Covariates included age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, kidney disease, smoking history, alcohol intake, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep time. The associations of subject characteristics with liver CAP and LSM were evaluated using survey multivariable linear regression. Shapley Additive Explanations values determined the relative importance of each attribute in the model. The discriminative performance of classification models was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Results The population prevalence of liver steatosis was 57.2% (10.2% mild; 47.0% advanced). The relative importance of covariates in predicting liver CAP was 63.1% for BMI, 10.7% for ALT, and less than 10% for the other covariates. The prevalence of significant fibrosis was 11.4% (8.3% moderate/severe fibrosis; 3.1% cirrhosis). The relative importance of covariates in predicting LSM was 67.3% for BMI and less than 10% for the other covariates. BMI alone demonstrated acceptable discriminative performance in classifying varying severities of steatosis and fibrosis (AUROC range 72%-78%) at cutoffs between 28 and 33 kg/m2. Conclusions Undiagnosed chronic liver disease based on VCTE findings is highly prevalent among US adults, particularly in obese individuals. Efforts to increase awareness about liver disease and to reconsider existing BMI thresholds for liver disease screening may be warranted.

7.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 6901, 2020 04 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32327689

RESUMO

The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of conservative surgery with or without adjunctive presacral neurectomy (PN) for chronic endometriosis-related pelvic pain. In a systematic review with meta-analysis, randomized or nonrandomized controlled studies of conservative endometriosis surgery with or without adjunctive PN were included. Main outcomes were treatment failure (the proportion of women in which surgery failed to adequately resolve midline pain) and the frequency of operative and postoperative complications. A total of 7 studies with 8 group comparisons (3 randomized) representing 503 women (250 PN; 253 Control) were included. Over 34 months median follow-up, crude rates of treatment failure were 15.0% with PN and 40.9% with Controls (risk ratio = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.60, p < 0.001). The risk of postoperative constipation was higher with PN vs. Controls (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.024). No treatment group differences were observed for the risk of operative complications (0.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.498), reoperation (4.1% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.758) or urinary incontinence (5.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.195). Overall, in well-selected patients, conservative surgery with adjunctive PN may provide greater relief from midline pain and a similarly low rate of operative complications relative to conservative surgery alone but may increase the risk of constipation postoperatively. However, results were derived from mainly older and lower quality studies. Since then, surgical techniques to treat endometriosis have been improved and the effect of PN observed in prior studies should be confirmed in future studies in women in whom radical excision of deep infiltrating lesions is obtained.


Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Denervação , Endometriose/cirurgia , Sacro/inervação , Sacro/cirurgia , Adulto , Denervação/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Viés de Publicação , Análise de Regressão , Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy ; 13: 519-522, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32581614

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since the first occurrence of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), a number of online tools have become available to assist with tracking Covid-19 prevalence. Yet we are unaware of resources that provide country-specific Covid-19 incidence data. METHODS: We undertook a descriptive analysis of the global impact of Covid-19 using data reported on March 17, 2020. The prevalence of Covid-19 cases, fatalities attributed to Covid-19, and the case fatality rate for each of the 238 countries were accessed from the World Health Organization global Covid-19 tracking site, and we additionally calculated Covid-19 incidence based on country-specific population data. We determined the country-specific point prevalence and incidence of Covid-19 and associated deaths while using geocoded data to display their spatial distribution with geographic heat maps. RESULTS: The analysis included 193,197 Covid-19 cases and 7859 associated deaths. The point prevalence was highest in China (80,881), Italy (31,506), Iran (16,169), and Spain (11,312); no other country reported more than 10,000 cases. The incidence (per million population) was highest in San Marino (3389) followed by Iceland (645) and Italy (521); no other country had an incidence above 400 per million population. CONCLUSION: Countries with a high Covid-19 prevalence may not have a high incidence, and vice versa. Public health agencies that provide real-time infection tracking tools should report country-specific Covid-19 incidence metrics, in addition to prevalence data.

9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(40): e22439, 2020 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33019426

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The mortality rate associated with Covid-19 varies considerably among studies and determinants of this variability are not well characterized. METHODS: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature published through March 31, 2020 was performed to estimate the mortality rate among hospitalized patients in China with a confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19. Hospital mortality rates were estimated using an inverse variance-weighted random-effects meta-analysis model. Funnel plot symmetry was evaluated for small-study effects, a one-study removed sensitivity analysis assessed the influence of individual studies on the pooled mortality rate, and metaregression assessed the association of potential confounding variables with mortality rates. RESULTS: The review included 16 observational studies involving 1832 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of Covid-19. The surveillance period among studies ranged from December 16, 2019 to February 23, 2020. The median patient age was 53 years and 53% were males. A total of 38.5% of patients presented with at least 1 comorbidity, most commonly hypertension (24.0%), cardiac disease (15.1%), and diabetes mellitus (14.4%). Fever and cough, reported in 84.8% and 61.7% of patients respectively, were the most common patient symptoms. The pooled mortality rate was 9.9% (95% confidence interval 6.1% to 14.5%). Funnel plot asymmetry was not observed and the meta-analysis results were not substantially influenced by any single study since the pooled mortality rate ranged from 8.9% to 11.1% following iterative removal of one study at a time. Substantial heterogeneity in the mortality rate was identified among studies (I = 87%; P < .001). In a metaregression that included demographics, patient risk factors, and presenting symptoms, only a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus was associated with a higher mortality rate (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of hospitalized patients in China with a diagnosis of Covid-19, the mortality rate was 9.9% and a higher diabetes mellitus prevalence was independently associated with a worse prognosis. The independent influence of diabetes mellitus with Covid-19 mortality should be viewed as hypothesis-generating and warrants further study.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Complicações do Diabetes/mortalidade , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Complicações do Diabetes/virologia , Diabetes Mellitus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Data Brief ; 32: 106276, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32984469

RESUMO

This article contains data on country-specific variability in Covid-19 prevalence, incidence, and case fatality rate among the 238 countries globally. We used the World Health Organization worldwide Covid-19 tracking site to determine the number of confirmed Covid-19 cases, the number of fatalities attributed to Covid-19, and the case fatality rate for each of 238 countries. Using data from the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, we extracted key country-specific metrics with potential associations with Covid-19 including total population, land area, population density, percentage of residents living in urban areas, and median age. We extracted country-specific economic indicators from The World Bank Group Open Data database. All data were extracted on August 15, 2020. We developed consolidated data sets and calculated the country-specific point prevalence and incidence of Covid-19 and associated deaths. These data are associated with the article "Spatial Analysis of Global Variability in Covid-19 Burden". Data are stored in a comma separated value format and can be downloaded from the Data in Brief website.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA