Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of clinically relevant Bacteroides, Phocaeicola, Parabacteroides and Prevotella species, isolated by eight laboratories in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, reports on antimicrobial-resistant Bacteroides and Prevotella isolates have increased in the Netherlands. This urged the need for a surveillance study on the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Bacteroides, Phocaeicola, Parabacteroides and Prevotella isolates consecutively isolated from human clinical specimens at eight different Dutch laboratories. METHODS: Each laboratory collected 20-25 Bacteroides (including Phocaeicola and Parabacteroides) and 10-15 Prevotella isolates for 3 months. At the national reference laboratory, the MICs of amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, metronidazole, clindamycin, tetracycline and moxifloxacin were determined using agar dilution. Isolates with a high MIC of metronidazole or a carbapenem, or harbouring cfiA, were subjected to WGS. RESULTS: Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron/faecis isolates had the highest MIC90 values, whereas Bacteroides fragilis had the lowest MIC90 values for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem and moxifloxacin. The antimicrobial profiles of the different Prevotella species were similar, except for amoxicillin, for which the MIC50 ranged from 0.125 to 16 mg/L for Prevotella bivia and Prevotella buccae, respectively. Three isolates with high metronidazole MICs were sequenced, of which one Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron isolate harboured a plasmid-located nimE gene and a Prevotella melaninogenica isolate harboured a nimA gene chromosomally.Five Bacteroides isolates harboured a cfiA gene and three had an IS element upstream, resulting in high MICs of carbapenems. The other two isolates harboured no IS element upstream of the cfiA gene and had low MICs of carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in resistance between species were observed. To combat emerging resistance in anaerobes, monitoring resistance and conducting surveillance are essential.

Proposal for a screening protocol for Candida auris colonization.

BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast which can cause severe infection in hospitalized patients. Since its first detection in 2009, C. auris has spread globally. The control and elimination of this pathogen in a hospital setting is particularly challenging because of its ability to form biofilms, allowing for long-term patient colonization and persistence in the environment. Identification of C. auris from cultures is difficult due to the morphologic similarities to other yeasts, its slow growth, and the low culture sensitivity when using standard agars and temperatures. AIM: We have developed a screening protocol for C. auris colonization using an in-house-developed polymerase chain reaction (PCR), combined with confirmatory culture in optimized conditions. METHODS: C. auris-specific primers and probe were developed, targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, and specificity was confirmed in silico using the BLAST tool. The PCR was validated using a panel of 12 C. auris isolates and 103 isolates from 22 other Candida species and was shown to be 100% accurate. The limit of detection of the assay was determined at approximately four cells per PCR. FINDINGS: C. auris screening was introduced on February 15th, 2023, and was used for patients who had been admitted to a healthcare facility abroad in the two months prior to admission to our hospital. The screening protocol included swabs from nose, throat, rectum, axilla, and groin. In the first eight months, 199 patients were screened and seven were found positive (4%). CONCLUSION: Our proposed screening protocol may contribute to control C. auris in hospitals.