Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 40(4): 605-611, 2024 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38376123

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and dependent cannabis use or cannabis use disorder (CUD+) are independent risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Usage of cannabis for pain increased in IBD patients. However, associated cardiovascular safety remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) associated with CUD + in hospitalized IBD patients. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample 2020 using ICD-10-CM codes; hospitalized IBD patients were identified and divided based on CUD's presence or absence. Multivariable regression models were performed to evaluate MACCE [in-hospital mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiac arrest (CA), and acute ischemic stroke (AIS)] odds after adjusting for baseline demographics, hospital-level characteristics, and relevant cardiac/extra-cardiac morbidities. RESULTS: Among the 302,770 hospitalized adult IBD patients, 3.1% (9,490) had CUD+. The majority of patients in the CUD + cohort were white (67.7%), male (57.5%), and aged between 18 and 44 years (66.2%). Cardiovascular risk factors like hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and prior myocardial infarction were higher in the CUD - cohort (p <0.001) compared to the CUD + cohort. The CUD + cohort had a lower rate of MACCE (3.1% vs. 5.8%), crude in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs. 2.2%), AMI (1.7% vs. 2.6%), CA (0.3% vs. 0.7%), and AIS (0.6% vs. 1.2%) with statistical significance (p <0.001). However, after adjusting for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) did not show a statistically significant difference for MACCE (aOR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.65-1.25, p = 0.530), CA (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.2-1.47, p = 0.227), and AIS (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.43-1.73, p = 0.669). CONCLUSION: Our study did not find a statistically significant difference in MACCE among hospitalized IBD patients with and without CUD. This emphasizes the need for more extensive prospective studies focusing on the quantity, method, and duration of cannabis use (recreational or medicinal) in patients with IBD.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , AVC Isquêmico , Infarto do Miocárdio , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pacientes Internados , AVC Isquêmico/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Hospitalização
2.
J Clin Med ; 13(10)2024 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792362

RESUMO

Background: Obesity or overweight raises the risk of developing 13 types of cancer, representing 40% of all cancers diagnosed in the United States annually. Given the ongoing debate surrounding the impact of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) on cardiovascular outcomes, it is crucial to comprehend the incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCEs) and the influence of MHO on these outcomes in cancer patients. Methods: Data of hospitalized cancer patients with and without obesity were analyzed from the National Inpatient Sample 2016-2020. Metabolically healthy patients were identified by excluding diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia using Elixhauser comorbidity software, v.2022.1. After that, we performed a multivariable regression analysis for in-hospital MACCEs and other individual outcomes. Results: We identified 3,111,824 cancer-related hospitalizations between 2016 and 2020. The MHO cohort had 199,580 patients (6.4%), whereas the MHnO (metabolically healthy non-obese) cohort had 2,912,244 patients (93.6%). The MHO cohort had a higher proportion of females, Blacks, and Hispanics. Outcomes including in-hospital MACCEs (7.9% vs. 9.5%; p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (6.1% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.001), and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1.5% vs. 1.6%; p < 0.001) were lower in the MHO cohort compared to the MHnO cohort. Upon adjusting for the baseline characteristics, the MHO group had lower odds of in-hospital MACCEs [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.93, 95% CI (0.90-0.97), p < 0.001], all-cause mortality [AOR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.87-0.94); p < 0.001], and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) [AOR = 0.76, 95% CI (0.69-0.84); p < 0.001], whereas there were higher odds of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [AOR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.01-1.16); p < 0.001] and cardiac arrest (CA) [AOR = 1.26, 95% CI (1.01-1.57); p = 0.045] in the MHO cohort compared to the MHnO cohort. Conclusions: Hospitalized cancer patients with MHO exhibited a lower prevalence of in-hospital MACCEs than those with MHnO. Additional prospective studies and randomized clinical trials are imperative to validate these findings, particularly in stratifying MHO across various cancer types and their corresponding risks of in-hospital MACCEs.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA