Pilot Trial of Online Measurement Training and Feedback in Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems.

OBJECTIVE: Pragmatic procedures for sustaining high-fidelity delivery of evidence-based interventions are needed to support implementation in usual care. This study tested an online therapist training system, featuring observational coder training and self-report fidelity feedback, to promote self-report acumen and routine use of family therapy (FT) techniques for adolescent behavior problems. METHOD: Therapists (N = 84) from nine substance use and mental health treatment sites reported on 185 adolescent clients. Therapists submitted baseline data on FT technique use with clients, completed a workshop introducing the 32-week training system, and were randomly assigned by site to Core Training versus Core Training + Consultation. Core Training included a therapist coder training course (didactic instruction and mock session coding exercises in 13 FT techniques) and fidelity feedback procedures depicting therapist-report data on FT use. Consultation convened therapists and supervisors for one-hour monthly sessions with an external FT expert. During the 32 weeks of training, therapists submitted self-report data on FT use along with companion session audiotapes subsequently coded by observational raters. RESULTS: Therapist self-report reliability and accuracy both increased substantially during training. Observers reported no increase over time in FT use; therapists self-reported a decrease in FT use, likely an artifact of their improved self-report accuracy. Consultation did not enhance therapist self-report acumen or increase FT use. CONCLUSIONS: Online training methods that improve therapist-report reliability and accuracy for FT use may confer important advantages for treatment planning and fidelity monitoring. More intensive and/or different training interventions appear needed to increase routine FT delivery.

Training Community Therapists in Core Elements of CBT and Family Therapy for Adolescent Externalizing Problems.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study tested pragmatic methods for training therapists in core techniques of two evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for adolescent externalizing problems: cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or family therapy (FT). Training methods were designed to help therapists accurately self-monitor their use of EBIs and increase delivery of EBIs with current clients. The study compared coder training only versus coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation. METHOD: Therapists (N = 42) from seven behavioral health clinics reported on 65 youth clients; four clinics elected to train in CBT and three in FT. Therapists were randomized to either coder training only, consisting of a 25-week observational coder training course (didactic instruction and mock session coding exercises in core EBI techniques); or coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation, consisting of direct-to-therapist fidelity measurement feedback along with fidelity-focused expert consultation. During the 25 weeks of training, therapists submitted self-report data on EBI use along with companion session audiotapes subsequently coded by observational raters. RESULTS: Compared to coder training only, coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation produced superior effects in therapist ability to judge the extensiveness of EBI techniques in online coding sessions, as well as therapist ability to self-rate use of EBI techniques with their own cases. In both conditions, therapists who trained in CBT showed a significant, though modest, increase in real-world delivery of core CBT techniques; this did not occur for FT. CONCLUSIONS: Pragmatic training and consultation methods show promise as viable and effective options for enhancing EBI fidelity monitoring and, for CBT, increasing EBI delivery.

Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavioral Health Problems: Validity Generalization in Community Settings.

OBJECTIVE: The core elements of family therapy for adolescent mental health and substance use problems, originally distilled from high-fidelity sessions conducted by expert clinicians, were tested for validity generalization when delivered by community therapists in routine settings. METHOD: The study sampled recorded sessions from 161 cases participating in one of three treatment pools: implementation trial of Functional Family Therapy (98 sessions/50 cases/22 therapists), adaptation trial of Multisystemic Therapy (115 sessions/59 cases/2 therapists), and naturalistic trial of non-manualized family therapy in usual care (107 sessions/52 cases/21 therapists). Adolescents were identified as 60% male and 40% female with an average age of 15.4 years; 49% were Latinx, 27% White Non-Latinx, 15% African American, 3% another race/ethnicity, 6% race/ethnicity unknown. Session recordings (n = 320) were randomly selected for each case and coded for 21 discrete family therapy techniques. Archived data of one-year clinical outcomes were gathered. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses replicated the factor structure from the original distillation study, retaining all four clinically coherent treatment modules comprised of all 21 techniques: Interactional Change (ICC = .77, Cronbach's α = .81); Relational Reframe (ICC = .75, α = .81); Adolescent Engagement (ICC = .72, α = .78); Relational Emphasis (ICC = .76, α = .80). Exploratory analyses found that greater use of core techniques predicted symptom improvements in one treatment pool. CONCLUSIONS: Core techniques of family therapy distilled from manualized treatments for adolescent behavioral health problems showed strong evidence of validity generalization, and initial evidence of links to client outcomes, in community settings.

