Hippocampal sclerosis and epilepsy surgery in neurofibromatosis type 1: case report of a 3-year-old child explored by SEEG and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is infrequent and usually controlled with anti-epileptic drugs. However, in some drug-resistant patients a presurgical evaluation should be considered. Hippocampal sclerosis (HS) is one of the rare causes of epilepsy in neurofibromatosis type 1, which can lead to surgery. METHODS: We present a three-year-old child with refractory epilepsy associated with several structural brain abnormalities but normal hippocampi on brain MRI and a heterozygous variant in the NF1 gene (c.2542G > A). A complete presurgical evaluation was performed including stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG). RESULTS: Usual seizures were recorded, and the seizure onset zone was delineated in the anterior hippocampus. Pathological examination performed after a tailored mesio-temporal resection confirmed hippocampal sclerosis, and the child achieved seizure freedom with 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This rare pediatric case illustrates that NF1 may be associated with early-onset refractory epilepsy secondary to MRI-negative HS, supporting the major role of SEEG in the presurgical evaluation of patients with extended cortical malformations.

Hypothalamic hamartoma associated with polymicrogyria and periventricular nodular heterotopia in children: report of three cases and discussion of the origin of the seizures.

PURPOSE: Hypothalamic hamartomas (HH) are malformations responsible for drug-resistant epilepsy. HH are usually isolated or part of a genetic syndrome, such as Pallister-Hall. Exceptionally they can be associated with other brain malformations such as polymicrogyria (PMG) and periventricular nodular heterotopia (PNH). We discuss the origin of the seizures associated with this combination of malformations, through electrophysiological studies, and review the literature on this rarely reported syndrome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the patients with HH who had surgery between 1998 and 2020 and selected those with associated focal PMG and PNH, detected on MRIs. All patients had comprehensive clinical evaluation and surface video-EEG and one underwent stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). RESULTS: Three male patients out of 182 were identified with a mean age at surgery of 7.5 years. MRI showed unilateral focal PMG (fronto-insulo-parietal, fronto-insulo-parieto-opercular, and fronto-insular, respectively) and multiple PNH homolateral to the main HH implantation side. In two patients, there were strong clinical and scalp EEG arguments for seizure onset within the HH. In the third, due to abnormalities on scalp video-EEG in the same area as PMG and the lack of gelastic seizures, SEEG was indicated and demonstrated seizure onset within the hamartoma. With a mean follow-up of 6 years, two patients were seizure-free. CONCLUSION: Our results show that HH is the trigger of epilepsy, which confirms the high epileptogenic potential of this malformation. In patients such as ours, as in those with isolated HH, we recommend to begin by operating the HH independently of seizure semiology or electrophysiological abnormalities.

Focal polymicrogyria in children: Contribution of invasive explorations and epileptogenicity mapping in the surgical decision.

OBJECTIVE: Report of the contribution of invasive EEG (iEEG) and epileptogenicity mappings (EM) in a pediatric cohort of patients with epilepsy associated with focal polymicrogyria (PMG) and candidates for resective surgery. METHOD: Retrospective pediatric case series of patients presenting focal PMG-related refractory epilepsy undergoing an invasive exploration (iEEG) at Fondation Rothschild Hospital. We reviewed clinical data, structural MRI, and visual analysis of iEEG recordings. Moreover, time-frequency analysis of SEEG signals with a neuroimaging approach (epileptogenicity maps) was used to support visual analysis. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2019, eight patients were selected. Five patients were explored with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) only, one patient with subdural exploration (SDE) only and two patients first underwent SEEG and then SDE. The mean age at seizure onset was 40.3 months (range 3-120), and the mean age for the iEEG 10.8 years (range 7-15). The epileptogenic zone (EZ) appeared concordant to the PMG lesion in only one case, was larger in three cases, smaller in two cases and different in one case. Four cases were selected for tailored resective surgery and one for total callosotomy. Two patients remained seizure-free at their last follow-up (mean 32.6 months, range 7-98). Epileptogenicity mapping (EM) refined the qualitative analysis, showing in four patients an EZ larger than visually defined. CONCLUSION: This study is the first pediatric study to analyze the value of iEEG and EM as well as operability in focal PMG-related refractory epilepsy. The results illustrate the complexity of this pathology with variable concordance between the EZ and the lesion and mixed response to surgery.

Cerebral plasticity in crossed C7 grafts of the brachial plexus: an fMRI study.

In order to rescue elbow flexion after complete accidental avulsion of one brachial plexus, seven patients underwent a neurotization of the biceps with fibers from the contralateral C7 root. The C7 fibers used for the graft belonged to the pyramidal pathway, which descends from the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the damaged plexus, and which controls extension and abduction of the contralateral arm. After several months of reeducation, a functional magentic resonance imaging study was performed with a 1.5 tesla clinical magnetic resonance scan system, in order to investigate the central neural networks involved in the recovery of elbow flexion. Functional brain images were acquired under four conditions: flexion of each of the two elbows, and imagined flexion of each elbow. Results show that flexion of the neurotized arm is associated with a bilateral network activity. The contralateral cortex originally involved in control of the rescued arm still participates in the elaboration and control of the task through the bilateral premotor and primary motor cortex. The location of the ipsilateral clusters in the primary motor, premotor, supplementary motor area, and posterior parietal areas is similar among patients. The location of contralateral activations within the same areas differs across patients.