A prospective analysis of the postoperative and long-term functional outcomes of a novel technique to perform rectal transection during laparoscopic restorative proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) technique is not standardized. An irregular division of the rectum could result in poor functional outcomes and residual diseased mucosa. The aim of the study was to develop a new technique for performing the rectal transection via a laparoscopic approach, and to compare the outcomes of this technique with those of the open surgery IPAA. METHODS: This prospective study included all patients who underwent restorative proctectomy (following a previous subtotal colectomy) for ulcerative colitis in October 2017-November 2020. Rectal division was performed using a 30 mm open linear stapler which was applied laparoscopically across the distal rectum. Postoperative and functional outcomes, length of anal stump and completeness of mucosal removal were compared. Only the patients who had their ileostomy reversed by 31 December 2020 and, therefore, a minimum follow-up of 6 months from the ileostomy closure, were included in the analysis of the functional outcomes and quality of life. RESULTS: There were 207 patients (161 laparoscopic, 46 open). Median age was 43 (18-77) years and 85 patients (41.1%) were male. Major complications (9.3 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.89) including anastomotic leaks (3.7 vs 4.4%, p = 0.84) were similar after laparoscopic and open IPAA. Patients reported a comparable number of bowel movements during the day (6 vs. 7, p = 0.21) and at night (2 vs. 2, p = 0.66), and a similar rate of episodes of incontinence during the previous 6 months (3.7 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.75). The mean Cleveland Global Quality of Life score was also similar (0.79 vs. 0.74, p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Our technique is safe and reproducible, and replicates the results of the open IPAA, while maintaining the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and avoiding any kind of anal manipulation which could result in poor long-term functional outcomes.

Mesenteric lengthening during pouch surgery: technique and outcomes in a tertiary centre.

Anastomotic complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are often associated with excessive tension and poor blood supply. Carrying out a tension-free IPAA might prove difficult in a proportion of cases, especially if mucosectomy and hand-sewn anastomosis are necessary. The aim of the study was to analyse the outcomes of mesenteric lengthening in patients undergoing IPAA in a tertiary centre. Consecutive patients who required mesenteric lengthening during IPAA surgery between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively included. Short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Chi square, Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier analysis was carried out to report the long-term rate of pouch failure. Some 131 patients (78 UC, three indeterminate colitis, 50 FAP) were included. The need for mesenteric lengthening, due to short mesentery or intraoperative complications, was unpredictable in 15 patients. The rate of surgical complications was 20.6%; eight patients required a reoperation, two of them experienced postoperative pouch ischemia. After a median follow-up time of 9.4 years, the risk of pouch failure in FAP and UC patients was 7.2% and 13% at 10 years. Despite the indication to mucosectomy has been reducing over the years, mesenteric lengthening is still required in a significant proportion of UC and FAP patients, also because of unforeseeable intraoperative conditions necessities.

Gracilis muscle transposition for the treatment of recurrent rectovaginal and pouch-vaginal fistula: is Crohn's disease a risk factor for failure? A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of rectovaginal fistulae associated with Crohn's disease is often frustrated by poor results regardless of the different techniques. The outcomes of the gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) for the treatment of recurrent Crohn's-associated fistulae are still debated. The aim of the study is to determine whether the success rate of GMT is similar in Crohn's disease patients and in a control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing GMT for rectovaginal or pouch-vaginal fistula were collected from a prospectively maintained database (2005-2016). The primary study outcome was the comparison of the success rate of GMT in Crohn's disease and control group patients. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a rectovaginal fistula due to Crohn's disease (8, 38.1%) or other etiologies (13, 61.9%) were included. The groups had similar characteristics and postoperative outcomes. After a median follow-up time of 81 and 57 months (p 0.34), the success rate of GMT was 75% in patients with Crohn's disease and 68.4% in control group (p 0.6). The median time to recurrence was 3.5 months (1-12). The success rate in patients who had more than two previous attempts of repair was lower regardless of the etiology (50 vs 79.4%, p 0.1). CONCLUSION: GMT is associated with a high success rate, especially in Crohn's disease-related rectovaginal fistula. In consideration of the low morbidity rate and the fact that an increasing number of previous local operations might be associated with failure, the procedure should be considered as a first line of treatment for recurrent rectovaginal fistulae.

Transabdominal salvage surgery after pouch failure in a tertiary center: A case-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Salvage surgery after failure of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) could be offered to selected patients. However, the results vary widely in different centers. AIMS: To assess the outcomes of salvage surgery by comparison with a control group matched for confounding variables. METHODS: From a prospective database of 1286 IPAA, patients undergoing transabdominal salvage surgery were compared for perioperative and functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) to a 1:3 control group of primary IPAA cases. RESULTS: Salvage surgery patients (30) had a higher rate of hand-sewn anastomoses (80 vs 20%, p <0.0001) and reoperations (10 vs 2.2%, p 0.02) than control group (90). A higher number of daytime and nighttime bowel movements (7.4 vs 4.1, p <0.0001, and 2.6 vs 1.8, p=0.002), a lower median CGQL score (0.7 vs 0.8, p=0.0001) and a higher rate of pouch fistulae (13.3 vs 1.1%, p=0.003) were reported after salvage surgery. Pouch failure rate after salvage surgery was 10.1%, 18.7% and 26.8% at 1, 5 and 10 years (vs 0%, 3.5% and 8.4% in control group, p=0.0085). CONCLUSIONS: Although worse functional outcomes and decreased QOL have to be expected, salvage surgery after pouch failure is associated with acceptable outcomes when performed in a referral center.

Outcomes of pelvic exenteration for recurrent and primary locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration is the only radical treatment for locally advanced (ARC) or recurrent (RRC) rectal cancers. The long-term results of the procedure are variably reported in the literature, with recent series suggesting similar survival between ARC and RRC. The study aimed to analyze and compare the long-term survival and perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for ARC and RRC in a tertiary center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Comparison of variables was performed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact or Wilcoxon rank sum test as appropriate. The Kaplan Meier method was used to analyze the disease-free survival (DFS) and the log-rank test to compare the two groups. RESULTS: Since 2002, 46 patients underwent pelvic exenteration for ARC (28, 60.9%) and RRC (18, 39.1%). The groups had comparable characteristics, perioperative results, including postoperative complications, and rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. A R0 resection was obtained in 71.4% and 55.6% (p 0.41) and a T4 stage was diagnosed in 75% and 94.4% (p 0.22) of ARC and RRC patients, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 32.5 and 56.6 months (p 0.01), the 5-year DFS was significantly lower in the RRC group (23.6 vs 46.2%, p 0.006), even after exclusion of R1 cases (30 vs 54.5%, p 0.044). CONCLUSION: The long-term disease free survival of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration is significantly worse when the procedure is performed for RRC, regardless of the tumor involvement of the resection margins.

Liver damage in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and cryptogenetic cirrhosis are frequent in an obese population. Therefore, it is wise to submit all obese patients with significant alterations in hepatic function tests to transparietal liver biopsy. The aim of this study is to determine the hepatic conditions of morbidly obese patients during bariatric surgery by means of a wedge liver biopsy, to avoid any eventual hepatic damage being ascribed to the surgical procedure. METHODS: This prospective study entails 216 consecutive patients, whose work-up included liver function tests, before undergoing vertical gastroplasty and wedge liver biopsy. Histology was assessed for hepatic steatosis, necroinflammatory activity and liver fibrosis/cirrhosis. RESULTS: Abnormal preoperative liver function tests were detected in 65 patients, in 52 unexpectedly. Histologically, significant steatosis was found in 168 patients (77.8%); necroinflammatory activity in 13 (6.0%); liver fibrosis in 46 (21.3%), 5 of whom (2.3%) were found to have an asymptomatic and unknown liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: In morbidly obese patients, the incidence of histological liver damage is very high, despite acceptable liver function tests. In addition to steatosis, however, a "second hit" to induce necrosis and inflammation, favoring the development of significant fibrosis, is not essential. Being obese is an independent risk factor for liver damage and could contribute to liver fibrosis either alone or in association with other insulting factors. The identification of obese patients with septal fibrosis/cirrhosis, at surgery, is of considerable interest in clinical practice, mainly under the aspect of prognosis and liability.