Post-COVID-19 condition is not only a question of persistent symptoms: structured screening including health-related quality of life reveals two separate clusters of post-COVID.

PURPOSE: Some patients experience long-term sequelae after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, despite a present post-COVID condition, defined as "any symptom lasting longer than 12 weeks," only a subset of patients search for medical help and therapy. METHOD: We invited all adults with a positive real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 between March 2020 and September 2021 (n = 4091) in the city of Jena to answer a standardized questionnaire including demographic information, the course of the acute infection and current health status. K-means-clustering of quality of life (QoL) was used to explore post-COVID subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 909 participants at a median interval of 367 (IQR 291/403) days after acute infection were included in the analysis. Of those, 643 (70.7%) complained of having experienced persistent symptoms at the time of the survey. Cluster analysis based on QoL revealed two subgroups of people with persistent post-COVID symptoms. Whereas 189/643 participants (29.4%) showed markedly diminished QoL, normal QoL was detected in 454/643 individuals (70.6%). CONCLUSION: Despite persistent symptoms being reported by nearly three quarters of participants, only one-third of these described a significant reduction in QoL (cluster 1), whereas the other two-thirds reported a near-normal QoL (cluster 2), thus indicating a differentiation between "post-COVID disease" and "post-COVID condition". The prevalence of clinically relevant post-COVID disease was at least 20.7%. Health policies should focus on this subset.

Clinical epidemiology and case fatality due to antimicrobial resistance in Germany: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021.

BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is of public health concern worldwide.AimWe aimed to summarise the German AMR situation for clinicians and microbiologists.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 60 published studies and data from the German Antibiotic-Resistance-Surveillance (ARS). Primary outcomes were AMR proportions in bacterial isolates from infected patients in Germany (2016-2021) and the case fatality rates (2010-2021). Random and fixed (common) effect models were used to calculate pooled proportions and pooled case fatality odds ratios, respectively.ResultsThe pooled proportion of meticillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus infections (MRSA) was 7.9% with a declining trend between 2014 and 2020 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.886-0.891; p < 0.0001), while vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium (VRE) bloodstream infections increased (OR = 1.18; (95% CI: 1.16-1.21); p < 0.0001) with a pooled proportion of 34.9%. Case fatality rates for MRSA and VRE were higher than for their susceptible strains (OR = 2.29; 95% CI: 1.91-2.75 and 1.69; 95% CI: 1.22-2.33, respectively). Carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative pathogens (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp. and Escherichia coli) was low to moderate (< 9%), but resistance against third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones was moderate to high (5-25%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited high resistance against carbapenems (17.0%; 95% CI: 11.9-22.8), third-generation cephalosporins (10.1%; 95% CI: 6.6-14.2) and fluoroquinolones (24.9%; 95% CI: 19.3-30.9). Statistical heterogeneity was high (I2 > 70%) across studies reporting resistance proportions.ConclusionContinuous efforts in AMR surveillance and infection prevention and control as well as antibiotic stewardship are needed to limit the spread of AMR in Germany.

[Outpatient Long/Post-COVID Care: Barriers and Desires of Affected Persons to Medical Care]. / Ambulante Long/Post-COVID-Versorgung: Analyse möglicher Barrieren und Wünsche von Betroffenen an die ärztliche Betreuung.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent and new-onset symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection (so-called Long/Post-COVID syndrome) represent a major challenge for our healthcare system. However, there have been limited data on primary outpatient care and care planning, complicating patient flow management and ultimately patient care. Assessing the care reality of patients with Long/Post-COVID-symptoms, as well as their difficulties and desires in receiving medical care, is a necessary first step toward improving outpatient care. METHODS: The JenUP study (Jena study on the population-based incidence of Post-COVID complaints) is a questionnaire-based survey of all adults in the city of Jena who were registered with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 2020 and September 2021. Part of this study focused on the medical care of the affected persons as well as subjective difficulties of the patients in the context of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1,008 of the 4,209 individuals responded to the questionnaire; 922 (91,5%) experienced at least one Long/Post-COVID-associated symptom. 85,6% of these individuals (790/922) also provided detailed information about contacts with health care facilities. Three out of four persons (590/790) consulted their general practitioner/family doctor in connection with their complaints and 155/790 (19,6%) specialists in addition (most frequently mentioned were specialists in internal medicine - 7,1% (55/790)). Difficulties in obtaining a subjectively required therapy were mentioned by 22,6% (162/718). The main reasons were the patient's apparent feeling of "not being sick enough" (69/162) and a lack of a specialist consultant (65/162). 27% (247/919) of all subjects with Long/Post-COVID complaints expressed a desire for a specific consultant. CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians represent a central element of outpatient care for Long/Post-COVID patients. In addition, nationwide structures for interdisciplinary care should be established according to the national S1 guideline. Analysis of wishes for medical care and perceived barriers to accessing it represent a first step in improving outpatient care for Long/Post-COVID patients.

[Attitudes of general practitioners and medical practice assistants towards the delegation of medical services: Results of a survey in Berlin, Brandenburg and Thuringia]. / Einstellungen von Hausärzt:innen und Medizinischen Fachangestellten zur Delegation ärztlicher Leistungen ­ Ergebnisse einer Befragung in Berlin, Brandenburg und Thüringen.

INTRODUCTION: The delegation of tasks and responsibilities from general practitioners (GPs) to medical practice assistants (MPAs) can contribute to ensuring primary care in Germany. The aim of the study was to collect and analyze attitudes and procedures of GPs and MPAs regarding the delegation of physician-related tasks and activities. METHODOLOGY: A self-designed, piloted questionnaire was sent to all GPs listed within the regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KV) in Thuringia, Berlin, and Brandenburg (n=5,516) and their MPAs. Participants were asked to indicate which physician-related activities were already delegated and on which occasions further delegations could be considered. RESULTS: 890 GPs (response rate: 16.1%) and 566 MPAs participated in the written survey. The participants were predominantly female and most of them worked in urban areas. Numerous activities, such as medical history taking, triage, Disease Management Program (DMP) controls, vaccinations and home visits, have already been delegated. The willingness to delegate further tasks (e. g., follow-up prescriptions and referrals, independent takeover of simple consultations, assessing the necessity of physician consultation) was high. CONCLUSION: The survey showed a high level of willingness of both occupational groups to delegate physician-related activities to MFAs. An expansion seems possible under certain conditions. Many activities have already been delegated to MPAs in primary care practices. Our survey provides suggestions regarding further tasks suitable for delegation, some of which go beyond the delegation agreement valid in Germany.

Nurses' perspectives on the role of relatives in emergency situations in nursing homes: a qualitative study from Germany.

BACKGROUND: In nursing homes, emergencies often result in unnecessary hospital transfers, which may negatively affect residents' health. Emergency management in nursing homes is complicated by structural conditions, uncertainties and difficulties communicating with the treating healthcare professionals. The present study investigated the role played by relatives in this emergency management, as perceived by nursing staff. METHODS: Within the context of a larger multi-method, interdisciplinary research project, we conducted six focus group discussions and 33 semi-structured interviews with nurses at nursing homes in northern Germany between September 2020 and April 2021. Discussions and interviews focused on emergency management in nursing homes, and were recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis, according to Mayring. RESULTS: Nurses reported that relatives were actively involved in emergency management in the nursing homes. Relatives were informed when there was an emergency situation, and they participated in decision making around the resident's care. Nurses sometimes perceived the involvement of relatives as challenging, due to a lack of time or staff, the opposing views of relatives and/or uncertain communication structures; however, they were willing to involve relatives according to the relatives' preferences. The role played by relatives was seen to range from that of an active supporter to that of a troublemaker. On the one hand, relatives were reported to support nurses in emergency management (i.e. by identifying residents' preferences and advocating for residents' interests). On the other hand, relatives were often perceived by the nurses as overstrained and unprepared in emergency situations, leading them to override residents' wishes, question the emergency plan and put pressure on the nurses' decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses perceive the roles played by relatives in emergency situations in nursing homes as relatively supportive or, alternatively, demanding and troublesome. The timely involvement of relatives in emergency planning, the establishment of clear agreements with general practitioners and the development of trusting relationships between nursing staff and relatives may improve emergency management for nurses.

[Emergency situations and emergency department visits in nursing homes-a scoping review about circumstances and healthcare interventions]. / Notfallsituationen und Krankenhauszuweisungen in Pflegeeinrichtungen ­ ein Scoping-Review zu Begleitumständen und versorgungsrelevanten Maßnahmen.

BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents are more likely to be hospitalized as non-institutionalized peers. A large number of emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department visits are classified as potentially avoidable. OBJECTIVES: To identify circumstances that increase the number of emergency situations in nursing homes and approaches to reduce hospital admissions in order to illustrate the complexity and opportunities for action. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scoping review with analysis of current original and peer-reviewed papers (2015-2020) in PubMed, CINAHL, and hand-search databases. RESULTS: From 2486 identified studies, 302 studies were included. Injuries, fractures, cardiovascular, respiratory, and infectious diseases are the most frequent diagnostic groups that have been retrospectively recorded. Different aspects could be identified as circumstances inducing emergency department visits: resident-related (e.g., multimorbidity, lack of volition, and advance directives), facility-related (e.g., staff turnover, uncertainties), physician-related (lack of accessibility, challenging access to specialists), and system-related circumstances (e.g., limited possibilities for diagnostics and treatment in facilities). Multiple approaches to reduce emergency department visits are being explored. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of circumstances influence the course of action in emergency situations in nursing facilities. Therefore, interventions to reduce emergency department visits address, among other things, strengthening the competence of nursing staff, interprofessional communication, and systemic approaches. A comprehensive understanding of the complex processes of care is essential for developing and implementing effective interventions.

[Structuring emergency management in nursing homes: Results of interprofessional focus group interviews]. / Strukturierung des Notfallmanagements in Pflegeheimen: Ergebnisse interprofessioneller Fokusgruppeninterviews.

BACKGROUND: Emergencies in nursing homes lead to frequent utilization of emergency medical services and emergency department visits, which are frequently assessed as avoidable and do not comply with the patients' wishes. Emergency management is complicated by structural conditions, uncertainty and difficulties in communication between the treating healthcare professionals. OBJECTIVE: In the framework of the NOVELLE research project a model for a recommendation for action was developed in an interprofessional process to structure the emergency management in nursing homes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The research process was organized according to the grounded theory as a constant interplay of data collection, analysis and concept development. From January to April 2021 a total of 6 focus group interviews were conducted with 24 nurses, physicians and experts from medical ethics and 1 guideline interview with an expert from the field of medical law. All interviews were performed as video conferences. They were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded with MAXQDA software. RESULTS: Recommendations for organizing and improving the emergency management are structured into three components: 1) initial assessment, 2) structured assessment including nursing evaluation and integration of patient treatment preferences and 3) organization of further treatment. Components include actions, results and consequences and can be arranged in the form of an algorithm. DISCUSSION: Recommendations for improvement of emergency management should enhance the competences of nursing staff, respect patient treatment preferences, consider situational conditions and support communication with external medical and care providers.

