Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Science ; 376(6596): 922-924, 2022 05 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35617382

RESUMO

Policies must help decarbonize power and transport sectors.

4.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 6693, 2022 11 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36335099

RESUMO

Adopting electric end-use technologies instead of fossil-fueled alternatives, known as electrification, is an important economy-wide decarbonization strategy that also reduces criteria pollutant emissions and improves air quality. In this study, we evaluate CO2 and air quality co-benefits of electrification scenarios by linking a detailed energy systems model and a full-form photochemical air quality model in the United States. We find that electrification can substantially lower CO2 and improve air quality and that decarbonization policy can amplify these trends, which yield immediate and localized benefits. In particular, transport electrification can improve ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), though the magnitude of changes varies regionally. However, growing activity from non-energy-related PM2.5 sources-such as fugitive dust and agricultural emissions-can offset electrification benefits, suggesting that additional measures beyond CO2 policy and electrification are needed to meet air quality goals. We illustrate how commonly used marginal emissions approaches systematically underestimate reductions from electrification.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar , Ozônio , Estados Unidos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Dióxido de Carbono , Poluição do Ar/análise , Material Particulado/análise , Ozônio/análise
5.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 3732, 2021 Jun 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34140470

RESUMO

Carbon dioxide removal technologies, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and direct air capture, are valuable for stringent climate targets. Previous work has examined implications of carbon removal, primarily bioenergy-based technologies using integrated assessment models, but not investigated the effects of a portfolio of removal options on power systems in detail. Here, we explore impacts of carbon removal technologies on electric sector investments, costs, and emissions using a detailed capacity planning and dispatch model with hourly resolution. We show that adding carbon removal to a mix of low-carbon generation technologies lowers the costs of deep decarbonization. Changes to system costs and investments from including carbon removal are larger as policy ambition increases, reducing the dependence on technologies like advanced nuclear and long-duration storage. Bioenergy with carbon capture is selected for net-zero electric sector emissions targets, but direct air capture deployment increases as biomass supply costs rise.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA