RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, several studies were conducted to explore the potential augmenting effect of oxytocin for the treatment of individuals with severe mental illness. Nonetheless, studies exploring its effects in routine inpatient settings using high-quality randomized controlled trials are scarce. The current study assessed the effect of oxytocin administration on treatment process and outcome among psychiatric inpatients, while employing a rigorous experimental methodology. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted at a public psychiatric hospital in Israel. Patients (N = 87, 71.3% female participants) were administered intranasal oxytocin/placebo twice daily for 4 weeks, as add-on to usual care. Patients were assessed for severity of anxiety and depression symptoms and their working alliance with their therapist after each therapy session, and treatment outcome was assessed weekly. Multilevel modeling was performed to assess the linear change from pre- to post-treatment. RESULTS: Patients receiving OT demonstrated significantly larger symptomatic improvements (B = -0.01, t [437] = -2.36, p = 0.01). Larger gains were also observed for depression (B = -0.14, p < 0.001 in the OT group, B = -0.06, p = 0.02 in the placebo group) and general distress (B = -0.57, p < 0.001 in the OT group, B = -0.29, p = 0.02 in the placebo group). No significant effect was observed for anxiety, the working alliance, or attachment. DISCUSSION: Oxytocin has the potential to improve treatment outcome among inpatients. Nonetheless, additional controlled research is needed to further assess its effects on therapy process, as well as to account for therapeutic, pharmacological, and neuronal intervening factors.
Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Transtornos Mentais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Administração Intranasal , Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Ocitocina/farmacologia , Ocitocina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has been a major stressor for the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents. Surveys and reports from hotlines indicate a significant rise in mental health problems. As the psychiatric emergency room (ER) is a first-line free-of-charge facility for psychiatric emergencies, we expected to see a significant increase in visits, specifically of new patients suffering from anxiety, depression, or stress-related disorders. METHODS: Data from two psychiatric hospital ERs and one general hospital were included. All visits of children and adolescents from the computerized files between March and December of 2019 were analyzed anonymously and compared to the same months in 2020, using multilevel linear modeling. RESULTS: There was a significant decline in the total number of visits (p = .017), specifically among those diagnosed as suffering from stress-related, anxiety, and mood disorder groups (p = .017), and an incline in the proportion of visits of severe mental disorders (p = .029). DISCUSSION: The limited use of child and adolescent psychiatric emergency facilities during the pandemic highlights the importance of tele-psychiatry as part of emergency services. It also suggests the importance of the timeline of the emergence of clinically relevant new psychiatric diagnoses related to the pandemic. Future studies are needed to establish the long-term effects of the pandemic and the expeditious use of tele-psychiatry.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos Mentais , Criança , Adolescente , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The research of theory of mind (ToM) and emotion perception (EP) in adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) is scarce, and no study to date has investigated the association between EP and long-term outcomes of adolescents with MDD. The aim of the current study was to evaluate ToM and EP in adolescents with MDD, as compared to healthy controls (HCs). In addition, we aimed to assess the association between impairment in ToM and EP, depressive symptom severity, and long-term outcome in the MDD group. METHODS: We compared the performance of 14 adolescents with MDD and 25 HC in the Facial Expression Recognition Task (FERT) and the Interpersonal Perception Task. We followed up with the MDD group 2 years later to assess the level of their depressive symptoms using the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R). RESULTS: No differences were found between adolescents with MDD and HC in the ToM and FERT tasks. Also, within the MDD group, there was no association between the severity of depressive symptoms and task performance. In the MDD group, there was a significant correlation between lower levels of accuracy in the FERT during the index depressive episode and lower CDRS-R scores on follow-up 2 years later (r2 = 0.35, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: EP impairments in adolescents with MDD might predict worse long-term outcome. Further research is needed to verify our findings and to assess for a possible neurobiological underpinning for the state and trait impairments in EP in adolescents with MDD.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Emoções/fisiologia , Percepção/fisiologia , Teoria da Mente/fisiologia , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Reconhecimento Facial/fisiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Gravidade do PacienteRESUMO
In recent years, great efforts have been exerted to minimize the rates of deterioration in clinical practice, especially in child psychotherapy. The present study explored the potential effect of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) with parents as a preventive intervention to reduce deterioration in children. Twenty-five children receiving treatment for emotional problems were randomized to parent-based, ROM-assisted group psychotherapy or to treatment as usual (TAU). A mixed-methods approach was utilized, with the number of deteriorating cases compared at the group level and two case illustrations assessed at the individual level. At the group level, there were fewer cases of deterioration in child's anxiety, parental stress, and quality of parent's alliance in the ROM-assisted group, compared with TAU. Case studies illustrated how ROM can be used as a tool to communicate with parents to prevent deterioration. Routine outcome monitoring in child psychotherapy may thus benefit therapy process and outcome. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/terapia , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/terapia , Pais/psicologia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Angústia Psicológica , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Adolescente , Criança , Progressão da Doença , Retroalimentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Poder Familiar/psicologia , Aliança TerapêuticaRESUMO
Objectives: Although process and outcome feedback is considered to be facilitative of psychotherapeutic processes, recent studies have suggested that such feedback may not produce the same effect when applied to highly distressed patients. This study examined the effect of process and outcome feedback in highly distressed patients treated in a public mental health center in Israel.Method: Patients (n = 197) were randomly allocated to receive feedback, or to treatment as usual. Therapists in the feedback condition received weekly reports, whereas therapists in the control group received no feedback. After attrition from study and treatment, a total of 123 cases were analyzed.Results: Feedback had no significant effect on either symptom reduction or on well-being. However, patients in the feedback group showed higher gains in alliance as compared to the treatment as usual group.Conclusion: Process and outcome feedback might have a potential beneficial effect of improving alliance for patients with severe symptomatology, with whom the establishment of an alliance can be challenging. The current findings also stress the need to continue to study the effect of feedback on therapy outcomes in diverse clinical settings. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
Assuntos
Retroalimentação Psicológica , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Angústia Psicológica , Processos Psicoterapêuticos , Adulto , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Aliança TerapêuticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mental health clinicians have previously been reported to express reservations regarding the utility and accuracy of the psychiatric classification systems. In this study we aimed to examine clinicians' experiences with instances of perceived inaccuracy of a schizophrenia diagnosis. METHODS: Mental health clinicians (N = 175) participated in an online survey assessing prevalence and perceived reasons for inaccuracies of a schizophrenia diagnosis. Respondents included psychiatric ward directors (13.1%), senior psychiatrists and psychologists (40.5%), and psychiatry and clinical psychology residents (36%). RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of respondents reported encountering instances where a schizophrenia diagnosis was assigned even though clinical presentation did not match diagnostic criteria. Seventy-three percent of senior psychiatrists in a position to determine a diagnosis declared assigning schizophrenia even when controversial among clinical staff, and 15% of them declared doing so frequently. The likelihood of frequently assigning a schizophrenia diagnosis even when clearly controversial was predicted by the perception that an inaccurate diagnosis is assigned due to the presence of negative symptoms (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.04-4.66, p = 0.039) and due to patient-related factors, such as the need to facilitate rehabilitation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.90, p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Although a schizophrenia diagnosis is considered relatively stable and clear, our study indicates that, in clinical practice, the assignment of this diagnosis is frequently controversial. These controversies are associated with the perception that an inaccurate diagnosis is assigned due to diagnostic considerations, or due to the possibility that patients might benefit from such a diagnosis. Implications and limitations for psychiatric practice and discourse are discussed.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Erros de Diagnóstico/psicologia , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Migraine attacks can cause significant discomfort and reduced functioning for days at a time, including the pre-ictal and post-ictal periods. During the inter-ictsal period, however, migraineurs seem to function normally. It is puzzling, therefore, that event-related potentials of migraine patients often differ in the asymptomatic and inter-ictal period. Part of the electrophysiological dynamics demonstrated in the migraine cycle are attention related. In this pilot study we evaluated an easy-to-use new marker, the Brain Engagement Index (BEI), for attention monitoring during the migraine cycle. We sampled 12 migraine patients for 20 days within one calendar month. Each session consisted of subjects' reports of stress level and migraine-related symptoms, and a 5 min EEG recording, with a 2-electrode EEG device, during an auditory oddball task. The first minute of the EEG sample was analyzed. Repetitive samples were also obtained from 10 healthy controls. The brain engagement index increased significantly during the pre-ictal (p ≈ 0.001) and the ictal (p ≈ 0.020) periods compared with the inter-ictal period. No difference was observed between the pre-ictal and ictal periods. Control subjects demonstrated intermediate Brain Engagement Index values, that is, higher than inter-ictal, yet lower than pre-ictal. Our preliminary results demonstrate the potential advantage of the use of a simple EEG system for improved prediction of migraine attacks. Further study is required to evaluate the efficacy of the Brain Engagement Index in monitoring the migraine cycle and the possible effects of interventions.
Assuntos
Atenção/fisiologia , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Fenômenos Eletrofisiológicos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Potenciais Evocados/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There is a dearth of up-to-date literature regarding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in adolescents, and the question of when to pronounce course failure has not been properly addressed. The current study aims to evaluate trajectories of clinical status throughout ECT courses in adolescent patients. METHODS: We retrieved detailed data of 36 patients who received ECT in our treatment center. Clinical records were retrospectively assessed and evaluated every 6 ECT sessions to quantify Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. RESULTS: The mean number of sessions per course was 24.4 ± 14.2. The mean CGI-I score at the conclusion of the ECT courses was 2.47 ± 1.19. At the end of the acute treatment stage, 26 patients (72.2%) were much or very much improved, based on CGI-I scores. Only 5 patients exhibited a significant response after 6 sessions or fewer, whereas 21 patients (56.6%) improved after 12 sessions. Pearson correlations between CGI-I scores throughout the course of ECT showed no significant correlation between CGI-I scores after 6 sessions and the final CGI-I scores. However, a significant correlation was found between CGI-I scores after 12 sessions and the final CGI-I score. CONCLUSIONS: An improvement in the clinical status of adolescents treated by ECT might occur only after a substantial number of sessions. An early lack of response does not necessarily predict a failed ECT course.
Assuntos
Eletroconvulsoterapia/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Eletroconvulsoterapia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing awareness of the importance of patients' subjective evaluations of therapy. Regarding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), the results are conflicting. We hypothesized that making a comparison between patients' satisfaction with ECT and other forms of psychiatric therapies would capture personal experience as opposed to opinion about the treatment modalities. We compared adult responses to adolescent responses. METHODS: Four unmatched patient groups were recruited (N = 98) and were divided as follows: (a) patients treated with ECT as adolescents (n = 13), (b) patients treated with ECT as adults (n = 25), (c) patients hospitalized as adolescents but not treated with ECT (n = 30), and (d) patients hospitalized as adults but not treated with ECT (n = 30). All patients were interviewed using similar questions related to their satisfaction regarding the treatment modalities they experienced, including psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, hospitalization and ECT, and years after being treated. RESULTS: Adults and adolescents viewed ECT as a legitimate and effective form of treatment (70%). Patients who were treated with ECT had a more positive attitude toward this treatment compared with patients who had not been treated with ECT. In comparison to other treatment modalities, ECT was considered by both adolescents and adults as the least effective form of therapy. Psychotherapy was considered the most effective, specifically among adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing patients' satisfaction in regard to different therapeutic modalities can potentially help clarify discrepancies in patient reports on satisfaction with ECT. Patients' satisfaction with ECT, just like their clinical response to ECT, is more dichotomous than with other forms of therapy.
Assuntos
Eletroconvulsoterapia/métodos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicoterapia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Eletroconvulsoterapia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This editorial relates to the study published in the current issue on how our current knowledge is practiced in screening, diagnosing and treating children suffering from ADHD in Israel. It seems that there is an awareness of the disorder by parents and teachers, thus there is no need for community screening. The roles of the different medical professions: pediatricians (after receiving training on ADHD), child neurologists and child psychiatrists are not clear enough and thus services are not utilized properly. The diagnosis demands a physical, developmental, psychosocial and mental evaluation, including information from multiple settings (home and school) and the use of validated questionnaires. The extremely common psychiatric differential diagnosis and comorbidities point to the importance of psychiatric consultation, just as neurological comorbidities demand a neurological evaluation in complex cases. The recommended treatment plan combines psychoeducation and a collaborative and flexible decision about the combination of pharmacological (most commonly stimulants) and evidence-based non-pharmacological treatments (mainly parent training and cognitive behavioral therapies). Since ADHD is a chronic and complex neurodevelopmental disorder, continuous and long term medical follow-up relating to both treatment targets and side effects are crucial, and are not adequately stressed in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/diagnóstico , Deficiências da Aprendizagem/diagnóstico , Pais/psicologia , Instituições Acadêmicas , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/terapia , Criança , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory (DRRI) is a widely used questionnaire assessing deployment-related risk and resilience factors among war veterans. Its successor, the DRRI-2, has only been validated and used among veterans deployed for overseas military missions, but because many countries still enforce compulsory military service, validating it among nonclinical samples of healthy discharged soldiers following mandatory service is also a necessity. In the current study, a sample of 101 discharged Israeli soldiers (39 males, 62 females; mean time since discharge 13.92, SD = 9.09 years) completed the DRRI-2. There were 52 participants who completed the questionnaire at a second time point (mean time between assessments 19.02, SD = 6.21 days). Both physical and mental health status were examined, as well as symptomatology of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Cronbach's αs for all latent variables in the inventory ranged from .47 to .95. The DRRI-2 risk factors were negatively associated with psychological functioning, whereas resilience factors were positively associated with better self-reported mental health. Test-retest reliability coefficients were generally high (Pearson correlations were .61 to .94, all p values < .01). Our study provides evidence for the reliability and validity of the DRRI-2 in assessing salient deployment experiences among a nonclinical sample following mandatory military service.
