Deep learning-based scan range optimization can reduce radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is essential in diagnosing coronary heart disease. However, a disadvantage is the associated radiation exposure to the patient which depends in part on the scan range. This study aimed to develop a deep neural network to optimize the delimitation of scan ranges in CT localizers to reduce the radiation dose. METHODS: On a retrospective training cohort of 1507 CT localizers randomly selected from calcium scoring and angiography scans and acquired between 2010 and 2017, optimized scan ranges were delimited by two radiologists in consensus. A neural network was trained to reproduce the scan ranges and was tested on two randomly selected and independent validation cohorts: an internal cohort of 233 CT localizers (January 2018-June 2020) and an external cohort from a nearby hospital of 298 CT localizers (July 2020-December 2020). Localizers where a bypass surgery was visible were excluded. The effective radiation dose to the patient was simulated using a Monte Carlo simulation. Scan ranges of radiographers, radiologists, and the network were compared using an equivalence test; likewise, the reduction in effective dose was tested using a superior test. RESULTS: The network replicated the radiologists' scan ranges with a Dice score of 96.5 ± 0.02 (p < 0.001, indicating equivalence). The generated scan ranges resulted in an effective dose reduction of 10.0% (p = 0.002) in the internal cohort and 12.6% (p < 0.001) in the external cohort compared to the scan ranges delimited by radiographers in clinical routine. CONCLUSIONS: Automatic delimitation of the scan range can result in a radiation dose reduction to the patient. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Fully automated delimitation of the scan range using a deep neural network enables a significant reduction in radiation exposure during CT coronary angiography compared to manual examination planning. It can also reduce the workload of the radiographers. KEY POINTS: • Scan range delimitation for coronary computed tomography angiography could be performed with high accuracy by a deep neural network. • Automated scan ranges showed a high agreement of 96.5% with the scan ranges of radiologists. • Using a Monte Carlo simulation, automated scan ranges reduced the effective dose to the patient by up to 12.6% (0.9 mSv) compared to the scan ranges of radiographers in clinical routine.

Radiation dose and fluoroscopy time of aneurysm coiling in patients with unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms as a function of aneurysm size, location, and patient age.

PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) requires a risk-benefit analysis and adherence to diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). The national DRL (250 Gy·cm2) is only determined for intracranial aneurysm coiling in general, including ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs). This study aims to investigate the dose in the treatment of UIAs and RIAs separately. METHODS: In a retrospective study design, dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were assessed for all patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm coiling between 2010 and 2021. DRL was set as the 75th percentile of the dose distribution. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to investigate DAP and FT for the two groups, UIA and RIA adjusted for patient age, aneurysm size, and location. RESULTS: 583 (414 females, mean age 56.5 years, 311 UIAs) are included. In the overall population, DAP (median (IQR)) is 157 Gy·cm2 (108-217) with a median FT of 32.7 min (IQR 24.0-47.0). Local DRL is 183 Gy·cm2 for UIAs and 246 Gy·cm2 for RIAs. After adjustment for the other variables, the UIA and RIA groups have a significant effect on both DAP (p < 0.001; 95% CI - 68.432 - - 38.040) and FT (p < 0.001; 95% CI - 628.279 - - 291.254). In general, both DAP and FT increase significantly with patient age and aneurysm size, whereas the location of the aneurysm did not significantly change neither DAP (p = 0.171; 95% CI - 5.537-31.065) nor FT (p = 0.136; 95% CI - 357.391-48.508). CONCLUSION: Both aneurysm size and patient age were associated with increased DAP, whereas aneurysm location did not significantly change DAP or FT. The increased dose in patients with RIAs is likely equivalent to additional diagnostic cerebral four-vessel angiography performed in this group.

An Image Quality-informed Framework for CT Characterization.

Background Lack of standardization in CT protocol choice contributes to radiation dose variation. Purpose To create a framework to assess radiation doses within broad CT categories defined according to body region and clinical imaging indication and to cluster indications according to the dose required for sufficient image quality. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study using Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine metadata. CT examinations in adults from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 from the University of California San Francisco International CT Dose Registry were grouped into 19 categories according to body region and required radiation dose levels. Five body regions had a single dose range (ie, extremities, neck, thoracolumbar spine, combined chest and abdomen, and combined thoracolumbar spine). Five additional regions were subdivided according to dose. Head, chest, cardiac, and abdomen each had low, routine, and high dose categories; combined head and neck had routine and high dose categories. For each category, the median and 75th percentile (ie, diagnostic reference level [DRL]) were determined for dose-length product, and the variation in dose within categories versus across categories was calculated and compared using an analysis of variance. Relative median and DRL (95% CI) doses comparing high dose versus low dose categories were calculated. Results Among 4.5 million examinations, the median and DRL doses varied approximately 10 times between categories compared with between indications within categories. For head, chest, abdomen, and cardiac (3 266 546 examinations [72%]), the relative median doses were higher in examinations assigned to the high dose categories than in examinations assigned to the low dose categories, suggesting the assignment of indications to the broad categories is valid (head, 3.4-fold higher [95% CI: 3.4, 3.5]; chest, 9.6 [95% CI: 9.3, 10.0]; abdomen, 2.4 [95% CI: 2.4, 2.5]; and cardiac, 18.1 [95% CI: 17.7, 18.6]). Results were similar for DRL doses (all P < .001). Conclusion Broad categories based on image quality requirements are a suitable framework for simplifying radiation dose assessment, according to expected variation between and within categories. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Mahesh in this issue.

Diagnostic reference levels and median doses for common clinical indications of CT: findings from an international registry.

OB JECTIVES: The European Society of Radiology identified 10 common indications for computed tomography (CT) as part of the European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs, EUCLID), to help standardize radiation doses. The objective of this study is to generate DRLs and median doses for these indications using data from the UCSF CT International Dose Registry. METHODS: Standardized data on 3.7 million CTs in adults were collected between 2016 and 2019 from 161 institutions across seven countries (United States of America (US), Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany, UK, Israel, Japan). DRLs (75th percentile) and median doses for volumetric CT-dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were assessed for each EUCLID category (chronic sinusitis, stroke, cervical spine trauma, coronary calcium scoring, lung cancer, pulmonary embolism, coronary CT angiography, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colic/abdominal pain, appendicitis), and US radiation doses were compared with European. RESULTS: The number of CT scans within EUCLID categories ranged from 8,933 (HCC) to over 1.2 million (stroke). There was greater variation in dose between categories than within categories (p < .001), and doses were significantly different between categories within anatomic areas. DRLs and median doses were assessed for all categories. DRLs were higher in the US for 9 of the 10 indications (except chronic sinusitis) than in Europe but with a significantly higher sample size in the US. CONCLUSIONS: DRLs for CTDIvol and DLP for EUCLID clinical indications from diverse organizations were established and can contribute to dose optimization. These values were usually significantly higher in the US than in Europe. KEY POINTS: • Registry data were used to create benchmarks for 10 common indications for CT identified by the European Society of Radiology. • Observed US radiation doses were higher than European for 9 of 10 indications (except chronic sinusitis). • The presented diagnostic reference levels and median doses highlight potentially unnecessary variation in radiation dose.

Radiation exposure in the endovascular therapy of cranial and spinal dural arteriovenous fistula in the last decade: a retrospective, single-center observational study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in the endovascular therapy (EVT) of patients with cranial and spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF). METHODS: In a retrospective study design, DRLs and achievable dose (AD) were assessed for all patients with cranial and spinal dAVF undergoing EVT (I) or diagnostic angiography (II). All procedures were performed at the flat-panel angiography-system Allura Xper (Philips Healthcare). Interventional procedures were differentiated according to the region of fistula and the type of procedure. RESULTS: In total, 264 neurointerventional procedures of 131 patients with dAVF (94 cranial, 37 spinal) were executed between 02/2010 and 12/2020. The following DRLs, AD, and mean values could be determined: for cranial dAVF (I) DRL 507.33 Gy cm2, AD 369.79 Gy cm2, mean 396.51 Gy cm2; (II) DRL 256.65 Gy cm2, AD 214.19 Gy cm2, mean 211.80 Gy cm2; for spinal dAVF (I) DRL 482.72 Gy cm2, AD 275.98 Gy cm2, mean 347.12 Gy cm2; (II) DRL 396.39 Gy cm2, AD 210.57 Gy cm2, mean 299.55 Gy cm2. Dose levels of EVT were significantly higher compared to diagnostic angiographies (p < 0.001). No statistical difference in dose levels regarding the localization of dAVF was found. CONCLUSION: Our results could be used for establishing DRLs in the EVT of cranial and spinal dAVF. Because radiation exposure to comparably complex interventions such as AVM embolization is similar, it may be useful to determine general DRLs for both entities together.

Radiation exposure and establishment of diagnostic reference levels of whole-body low-dose CT for the assessment of multiple myeloma with second- and third-generation dual-source CT.

BACKGROUND: In the assessment of diseases causing skeletal lesions such as multiple myeloma (MM), whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is a sensitive diagnostic imaging modality, which has the potential to replace the conventional radiographic survey. PURPOSE: To optimize radiation protection and examine radiation exposure, and effective and organ doses of WBLDCT using different modern dual-source CT (DSCT) devices, and to establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 281 WBLDCT scans of 232 patients performed between January 2017 and April 2020 either on a second- (A) or third-generation (B) DSCT device could be included. Radiation exposure indices and organ and effective doses were calculated using a commercially available automated dose-tracking software based on Monte-Carlo simulation techniques. RESULTS: The radiation exposure indices and effective doses were distributed as follows (median, interquartile range): (A) second-generation DSCT: volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) 1.78 mGy (1.47-2.17 mGy); dose length product (DLP) 282.8 mGy·cm (224.6-319.4 mGy·cm), effective dose (ED) 1.87 mSv (1.61-2.17 mSv) and (B) third-generation DSCT: CTDIvol 0.56 mGy (0.47-0.67 mGy), DLP 92.0 mGy·cm (73.7-107.6 mGy·cm), ED 0.61 mSv (0.52-0.69 mSv). Radiation exposure indices and effective and organ doses were significantly lower with third-generation DSCT (P < 0.001). Local DRLs could be set for CTDIvol at 0.75 mGy and DLP at 120 mGy·cm. CONCLUSION: Third-generation DSCT requires significantly lower radiation dose for WBLDCT than second-generation DSCT and has an effective dose below reported doses for radiographic skeletal surveys. To ensure radiation protection, DRLs regarding WBLDCT are required, where our locally determined values may help as benchmarks.

Diagnostic reference levels for chest computed tomography in children as a function of patient size.

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposures from computed tomography (CT) in children are inadequately studied. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) can help optimise radiation doses. OBJECTIVE: To determine local DRLs for paediatric chest CT performed mainly on modern dual-source, multi-slice CT scanners as a function of patient size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-eight chest CT scans in 345 children under 15 years (y) of age (median age: 8 y, interquartile range [IQR]: 4-13 y) performed on four different CT scanners (38% on third-generation and 43% on second-generation dual-source CT) between November 2013 and December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Examinations were grouped by water-equivalent diameter as a measure of patient size. DRLs for volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were determined for six different patient sizes and compared to national and European DRLs. RESULTS: The DRLs for CTDIvol and DLP are determined for each patient size group as a function of water-equivalent diameter as follows: (I) < 13 cm (n = 22; median: age 7 months): 0.4 mGy, 7 mGy·cm; (II) 13 cm to less than 17 cm (n = 151; median: age 3 y): 1.2 mGy, 25 mGy·cm; (III) 17 cm to less than 21 cm (n = 211; median: age 8 y): 1.7 mGy, 44 mGy·cm; (IV) 21 cm to less than 25 cm (n = 97; median: age 14 y): 3.0 mGy, 88 mGy·cm; (V) 25 cm to less than 29 cm (n = 42; median: age 14 y): 4.5 mGy, 135 mGy·cm; (VI) ≥ 29 cm (n = 15; median: age 14 y): 8.0 mGy, 241 mGy·cm. Compared with corresponding age and weight groups, our size-based DRLs for DLP are 54% to 71% lower than national and 23% to 85% lower than European DRLs. CONCLUSION: We developed DRLs for paediatric chest CT as a function of patient size with substantially lower values than national and European DRLs. Precise knowledge of size-based DRLs may assist other institutions in further dose optimisation in children.

Radiation dose aspects and establishment of diagnostic reference levels for90Y radioembolisation during angiographic procedure.

90Y radioembolisation (RE) is an angiographic procedure used in patients with both primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Local tumour control can be achieved by short range tumour irradiation by the regional intra-arterial administration of glass or resin microspheres loaded with 90yttrium that accumulate in the tumorous tissue. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiation exposure of RE and to establish a local diagnostic reference level (DRL). In this retrospective study, dose data from 397 procedures in 306 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 10.6 years, 82 female) who underwent RE between 06/2017 and 01/2022 using one of two different angiography systems were analysed. DRL was set as the 75th percentile of the dose distribution. In the overall population, dose area product (DAP) (median (interquartile range, IQR)) was 26 Gy cm2(IQR 12-50) with a median fluoroscopy time (FT) of 4.5 min (IQR 2.9-8.0). FT and DAP increased significantly with the number of infusion positions (median, IQR): one position 23 Gy cm2(12-46), two positions 33 Gy cm2(14-60), three positions 50 Gy cm2(24-82) (p< 0.0001). Local DRL is 47 Gy cm2for RE and 111 Gy cm2for RE with additional embolisation. Radiation exposure and FT are significantly higher with increasing number of infusion positions as well as additional embolisation. Our established DRLs for RE may serve as a benchmark for dose optimisation.

Radiation exposure, organ and effective dose of CT-guided liver biopsy as a function of lesion depth and size.

Computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous biopsies play an important role in the diagnostic workup of liver lesions. Because radiation dose accumulates rapidly due to repeated image acquisition in a relatively small scan area, analysing radiation exposure is critical for improving radiation protection of CT-guided interventions. The aim of this study was to assess the radiation dose of CT-guided liver biopsies and the influence of lesion parameters, and to establish a local diagnostic reference level (DRL). In this observational retrospective cohort study, dose data of 60 CT-guided liver biopsies between September 2016 and July 2017 were analysed. Radiation exposure was reported for volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), dose-length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED). Radiation dose of CT-guided liver biopsy was (median (interquartile range)): CTDIvol9.91 mGy (8.33-11.45 mGy), SSDE 10.42 mGy (9.39-11.70 mGy), DLP 542 mGy cm (410-733 mGy cm), ED 8.52 mSv (7.17-13.25 mSv). Radiation exposure was significantly higher in biopsies of deep liver lesions compared to superficial lesions (DLP 679 ± 285 mGy cm vs. 497 ± 167 mGy cm,p= 0.0046). No significant dose differences were observed for differences in lesion or needle size. With helical CT spirals additional to the biopsy-guiding axial CT scans, radiation exposure was significantly increased: 797 ± 287 mGy cm vs. 495 ± 162 mGy cm,p< 0.0001. The local DRL is CTDIvol9.91 mGy, DLP 542 mGy cm. Radiation dose is significantly increased in biopsies of deeper liver lesions compared with superficial lesions. Interventions with additional biopsy-guiding CT spirals lead to higher radiation doses. This study provides a detailed analysis of local radiation doses for CT-guided liver biopsies and provides a benchmark for optimising radiation protection in interventional radiology.

Radiation exposure in the intra-arterial nimodipine therapy of subarachnoid hemorrhage related cerebral vasospasm.

