Pediatric Aerodigestive Medicine: Advancing Collaborative Care for Children With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

OBJECTIVES: Aerodigestive disorders encompass various pathological conditions affecting the lungs, upper airway, and gastrointestinal tract in children. While advanced care has primarily occurred in specialty centers, many children first present to general pediatric gastroenterologists with aerodigestive symptoms necessitating awareness of these conditions. At the 2021 Annual North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition meeting, the aerodigestive Special Interest Group held a full-day symposium entitled, Pediatric Aerodigestive Medicine: Advancing Collaborative Care of Children with Aerodigestive Disorders. The symposium aimed to underline the significance of a multidisciplinary approach to achieve better outcomes for these complex patients. METHODS: The symposium brought together leading experts to highlight the growing aerodigestive field, promote new scientific and therapeutic strategies, share the structure and benefits of a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosing common and rare aerodigestive disorders, and foster multidisciplinary discussion of complex cases while highlighting the range of therapeutic and diagnostic options. In this article, we showcase the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD), one of the most common aerodigestive conditions, emphasizing the role of a collaborative model. CONCLUSIONS: The aerodigestive field has made significant progress and continues to grow due to a unique multidisciplinary, collaborative model of care for these conditions. Despite diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, the multidisciplinary approach has enabled and greatly improved efficient, high-quality, and evidence-based care for patients, including those with OPD.

Consensus on intake questionnaire data elements in the development of an aerodigestive registry.

OBJECTIVE: To define the essential elements of the intake questionnaire that will be a part of a larger multicenter registry for aerodigestive patients. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was utilized to obtain consensus on the data elements that should warrant inclusion in the final research database. Patient questionnaires from the eight participating institutions were reviewed and individual elements were aggregated into 14 categories. RESULTS: A total of 198 initial elements were voted on for inclusion. The categories included demographics, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, ear nose and throat symptoms, feeding, birth history, medical history, surgical history, family history, social history, medications prior to evaluation, devices used prior to evaluation, prior diagnostic evaluations, and prior evaluation by aerodigestive team members. 83 of the 198 elements met consensus for inclusion in the final registry for an inclusion rate of 41.9 %. Three separate rounds of ranking were required to obtain consensus. CONCLUSION: The aerodigestive registry is an important initiative that will help foster research and help guide future management. The intake questionnaire of the registry is a critical component of this project, and the consensus obtained during this study should help create a streamlined and efficient registry that will help all aerodigestive patients on a national level.

Obstructive lung disease is common in children with syndromic and congenital scoliosis: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that restrictive lung disease (RLD) is associated with scoliosis. This study identifies that obstructive lung disease (OLD) is associated with syndromic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis. METHODS: We searched a local database for patients with scoliosis who underwent a pulmonary function testing (PFT) from 2004 to 2009. All patients with congenital scoliosis or syndromic thoracolumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle of ≥40 degrees and acceptable and repeatable PFT testing were included in the study. OLD was defined as an forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity ratio below 95% confidence interval. Bronchoscopy videos and computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance images were reviewed to identify anatomic causes of lower airway disease. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients met the criteria for inclusion. The median age at diagnosis was 11.3 years. The median primary Cobb angle was 60 degrees. The prevalence of OLD was 33% and RLD was 57%. The 6 children with OLD underwent preoperative bronchoscopy and chest computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to identify anatomic causes of lower airway obstruction. The 4 children with OLD and right-sided major thoracic curves had compression of the right mainstem bronchus between the spine (posterior) and the right pulmonary artery (anterior). The 2 children with OLD and left-sided major thoracic curves had compression of the left mainstem bronchus between the spine (posterior) and the descending aorta (anterior) or the left atrium (anterior). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the prevalence of OLD in children with congenital scoliosis or syndromic scoliosis was 33%, which was elevated when compared with the population prevalence of 2% to 5%. Mainstem airway compression from spine rotation was discovered to be the potential mechanism of disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study investigating the effect of a patient characteristic on the outcome of disease.

Predictive power of chest radiography for infectious or inflammatory lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: Children frequently present with chronic cough, recurrent respiratory infections, and dysphagia. These symptoms are poor predictors of significant inflammatory lung disease, such as from chronic aspiration. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the gold standard for identification of lung infection and airway inflammation but is expensive and requires sedation. Chest X-rays (CXR) are inexpensive, low-radiation tests that do not require sedations and can document findings associated with infectious or inflammatory lung disease. The accuracy of CXR to predict or exclude infectious or inflammatory lung disease has not been directly evaluated and is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of all pediatric patients who underwent FFB with BAL within 2 weeks of a CXR. Blinded CXR images reviewed for findings consistent with inflammatory disease by two senior pediatric radiologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for CXR to identify significant inflammation and/or infection on BAL were calculated. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-four subjects included. Two hundred and sixty-three had positive CXR (77%), 183 had inflammatory BAL (53%), and 110 had infection (32%). The sensitivity of CXR changes for BAL inflammation, infection, and either inflammation or infection was 84.7, 90.9, and 85.3, respectively. The PPV of CXR was 58.9, 38.0, and 59.7. The NPV of CXR was 65.0, 87.5, and 66.3. CONCLUSIONS: Although CXR are inexpensive, do not require sedation, and are of low radiation dose, the ability of an entirely normal CXR to exclude active inflammatory or infectious lung disease is limited.

Consensus on Triple Endoscopy Data Elements Preparatory to Development of an Aerodigestive Registry.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study defines essential data elements to be recorded during an aerodigestive "triple endoscopy" to form the foundation of a standardized multicenter registry and to clearly define measurement of each consensus item. STUDY DESIGN: Modified Delphi process. METHODS: Modified Delphi consensus with six survey rounds. Twenty-four expert pediatric otolaryngology, pulmonology, and gastroenterology aerodigestive clinicians from eight large academic pediatric aerodigestive programs formed the Delphi panel. After achieving consensus through the Delphi process, outside validation was performed at 2019 national Aerodigestive Society conference. Consensus, near-consensus, or exclusion was obtained for each proposed data element. Concordance was then measured between expert panel conclusions and validation group conclusions. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 94.4%. 73/167 proposed items reached consensus in six domains (flexible bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, microdirect laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies, and esophageal impedance and pH probe). Measurement of all items was defined; classification/grading systems were selected for 11 items. Validation group endorsed importance of 82/167 data items; compared to expert consensus, overall, inclusion, and exclusion concordance rates were 94.5%, 98.7%, and 90.9%. CONCLUSION: Triple endoscopy is a central component of aerodigestive care. This study identifies and defines data elements to be recorded for all triple endoscopy procedures. The list is of usable length, and clear definitions were created for all items, with explicit classification/grading systems selected for 11 items. Face validity was confirmed with an independent multispecialty sample of aerodigestive providers. This consensus provides the foundation for a triple endoscopy registry but also is immediately applicable to standardize clinical documentation in aerodigestive care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 132:2251-2258, 2022.

Temporary bronchial stenting for airway compression in the interstage palliation of functional single ventricle.

The Norwood procedure is the first of three palliative surgical procedures offered for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). Due to the small size of the thorax and proximity of airway and vascular structures, compression of the airway is possible following the Norwood procedure. We describe the management of an infant with HLHS following Stage I surgical palliation who developed refractory respiratory failure secondary to severe left bronchial compression.

Sedation in Bronchoscopy: A Review.

Bronchoscopy has long been used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in medicine, with a wide range of appropriate sedative options. Flexible bronchoscopy is generally performed with sedation, and the choice of sedative is generally left to the practice pattern of the performing bronchoscopist. The concept of sedation is complex, with varying degrees of consciousness. A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE from 1969 to 2016, and appropriate data were reviewed. Randomized, controlled trials and prospective cohort studies were considered of highest impact. This article is a comprehensive review of existing data regarding sedation during bronchoscopy.

Relationship between upper airway obstruction and gastroesophageal reflux in a dog model.

The association between gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and upper airway obstruction in children is recognized but not well understood. Our objective was to determine if the creation of a model of upper airway obstruction in dogs would cause GER and to determine if the GER is related to intrathoracic pressure changes. Five dogs underwent evaluation with esophageal manometry and pH probe at baseline and 1 week after creation of an upper airway obstruction. Airway obstruction was created by placement of a fenestrated cuffed tracheostomy tube, which was then capped and the cuff was inflated, requiring the animals to breathe via the fenestrations. The negative inspiratory pressure (Pes) (+/- SD) increased from 11.8 +/- 4.8 cm H(2)O at baseline to 17.6 +/- 4.9 cm H(2)O 1 week after creation of an airway obstruction (p = .029). None of the dogs had GER at baseline with a reflux index (RI) value of 0.0; however, 1 week after creation of airway obstruction, three out of five dogs had GER, with a mean RI value of 21.2 +/- 21.2. There was a significant (p = .023) correlation (r = .928) of the changes in Pes and RI values following airway obstruction. Upper airway obstruction (UAO) does cause GER in this canine model. Severity of GER is significantly correlated with Pes changes.