Caregiver Engagement in Outpatient Treatment for Adolescents in Community Settings: Construct and Predictive Validity of Family Therapy Techniques.

Caregiver engagement and participation in community-based outpatient treatment services for adolescents is generally poor, which is problematic given the integral role of caregivers prescribed by evidence-based treatments across orientations. The current study explores the psychometric and predictive properties of a set of caregiver engagement techniques distilled from family therapy, used by community clinicians in routine care. It highlights relational engagement interventions and adds to growing work distilling core elements of family therapy. The study examined caregiver engagement techniques observed in 320 recorded sessions and outcome data from 152 cases treated by 45 therapists participating in one of three randomized trials investigating delivery of family therapy for adolescent behavior problems in community settings. Construct and predictive validity of caregiver engagement coding items were analyzed to understand the degree to which they cohered as a single factor and predicted outcomes in predictable ways. Results demonstrated item reliability and construct validity of a Caregiver Engagement Techniques factor. Greater use of these techniques was associated with decreased adolescent substance use. Unexpected results suggested greater use of techniques was associated with worsening internalizing symptoms and family cohesion per youth-report only. Post-hoc analyses revealed additional complexities in the association between engagement techniques and outcomes. Caregiver engagement practices tested in the current study represent a unified treatment factor that may contribute to positive therapeutic outcomes for adolescents in some clinical domains. Further research is needed to understand predictive effects.

Therapist Self-Report of Fidelity to Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems: Psychometrics of a Pragmatic Quality Indicator Tool.

Therapist-report measures of evidence-based interventions have enormous potential utility as quality indicators in routine care; yet, few such tools have shown strong psychometric properties. This study describes reliability and validity characteristics of a therapist-report measure of family therapy techniques for treating adolescent conduct and substance use problems: Inventory of Therapy Techniques for Core Elements of Family Therapy (ITT-CEFT). Study participants included 31 staff therapists treating 68 adolescent clients in eight community-based mental health and substance use clinics. Therapists submitted ITT-CEFT checklists and companion audio recordings for 189 sessions. The ITT-CEFT contains 13 techniques identified as core elements of three manualized family therapy models that are empirically supported for the target group. Therapists also reported on their use of three motivational interventions, and independent observers coded the submitted recordings. ITT-CEFT factor validity was shown via confirmatory factor analyses of the tool's theoretical structure. Derived modules were: Family Engagement (four items; Cronbach's α = .72); Relational Orientation (five items; α = .74); and Interactional Change (four items; α = .66). Concurrent validity analyses showed fair-to-excellent therapist reliability compared to observer ratings (ICCs range .64-.75); they showed moderate therapist accuracy compared to observer mean scores, reflecting a tendency to overestimate delivery of the techniques. Discriminant validity analyses showed tool differentiation from motivational interventions. Results offer provisional evidence for the feasibility of using the therapist-report ITT-CEFT to anchor quality procedures for family therapy interventions in real-world settings.Trial Registration: The parent clinical trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT03342872 (registration date: 11.10.17).

Online Training of Community Therapists in Observational Coding of Family Therapy Techniques: Reliability and Accuracy.

A foundational strategy to promote implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is providing EBI training to therapists. This study tested an online training system in which therapists practiced observational coding of mock video vignettes demonstrating family therapy techniques for adolescent behavior problems. The study compared therapists ratings to gold-standard scores to measure therapist reliability (consistency across vignettes) and accuracy (approximation to gold scores); tested whether reliability and accuracy improved during training; and tested therapist-level predictors of overall accuracy and change in accuracy over time. Participants were 48 therapists working in nine community behavioral health clinics. The 32-exercise training course provided online instruction (about 15 min/week) in 13 core family therapy techniques representing three modules: Family Engagement, Relational Orientation, Interactional Change. Therapist reliability in rating technique presence (i.e., technique recognition) remained moderate across training; reliability in rating extensiveness of technique delivery (i.e., technique judgment) improved sharply over time, from poor to good. Whereas therapists on average overestimated extensiveness for almost every technique, their tendency to give low-accuracy scores decreased. Therapist accuracy improved significantly over time only for Interactional Change techniques. Baseline digital literacy and submission of self-report checklists on use of the techniques in their own sessions predicted coding accuracy. Training therapists to be more reliable and accurate coders of EBI techniques can potentially yield benefits in increased EBI self-report acumen and EBI use in daily practice. However, training effects may need to improve from those reported here to avail meaningful impact on EBI implementation.Trial Registration: The parent clinical trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT03342872 (registration date: 11.10.17).

Randomized Trial of Academic Training and Medication Decision-Making for Adolescents with ADHD in Usual Care.

Objective: This study tested two family-based interventions designed for delivery in usual care: Changing Academic Support in the Home for Adolescents with ADHD (CASH-AA), containing motivational interventions, homework management and schoolwork organization training, and family-school partnership building; and Medication Integration Protocol (MIP), containing ADHD psychoeducation, medication decision-making, and integrated medication management.Method: This study used a cluster randomized design to test CASH-AA + MIP versus CASH-AA Only for adolescents with ADHD in five sites. Therapists (N = 49) were site clinicians randomized to condition. Clients (N = 145) included 72% males; 42% White Non-Hispanic, 37% Hispanic American, 15% African American, and 6% more than one race; average age was 14.8 years. Fidelity data confirmed protocol adherence and between-condition differentiation.Results: One-year improvements were observed across conditions in several outcomes. Overall, CASH-AA + MIP produced greater declines in adolescent-report inattentive symptoms and delinquent acts. Similarly, among non-substance users, CASH-AA + MIP clients attended more treatment sessions. In contrast, among substance users, CASH-AA Only clients showed greater declines in caregiver-report hyperactive symptoms and externalizing.Conclusions: This study provides initial experimental support for family-based ADHD medication decision-making when coupled with academic training in usual care. The treatment protocols, CASH-AA and MIP, showed positive effects in addressing not only ADHD symptoms but also common co-occurring problems, and youth with substance use problems benefitted along with non-using peers.

Core Elements of CBT for Adolescent Conduct and Substance Use Problems: Comorbidity, Clinical Techniques, and Case Examples.

Adolescent externalizing problems (AEPs), including serious conduct problems, delinquency, and substance misuse, are the most common adolescent behavioral issues in specialty care. High rates of comorbidity between conduct and substance use problems necessitate multidomain treatment strategies that can effectively address the AEP spectrum. One strategy to increase delivery of evidence-based interventions for multiproblem youth in usual care is to focus on core elements of empirically supported treatments that can be judiciously applied to clients presenting with diverse clinical profiles. This article describes six core practice elements of the cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) approach for AEPs: (1) Functional Analysis of Behavior Problems; (2) Prosocial Activity Sampling; (3) Cognitive Monitoring and Restructuring; (4) Emotion Regulation Training; (5) Problem-solving Training; (6) Communication Training. Integrated delivery of these core CBT elements is illustrated in two case examples, and implications for treatment planning for youth with AEPs are discussed.

Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems: Empirical Distillation of Three Manualized Treatments.

