Short stem total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients 60 years or younger: a 3- to 10-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: In young patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) could allow a potential advantage in preserving metaphyseal bone-stock, when revision surgery might become necessary. However, only a few studies have evaluated the outcome of short-stem THAs in ONFH. We reviewed the prospectively collected data of a cementless partial neck-retaining short-stem with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in ONFH patients. METHODS: Thirty patients (37 hips) younger than 60 years (mean age at surgery, 51.5 years) underwent THA with the NANOS® stem (Smith and Nephew, Marl, Germany) from January 2006 to December 2012. All patients received a 32-mm or 36 mm ceramic femoral head. Harris hip score, WOMAC and UCLA activity score were recorded. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for bone-implant fixation and osteolysis. Further analysis correlated clinical findings with implants characteristics and patient demographics at mean 5.6 years' follow-up (range, 3-10 years). RESULTS: The clinical and functional results improved significantly (p < 0.001). At latest follow-up, mean HHS, WOMAC, and UCLA activity scores were 90 (range, 71-100), 94 (range, 76-100), and 6.3 (range, 4-10) points, respectively. The diameter of the femoral head did not influence the clinical outcome (p = 0.661). All hips showed bone ingrowth fixation of the acetabular and femoral components. No patients showed osteolysis. No revision for any reason was performed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent clinical results and fixation pattern at mean 5.6 years' follow-up reveal this implant as a reliable option in advanced stage of ONFH either. Further investigations are crucial to determine the long-term durability and to assess whether the association of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, can be useful to achieve longer survivorship and lower complications rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry number: ISRCTN 91336248 ; date of registration: 04/07/2017.

Combined use of minimal screw synthesis and external articulated fixation is effective for the management of supra-intercondyloid humeral fractures in the elderly? A retrospective study.

Background: Fractures of the distal humerus are relatively rare and can be a source of disabling outcomes especially if not properly treated. Therefore, the objective of the treatment must be to obtain a stable synthesis that allows early mobilization, avoiding complications such as muscular hypotonotrophy, joint rigidity or delays in consolidation that may be due to prolonged immobilization of this joint. Although ORIF treatment of these fractures may intuitively appear to be the gold standard, there is still no consensus in the literature on which type of treatment is most suitable. Patients and method: We report in this retrospective case series analysis our experience on 31 elder patients (more than 65 years old), affected by a supra-intercondyloid humerus fracture, treated using a minimal internal fixation with cannulated screws combined with the use of an external articulated elbow fixator. This methodology is less invasive but allows a stable synthesis and an early mobilization.Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed for each patient at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after surgery. At 6 months the residual joint excursion was evaluated and the data were collected. In addition, at 6 months, each patient underwent three different functional capacity assessment questionnaires: MAYO Elbow Performance score, The Disability of the ARM, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH) and Oxford Elbow Score. Results: The healing rate was 100% with no cases of non-union, despite the old age of our patients. The average range of motions obtained at 6 months from the surgery was 111° in flexion-extension and 157° in pronation-supination for the patient with an extra-articular fracture, 88° in flexion-extension and 153° in pronation-supination for the patients with a partial articular fracture and 85° in flexion-extension and 149° in pronation-supination for the patients with a complete articular fracture. Our results in the recovery of an arc of motion in flexion-extension are slightly less performing than the results obtained with an ORIF treatment. Indeed, according to literature the mean postoperative flexion arc in an ORIF treatment of distal humerus fractures in adults is 110°.The functional results obtained were satisfactory, with an average score at 6 months from the surgery of 95/100 (Mayo score) for the patients with an extra-articular fracture, 83.3/100 for the patients with a partial articular fracture and 79/100 for the patients with a complete articular fracture. Conclusion: The results obtained, in terms of range of motions, function, pain and healing and complications rate lead us to affirm that, in selected patients, this technique can represent a valid treatment and therefore a valid option that could be considered.

Functional and radiological outcomes in displaced heel fractures: Open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation.

Management of intra-articular heel fractures is controversial. The main goals of surgical treatment are restoring subtalar articular congruence and width, height, form and alignment of the heel. The gold standard is considered Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF), a complex technique with a high rate of complications. External Fixation (EF) could be a good alternative. In this study were identified 37 fractures in 35 patients (24 patients underwent ORIF and EF was performed in 13 cases) and the outcomes of the two techniques were compared. The mean surgical time for ORIF was 107.8 minutes, while for EF was 88.61 minutes and the ORIF group presented a higher rate of complications, despite of similar results in the mean postoperative AOFAS Ankle and Hindfoot Scale scores (73.31/100 points in the ORIF group and 75.40/100 points in the EF group). Fast learning curve, short surgery time and low complications rate make EF an alternative to ORIF in treating intraarticular heel fractures.