The implementation and outcome of a 2-year prospective audit and feedback based antimicrobial stewardship program at a private tertiary care hospital.

PURPOSE: Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a major public health problem in India. Hence effective antimicrobial stewardship programs (AMSP) are needed. We report the design, implementation and results of a prospective audit and feedback based AMSP at a private tertiary care hospital. METHODS: During the study period - January 2018 to December 2019 - the prescription of restricted antimicrobials required the filling of a justification form which was reviewed by the antimicrobial stewardship committee (AMSC) at 48-72 â€‹h. Patients in whom the restricted antimicrobial was stopped earlier than 48 â€‹h were not applicable for review. The eligible prescriptions were judged as justified/unjustified by AMSC based on the patient's clinical and previous antimicrobial history, course, results of investigations/cultures, guidelines and communicated to the treating team. Compliance to the recommendations of the AMSC was measured. Days of therapy for each restricted antimicrobial/1000 patient days was calculated. Colistin resistance rates in pathogens causing central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) were compared with previous years. RESULTS: A total of 2397 restricted antimicrobials in 1366 patients were prescribed in the study period of which 1801 prescriptions were applicable for review (75%). Overall, 1.4% of admitted patients were prescribed restricted antimicrobials. The total days of therapy with restricted antimicrobials was 41/1000 patient days. The AMSC committee adjudged 12.5% of prescriptions as unjustified and recommendations for de-escalation were accepted in 89%. There was no significant difference in the study outcomes between 2018 and 2019. CONCLUSION: The prospective audit and feedback component of AMSP provided insight into the use of restricted antimicrobials at our hospital. This component should be considered by hospitals for inclusion in their AMSP program on an ongoing basis even if limited to a few drugs and in few areas of the hospital.

Evaluation and appraisal of drug information services in a rural secondary level care hospital, Anantapur, AP.

BACKGROUND: Drug Information Center (DIC) is an information center which provides drug information (DI) to healthcare professionals. The aim was to evaluate the performance of DIC for improving the quality and quantity of information services provided to the healthcare professionals. The service was provided free of cost to the customers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive study was conducted for the period of 6 months from February to August 2011 excluding May due to vacation. Customers were asked: how did they find the service provided to them? Was it good, satisfactory, or need improvement? There were written feedback forms to be filled by the customers, including customer satisfaction questions. The official publication of the DIC, RIPER PDIC Bulletin was screened for its types of articles/number of drug news published. The bulletin is circulated for free to the healthcare professionals electronically. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 232 queries were obtained during the study period of 6 months. Average number of queried received to the DIC was 39 per month. Most preferred mode of queries was personal access (89%). Majority of queries were received from nurses, i.e., 162 (70%) queries and 81% of all queries were drug oriented for improving knowledge. There were only 19% of the queries for individual patients; doctors asked most of those queries. Only 3% queries answered were rated as need improvement by the healthcare professionals. Rest were considered as either Good (56%) or satisfactory (49%). Range of drug news published in each bulletin was 3-4 and most of the other articles include expert opinion to improve practice or training. CONCLUSION: The DI services were satisfactorily used for academic interests. Nurses used the service for the highest compared to other health care professionals. Future studies should plan to establish the usefulness of DI to improve healthcare practice.