Substrate-dependent risk stratification for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: The importance of T1 mapping in nonischemic patients.

INTRODUCTION: The role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in nonischemic cardiomyopathy is unclear and better risk-stratification is required. We sought to determine if T1 mapping predicts appropriate defibrillator therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. We studied a mixed cohort of ischemic and nonischemic patients to determine whether different cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) applications (T1 mapping, late gadolinium enhancement, and Grayzone) were selectively predictive of therapies for the different arrhythmic substrates. METHODS AND RESULTS: We undertook a prospective longitudinal study of consecutive patients receiving defibrillators in a tertiary cardiac center. Participants underwent CMR myocardial tissue characterization using T1 mapping and conventional CMR scar assessment before device implantation. QRS duration and fragmentation on the surface electrocardiogram were also assessed. The primary endpoint was appropriate defibrillator therapy. One-hundred thirty patients were followed up for a median of 31 months (IQR ± 9 months). In nonischemic patients, T1_native was the sole predictor of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12 per 10 millisecond increment in value [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.21; P ≤ 0.01]). In ischemic patients, Grayzone_2SD-3SD was the strongest predictor of appropriate therapy (HR 1.34 per 1% left ventricular increment in value [95% CI 1.03-1.76; P = 0.03]). QRS fragmentation correlated well with myocardial scar core (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [ROC AUC] 0.64; P = 0.02) but poorly with T1_native (ROC AUC 0.4) and did not predict appropriate therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In the medium-long term, T1_native mapping was the only independent predictor of therapy in nonischemic patients, whereas Grayzone was a better predictor in ischemic patients. These findings suggest a potential role for T1_native mapping in the selection of patients for ICDs in a nonischemic population.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads provides more pacing vectors compared to bipolar leads. This may avoid phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) and allow optimal lead placement to maximize biventricular pacing. However, a long-term improvement in patient outcome has yet to be demonstrated. METHODS: A total of 721 consecutive patients with conventional CRTD criteria implanted with quadripolar (n = 357) or bipolar (n = 364) LV leads were enrolled into a registry at 3 UK centers. Lead performance and mortality was analyzed over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Patients receiving a quadripolar lead were of similar age and sex to those receiving a bipolar lead, although a lower proportion had ischemic heart disease (62.6% vs. 54.1%, P = 0.02). Both groups had similar rates of procedural success, although lead threshold, impedance, and procedural radiation dose were significantly lower in those receiving a quadripolar lead. PNS was more common in those with quadripolar leads (16.0% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.08), but was eliminated by switching pacing vector in all cases compared with 60% in the bipolar group (P < 0.001). Furthermore, LV lead displacement (1.7% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.03) and repositioning (2.0% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.03) occurred significantly less often in those with a quadripolar lead. All-cause mortality was also significantly lower in the quadripolar compared to bipolar lead group in univariate and multivariate analysis (13.2% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large, multicenter experience, the use of quadripolar LV leads for CRT was associated with elimination of PNS and lower overall mortality. This has important implications for LV pacing lead choice.

A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study.

AIMS: Alternative forms of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), including biventricular endocardial (BV-Endo) and multisite epicardial pacing (MSP), have been developed to improve response. It is unclear which form of stimulation is optimal. We aimed to compare the acute haemodynamic response (AHR) and electrophysiological effects of BV-Endo with MSP via two separate coronary sinus (CS) leads or a single-quadripolar CS lead. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a previously implanted CRT system received a second temporary CS lead and left ventricular (LV) endocardial catheter. A pressure wire and non-contact mapping array were placed into the LV cavity to measure LVdP/dtmax and perform electroanatomical mapping. Conventional CRT, BV-Endo, and MSP were then performed (MSP-1 via two epicardial leads and MSP-2 via a single-quadripolar lead). The best overall AHR was found using BV-Endo pacing with a 19.6 ± 13.6% increase in AHR at the optimal endocardial site over baseline (P < 0.001). There was an increase in LVdP/dtmax with MSP-1 and MSP-2 compared with conventional CRT, but this was not statistically significant. Biventricular endocardial pacing from the optimal site was significantly superior to conventional CRT (P = 0.039). The AHR achieved when BV-Endo pacing was highly site specific. Within individuals, the best pacing modality varied and was affected by the underlying substrate. Left ventricular activation times did not predict the optimal haemodynamic configuration. CONCLUSION: Biventricular endocardial pacing and not MSP was superior to conventional CRT, but was highly site specific. Within individuals, however, different methods of stimulation are optimal and may need to be tailored to the underlying substrate.

Laser lead extraction to facilitate cardiac implantable electronic device upgrade and revision in the presence of central venous obstruction.

AIMS: The number of procedures involving upgrade or revision of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing and the risks of adding additional leads are significant. Central venous occlusion in patients with pre-existing devices is often asymptomatic and optimal management of such patients in need of device revision/upgrade is not clear. We sought to assess our use of laser lead extraction in overcoming venous obstruction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients in need of device upgrade/revision underwent pre-procedure venography to assess venous patency. In patients with venous occlusion or stenosis severe enough to preclude passage of a hydrophilic guide wire, laser lead extraction with retention of the outer sheath in the vasculature was performed with the aim of maintaining a patent channel through which new leads could be implanted. Data were recorded on a dedicated database and patient outcomes were assessed. Between July 2004 and April 2012, laser lead extractions were performed in 71 patients scheduled for device upgrade/revision who had occluded or functionally obstructed venous anatomy. New leads were successfully implanted across the obstruction in 67 (94%) cases. There were two major complications (infection) and four minor complications with no peri-procedural mortality. Device follow-up was satisfactory in 65 (92%) cases with mean follow-up up to 26 ± 19 months. CONCLUSION: Laser lead extraction is a safe and effective option when managing patients with central venous obstruction in need of CIED revision or upgrade.

Use of High-density Mapping to Ablate a Wide Accessory Pathway and Mahaim Fiber in a Patient with Ebstein's Anomaly.

Ablation of accessory pathways in patients with Ebstein's anomaly can be challenging. Despite increasing experience and advances in mapping technology, success is limited and recurrence rates can be high. To date, high-density electroanatomic mapping has not been studied in this anatomical substrate. We present a pediatric case of Ebstein's anomaly in which high-density mapping in Ebstein's anomaly was a useful additional tool to improve the outcome of catheter ablation.

The current practice and perception of cardiac implantable electronic device transvenous lead extraction in the UK.

AIMS: The number of patients requiring an extraction of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is rising. Lead extraction of chronically implanted leads is a highly specialized procedure and the Heart Rhythm Society published a consensus document outlining best practice. We sought to ascertain the current practice and perception of lead extraction in the UK. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective e-mail survey consisting of 21 questions was sent to members of Heart Rhythm UK. Key areas for exploration included case volume, settings for extraction procedures, levels of surgical support, preferred techniques, and the perceptions of difficulty, risk, morbidity, and mortality associated with lead extraction. Thirty responses were received giving a response rate of 9.3%. Eighty-three per cent of responders performed extractions regularly and of these 92% were electrophysiologists. Median number of cases performed per year was 13 (interquartile range 6-26). Fifty-six per cent performed <20 procedures per year. Eighty per cent of procedures were performed in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory and of these 50% had no identifiable surgeon or operating theatre on standby. Mechanical dissection sheaths were the most widely used method of extraction after failure of manual traction (63%). The risk of minor complications was perceived to be 4% or less by the majority of respondents across the device range. The same measure for major complications and death was 2 and 1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Increased operator caseload and closer links between EP extractors and surgeons should be seen as achievable goals.

Quad-site pacing using a quadripolar left ventricular pacing lead.

Pacing the left ventricle (LV) from multiple sites simultaneously may result in a better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to assess whether multisite pacing using a quadripolar LV lead improves acute hemodynamic response (AHR) to CRT. We paced four ventricular sites simultaneously using two vectors of a Quartet lead, a right ventricular apical lead, and an additional LV lead temporarily placed in an anterior branch of the coronary sinus. Multisite pacing using the Quartet lead alone did not improve the AHR but "quad-site" pacing using an additional temporary LV lead did increase dP/dt(max).

A modified subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant in a patient with a previous left ventricular epicardial defibrillation patch.

We describe a case of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant in a patient with an existing epicardial defibrillation patch. Potential issues with shock vector shielding were overcome by a modification of the generator implant site and poor sensing were successfully managed by programming a sensing vector which excluded the generator.

Multi-site left ventricular pacing as a potential treatment for patients with postero-lateral scar: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and invasive haemodynamic assessment.