Assuntos
Resiliência Psicológica , Autorrelato/normas , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Veteranos/psicologia , Adulto , Ansiedade/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Exposição à Violência/psicologia , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Traduções , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The study of video games is expanding, and so is the debate regarding their possible positive and deleterious effects. As controversies continue, several researchers have expressed their concerns about substantial biases existing in the field, which might lead to the creation of a skewed picture, both in the professional and in the lay literature. However, no study has tried to examine this issue quantitatively. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to examine possible systematic biases in the literature, by analyzing the publication trends of the medical and life sciences literature regarding video games. METHODS: We performed a complete and systematic PubMed search up to December 31, 2013. We assessed all 1927 articles deemed relevant for their attitude toward video games according to the focus, hypothesis, and authors' interpretation of the study results, using a 3-category outcome (positive, negative, and neutral). We assessed the prevalence of different attitudes for possible association with year of publication, location of researchers, academic discipline, methodological research, and centrality of the publishing journals. RESULTS: The attitude toward video games presented in publications varied by year of publication, location, academic discipline, and methodological research applied (P<.001 for all). Moreover, representation of different attitudes differed according to centrality of the journals, as measured by their impact factor (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that context, whether scientific or social, is related to researchers' attitudes toward video games. Readers, both lay and professional, should weigh these contextual variables when interpreting studies' results, in light of the possible bias they carry. The results also support a need for a more balanced, open-minded approach toward video games, as it is likely that this complex phenomenon carries novel opportunities as well as new hazards.
Assuntos
Publicações/tendências , Projetos de Pesquisa/tendências , Jogos de Vídeo/tendências , Viés , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: One of the major factors affecting treatment compliance and outcome in patients is the wide range of side effects (SEs) associated with antidepressants. In the present study, we aimed to assess the extent to which Israeli primary care (PC) physicians and psychiatrists discuss the SEs of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) with patients prior to the onset of treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among PC physicians (N = 123) and psychiatrists (N = 105). Questionnaires were distributed using a mixed-modality design, combining a web survey and in-person delivery of questionnaires. RESULTS: A significant percentage of our respondents reported that they rarely discuss psychological (60 %) or severe (29 %) SEs of SSRIs. Nearly half (41 %) admitted to avoiding discussion of impact on suicidal ideation. Specialists were noted to discuss and evaluate SEs significantly more than residents, and Psychiatrists more than PC physicians. Specifically, psychiatrists more often discussed the possibility of sexual dysfunction (t (225) = 2.23; p < 0.05) and suicidal ideation (t (225) = 2.11; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It seems that PC physicians and psychiatrists surveyed in this study do not share sufficient information regarding the SEs of SSRIs with their patients at the onset of treatment. In improving this practice, the integration of proper SE management into educational interventions has potential in enhancing compliance and improving expertise and level of care.
RESUMO
In recently depressed adolescents, attention and emotional reactivity improved significantly compared with baseline. Working memory did not improve. This supports the position that, in adolescent depression, attention is state dependent compared with other executive functions that are trait dependent.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/etiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Depressão/complicações , Depressão/psicologia , Adolescente , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Memória de Curto Prazo , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Callous-unemotional (CU) traits correlate with the severity and prognosis of conduct disorder in youth. The neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) has been linked to prosocial behaviors, including empathy and collaboration with others. This study discusses a possible role for OT in the biology of delinquent behavior. We hypothesized that in delinquent youth OT secretion will correlate with the severity of conduct problems and specifically with the level of CU traits. The study group included 67 male adolescents (mean age 16.2 years) undergoing residential treatment, previously assessed by an open clinical interview and history for the psychiatric diagnosis. Staff based Inventory of Callous-Unemotional traits for psychopathy and Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire were administered, and patients' medical and social personal files were systematically coded for previous history of antisocial acts using the Brown-Goodwin Questionnaire. Salivary OT was assayed by ELISA. Salivary OT levels were inversely correlated with conduct problems severity on Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (r = -0.27; p ≤ 0.01). Recorded history of antisocial acts did not correlate with current OT levels. Odds ratio (OR) for significant CU traits among subjects with conduct problems was increased in low-OT (OR = 14, p ≤ 0.05) but not in high-OT subjects (OR = 6, p ≥ 0.05). Children with conduct problems and low levels of salivary OT are at risk for significant CU traits. These results suggest a possible role for salivary OT as a biomarker for CU traits and conduct problems severity.
Assuntos
Transtorno da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Ocitócicos/química , Ocitocina/química , Adolescente , Transtorno da Personalidade Antissocial/psicologia , Criança , Transtorno da Conduta/psicologia , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) is a highly prevalent condition, that causes chronic pain and severe reduction in quality of life and productivity, as well as social isolation. Despite the significant morbidity and economic burden of FMS, current treatments are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether stimulation of ACC -mPFC activity by dTMS enhances a pain-directed psychotherapeutic intervention. METHODS: 19 FMS patients were randomised to receive either 20 sessions of dTMS or sham stimulation, each followed by a pain-directed psychotherapeutic intervention. With the H7 HAC coil or sham stimulation, we targeted the ACC -mPFC; specific brain areas that play a central role in pain processing. Clinical response to treatment was assessed with the McGill Pain Questionnaire Short Form (SF-MPQ), the Visual Analogue Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: DTMS treatment was safe and well tolerated by FMS patients. A significant decrease in the combined sensory and affective pain dimensions was specifically demonstrated in the dTMS cohort, as measured by the SF-MPQ (Significant group × time interaction [F(2, 32) = 3.51, p < .05,ηp2 = 0.18]; No significant changes were found in depressive symptoms in both the dTMS and sham groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a course of dTMS combined with a pain-directed psychotherapeutic intervention can alleviate pain symptoms in FMS patients. Beyond clinical possibilities, future studies are needed to substantiate the innovative hypothesis that it is not dTMS alone, but rather dTMS-induced plasticity of pain-related networks, that enables the efficacy of pain-directed psychotherapeutic interventions.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Fibromialgia , Humanos , Fibromialgia/complicações , Fibromialgia/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana/métodos , Medição da Dor , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) have been found to suffer a greater decline in psychological well-being compared to the general population in times of stress. The present study aimed to examine clinical and endocrine resilience factors of psychological well-being in SMI patients during the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: After Covid-19 crisis outburst in Israel 112 participants, 69 outpatients, and 43 inpatients and day treatment patients were recruited. Outpatients signed an online informed consent and filled in questionnaires regarding their level of mental health symptoms (OQ-45), fear of Covid-19 (FCV), and psychological well-being (PWB). Inpatients answered the same questionnaires and in addition, went through a positive social interaction paradigm while providing three saliva samples to measure their s-IgA and oxytocin (OT) levels. RESULTS: A strong negative correlation was found in the whole sample between reported mental health symptoms, fear of Covid-19, and well-being. Hierarchical regression did not find additional contribution of the fear of the pandemic in predicting well-being beyond the impact of symptomatology. For inpatients (N = 39) only, hierarchical regression found that oxytocin, but not s-IgA could explain 5% of the variance of well-being (R2 = 0.05) in individuals with SMI regardless of their mental health symptoms (R2 = 0.46) and their marital status (R2 = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: OT is suggested as a possible independent biological resilience factor of well-being in times of major stress among SMI patients. It is still unknown whether OT is a mediator that contributes to well-being or a biological marker that indicates the degree of beneficial social interactions.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Ocitocina , Pandemias , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores , Imunoglobulina ARESUMO
A group of 20 drug-naïve depressed adolescents and 20 matched controls underwent cognitive evaluations and assessment of emotional reactivity. Emotional reactivity correlated only with attention and only in depressed patients. The cognitive-emotional construct may enhance the understanding of adolescent depression and aid diagnosis.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/complicações , Depressão/complicações , Emoções/fisiologia , Estatística como Assunto , Adolescente , Aprendizagem por Associação/fisiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Memória de Curto Prazo , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Desempenho Psicomotor/fisiologia , Percepção EspacialRESUMO
The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of healthy students regarding the acceptability of placebo treatment if they were to experience depression. A survey was conducted among 344 students in five academic centers in Israel. After a thorough explanation of the placebo effect, its efficacy and limitations in the treatment of depression, the study participants completed a 32-item self-report questionnaire. Seventy percent (n = 243) of the participants answered that they would agree to treatment with a placebo as a first-line treatment if they were to experience depression in the future. Eighty-eight percent (n = 297) of the subjects did not think that a physician who administered placebos was deceitful. Once aware of the possible benefits and limitations of placebo treatment, most of our study population was willing to accept placebo as a legitimate treatment of depression. Additional studies on the possible use of placebo as an effective, safe, and acceptable form of therapy are warranted.