REDuction of Antibiotic RESistance (REDARES) in urinary tract infections using treatments according to national clinical guidelines: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a multimodal intervention in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common cause of prescribing antibiotics in family medicine. In Germany, about 40% of UTI-related prescriptions are second-line antibiotics, which contributes to emerging resistance rates. To achieve a change in the prescribing behaviour among family physicians (FPs), this trial aims to implement the guideline recommendations in German family medicine. METHODS/DESIGN: In a randomized controlled trial, a multimodal intervention will be developed and tested in family practices in four regions across Germany. The intervention will consist of three elements: information on guideline recommendations, information on regional resistance and feedback of prescribing behaviour for FPs on a quarterly basis. The effect of the intervention will be compared to usual practice. The primary endpoint is the absolute difference in the mean of prescribing rates of second-line antibiotics among the intervention and the control group after 12 months. To detect a 10% absolute difference in the prescribing rate after one year, with a significance level of 5% and a power of 86%, a sample size of 57 practices per group will be needed. Assuming a dropout rate of 10%, an overall number of 128 practices will be required. The accompanying process evaluation will provide information on feasibility and acceptance of the intervention. DISCUSSION: If proven effective and feasible, the components of the intervention can improve adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines and contribute to antimicrobial stewardship in ambulatory care.  Trial registration DRKS, DRKS00020389, Registered 30 January 2020, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00020389 .

" darum rufe ich jetzt den Rettungsdienst!"

"… that's why I call the ambulance!" - A qualitative study of emergency scenarios in nursing homes Abstract. Background: In nursing homes, emergencies lead to frequent utilisation of emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department visits. A broad interprofessional perspective of involved practitioners on emergencies in nursing homes has been little studied so far. Aim: Characterization, identification and prioritization of emergency scenarios by relevance and frequency in nursing homes. Methods: We conducted two multi-method, interprofessional group discussions with a total of 18 participants from nursing, medicine and science in January and February 2020. Group discussions were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Results: Emergency scenarios in nursing homes arise from interactions between person-related aspects and contextual conditions. The following person-related aspects were named as relevant: Falls, unstable vital signs, abnormal behavior, neurological symptoms and lifelessness. Contextual conditions are classified into organizational-structural, political-legal and ethical aspects. The following were considered to be most relevant: lack of communication between the actors, uncertainties among staff, absent living wills and increasing workload in nursing. Conclusions: Emergencies in nursing homes turn out to be complex emergency scenarios. Contextual conditions are important for dealing with emergency scenarios in nursing homes. Recommended actions should be based on the perspective of involved practitioners on emergencies and take greater account of the contextual conditions.

Multidisciplinary intervention to improve medication safety in nursing home residents: protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial (HIOPP-3-iTBX study).

BACKGROUND: Medication safety is an important health issue for nursing home residents (NHR). They usually experience polypharmacy and often take potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) and antipsychotics. This, coupled with a frail health state, makes NHR particularly vulnerable to adverse drug events (ADE). The value of systematic medication reviews and interprofessional co-operation for improving medication quality in NHR has been recognized. Yet the evidence of a positive effect on NHR' health and wellbeing is inconclusive at this stage. This study investigates the effects of pharmacists' medication reviews linked with measures to strengthen interprofessional co-operation on NHR' medication quality, health status and health care use. METHODS: Pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in nursing homes in four regions of Germany. A total of 760 NHR will be recruited. Inclusion: NHR aged 65 years and over with an estimated life expectancy of at least six months. Intervention with four elements: i) introduction of a pharmacist's medication review combined with a communication pathway to the prescribing general practitioners (GPs) and nursing home staff, ii) facilitation of change in the interprofessional cooperation, iii) educational training and iv) a "toolbox" to facilitate implementation in daily practice. ANALYSIS: primary outcome - proportion of residents receiving PIM and ≥ 2 antipsychotics at six months follow-up. Secondary outcomes - cognitive function, falls, quality of life, medical emergency contacts, hospital admissions, and health care costs. DISCUSSION: The trial assesses the effects of a structured interprofessional medication management for NHR in Germany. It follows the participatory action research approach and closely involves the three professional groups (nursing staff, GPs, pharmacists) engaged in the medication management. A handbook based on the experiences of the trial in nursing homes will be produced for a rollout into routine practice in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the German register of clinical studies (DRKS, study ID DRKS00013588 , primary register) and in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (secondary register), both on 25th January 2018.

Optimal care at the end of life (OPAL): study protocol of a prospective interventional mixed-methods study with pretest-posttest-design in a primary health care setting considering the view of general practitioners, relatives of deceased patients and health care stakeholders.

BACKGROUND: At the end of life, about 85-90% of patients can be treated within primary palliative care (PC) provided by general practitioners (GPs). In Germany, there is no structured approach for the provision of PC by GPs including a systematic as well as timely identification of patients who might benefit from PC, yet. The project "Optimal care at the end of life" (OPAL) focusses on an improvement of primary PC for patients with both oncological and non-oncological chronic progressive diseases in their last phase of life provided by GPs and health care services. METHODS: OPAL will take place in Hameln-Pyrmont, a rural region in Lower Saxony, Germany. Target groups are (a) GPs, (b) relatives of deceased patients and (c) health care providers. The study follows a three-phase approach in a mixed-methods and pre-post design. In phase I (baseline, t0) we explore the usual practice of providing PC for patients with chronic progressive diseases by GPs and the collaboration with other health care providers. In phase II (intervention) the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) for the timely identification of patients who might benefit from PC will be implemented and tested in general practices. Furthermore, a public campaign will be started to inform stakeholders, to connect health care providers and to train change agents. In phase III (follow-up, t1) we investigate the potential effect of the intervention to evaluate differences in the provision of PC by GPs and to convey factors for the implementation of SPICT in general practices. DISCUSSION: The project OPAL is the first study to implement the SPICT-DE regionwide in general practices in Germany. The project OPAL may contribute to an overall optimisation of primary PC for patients in Germany by reducing GPs' uncertainty in initiating PC, by consolidating their skills and competencies in identifying patients who might benefit from PC, and by improving the cooperation between GPs and different health care stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien; trial registration number: DRKS00015108 ; date of registration: 22th of January 2019).

Reducing antibiotic use for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in general practice by treatment with uva-ursi (REGATTA) - a double-blind, randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness trial.

BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in general practice and usually treated with antibiotics. This contributes to increasing resistance rates of uropathogenic bacteria. A previous trial showed a reduction of antibiotic use in women with UTI by initial symptomatic treatment with ibuprofen. However, this treatment strategy is not suitable for all women equally. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (UU, bearberry extract arbutin) is a potential alternative treatment. This study aims at investigating whether an initial treatment with UU in women with UTI can reduce antibiotic use without significantly increasing the symptom burden or rate of complications. METHODS: This is a double-blind, randomized, and controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Women between 18 and 75 years with suspected UTI and at least two of the symptoms dysuria, urgency, frequency or lower abdominal pain will be assessed for eligibility in general practice and enrolled into the trial. Participants will receive either a defined daily dose of 3 × 2 arbutin 105 mg for 5 days (intervention) or fosfomycin 3 g once (control). Antibiotic therapy will be provided in the intervention group only if needed, i.e. for women with worsening or persistent symptoms. Two co-primary outcomes are the number of all antibiotic courses regardless of the medical indication from day 0-28, and the symptom burden, defined as a weighted sum of the daily total symptom scores from day 0-7. The trial result is considered positive if superiority of initial treatment with UU is demonstrated with reference to the co-primary outcome number of antibiotic courses and non-inferiority of initial treatment with UU with reference to the co-primary outcome symptom burden. DISCUSSION: The trial's aim is to investigate whether initial treatment with UU is a safe and effective alternative treatment strategy in women with UTI. In that case, the results might change the existing treatment strategy in general practice by promoting delayed prescription of antibiotics and a reduction of antibiotic use in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2016-000477-21 . Clinical trials.gov: NCT03151603 (registered: 10 May 2017).

[Living and dying with frailty : Qualitative interviews with elderly people in the domestic environment]. / Leben und Sterben mit Gebrechlichkeit : Qualitative Interviews mit älteren Menschen im häuslichen Umfeld.

