RESUMO
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The proximity or overlap of PTV and OAR poses a major challenge in SBRT of pancreatic cancer (PACA). This international treatment planning benchmark study investigates whether Simultaneously Integrated Boost (SIB) and Protection (SIP) concepts in PACA SBRT can lead to improved and harmonized plan quality. MATERIALS/METHODS: A multiparametric specification of desired target doses (GTVD50%, GTVD99%, PTVD95%, PTV0.5cc) with two prescription doses of GTVD50%=5×9.2Gy (46Gy) and GTVD50%=8×8.25Gy (66Gy) and OAR limits were distributed with planning CT and contours from 3 PACA patients. In phase 1, plans were ranked using a scoring system for comparison of trade-offs between GTV/PTV and OAR. In phase 2, re-planning was performed for the most challenging case and prescription with dedicated SIB and SIP contours provided for optimization after group discussion. RESULTS: For all 3 cases and both phases combined, 292 plans were generated from 42 institutions in 5 countries using commonly available treatment planning systems. The GTVD50% prescription was performed by only 76% and 74% of planners within 2% for 5 and 8 fractions, respectively. The GTVD99% goal was mostly reached, while the balance between OAR and target dose showed initial SIB/SIP-like optimization strategies in about 50% of plans. For plan ranking, 149 and 217 score penalties were given for 5 and 8 fractions, pointing to improvement possibilities. For phase 2, the GTVD50% prescription was performed by 95% of planners within 2% and GTVD99% as well as OAR doses were better harmonized with notable less score penalties. Fourteen of 19 planners improved their plan rank, 9 of them by at least 2 ranks. CONCLUSION: Dedicated SIB/SIP concepts in combination with multiparametric prescriptions and constraints can lead to overall harmonized and high treatment plan quality for PACA SBRT. Standardized SIB/SIP treatment planning in multicenter clinical trials appears feasible after group consensus and training.
RESUMO
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the differences between dose distributions calculated with the pencil beam (PB) and X-ray voxel Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms for patients with lung cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or HybridArc techniques. The 2 algorithms were compared in terms of dose-volume histograms, under normal and deep inspiration breath hold, and in terms of the tumor control probability (TCP). The dependence of the differences in tumor volume and location was investigated. Dosimetric validation was performed using Gafchromic EBT3 (International Specialty Products, ISP, Wayne, NJ). Forty-five Computed Tomography (CT) data sets were used for this study; 40 Gy at 8 Gy/fraction was prescribed with 5 noncoplanar 6-MV IMRT beams or 3 to 4 dynamic conformal arcs with 3 to 5 IMRT beams distributed per arc. The plans were first calculated with PB and then recalculated with MC. The difference between the mean tumor doses was approximately 10% ± 4%; these differences were even larger under deep inspiration breath hold. Differences between the mean tumor dose correlated with tumor volume and path length of the beams. The TCP values changed from 99.87% ± 0.24% to 96.78% ± 4.81% for both PB- and MC-calculated plans (P = .009). When a fraction of hypoxic cells was considered, the mean TCP values changed from 76.01% ± 5.83% to 34.78% ± 18.06% for the differently calculated plans (P < .0001). When the plans were renormalized to the same mean dose at the tumor, the mean TCP for oxic cells was 99.05% ± 1.59% and for hypoxic cells was 60.20% ± 9.53%. This study confirms that the MC algorithm adequately accounts for inhomogeneities. The inclusion of the MC in the process of IMRT optimization could represent a further step in the complex problem of determining the optimal treatment plan.