Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection: Evaluating biopsy-based transcript diagnostics in the presence of donor-specific antibodies but without microvascular inflammation, a single-center descriptive analysis.

Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics may identify molecular antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) when microvascular inflammation (MVI) is absent. In this single-center cohort, biopsy-based transcript diagnostics were validated in 326 kidney allograft biopsies. A total of 71 histological AMR and 35 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases were identified as molecular AMR and TCMR in 55% and 63%, respectively. Among 121 cases without MVI (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis = 0), 45 (37%) donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive and 76 (63%) DSA-negative cases were analyzed. Twenty-one out of the 121 (17%) cases showed borderline changes, or TCMR, while BK nephropathy was excluded. None of the 45 DSA-positive patients showed molecular AMR. Among 76 DSA-negative patients, 2 had mixed molecular AMR/TCMR. All-AMR phenotype scores (sum of R4-R6) exhibited median values of 0.13 and 0.12 for DSA-positive and DSA-negative patients, respectively (P = .84). A total of 13% (6/45) DSA-positive and 11% (8/76) DSA-negative patients showed an all-AMR phenotype score > 0.30 (P = .77). Patients with a higher all-AMR phenotype score showed 33% more histologic TCMR (P = .005). The median all-AMR phenotype scores of glomerular basement membrane double contours = 0 and glomerular basement membrane double contours > 0 biopsies were 0.12 and 0.10, respectively (P = .35). Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics did not identify molecular AMR in cases without MVI. Follow-up biopsies and outcome data should evaluate the clinical relevance of subthreshold molecular alterations.

Limitations of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics to detect T cell-mediated allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Isolated Tubulitis, Borderline Changes, and Isolated Arteritis suspicious for histologic T cell-mediated rejection (hTCMR) remain findings of uncertain significance. Although the Molecular Microscope Diagnostics System (MMDx) has not been trained on those lesions, it was suggested that MMDx might reclassify a subgroup to molecular TCMR (mTCMR). METHODS: In this single-center cohort of 326 consecutive, unselected kidney allograft biopsies assessed by histology and MMDx, we analyzed 249 cases with Isolated Tubulitis (i0, t1-3, v0; n=101), Borderline Changes (according to Banff 2022, v0; n=9), Isolated Arteritis (no borderline, v1; n=37), No Inflammation (i0, t0, v0; n=67) and a Positive Control Cohort (hTCMR, n=27; Mixed histologic Rejection, n=8; both according to Banff 2022; total n=35). The first three groups were summarized as TCMR-Suspicion (n=147). Subcategorization included the presence and absence of microvascular inflammation (MVI; g+ptc≥2). Molecular rejection rates and differentiation were investigated. RESULTS: Molecular rejection rates were 37/147 cases (25.2%; 32 with MVI) in TCMR-Suspicion, 6/67 (9%; 4 with MVI) in No Inflammation and 30/35 (85.7%; 19 with MVI) in the Positive Control Cohort. Molecular antibody-mediated rejection (mAMR) was present in 39/73 (53.4%) of cases. The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) at the time of the biopsy was high (127/249, 51%). Only 3 mAMR/TCMR and no pure mTCMR cases were detected in TCMR-Suspicion and No Inflammation, compared to 12 mAMR/TCMR and 10 mTCMR cases in the Positive Control Cohort (p<0.001). Even though the TCMR-specific molecular (Classifier) score differentiated between TCMR-Suspicion and No Inflammation (p=0.005), rejection phenotype scores (R2 and R3) did not (p=0.157 and 0.121). CONCLUSIONS: MMDx did not identify pure mTCMR among Isolated Tubulitis, Borderline Changes, or Isolated Arteritis, likely due to low sensitivity for TCMR-lesions. However, it identified mAMR or mAMR/TCMR, especially in cases with MVI. Subthreshold findings remain to be further studied.

Antitumor effects of curcumin in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma in combination with chemotherapy and phototherapy in vitro.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma, has an unfavorable outcome in advanced tumor stages with less than 30% failure­free survival. Curcumin (CUR) is a promising drug in complementary oncology with few side effects but proven efficacy in various adult oncological entities. The present study analyzed the effects of CUR on pediatric (RMS) cell lines in vitro. RMS cell lines (RD and RH30), and skeletal muscle cells (SKMC) were treated with different doses of CUR (1.5­30 µM) alone, with phototherapy (PDT, 488 nm) or in combination with vincristine (VCR) or dactinomycin (DAC). MTT assays were used for analysis of RMS tumor cell viability. Clonal cell growth was assessed via colony forming assays and migration of the cells was analyzed with scratch tests. Annexin V staining was used to determine apoptosis in flow cytometry. Possible RMS resistance towards CUR after long­term treatment was analyzed with MTT assays. CUR decreased cell viability in all assessed RMS cell lines in a concentration­dependent manner with IC50=14­20 µM. CUR enhanced the effects of the cytotoxic drugs VCR or DAC, and led to reduced migration and increased cell apoptosis. In combination with PDT, CUR decreased the cell viability in minute quantities with up to a 10­fold lower IC50 than without PDT. CUR effectively inhibited the malignant properties of pediatric RMS cells and should be focused on as a useful additional agent in standard chemotherapy of RMS in children.

Photodynamic Therapy Potentiates the Effects of Curcumin on Pediatric Epithelial Liver Tumor Cells.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Curcumin (CUM) is a promising agent in complementary oncology. The present study analyzed the photoactive properties of curcumin on pediatric epithelial liver tumor cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hepatoblastoma cell lines (HuH6, HepT1) and hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2, HC-AFW1) were treated with curcumin and exposed to blue light (phototherapy, 480 nm, 300 W). Cell viability (MTT tests), cellular oxidative stress (production of reactive oxygen species (ROS)) and cellular uptake/degradation of curcumin were analyzed. RESULTS: Significant loss of viability resulted from 24-48 h incubation with curcumin. With photodynamic therapy (PDT), even short time incubation (1 h) with curcumin resulted in significantly lower half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) (p<0.001, two-way ANOVA). Significant ROS production was observed with PDT and curcumin. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy strongly enhances the anticancer properties of curcumin in pediatric solid liver tumors in vitro.

Effects of curcumin in pediatric epithelial liver tumors: inhibition of tumor growth and alpha-fetoprotein in vitro and in vivo involving the NFkappaB- and the beta-catenin pathways.

In children with hepatocellular carcinoma (pHCC) the 5-year overall survival rate is poor. Effects of cytostatic therapies such as cisplatin and doxorubicin are limited due to chemoresistance and tumor relapse. In adult HCC, several antitumor properties are described for the use of curcumin. Curcumin is one of the best-investigated phytochemicals in complementary oncology without relevant side effects. Its use is limited by low bioavailability. Little is known about the influence of curcumin on pediatric epithelial hepatic malignancies. We investigated the effects of curcumin in combination with cisplatin on two pediatric epithelial liver tumor cell lines. As mechanisms of action inhibition of NFkappaB, beta-catenin, and decrease of cyclin D were identified. Using a mouse xenograft model we could show a significant decrease of alpha-fetoprotein after combination therapy of oral micellar curcumin and cisplatin. Significant concentrations of curcuminoids were found in blood samples, organ lysates, and tumor tissue after oral micellar curcumin administration. Micellar curcumin in combination with cisplatin can be a promising strategy for treatment of pediatric HCC.