RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the impact of two different phytotherapeutic agents on decision making regarding prostate biopsy for patients with higher-than-normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. METHODS: From June 2022 to May 2023, all patients attending two urological institutions due to higher-than-normal PSA levels were randomized to receive either oral capsules of Curcuma Longa, Boswellia, Pinus pinaster and Urtica dioica (Group A) or Serenoa Repens 320 mg (Group B) for 3 months. At the follow-up visit after 3 months, all patients underwent PSA tests and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). RESULTS: In the per-protocol analysis, data from 66 patients in Group A and 76 in Group B were analyzed. Fifty patients in Group A (75.7%) showed a significant reduction in total PSA compared to forty-nine in Group B (64.4%) (p < 0.001). Twenty-eight patients had PI-RADS III or higher in mpMRI: twelve in Group A and fourteen in Group B. Twenty-three patients (34.8%) in Group A and fifty-nine (77.6%) in Group B (p < 0.001) underwent prostate biopsy based on the mpMRI findings and PSA values. Three patients in Group A showed a significant reduction in total PSA values while having positive mpMRI findings (6%) compared with nine in Group B (19.5%) (p < 0.001). On the contrary, 7 patients in Group A did not show significant reduction in total PSA values and had negative mpMRI findings (43%) compared to 22 in Group B (81.4%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a three-month course of a combination of Curcuma Longa, Boswellia, Pinus pinaster and Urtica dioica seems to be an interesting tool to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies among men with higher-than-normal PSA levels.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Even if Meares-Stamey 4-glass (M&S) test is regarded a decisive tool for diagnosing prostatitis its use is only rarely performed in everyday clinical practice. Here, we analyze if the diagnostic yield of the M&S test could be improved by a pre-test categorization of patients due to undergo a M&S test. METHODS: All clinical and microbiological data of patients who underwent M&S test in two urological centers from January 2004 to December 2021 were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. One center has a dedicated staff member for the study of prostatitis (Cohort I), while the other center is a general urological unit (Cohort II). All patients were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the assembled data: patients with symptoms related to prostatitis only (Group I), patients with symptoms related to both prostatitis and BPH (Group II), patients with symptoms related to BPH only (Group III). The rates of positive microbiological results in each group were compared. RESULTS: In the whole period, 9347 patients were analyzed and categorized as follows: Group I, 1884; Group II, 5151; Group III, 2312. Three-thousand and eight-hundred twenty-three patients showed positive culture results (40.9%). The most common isolated species was Escherichia coli (49.7%), followed by Enteroccus spp. (31.8%). The rates of positive M&S tests in the different symptom groups were: Group I, 1532 (81.4%); Group II, 1494 (29.0%); Group III, 797 (34.4%). The overall rate of positive M&S tests in each urology center showed that the center with a staff member who is dedicated to prostatitis studies (Cohort I) had a significantly higher rate of positive M&S tests than the general urological department (Cohort II) (64.3% vs 31.4%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom-based patient selection and dedicated staff members will increase the diagnostic yield of the M&S test and reduce the number of unnecessary tests.