RESUMO
We were interested in identifying novel agents for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by screening for activities that model renal tumor biology. Searching for relative renal cell sensitivity and leukemia insensitivity among cytotoxicity profiles in the NCI Drug Screen database, we identified 16 potential agents with renal selectivity. We evaluated the agents in 10 RCC cell lines (of primary and metastatic origin) isolated from 5 patients. The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) in these cell lines ranged from 0.019 +/- 0.013 to 11.4 +/- 0.55 microM and were comparable with values obtained with renal cell lines in the NCI Drug Screen panel. Because RCC are slowly growing tumors, we evaluated the compounds on rapidly (27% S phase) or slowly (6% S phase) growing cells. In contrast to doxorubicin, where cytotoxicity was restricted to rapidly proliferating cells, three compounds (NSC 280074, 281613, and 281817) were more cytotoxic in slowly proliferating cells. NSC 72151 and 268965 were equitoxic for both populations. NSC 94889, 638850, and 630938 were more cytotoxic in rapidly growing cells. In in vitro time exposure studies, four compounds, NSC 268965, 280074, 281613, and 281817, were maximally cytotoxic with as little as 3 h exposure time. From an analysis comparing the p53 genotype of the 60 cell lines of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Drug Screen with the cytotoxicity profiles for the 16 putative renal compounds, 13 compounds were classified as likely to be indifferent to p53 status. We also developed a panel specificity detection method for the NCI Drug Screen database to evaluate the prevalence of renal sensitive compounds. Of the 16 studied compounds, 14 were among those identified as renal sensitive by the statistical analysis. Lastly, we found reduced tumor growth in mice with established renal human tumor xenografts after treatment with two of the renal active compounds. These studies describe compounds with potential renal activity that are candidates for preclinical development for renal cell carcinoma.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Desenho de Fármacos , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Membro 1 da Subfamília B de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/metabolismo , Animais , Bromodesoxiuridina/metabolismo , Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Divisão Celular , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Genes p53/genética , Genótipo , Humanos , Concentração Inibidora 50 , Leucemia/tratamento farmacológico , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Camundongos , Modelos Químicos , Transplante de Neoplasias , Fatores de Tempo , Células Tumorais CultivadasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: As our population ages, treatment for joint pain associated with articular cartilage damage is becoming a prevalent challenge. Accordingly, this work investigates local delivery of two regulatory proteins - transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) - to cartilage defects from degradable scaffolds as a potential strategy for improving cartilage repair. METHOD: The effects of TGF-beta1 and/or IGF-1 delivery on osteochondral repair in adult rabbits were examined through histomorphometric analysis of 11 markers of osteochondral repair. RESULTS: Complete scaffold degradation occurred allowing for assessment of the healing response at 12 weeks post-surgery. When compared to untreated defects, higher scores were observed with IGF-1-treated defects for the six markers of neo-surface repair: neo-surface morphology, cartilage thickness, surface regularity, chondrocyte clustering, and the chondrocyte/glycosaminoglycan content of the neo-surface and the cartilage surrounding the defect. Surprisingly, the benefits of IGF-1 delivery were not maintained when this growth factor (GF) was co-delivered with TGF-beta1, despite numerous in vitro reports of the combinatory actions of these GFs. CONCLUSIONS: While localized delivery of IGF-1 may be a promising repair strategy, further in vivo assessment is necessary, since fibrous tissue was commonly observed in the neo-surface of all treatment groups. More importantly, this study highlights the need to rigorously examine GF interactions in the wound healing environment and demonstrates that in vitro observations do not directly translate to the in vivo setting.