Alternative genetic alterations of MYC, BCL2, and/or BCL6 in high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): Can we identify different prognostic subgroups?

High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL)/diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with rearrangements (R) in MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 are correlated with poor prognosis. Little is known about the impact of other genetic alterations (gain (G) or amplification (A)) of these genes. The aim of the study was to investigate whether we can identify new prognostic subgroups. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results from 169 HGBL/DLBCL were retrospectively categorized into: (1) concurrent MYC-R and BCL2-R and/or BCL6-R-samples with MYC-R and BCL2-R (+/- BCL6-R); n = 21, and HGBL/DLBCL with MYC-R and BCL6-R; n = 11; (2) concurrent R and G/A in MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 called "alternative HGBL/DLBCL"-samples with (n = 16) or without (n = 6) BCL2 involvement; (3) BCL2 and/or BCL6 alterations without MYC involvement (n = 35); (4) concurrent G/A in MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 without R (n = 25); and (5) "No alterations" (n = 55). Patients with HGBL/DLBCL-MYC/BCL2 and "alternative" HGBL/DLBCL (with BCL2 involvement) had significantly worse survival rates compared to the "no alterations" group. G/A of these genes in the absence of rearrangements did not show any prognostic significance. HGBL/DLBCL with MYC-R and BCL6-R without BCL2 involvement showed a better survival rate compared to HGBL/DLBCL-MYC/BCL2. According to immunohistochemistry, "double/triple" expression (DEL/TEL) did not show a significantly worse outcome compared to absent DEL/TEL. This study highlights the continued value of FISH assessment of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 in the initial evaluation of HGBL/DLBCL with different survival rates between several genetic subgroups.

Routine noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal Rh D in maternal plasma-A 2-year experience from a single center in Belgium.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to rhesus D (RhD) immunization is a potentially life-threatening situation for which use of Rh Immunoglobulin (RhIg) has decreased risk drastically. Determination of fetal RHD on maternal plasma can be used to restrict prenatal RhIg administration to women carrying an RhD-positive child, avoiding unnecessary administration of blood-derived products. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this study is to determine the performance of fetal RHD typing in our center. We prospectively collected 205 fetal RHD and 127 serological cord blood RhD data from RhD-negative women starting at 11 weeks of pregnancy (from October 2019 to October 2021). Real-time polymerase chain reaction targeting RHD exon 5 and 7 was used, similar to the screening program in The Netherlands, supplemented with an amplification control (beta-actin; ACTB) and a sex determination marker located on the Y-chromosome (SRY gene). RESULTS: Fetal RHD testing reached a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. No false-negative nor false-positive results were reported. Inconclusive results (6%, 13/205) were due to weak amplification in 10 cases, a maternal RHD variant in 2 cases (RHD*01N.71 and partial DVI), and a fetal RHD variant (partial DVI) in 1 case. Unnecessary administration of RhIg prophylaxis was avoided in 33% of cases and on the other hand was administered in one case (fetal partial DVI) which would have been missed with cord blood serology. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the high accuracy of routine prenatal fetal RHD gene screening after 11 weeks of pregnancy, encouraging routine clinical practice.

The integration of Sysmex XN-9100' WPC channel reflex testing in the detection of reactive versus malignant blood samples.

INTRODUCTION: Sysmex XN-9100™ (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) system has an optional White Progenitor Cell (WPC) channel. While the White Differentiation (WDF) channel reports a combined flag for blasts/abnormal lymphocytes, WPC channel specifies flagging into a separate flag for each cell type or removes the flag entirely. Aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of this WPC channel in the detection of malignant samples. METHODS: Routine blood samples analyzed on Sysmex XE-5000 with flagging for either blasts, abnormal lymphocytes, or atypical lymphocytes (n = 630) were selected for testing on Sysmex XN-9100, resulting in a reflex WPC analysis in 420 samples. All samples were microscopically evaluated with DI-60 digital cell imaging analyzer. RESULTS: WPC reflex testing resulted in a suspect flag ("blasts" and/or "abnormal lymphocytes") in 334 samples, which was confirmed microscopically in 38% (128/334). In all true positive samples, WPC correctly classified the initial WDF flag in either "blasts" flag or "abnormal lymphocytes?" flag in 75%. Only 12% (50/420) of WDF "blasts/abnormal lymphocytes" positive samples became negative after WPC reflex testing. Subgroup analysis showed differences between the "pediatric" versus "adult" groups and the "hematological/chemotherapy" versus "nonhematological/nonchemotherapy" groups in specificity and smear reduction. CONCLUSION: Overall, WPC reflex testing showed good sensitivity (99%); however, the specificity remains poor (29%). Using reflex WPC to the WDF channel resulted in a 12% reduction of the smear review rate. Although the WPC channel offers different interesting advantages, additional topics and a specific workflow should be applied to optimize the use of this channel.

A comparison of three column agglutination tests for red blood cell alloantibody identification.

OBJECTIVE: Commercial kits of column tests for pre-transfusion testing have progressively replaced conventional tube tests in most laboratories. Aim of this study was to compare three commercial test cell panels for the identification of irregular red blood cell (RBC) alloantibodies. Overall, 44 samples with a positive indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) by routine testing were used for comparison of following panels: Ortho RESOLVE® panelC (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics (OCD), Milan, Italy), ID-DiaPanel(-P) (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA) and Identisera Diana(P) (Grifols, Barcelona, Spain). Column agglutination techniques were used, with microtubes containing either microgel (Bio-Rad/Grifols) or glass bead microparticles (Ortho). RESULTS: Alloantibody identification was possible in 38 samples, of which identical identification was shown in 33 samples by all methods. The remaining samples showed differences between certain methods, with the gel card system being superior to the glass card system for analyzing stored samples Considering that not all samples were evaluated in all three methods, the concordance rate reached 100% between Bio-Rad and Grifols, 90.5% between Bio-Rad and OCD, 86.5% between OCD and Grifols and 90.5% between all methods. Although differences in sensitivities were seen for specific antibodies, the three methods showed comparable performance for the identification of RBC alloantibodies.