The selective intra-arterial nimodipine application for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm (CVS) in patients after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (sSAH) is widely employed. The purpose of this study is to examine the radiation exposure and to determine local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of intra-arterial nimodipine therapy. In a retrospective study design, DRLs and achievable dose (AD) were assessed for all patients undergoing (I) selective intra-arterial nimodipine application or (II) additional mechanical angioplasty for CVS treatment. Interventional procedures were differentiated according to the type of procedure and the number of probed vessels. Altogether 494 neurointerventional procedures of 121 patients with CVS due to sSAH could be included. The radiation exposure indices were distributed as follows: (I) DRL 74.3 Gy·cm2, AD 59.8 Gy·cm2; (II) DRL 128.3 Gy·cm2, AD 94.5 Gy·cm2. Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed significant dose difference considering the number of probed vessels (p< 0.001). The mean cumulative dose per patient was 254.9 Gy·cm2(interquartile range 88.6-315.6 Gy·cm2). The DRLs of intra-arterial nimodipine therapy are substantially lower compared with DRLs proposed for other therapeutic interventions, such as thrombectomy or aneurysm coiling. However, repeated therapy sessions are often required, bearing the potential risk of a cumulatively higher radiation exposure.

Radiation exposure of computed tomography imaging for the assessment of acute stroke.

PURPOSE: To assess suspected acute stroke, the computed tomography (CT) protocol contains a non-contrast CT (NCCT), a CT angiography (CTA), and a CT perfusion (CTP). Due to assumably high radiation doses of the complete protocol, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and to establish diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). METHODS: In this retrospective study, dose data of 921 patients with initial CT imaging for suspected acute stroke and dose monitoring with a DICOM header-based tracking and monitoring software were analyzed. Between June 2017 and January 2020, 1655 CT scans were included, which were performed on three different modern multi-slice CT scanners, including 921 NCCT, 465 CTA, and 269 CTP scans. Radiation exposure was reported for CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP). DRLs were set at the 75th percentile of dose distribution. RESULTS: DRLs were assessed for each step (CTDIvol/DLP): NCCT 33.9 mGy/527.8 mGy cm and CTA 13.7 mGy/478.3 mGy cm. Radiation exposure of CTP was invariable and depended on CT device and its protocol settings with CTDIvol 124.9-258.2 mGy and DLP 1852.6-3044.3 mGy cm. CONCLUSION: Performing complementary CT techniques such as CTA and CTP for the assessment of acute stroke increases total radiation exposure. Hence, the revised DRLs for the complete protocol are required, where our local DRLs may help as benchmarks.

Estimation of radiation exposure of children undergoing superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma treatment: assessment of local diagnostic reference levels as a function of age, sex, and interventional success.

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) procedures of pediatric patients with retinoblastoma (RB) to provide data for establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in pediatric interventional radiology (IR). METHODS: In a retrospective study design, LDRLs and achievable dose (AD) were assessed for children undergoing superselective IAC for RB treatment. All procedures were performed at the flat-panel angiography systems (I) ArtisQ biplane (Siemens Healthineers) and (II) Allura Xper (Philips Healthcare). Patients were differentiated according to age (A1: 1-3 months; A2: 4-12 months; A3: 13-72 months; A4: 73 months-10 years; A5: > 10 years), sex, conducted or not-conducted chemotherapy. RESULTS: 248 neurointerventional procedures of 130 pediatric patients (median age 14.5 months, range 5-127 months) with RB (68 unilateral, 62 bilateral) could be included between January 2010 and March 2020. The following diagnostic reference values, AD, and mean values could be determined: (A2) DRL 3.9 Gy cm2, AD 2.9 Gy cm2, mean 3.5 Gy cm2; (A3) DRL 7.0 Gy cm2, AD 4.3 Gy cm2, mean 6.0 Gy cm2; (A4) DRL 14.5 Gy cm2, AD 10.7 Gy cm2, mean 10.8 Gy cm2; (A5) AD 8.8 Gy cm2, mean 8.8 Gy cm2. Kruskal-Wallis-test confirmed a significant dose difference between the examined age groups (A2-A5) (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference considering sex (p = 0.076) and conducted or not-conducted chemotherapy (p = 0.627). A successful procedure was achieved in 207/248 cases. CONCLUSION: We report on radiation exposure during superselective IAC of a pediatric cohort at the German Retinoblastoma Referral Centre. Although an IAC formally represents a therapeutic procedure, our results confirm that radiation exposure lies within the exposure of a diagnostic interventional procedure. DRLs for superselective IAC are substantially lower compared with DRLs of more complex endovascular interventions.

Experimental examination of radiation doses from cardiac and liver CT perfusion in a phantom study as a function of organ, age and sex.