BACKGROUND: Frail older people are becoming an increasingly more important target group in healthcare provision. Little is known about patients' views on frailty and its various impacts, especially towards the end of life. This study was carried out to analyze the needs of frail elderly people at the end of life. METHOD: A qualitative, longitudinal case study design was applied and included 31 frail older patients (≥ 70 year) with a Canadian study of health and aging (CSHA) clinical frailty scale (CFS) grade 6/7 from urban and rural areas within the region of Lower Saxony. The analysis was based on guided interviews and followed the principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: From the patients' perspective frailty is perceived as a process of increasing complexity of health problems, increased vulnerability and reduced ability to perform tasks. Frailty is experienced as various deficits including the physical, psychological, social and existential dimensions. Living and dying in a familiar environment and maintaining autonomy was identified as a core category. Key determinants were access to and quality of healthcare services as well as various individual and social resources. CONCLUSION: A palliative biopsychosocial care approach should be established early in the process of frailty, including advance care planning in order to meet the patients' needs of staying in a familiar environment. General practitioners as well as home care nursing personnel have to collaborate in order to balance issues of autonomy with increased care needs and the support of informal carers as key partners towards the end of life.

Caring for frail older people in the last phase of life - the general practitioners' view.

BACKGROUND: Frail older people are an increasingly important group in primary care due to demographic change. For these patients, a palliative care approach may be useful to sustain the quality of life in the last phase of their lives. While general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the primary care for older patients, general palliative care is still in its infancy and little is known in Germany about caring for frail older people towards the end of life. This study aims to explore the tasks and challenges regarding the care for frail older patients in the last phase of life from the GPs' point of view, and the latter's perception of their own role and responsibilities. METHODS: Explorative qualitative study based on semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 GPs from urban and rural regions in Lower Saxony, Germany. Analysis was carried out according to the principles of Grounded Theory. RESULTS: The GPs' key commitment "caring for frail older patients until the end" as an integral part of primary care was worked out as a key category, flanked by central issues: "causal conditions and challenges," which include patients' preconditions and care needs as well as communication and cooperation aspects on the carers' level. "Barriers and facilitators within the health system" refers to prerequisites of the German healthcare system, such as high caseloads. Regarding "strategies to comply with this commitment", various self-developed strategies for the care of frail older people are presented, depending on the GPs' understanding of their professional role and individual circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: The GPs show a strong commitment to caring for the frail older patients until the end of life. However, it is a challenging and complex task that requires significant time, which can take GPs to their limits. There is a great need to improve patient-and family-centered proactive communication, as well as interprofessional cooperation. Strengthening the team approach in primary care could relieve the burden on GPs, especially in rural areas, while simultaneously improving end-of-life care for their patients.

Living with and dying from advanced heart failure: understanding the needs of older patients at the end of life.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a life-limiting illness and patients with advanced heart failure often suffer from severe physical and psychosocial symptoms. Particularly in older patients, HF often occurs in conjunction with other chronic diseases, resulting in complex co-morbidity. This study aims to understand how old and very old patients with advanced HF perceive their disease and to identify their medical, psychosocial and information needs, focusing on the last phase of life. METHODS: Qualitative longitudinal interview study with old and very old patients (≥70 years) with severe HF (NYHA III-IV). Interviews were conducted at three-month intervals over a period of up to 18 months and were analysed using qualitative methods in relation to Grounded Theory. RESULTS: A total of 95 qualitative interviews with 25 patients were conducted and analysed. The following key categories were developed: (1a) dealing with advanced heart failure and ageing, (1b) dealing with end of life; (2a) perceptions regarding care, and (2b) interpersonal relations. Overall, our data show that older patients do not experience HF as a life-limiting disease. Functional restrictions and changed conditions leading to problems in daily life activities were often their prime concerns. The needs and priorities of older HF patients vary depending on their disease status and individual preferences. Pain resulting in reduced quality of life is an example of a major symptom requiring treatment. Many older HF patients lack sufficient knowledge about their condition and its prognosis, particularly concerning emergency situations and end of life issues, and many expressed a wish for open discussions. From the patients' perspective, there is a need for improvement in interaction with health care professionals, and limits in treatment and medical care are not openly discussed. CONCLUSION: Old and very old patients with advanced HF often do not acknowledge the seriousness and severity of the disease. Their communication with physicians predominantly focuses on curative treatment. Therefore, aspects such as self-management of the disease, dealing with emergency situations and end-of-life issues should be addressed more prominently. An advanced care planning (ACP) programme for heart disease in older people could be an option to improve patient-centred care.