Family therapy has the strongest evidence base for treating adolescent conduct and substance use problems, yet there remain substantial barriers to widespread delivery of this approach in community settings. This study aimed to promote the feasibility of implementing family-based interventions in usual care by empirically distilling the core practice elements of three manualized treatments. The study sampled 302 high-fidelity treatment sessions from 196 cases enrolled in 1 of 3 manualized family therapy models: multidimensional family therapy (102 sessions/56 cases), brief strategic family therapy (100 sessions/94 cases), or functional family therapy (100 sessions/46 cases). Adolescents were 57% male; 41% were African American, 31% White non-Hispanic, 9% Hispanic American, 6% another race/ethnicity, and 13% unknown. The observational fidelity measures of all three models were used to code all 302 sessions. Fidelity ratings were analyzed to derive model-shared treatment techniques via exploratory factor analyses on half the sample; the derived factors were then validated via confirmatory factor analyses supplemented by Bayesian structural equation modeling on the remaining half. Factor analyses distilled 4 clinically coherent practice elements with strong internal consistency: Interactional Change (6 treatment techniques; Cronbach's α = .93), Relational Reframe (7 techniques; α = .79), Adolescent Engagement (4 techniques; α = .68), and Relational Emphasis (4 techniques; α = .67). The 4 empirically derived factors represent the core elements of 3 manualized family therapy models for adolescent behavior problems, setting the foundation of a more sustainable option for delivering evidence-based family interventions in routine practice settings. Public Health Significance: Increasing implementation of high-fidelity family-based interventions would improve the quality of treatment services for adolescent conduct and substance use problems.

Distilling the Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Substance Use: Conceptual and Empirical Solutions.

This article describes several barriers to widespread dissemination of manualized family-based treatments for adolescent substance use (ASU). We then offer a highly promising solution for adopting and sustaining family therapy in usual care: distilling the core practice elements of empirically validated family therapy models for ASU. We present a conceptual distillation of family therapy for ASU grounded in existing observational fidelity measures for three manualized models, a process that yielded four core elements: Family Engagement, Relational Reframing, Family Behavior Change, and Family Restructuring. We then introduce an innovative empirical method for distilling core elements that can serve as a template for rigorous distillation of other treatment approaches. Finally, we discuss how core elements can enhance family therapy services within the diverse workforce of usual care for ASU.

Pilot Evaluation of the Medication Integration Protocol for Adolescents with ADHD in Behavioral Care: Treatment Fidelity and Medication Uptake.

Although Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is prevalent among adolescents in outpatient behavioral care, one of the few evidence-based treatment options, stimulant medication, is significantly underutilized. The Medication Integration Protocol (MIP) is a family-based intervention designed to help behavior therapists assume a lead role in educating clients about ADHD in adolescents, promoting family-centered decisions about medication initiation, and integrating medication management activities within behavioral treatment planning. This pilot study evaluated treatment fidelity and medication utilization for inner-city teens receiving MIP (n = 14) compared to a matched Historical Control (HC) group (n = 21) in a community clinic. Observational analyses revealed that in comparison to HC, MIP demonstrated basic protocol fidelity with regard to adherence to the MIP protocol, therapeutic alliance with the adolescent, and clinical focus on ADHD in session. MIP showed greater psychiatric evaluation completion and ADHD medication initiation than HC. Next steps in the ongoing development of MIP are outlined.

Changing Academic Support in the Home for Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Family-Based Clinical Protocol for Improving School Performance.

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is highly prevalent among adolescent clinical populations and associated with myriad deficits in school functioning. Yet, behavior therapists have few developmentally appropriate tools for addressing school problems in this group. This article introduces a behavioral protocol designed to fill the gap: Changing Academic Support in the Home for Adolescents with ADHD (CASH-AA). CASH-AA is a family-based intervention that targets home environment, adolescent skills, and family-school partnership characteristics in order to improve school performance. Protocol components are derived from three evidence-based approaches for adolescent behavior problems: family psychoeducation, clinical family interventions to heighten adolescent and caregiver motivation to change, and training interventions for homework planning and organization skills. CASH-AA contains four treatment modules: (1) Psychoeducation: ADHD and Academic Functioning; (2) Motivation & Preparation: Home Academic Environment; (3) Behavior Change: School Attendance and Homework Plan; (4) Collaboration: Therapist-Family-School Partnership. The protocol can be implemented as a stand-alone intervention for ADHD or an adjunct to other behavioral interventions for co-occurring disorders. Two case examples with markedly different treatment profiles are presented to illustrate the utility and flexibility of the protocol.

Randomized Trial of Family Therapy Versus Nonfamily Treatment for Adolescent Behavior Problems in Usual Care.

A major focus of implementation science is discovering whether evidence-based approaches can be delivered with fidelity and potency in routine practice. This randomized trial compared usual care family therapy (UC-FT), implemented without a treatment manual or extramural support as the standard-of-care approach in a community clinic, to nonfamily treatment (UC-Other) for adolescent conduct and substance use disorders. The study recruited 205 adolescents (M age = 15.7 years; 52% male; 59% Hispanic American, 21% African American) from a community referral network, enrolling 63% for primary mental health problems and 37% for primary substance use problems. Clients were randomly assigned to either the UC-FT site or one of five UC-Other sites. Implementation data confirmed that UC-FT showed adherence to the family therapy approach and differentiation from UC-Other. Follow-ups were completed at 3, 6, and 12 months postbaseline. There was no between-group difference in treatment attendance. Both conditions demonstrated improvements in externalizing, internalizing, and delinquency symptoms. However, UC-FT produced greater reductions in youth-reported externalizing and internalizing among the whole sample, in delinquency among substance-using youth, and in alcohol and drug use among substance-using youth. The degree to which UC-FT outperformed UC-Other was consistent with effect sizes from controlled trials of manualized family therapy models. Nonmanualized family therapy can be effective for adolescent behavior problems within diverse populations in usual care, and it may be superior to nonfamily alternatives.

Validity of therapist self-report ratings of fidelity to evidence-based practices for adolescent behavior problems: correspondence between therapists and observers.

Developing therapist-report fidelity tools to support quality delivery of evidence-based practices in usual care is a top priority for implementation science. This study tested the reliability and accuracy of two groups of community therapists who reported on their use of family therapy (FT) and motivational interviewing/cognitive-behavioral therapy (MI/CBT) interventions during routine treatment of inner-city adolescents with conduct and substance use problems. Study cases (n = 45) were randomized into two conditions: (a) Routine Family Therapy (RFT), consisting of a single site that featured family therapy as its standard of care for behavioral treatment; or (b) Treatment As Usual (TAU), consisting of five sites that featured non-family approaches. Therapists and trained observational raters provided FT and MI/CBT adherence ratings on 157 sessions (104 RFT, 53 TAU). Overall therapist reliability was adequate for averaged FT ratings (ICC = .66) but almost non-existent for MI/CBT (ICC = .06); moreover, both RFT and TAU therapists were more reliable in reporting on FT than on MI/CBT. Both groups of therapists overestimated the extent to which they implemented FT and MI/CBT interventions. Results offer support for the feasibility of using existing therapist-report methods to anchor quality assurance procedures for FT interventions in real-world settings, though not for MI/CBT.

"I need as much support as I can get": A qualitative study of young adult perspectives on family involvement in treatment for opioid use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Opioid use disorder (OUD) among young adults (YAs) continues to persist as a national health crisis. Best practice recommendations for YA OUD treatment highlight the importance of medication for OUD (MOUD) and family involvement across the treatment services continuum for better treatment retention and outcomes. Yet, concerned significant others (CSOs) such as family members, romantic partners, and family-of-choice members are not routinely involved in OUD and MOUD treatment for YAs. METHOD: We used convenience sampling to recruit 25 YAs (ages 21 to 36) in treatment for OUD from two urban treatment centers. We discussed with YAs the identities of their CSOs and the dynamics of those relationships, their perspectives on CSO involvement in their OUD treatment, and the beliefs and attitudes they hold about family involvement in treatment and recovery. Thematic content analysis was deductive-dominant based on a semi-structured qualitative interview guide. Group consensus coding was followed by matrix analysis. RESULTS: We identified five main themes: (1) YA and CSO relationships were supportive, evolving, and complex. (2) CSO support motivated treatment engagement and participation. (3) Only a small proportion of CSOs participated in treatment activities despite actively supporting treatment in other ways. (4) YAs experienced their CSOs as supportive of their treatment and recovery goals, including MOUD. (5) YAs believed family involvement is essential to treatment and many were unsatisfied with current family involvement in their care. CONCLUSIONS: In this qualitative study of OUD treatment experiences among YAs, we learned that many YAs have CSOs who are invested in their treatment and recovery and yet are not routinely involved in treatment. Moreover, YAs often expressed family involvement is essential to OUD treatment, and many expressed a desire for greater family involvement in their own treatment. Clinical recommendations for relationship-oriented treatment are presented.

