Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial (cMPsE02).

BACKGROUND: Various brain stimulation techniques are in use to treat epilepsy. These methods usually require surgical implantation procedures. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a non-invasive technique to stimulate the left auricular branch of the vagus nerve at the ear conch. OBJECTIVE: We performed a randomized, double-blind controlled trial (cMPsE02) to assess efficacy and safety of tVNS vs. control stimulation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: Primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of add-on therapy with tVNS (stimulation frequency 25 Hz, n = 39) versus active control (1 Hz, n = 37) in reducing seizure frequency over 20 weeks. Secondary objectives comprised reduction in seizure frequency from baseline to end of treatment, subgroup analyses and safety evaluation. RESULTS: Treatment adherence was 84% in the 1 Hz group and 88% in the 25 Hz group, respectively. Stimulation intensity significantly differed between the 1 Hz group (1.02 ± 0.83 mA) and the 25 Hz group (0.50 ± 0.47 mA; p = 0.006). Mean seizure reduction per 28 days at end of treatment was -2.9% in the 1 Hz group and 23.4% in the 25 Hz group (p = 0.146). In contrast to controls, we found a significant reduction in seizure frequency in patients of the 25 Hz group who completed the full treatment period (20 weeks; n = 26, 34.2%, p = 0.034). Responder rates (25%, 50%) were similar in both groups. Subgroup analyses for seizure type and baseline seizure frequency revealed no significant differences. Adverse events were usually mild or moderate and comprised headache, ear pain, application site erythema, vertigo, fatigue, and nausea. Four serious adverse events were reported including one sudden unexplained death in epilepsy patients (SUDEP) in the 1 Hz group which was assessed as not treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: tVNS had a high treatment adherence and was well tolerated. Superiority of 25 Hz tVNS over 1 Hz tVNS could not be proven in this relatively small study, which might be attributed to the higher stimulation intensity in the control group. Efficacy data revealed results that justify further trials with larger patient numbers and longer observation periods.

Diagnostic workup of patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) remains challenging. Diagnostic algorithms suggest the use of factor VIII (FVIII:C), von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo), and collagen-binding capacity (VWF:CB), but the sensitivity of these and other laboratory tests for the diagnosis of AVWS is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the capacity of laboratory tests, including point-of-care testing (POCT), for the identification of patients with AVWS. PATIENTS/METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients were enrolled with AVWS diagnosed because of a history of recent onset of bleeding, a negative family history of von Willebrand disease, and abnormal plasma VWF multimers. RESULTS: According to our inclusion criteria, all patients had bleeding symptoms, and the VWF high molecular weight multimers were either decreased or absent. Regarding POCT, PFA-100 was inconclusive, due to anemia or thrombocytopenia, in 29%; the sensitivity was 80% in the remaining patients. The sensitivity of VWF:Ag (23%), VWF:RCo/Ag ratio < 0.7 (26%), VWF:CB/Ag ratio < 0.7 (46%), anti-VWF antibodies (15%) and VWF propeptide/Ag ratio (22%) was too low to rule out the disease. A combination of VWF:Ag < 50 IU dL(-1), VWF:RCo/Ag ratio < 0.7 and VWF:CB/Ag ratio < 0.8 yielded a sensitivity of 86%. Patients diagnosed only because of abnormal VWF multimers showed similar clinical characteristics as other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of AVWS is difficult, due to lack of sensitivity of the tests used. A substantial number of patients present with normal or increased test results, emphasizing the importance of multimer analysis in all patients with suspected AVWS.