Total trans-obturator tape (TOT) removal; a case series including pain and urinary continence outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: For many years, mid-urethral mesh tape (MUT) was the gold-standard procedure for management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, significant concerns were raised over its safety. We present a case series of total trans-obturator tape (TOT) removals, performed in a tertiary unit over a 3-year period. We aim to evaluate improvement of pain and change in urinary continence symptoms following mesh explantation. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of the outcomes of total TOT removal. Primary outcome is the change in pain scores following total removal, assessed preoperatively, at discharge and follow-up. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications, including return to theatre, re-admission rates and incidence of worsening SUI and overactive bladder symptoms (OAB) postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0 package (IBM, Chicago, IL) and the GraphPad Prism 9 statistical packages. RESULTS: Nineteen women were identified. Mean age was 52 years and mean BMI was 31. Indications for mesh removal were: chronic pain (95%), vaginal exposure (37%) and pelvic sepsis (5%). No patients had return to theatre. Median intraoperative blood loss was 200 ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 150-288). Mean length of mesh excised was 22 cm. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. At follow-up, most patients (72%) reported "improvement" of their mesh-related pain at follow-up, while 6% reported "worsening" of pain. Eighty-three per cent of patients reported worsening SUI, and 50% reported worsening OAB symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of sepsis, significant intraoperative complications are rare during total TOT removals. While 72% of patients reported improvement of their mesh-related pain, 6% still reported worsening pain after total mesh excision.

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in women with suspected complications following insertion of implants for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in women presenting with suspected implant complications following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single-centre cohort study in a designated tertiary referral centre. All women with vaginally and/or abdominally placed implants for POP or SUI who were referred with suspected mesh complications, and investigated with an MRI scan, between January 2018-October 2020 were included in the study. RESULTS: 97 women were identified over this time-period with a total of 123 implants, a median age of 55 years (Range: 34-79) and an average insertion to presentation time of 84 months (Range: 2-300). 78% (74) had one implant in situ, with the remainder having at least 2 in situ. Transobturator tapes (TVT-O/TOT) were the most common implants [35% (43)]. Chronic Pelvic or abdominal pain was the most common clinical symptom [73.2% (71/112 primary complaints)] with provoked tenderness on examination being the most common clinical finding [27.8% (32/115 clinical findings)]. MRI was more likely to detect abdominally placed implants [100% (all 30)] and Retropubic Tapes [89% (16/18)] when compared to Transvaginal POP implants [87.5% (28/32)] and TVT-O/TOT [67% (29/43)]. MRI identified both cases of Sacrocolpopexy mesh rupture as well as all 11 cases of infection (100%). In 91% (10/11) of these cases, MRI revealed the infection to be more widespread than clinical findings initially suspected. Cohen's Kappa demonstrated excellent correlation between MRI and surgical findings in cases with implant related infection, rupture and normal findings (κ = 1; z = 4.58; p = 0.00000459). CONCLUSION(S): MRI can be a useful tool in assessment and management of patients with complications from implants. MRI can detect infection that may be more extensive that is initially clinically apparent in the outpatient setting. Abdominal implants appear to be easier to detect than transvaginal meshes and trans obturator tapes.