[Evaluation of electronic medical records from general practices using the example of the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia: A qualitative feasibility study]. / Nutzung von Daten aus dem Praxisverwaltungssystem eines großen hausärztlichen Verbundes medizinischer Versorgungszentren am Beispiel der Diagnosestellung einer ambulant erworbenen Pneumonie ­ eine qualitative Machbarkeitsstudie.

BACKGROUND: Data collected by general practitioners (GPs) may provide potential for health services research. In this study, we investigated if clinical questions can be answered with GPs' electronic medical records (EMRs) by means of diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHOD: Patients diagnosed with CAP, defined as ICD code J18.9, were identified in the fourth quarter of 2021. The data were derived from the EMR system (Medical Office®) of a central German association of 30 general practices, using three different approaches: 1. The integrated statistic tool was used to record whether patients were referred for radiological diagnostic confirmation. 2. Retrospectively, EMRs were evaluated manually by a doctor familiar with the EMR. 3. The raw data of the EMR system were extracted by automated export. The information obtained through the three types of access was compared. For each patient case, detailed comments on problems and specifics were documented and evaluated by qualitative content analysis (QCA) according to Mayring. RESULTS: In total, 164 patients diagnosed with CAP were identified. The numbers of documented radiological diagnostic confirmations varied between data approaches: While the manual evaluation of the EMRs revealed 60 referred patients, the statistics tool identified 38 of these cases. The export of the raw data identified 58 referrals to radiography after adjustment. According to QCA, there was a high variation in applied diagnostics and time of diagnosis. Referrals for radiography were made both before and after coding of the diagnosis. In case of hospitalization, X-rays were usually performed during the inpatient stay. Laboratory tests were performed as an alternative to radiography. There was also a high variation in the documentation of risk factors and diagnostic certainty. DISCUSSION: The statistics tool integrated into the EMR system is a quick way to perform simple queries but proved to be impracticable for complex questions. The EMRs provide detailed information but need to be evaluated manually. An automated data export from the raw data offers both detailed information and access to large volumes of data but requires complex preparation and appropriate IT expertise. CONCLUSION: Based on the example of diagnosed CAP in a GP setting, the use of data extracted from an EMR system seems to be feasible to answer simple clinical questions. However, it is necessary to adapt the data export, and a comparison with a small number of manually evaluated cases is useful to achieve valid results.

[Changes in the provision and utilization of health care in German primary care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic - A survey of patients in three federal states]. / Veränderungen in der Bereitstellung und Inanspruchnahme der Gesundheitsversorgung in deutschen Hausarztpraxen während der COVID-19-Pandemie ­ eine Befragung von Patient*innen in drei Bundesländern.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic general practitioners (GP) practice teams were temporally confronted with major challenges which were accompanied by changes in practice organization and service provision. So far, little has been known about the views of patients who visited the GP practice for other than COVID-related reasons with regard to provision and use of GP services, the adjustments in the practice and the work of the practice team members. METHODS: The patient survey is a sub-study of the mixed-methods study VeCo-Praxis (GP healthcare for patients not suffering from COVID during the Corona pandemic) of the research practice network RESPoNsE (Research Practice Network East), which was conducted in the federal states of Berlin, Brandenburg and Thuringia. The questionnaire-based survey was carried out among patients who visited their GP practice in November 2022. The topics covered in the survey were developed by two focus groups consisting of 13 members of the RESPoNsE patient advisory board. The questionnaire was developed and piloted in a participatory approach with the RESPoNsE Patient Advisory Board. The results were analyzed descriptively using SPSS and discussed with the advisory board. RESULTS: 1,405 questionnaires from 37 practices were analyzed. 97% of respondents felt that the treatment they received at their GP practice during the COVID-19 pandemic was good. For the vast majority, appointments and acute consultations, prescriptions, laboratory tests, discussions of diagnostic results, routine follow-up check-ups and health checks were available to a sufficient extent. From the patients' perspective, the practices have successfully adapted to the challenges caused by COVID-19. Overall, the patients' trust in and their appreciation of the work of the practice staff have increased since the pandemic. Patients stated that GP practices should continue hygiene procedures, such as wearing a mask or keeping physical distance, in the future. DISCUSSION: Despite multiple reports of a significant decline in both provision and utilization of standard care in GP practices during the pandemic, our survey showed that the majority of patients felt that they received adequate GP care and were highly satisfied. The results should be interpreted against the background of possible selection bias. CONCLUSION: In this survey, GP patients were predominantly appreciative of GP care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The patients' assessment of the provision and use of GP services during the pandemic complements the corresponding perspective of GPs and medical practice assistants.