Family Support Protocol for Adolescent Internalizing Disorders: Protocol for a Pre-Post Quantitative Treatment Development Study.

BACKGROUND: Internalizing disorders (IDs), primarily depression and anxiety, are highly prevalent among adolescents receiving community-based treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). For such clients, interventions that do not holistically address both SUDs and IDs are less effective. OBJECTIVE: This pilot treatment development study aims to develop and test a modular treatment protocol for addressing cooccurring IDs among adolescents (aged 13 to 18 years) enrolled in routine care for substance use problems: Family Support Protocol for Adolescent Internalizing Disorders (Fam-AID). As an adjunctive protocol, Fam-AID will not require clinicians to markedly alter existing base practices for SUD. It will be anchored by 3 evidence-based foundations for treating cooccurring adolescent IDs: family engagement techniques, transdiagnostic individual cognitive behavioral therapy techniques, and family psychoeducation and safety planning. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study will proceed in 2 stages. The pilot stage will use rapid-cycle prototyping methods in collaboration with end-user stakeholders to draft protocol delivery and fidelity guidelines adapted from existing resources, solicit provider and client input on protocol content and delivery via cognitive interviewing, and pilot prototype components on 4 to 6 cases. The second stage will be an interrupted time series study for 60 comorbid SUD+ID cases across 2 sites serving diverse adolescents: 30 will receive treatment as usual (TAU); following clinician training in the protocol, 30 new cases will receive TAU enhanced by Fam-AID. For aim 1, the focus is on evaluating the acceptability of the Fam-AID protocol through therapist and client interviews as well as assessing fidelity benchmarks using therapist- and observer-reported protocol fidelity data. For aim 2, the plan is to compare the effects of TAU only cases versus TAU+Fam-AID cases on family treatment attendance and on adolescent ID and substance use symptoms, with measurements taken at baseline and at 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Study recruitment will begin in April 2025. CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that Fam-AID will contain 5 treatment modules that can be delivered in any sequence to meet client needs: family engagement of primary supports in treatment planning and services; relational reframing of family constraints, resiliencies, and social capital connected to the adolescent's ID symptoms; functional analysis of the adolescent's ID symptoms and related behaviors; cognitive behavioral therapy to address the adolescent's ID symptoms and functional needs, featuring 3 core techniques (emotion acceptance, emotional exposure, and behavioral activation) to address negative affect and emotional dysregulation; and family psychoeducation and safety planning focused on education about comorbid SUD+ID and prevention of adolescent self-harm. If the abovementioned modules are found to be feasible and effective, Fam-AID will offer a set of pragmatic interventions to SUD clinicians for treating cooccurring IDs in adolescent clients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06413979; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06413979. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/64332.

Standard Versus Family-Based Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Adolescent Substance Use in Primary Care: Protocol for a Multisite Randomized Effectiveness Trial.

