RESUMO
This report provides a summary of the third meeting of the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative held in San Diego, CA, U.S.A., 6-7 April 2013 (HOME III). The meeting addressed the four domains that had previously been agreed should be measured in every eczema clinical trial: clinical signs, patient-reported symptoms, long-term control and quality of life. Formal presentations and nominal group techniques were used at this working meeting, attended by 56 voting participants (31 of whom were dermatologists). Significant progress was made on the domain of clinical signs. Without reference to any named scales, it was agreed that the intensity and extent of erythema, excoriation, oedema/papulation and lichenification should be included in the core outcome measure for the scale to have content validity. The group then discussed a systematic review of all scales measuring the clinical signs of eczema and their measurement properties, followed by a consensus vote on which scale to recommend for inclusion in the core outcome set. Research into the remaining three domains was presented, followed by discussions. The symptoms group and quality of life groups need to systematically identify all available tools and rate the quality of the tools. A definition of long-term control is needed before progress can be made towards recommending a core outcome measure.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: To evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery were eligible. Patients underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced) before CRT, during CRT (week 3) and after CRT (1 week prior to surgery). Whole tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and Ktrans histogram quantiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th) were extracted for analysis. The associations between ADC and Ktrans at three timepoints with time to relapse were analysed as a continuous variable using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included in this analysis. The median follow-up was 4.4 years. No patient had locoregional relapse. Nine patients developed distant metastases. The hazard ratios for after CRT Ktrans 10th (P = 0.035), 25th (P = 0.048), 50th (P = 0.046) and 75th (P = 0.045) quantiles were statistically significant for DFS. The best Ktrans cut-off point after CRT for predicting relapse was 28 × 10-3 mL/g/min (10th quantile), with a higher Ktrans value predicting distant relapse. The 4-year DFS probability was 0.93 for patients with after CRT Ktrans value ≤28 × 10-3 mL/g/min versus 0.45 for patients with after CRT Ktrans value >28 × 10-3 mL/g/min. ADC was not able to predict DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher Ktrans values after CRT (before surgery) in a histogram analysis of whole tumour heterogeneity had a significantly lower 4-year distant DFS and could be considered for more intense systemic therapy.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia , Neoplasias Retais , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Perfusão , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Three-dimensional ultrasound is a new modality finding its way into clinical practice. Most of the major ultrasound vendors are now developing three-dimensional ultrasound capabilities. We expect that although three-dimensional ultrasound will not replace two-dimensional ultrasound, many additional benefits will be identified and its use will continue to grow. The ability to evaluate anatomy and pathology with multiplanar and surface-rendered images provides physicians additional valuable clinical information. Volume data allows for a specific point in space to be evaluated from many different orienta tions by rotating, slicing, and referencing the slice to other orthogonal slices. It also allows for new volume-rendering displays that show depth, curvature, and surface images not available with conventional methods. The current limitations of image resolution, intuitive interfaces for obtaining and displaying optimal images, and technologic limitations for data storage and manipulation (including real-time three-dimensional ultrasound) will surely be overcome in the near future.