Cardiac and liver computed tomography (CT) perfusion has not been routinely implemented in the clinic and requires high radiation doses. The purpose of this study is to examine the radiation exposure and technical settings for cardiac and liver CT perfusion scans at different CT scanners. Two cardiac and three liver CT perfusion protocols were examined with the N1 LUNGMAN phantom at three multi-slice CT scanners: a single-source (I) and second- (II) and third-generation (III) dual-source CT scanners. Radiation doses were reported for the CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) and a standardised DLP (DLP10cm) for cardiac and liver perfusion. The effective dose (ED10cm) for a standardised scan length of 10 cm was estimated using conversion factors based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 110 phantoms and tissue-weighting factors from ICRP 103. The proposed total lifetime attributable risk of developing cancer was determined as a function of organ, age and sex for adults. Radiation exposure for CTDIvol, DLP/DLP10 cmand ED10 cmduring CT perfusion was distributed as follows: for cardiac perfusion (II) 144 mGy, 1036 mGy·cm/1440 mGy·cm and 39 mSv, and (III) 28 mGy, 295 mGy·cm/279 mGy·cm and 8 mSv; for liver perfusion (I) 225 mGy, 3360 mGy·cm/2249 mGy·cm and 54 mSv, (II) 94 mGy, 1451 mGy·cm/937 mGy·cm and 22 mSv, and (III) 74 mGy, 1096 mGy·cm/739 mGy·cm and 18 mSv. The third-generation dual-source CT scanner applied the lowest doses. Proposed total lifetime attributable risk increased with decreasing age. Even though CT perfusion is a high-dose examination, we observed that new-generation CT scanners could achieve lower doses. There is a strong impact of organ, age and sex on lifetime attributable risk. Further investigations of the feasibility of these perfusion scans are required for clinical implementation.

Assessment of image quality and impact of deep learning-based software in non-contrast head CT scans.

In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess the objective and subjective image quality of different reconstruction techniques and a deep learning-based software on non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) images. In total, 152 adult head CT scans (77 female, 75 male; mean age 69.4 ± 18.3 years) obtained from three different CT scanners using different protocols between March and April 2021 were included. CT images were reconstructed using filtered-back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (IR), and post-processed using a deep learning-based algorithm (PS). Post-processing significantly reduced noise in FBP-reconstructed images (up to 15.4% reduction) depending on the protocol, leading to improvements in signal-to-noise ratio of up to 19.7%. However, when deep learning-based post-processing was applied to FBP images compared to IR alone, the differences were inconsistent and partly non-significant, which appeared to be protocol or site specific. Subjective assessments showed no significant overall improvement in image quality for all reconstructions and post-processing. Inter-rater reliability was low and preferences varied. Deep learning-based denoising software improved objective image quality compared to FBP in routine head CT. A significant difference compared to IR was observed for only one protocol. Subjective assessments did not indicate a significant clinical impact in terms of improved subjective image quality, likely due to the low noise levels in full-dose images.

Impact of AI-Based Post-Processing on Image Quality of Non-Contrast Computed Tomography of the Chest and Abdomen.

Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is commonly used for the evaluation of various pathologies including pulmonary infections or urolithiasis but, especially in low-dose protocols, image quality is reduced. To improve this, deep learning-based post-processing approaches are being developed. Therefore, we aimed to compare the objective and subjective image quality of different reconstruction techniques and a deep learning-based software on non-contrast chest and low-dose abdominal CTs. In this retrospective study, non-contrast chest CTs of patients suspected of COVID-19 pneumonia and low-dose abdominal CTs suspected of urolithiasis were analysed. All images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP) and were post-processed using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based commercial software (PixelShine (PS)). Additional iterative reconstruction (IR) was performed for abdominal CTs. Objective and subjective image quality were evaluated. AI-based post-processing led to an overall significant noise reduction independent of the protocol (chest or abdomen) while maintaining image information (max. difference in SNR 2.59 ± 2.9 and CNR 15.92 ± 8.9, p < 0.001). Post-processing of FBP-reconstructed abdominal images was even superior to IR alone (max. difference in SNR 0.76 ± 0.5, p ≤ 0.001). Subjective assessments verified these results, partly suggesting benefits, especially in soft-tissue imaging (p < 0.001). All in all, the deep learning-based denoising-which was non-inferior to IR-offers an opportunity for image quality improvement especially in institutions using older scanners without IR availability. Further studies are necessary to evaluate potential effects on dose reduction benefits.

