Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Joint replacement is an effective intervention for people with advanced arthritis, although there is an important minority of patients who do not improve post-operatively. There is a need for robust evidence on outcomes after surgery, but there are a number of measures that assess function after joint replacement, many of which lack any clear theoretical basis. The World Health Organisation has introduced the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which divides function into three separate domains: Impairment, activity limitations and participation restrictions. The aim of this study is to compare the properties and responsiveness of a selection of commonly used outcome tools that assess function, examine how well they relate to the ICF concepts, and to explore the changes in the measures over time. METHODS/DESIGN: Two hundred and sixty three patients listed for lower limb joint replacement at an elective orthopaedic centre have been recruited into this study. Participants attend the hospital for a research appointment prior to surgery and then at 3-months and 1-year after surgery. At each assessment time, function is assessed using a range of measures. Self-report function is assessed using the WOMAC, Aberdeen Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction Measure, SF-12 and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2. Clinician-administered measures of function include the American Knee Society Score for knee patients and the Harris Hip Score for hip patients. Performance tests include the timed 20-metre walk, timed get up and go, sit-to-stand-to-sit, step tests and single stance balance test. During the performance tests, participants wear an inertial sensor and data from motion analysis are collected. Statistical analysis will include exploring the relationship between measures describing the same ICF concepts, assessing responsiveness, and studying changes in measures over time. DISCUSSION: There are a range of tools that can be used to assess function before and after joint replacement, with little information about how these various measures compare in their properties and responsiveness. This study aims to provide this data on a selection of commonly used assessments of function, and explore how they relate to the ICF domains.

Fatigue fracture of an uncemented Zweymüller femoral stem at the neck-shoulder junction.

A fracture through the neck of the femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty is extremely rare. We report a neck fracture of a cementless Zweymüller stem, one of the most implanted stems worldwide. According to our knowledge, this is the first thorough case description of a neck fracture of a cementless Zweymüller stem. The case concerns a 53-year-old man, with a body weight of 103 kg and a body mass index of 31. We consider potential risk factors for a femoral stem fracture, such as patient-related factors, suboptimal implant positioning, surgical technique and implant characteristics.

The association of leg length and offset reconstruction after total hip arthroplasty with clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Restoring native hip anatomy and biomechanics is important to create a well-functioning hip arthroplasty. This study investigated the association of hip offset and leg length after hip arthroplasty with clinical outcomes, including patient reported outcome measures, the Trendelenburg Test and gait analysis. METHODS: In 77 patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (age mean = 65 SD = 11 years; BMI mean = 27 SD = 5 kg/m2), hip offset and leg length discrepancy were measured on anteroposterior radiographs. The Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Trendelenburg Test and gait were assessed preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. An inertial measurement unit was used to derive biomechanical parameters, including spatiotemporal gait parameters and tilt angles of the pelvis. Relationships between radiographic and functional outcomes were investigated, and subgroups of patients with >15% decreased and increased femoral offset were analysed separately. FINDINGS: Patient-reported function scores and clinical tests demonstrated a few significant, weak correlations with radiographic outcomes (Spearman's ρ range = 0.26-0.32; p < 0.05). Undercorrection of femoral offset was associated with lower patient-reported function scores and with more step irregularity as well as step asymmetry during gait. Postoperative leg length inequality was associated with increased frontal plane tilt angle of the pelvis during the Trendelenburg Test and increased sagittal plane motion of the pelvis during gait. Femoral offset subgroups demonstrated no significant differences for patient-reported function scores and outcomes of the Trendelenburg Test and gait analysis. INTERPRETATION: Reduced hip offset and leg length discrepancy following hip arthroplasty seem to be marginally associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Evaluating physical function and activity in the elderly patient using wearable motion sensors.

Wearable sensors, in particular inertial measurement units (IMUs) allow the objective, valid, discriminative and responsive assessment of physical function during functional tests such as gait, stair climbing or sit-to-stand.Applied to various body segments, precise capture of time-to-task achievement, spatiotemporal gait and kinematic parameters of demanding tests or specific to an affected limb are the most used measures.In activity monitoring (AM), accelerometry has mainly been used to derive energy expenditure or general health related parameters such as total step counts.In orthopaedics and the elderly, counting specific events such as stairs or high intensity activities were clinimetrically most powerful; as were qualitative parameters at the 'micro-level' of activity such as step frequency or sit-stand duration.Low cost and ease of use allow routine clinical application but with many options for sensors, algorithms, test and parameter definitions, choice and comparability remain difficult, calling for consensus or standardisation. Cite this article: Grimm B, Bolink S. Evaluating physical function and activity in the elderly patient using wearable motion sensors. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:112-120. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160022.

Validation of a novel activity monitor in impaired, slow-walking, crutch-supported patients.

BACKGROUND: A growing need in clinical practice of rehabilitation and orthopaedic medicine is for objective outcome tools to estimate physical activity. Current techniques show limited validity or are too demanding for routine clinical use. Accelerometer-based activity monitors (AMs) have shown promise for measuring physical activity in healthy people but lack validity in impaired patients. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to validate an accelerometer-based AM in impaired, slow-walking, crutch-supported patients after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: Shortly after TJA, patients who were safely mobilized with 2 crutches and 8 healthy participants completed a trial of different activities while wearing the AM on the lateral upper leg and being videotaped. Outcome variables (e.g., time walking, number of gait cycles, sit-stand-sit transfers) were compared to video recordings, and sensitivity, predictive value and mean percentage difference (MPD) values were calculated. RESULTS: We included 40 patients (mean age: 65±9 years; mean BMI: 30±6kg/m2; male:female ratio: 18:22) and 8 healthy participants (mean age: 49±20 years; mean BMI: 23±0.7kg/m2; male:female ratio: 5:3). The AM showed excellent sensitivity (>95%) and predictive value (>95%) in identifying activities (e.g., walking, sitting, resting) and detecting the number of gait cycles and sit-stand-sit transfers (mean percentage difference: ±2%). Detection of number of steps ascending and descending stairs and cadence was more difficult but still showed good results (mean percentage difference: ±7%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first validation study to assess physical activity with an AM in impaired, slow-walking, crutch-supported patients. The AM was a valid tool for measuring physical activity in these patients. The tool may help in evaluating and optimizing rehabilitation programs for patients after TJA, those recovering from stroke or chronic impaired patients.

Frontal plane pelvic motion during gait captures hip osteoarthritis related disability.

Gait analysis has widely been accepted as an objective measure of function and clinical outcome. Ambulatory accelerometer-based gait analysis has emerged as a clinically more feasible alternative to optical motion capture systems but does not provide kinematic characterisation to identify disease dependent mechanisms causing walking disability. This study investigated the potential of a single inertial sensor to derive frontal plane motion of the pelvis (i.e. pelvic obliquity) and help identify hip osteoarthritis (OA) related gait alterations. Patients with advanced unilateral hip OA (n = 20) were compared to patients with advanced unilateral knee OA (n = 20) and to a healthy control group (n = 20). Kinematic characterisation of frontal plane pelvic motion during gait demonstrated decreased range of motion and increased asymmetry for hip OA patients specifically.