Evaluation of utilization and consequences of CRP point-of-care-testing in primary care practices: qualitative interviews with general practitioners from Germany.

BACKGROUND: The use and advantages of point-of-care tests (POCTs) for C-reactive protein (CRP) in general practice, especially for upper respiratory tract infections (uRTIs), have been studied extensively. However, there is limited knowledge about test indications, prerequisites, and integration of these tests into everyday practice. AIM: This study aims to investigate the attitudes and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany regarding the use of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs. The study places special emphasis on implementation in routine care, including testing procedures, feasibility, opportunities and barriers for specific consultation scenarios, as well as test indications and their impact on GP-patient communication. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative interview study with 10 GPs (May/2023 to Aug/2023) METHOD: Ten German GPs who participated in an observational study on CRP-POCT use in general practices were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Audio recordings were transcribed and content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Interviewed GPs stated that CRP-POCTs offer several advantages for various treatment cases. They improve diagnostic confidence and certainty of GPs' therapeutic decisions, and offer a broad spectrum of indications and application scenarios. Additionally, they have a positive impact on GP-patient communication, and their ease of use enables rapid implementation into existing workflows. On the other hand, CRP-POCT increase the time required for test performance and patient consultation. CONCLUSION: Due to the numerous benefits of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs, interviewed GPs have a favourable attitude towards their regular integration into everyday practice. Implementation barriers include increased time and personnel expenses for testing and inadequate reimbursement by German statutory health insurance.

Utilization and consequences of CRP point-of-care-testing in primary care practices: a real-world multicentre observational study with 1,740 patient cases in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for C-reactive protein can support clinical decision-making of general practitioners (GPs) but are not widely used in German general practices. AIM: To investigate the utilization of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs in routine primary care. DESIGN & SETTING: Prospective observational study in 49 general practices in Germany (Nov/2022 to Apr/2023). METHOD: GPs were provided with CRP-POCTs and collected data for each CRP-POCT use using standardized data collection sheets. RESULTS: Data from 1,740 CRP-POCT uses were recorded. GPs employed CRP-POCTs mainly for patients with respiratory tract infections (RTIs, 70.9% of all cases) and to a lesser extent for gastrointestinal infections (GIs, 10.3%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs were frequently used to distinguish between bacterial and viral aetiology (60.8%) and to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing (62.8%). In GIs, CRP-POCTs were mainly used to rule out severe disease progressions (53.2%) and for decisions on further diagnostic procedures (45.6%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs influenced antibiotic prescribing in 77.5 % of the cases (32.3% in favour vs. 45.2% waiver). In GIs, CRP levels mainly affected decisions on further diagnostic procedures. GPs reported that CRP-POCTs were helpful in 88.6% of all cases. CONCLUSIONS: When available, German GPs predominantly use semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing in patients with RTI. CRP-POCT use improves clinical decision-making and increases the GPs' clinical confidence.