Low-dose high-resolution chest CT in adults with cystic fibrosis: intraindividual comparison between photon-counting and energy-integrating detector CT.

BACKGROUND: Regular disease monitoring with low-dose high-resolution (LD-HR) computed tomography (CT) scans is necessary for the clinical management of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose of LD-HR protocols between photon-counting CT (PCCT) and energy-integrating detector system CT (EID-CT) in pwCF. METHODS: This retrospective study included 23 pwCF undergoing LD-HR chest CT with PCCT who had previously undergone LD-HR chest CT with EID-CT. An intraindividual comparison of radiation dose and image quality was conducted. The study measured the dose-length product, volumetric CT dose index, effective dose and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Three blinded radiologists assessed the overall image quality, image sharpness, and image noise using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (deficient) to 5 (very good) for image quality and image sharpness and from 1 (very high) to 5 (very low) for image noise. RESULTS: PCCT used approximately 42% less radiation dose than EID-CT (median effective dose 0.54 versus 0.93 mSv, p < 0.001). PCCT was consistently rated higher than EID-CT for overall image quality and image sharpness. Additionally, image noise was lower with PCCT compared to EID-CT. The average SNR of the lung parenchyma was lower with PCCT compared to EID-CT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In pwCF, LD-HR chest CT protocols using PCCT scans provided significantly better image quality and reduced radiation exposure compared to EID-CT. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In pwCF, regular follow-up could be performed through photon-counting CT instead of EID-CT, with substantial advantages in terms of both lower radiation exposure and increased image quality. KEY POINTS: Photon-counting CT (PCCT) and energy-integrating detector system CT (EID-CT) were compared in 23 people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Image quality was rated higher for PCCT than for EID-CT. PCCT used approximately 42% less radiation dose and offered superior image quality than EID-CT.

Fully automated MR-based virtual biopsy of primary CNS lymphomas.

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) pose a challenge as they may mimic gliomas on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging, compelling precise differentiation for appropriate treatment. This study focuses on developing an automated MRI-based workflow to distinguish between PCNSL and gliomas. Methods: MRI examinations of 240 therapy-naive patients (141 males and 99 females, mean age: 55.16 years) with cerebral gliomas and PCNSLs (216 gliomas and 24 PCNSLs), each comprising a non-contrast T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequence were included in the study. HD-GLIO, a pre-trained segmentation network, was used to generate segmentations automatically. To validate the segmentation efficiency, 237 manual segmentations were prepared (213 gliomas and 24 PCNSLs). Subsequently, radiomics features were extracted following feature selection and training of an XGBoost algorithm for classification. Results: The segmentation models for gliomas and PCNSLs achieved a mean Sørensen-Dice coefficient of 0.82 and 0.80 for whole tumors, respectively. Three classification models were developed in this study to differentiate gliomas from PCNSLs. The first model differentiated PCNSLs from gliomas, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 (F1-score: 0.75). The second model discriminated between high-grade gliomas and PCNSLs with an AUC of 0.91 (F1-score: 0.6), and the third model differentiated between low-grade gliomas and PCNSLs with an AUC of 0.95 (F1-score: 0.89). Conclusions: This study serves as a pilot investigation presenting an automated virtual biopsy workflow that distinguishes PCNSLs from cerebral gliomas. Prior to clinical use, it is necessary to validate the results in a prospective multicenter setting with a larger number of PCNSL patients.

Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) studies are requested by specialists from most medical disciplines and play a vital role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. It follows that physicians of all specialties should possess basic knowledge of computed tomography, its proper use, and the radiation exposure associated with it. METHODS: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature. RESULTS: Approximately 12 million CT studies are carried out in Germany each year, and the trend is rising. Approximately 9% of all diagnostic studies involving ionizing radiation are CT studies. On average, more than 60% of the collective effective dose due to medical radiation exposure is attributable to CT. There are two types of radiation effects caused by ionizing radiation: sto - chastic and deterministic. The additional, individual relative lifetime cancer mortality risk due to ionizing radiation with wholebody exposure at a low single dose is estimated at 5% per sievert. Radiation exposure from CT studies of the head and trunk, e.g. of a patient with polytrauma, corresponds to an additional lifetime cancer mortality risk of approximately 0.1% at an effective dose of approximately 20 millisievert. CONCLUSION: The radiation exposure due to CT, and the risks to which patients are subjected by it, have become more important with greater use of CT. Technical advances, targeted dose monitoring, and analyses of dose data can help identify areas where improvement is necessary, in furtherance of the overriding goal of lowering patients' radiation exposure while preserving adequate image quality.

Determining body height and weight from thoracic and abdominal CT localizers in pediatric and young adult patients using deep learning.

In this retrospective study, we aimed to predict the body height and weight of pediatric patients using CT localizers, which are overview scans performed before the acquisition of the CT. We trained three commonly used networks (EfficientNetV2-S, ResNet-18, and ResNet-34) on a cohort of 1009 and 1111 CT localizers of pediatric patients with recorded body height and weight (between January 2013 and December 2019) and validated them in an additional cohort of 116 and 127 localizers (acquired in 2020). The best-performing model was then tested in an independent cohort of 203 and 225 CT localizers (acquired between January 2021 and March 2023). In addition, a cohort of 1401 and 1590 localizers from younger adults (acquired between January 2013 and December 2013) was added to the training set to determine if it could improve the overall accuracy. The EfficientNetV2-S using the additional adult cohort performed best with a mean absolute error of 5.58 ± 4.26 cm for height and 4.25 ± 4.28 kg for weight. The relative error was 4.12 ± 4.05% for height and 11.28 ± 12.05% for weight. Our study demonstrated that automated estimation of height and weight in pediatric patients from CT localizers can be performed.

Individualized scan protocols for CT angiography: an animal study for contrast media or radiation dose optimization.

BACKGROUND: We investigated about optimization of contrast media (CM) dose or radiation dose in thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) by automated tube voltage selection (ATVS) system configuration and CM protocol adaption. METHODS: In six minipigs, CTA-optimized protocols were evaluated regarding objective (contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR) and subjective (6 criteria assessed by Likert scale) image quality. Scan parameters were automatically adapted by the ATVS system operating at 90-kV semi-mode and configured for standard, CM saving, or radiation dose saving (image task, quality settings). Injection protocols (dose, flow rate) were adapted manually. This approach was tested for normal and simulated obese conditions. RESULTS: Radiation exposure (volume-weighted CT dose index) for normal (obese) conditions was 2.4 ± 0.7 (5.0 ± 0.7) mGy (standard), 4.3 ± 1.1 (9.0 ± 1.3) mGy (CM reduced), and 1.7 ± 0.5 (3.5 ± 0.5) mGy (radiation reduced). The respective CM doses for normal (obese) settings were 210 (240) mgI/kg, 155 (177) mgI/kg, and 252 (288) mgI/kg. No significant differences in CNR (normal; obese) were observed between standard (17.8 ± 3.0; 19.2 ± 4.0), CM-reduced (18.2 ± 3.3; 20.5 ± 4.9), and radiation-saving CTAs (16.0 ± 3.4; 18.4 ± 4.1). Subjective analysis showed similar values for optimized and standard CTAs. Only the parameter diagnostic acceptability was significantly lower for radiation-saving CTA compared to the standard CTA. CONCLUSIONS: The CM dose (-26%) or radiation dose (-30%) for thoracoabdominal CTA can be reduced while maintaining objective and subjective image quality, demonstrating the feasibility of the personalization of CTA scan protocols. KEY POINTS: • Computed tomography angiography protocols could be adapted to individual patient requirements using an automated tube voltage selection system combined with adjusted contrast media injection. • Using an adapted automated tube voltage selection system, a contrast media dose reduction (-26%) or radiation dose reduction (-30%) could be possible.