BACKGROUND: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for adolescents (SBIRT-A) is widely recommended to promote detection and early intervention for alcohol and other drug (AOD) use in pediatric primary care. Existing SBIRT-A procedures rely almost exclusively on adolescents alone, despite the recognition of caregivers as critical protective factors in adolescent development and AOD use. Moreover, controlled SBIRT-A studies conducted in primary care have yielded inconsistent findings about implementation feasibility and effects on AOD outcomes and overall developmental functioning. There is urgent need to investigate the value of systematically incorporating caregivers in SBIRT-A procedures. OBJECTIVE: This randomized effectiveness trial will advance research and scope on SBIRT-A in primary care by conducting a head-to-head test of 2 conceptually grounded, evidence-informed approaches: a standard adolescent-only approach (SBIRT-A-Standard) versus a more expansive family-based approach (SBIRT-A-Family). The SBIRT-A-Family approach enhances the procedures of the SBIRT-A-Standard approach by screening for AOD risk with both adolescents and caregivers; leveraging multidomain, multireporter AOD risk and protection data to inform case identification and risk categorization; and directly involving caregivers in brief intervention and referral to treatment activities. METHODS: The study will include 2300 adolescents (aged 12-17 y) and their caregivers attending 1 of 3 hospital-affiliated pediatric settings serving diverse patient populations in major urban areas. Study recruitment, screening, randomization, and all SBIRT-A activities will occur during a single pediatric visit. SBIRT-A procedures will be delivered digitally on handheld tablets using patient-facing and provider-facing programming. Primary outcomes (AOD use, co-occurring behavior problems, and parent-adolescent communication about AOD use) and secondary outcomes (adolescent quality of life, adolescent risk factors, and therapy attendance) will be assessed at screening and initial assessment and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-ups. The study is well powered to conduct all planned main and moderator (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and youth AOD risk status) analyses. RESULTS: This study will be conducted over a 5-year period. Provider training was initiated in year 1 (December 2023). Participant recruitment and follow-up data collection began in year 2 (March 2024). We expect the results from this study to be published in early 2027. CONCLUSIONS: SBIRT-A is widely endorsed but currently underused in pediatric primary care settings, and questions remain about optimal approaches and overall effectiveness. In particular, referral to treatment procedures in primary care remains virtually untested among youth. In addition, whereas research strongly supports involving families in interventions for adolescent AOD, SBIRT-A effectiveness trial testing approaches that actively engage family members in primary care are absent. This trial is designed to help fill these research gaps to inform the critical health decision of whether and how to include caregivers in SBIRT-A activities conducted in pediatric primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05964010; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05964010. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/54486.

Relationship-Oriented Recovery System for Youth (RORSY): Clinical Protocol for Transition-Age Youth with Opioid Use Disorders.

This article introduces the Relationship-Oriented Recovery System for Youth (RORSY) protocol, which is designed to increase uptake of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) and related services among adolescents and young adults. Youth exhibit alarmingly poor rates of MOUD initiation and adherence, OUD services involvement and long-term recovery success. RORSY attends to three developmentally unique recovery needs of this age group: assess and bolster youth recovery capital, prioritize involvement of concerned significant others, and use digital direct-to-consumer recovery supports. RORSY contains five evidence-informed intervention modules that can be flexibly tailored to meet the individual and relationship needs of a given youth: Relational Orientation, Youth Recovery Management Planning, Relational Recovery Management Planning, Relationship Skills Building, and Digital Recovery Support Planning. The article concludes with practice and policy recommendations for making relationship-building a top clinical priority for addressing youth OUD.

Launching Relationship-Oriented Behavioral Services for Youth Opioid Use Disorder: Innovations in Medication Decision-Making and Adherence Planning.

This article presents behavioral interventions designed to enhance uptake and retention on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among transition-age youth (16-25 years) enrolled in treatment services. The article describes three relationship-oriented interventions designed to address barriers to MOUD uptake, enhance MOUD adherence planning, and strengthen OUD recovery among youth: Relational Orientation; Medication Education and Decision-making Support, and Family Leadership and Ownership of Adherence to Treatment. These interventions are inter-connected can be delivered flexibly. The article concludes with three case examples that illustrate how these modular interventions can be tailored to meet the needs of diverse client profiles.

Couple and family therapy for substance use disorders: Evidence-based update 2010-2019.

This article updates the evidence-based on couple and family therapy interventions for substance use disorders (SUD) since publication of the previous JMFT reviews in 2012. It first summarizes previous reviews along with findings from more recent reviews and meta-analytic studies. It then presents study design and methods criteria used to select 13 studies of couple and family therapy for level of support evaluation. Cumulative level of support designations are then determined for identified treatment approaches. Findings indicate that systemic family therapy is well-established as a standalone treatment, and behavioral family therapy and behavioral couple therapy are probably efficacious as standalone treatments and well-established as part of a multicomponent treatment. The article then suggests practice guidelines with regard to treatment modality considerations and implementation challenges. It concludes with future directions for delivering couple and family interventions in routine systems of care for SUD.