AIMS: Multi-site left ventricular (LV) pacing may be superior to single-site stimulation in correcting dyssynchrony and avoiding areas of myocardial scar. We sought to characterize myocardial scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We aimed to quantify the acute haemodynamic response to single-site and multi-site LV stimulation and to relate this to the position of the LV leads in relation to myocardial scar. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy had implantation of two LV leads. One lead (LV1) was positioned in a postero-lateral vein, the second (LV2) in a separate coronary vein. LV dP/dtmax was recorded using a pressure wire during stimulation at LV1, LV2, and both sites simultaneously (LV1 + 2). Patients were deemed acute responders if ΔLV dP/dtmax was ≥ 10%. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess dyssynchrony as well as location and burden of scar. Scar anatomy was registered with fluoroscopy to assess LV lead position in relation to scar. RESULTS: LV dP/dtmax increased from 726 ± 161 mmHg/s in intrinsic rhythm to 912 ± 234 mmHg/s with LV1, 837 ± 188 mmHg/s with LV2, and 932 ± 201 mmHg/s with LV1 and LV2. Nine of 19 (47%) were acute responders with LV1 vs. 6/19 (32%) with LV2. Twelve of 19 (63%) were acute responders with simultaneous LV1 + 2. Two of three patients benefitting with multi-site pacing had the LV1 lead positioned in postero-lateral scar. CONCLUSION: Multi-site LV pacing increased acute response by 16% vs. single-site pacing. This was particularly beneficial in patients with postero-lateral scar identified on CMR.

Relationship between endocardial activation sequences defined by high-density mapping to early septal contraction (septal flash) in patients with left bundle branch block undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Early inward motion and thickening/thinning of the ventricular septum associated with left bundle branch block is known as the septal flash (SF). Correction of SF corresponds to response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We hypothesized that SF was associated with a specific left ventricular (LV) activation pattern predicting a favourable response to CRT. We sought to characterize the spatio-temporal relationship between electrical and mechanical events by directly comparing non-contact mapping (NCM), acute haemodynamics, and echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirteen patients (63 ± 10 years, 10 men) with severe heart failure (ejection fraction 22.8 ± 5.8%) awaiting CRT underwent echocardiography and NCM pre-implant. Presence and extent of SF defined visually and with M-mode was fused with NCM bull's eye plots of endocardial activation patterns. LV-dP/dt(max) was measured during different pacing modes. Five patients had a large SF, four small SF, and four no SF. Large SF patients had areas of conduction block in non-infarcted regions, whereas those with small or no SF did not. Patients with large SF had greater acute response to LV and biventricular (BIV) pacing vs. those with small/no SF (% increase dP/dt 28 ± 14 vs. 11 ± 19% for LV pacing and 42 ± 28 vs. 22 ± 21% for BIV pacing) (P < 0.05). This translated into a more favourable chronic response to CRT. The lines of conduction block disappeared with LV/BIV pacing while remaining with right ventricle pacing. CONCLUSION: A strong association exists between electrical activation and mechanical deformation of the septum. Correction of both mechanical synchrony and the functional conduction block by CRT may explain the favourable response in patients with SF.

The acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing within individual branches of the coronary sinus using a quadripolar lead.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether there is a large difference in acute hemodynamic response (AHR) to left ventricle (LV) pacing in different regions of the same coronary sinus (CS) vein. Using the four electrodes available on a Quartet LV lead, we evaluated the AHR to pacing within individual branches of the CS. METHODS: An acute hemodynamic study was attempted in 20 patients. In each patient, we assessed AHR in a number of CS veins and along a significant proportion of each CS branch using three different bipolar configurations. We compared the AHR achieved when pacing using each different vector and also the highest AHR achieved in any position within the same patient with the lowest achieved in that patient. RESULTS: Sixty-four different CS positions in 19 patients were successfully assessed. No significant difference in AHR was found overall between the three vectors tested. The mean percentage difference in AHR between the CS branch vectors with the lowest and highest dP/dt(max) was +6.5 ± 5.4% (P < 0.001). A much larger difference of +16.9 ± 6.1% (P < 0.001) was seen when comparing the highest and lowest AHR achieved using any vector in any position within the same patient. CONCLUSION: A small difference in AHR is seen when pacing within the same branch of the CS compared to pacing in different branches in the same patient. This suggests that although the site of LV lead placement is important, the position within a CS branch is less important than choosing the right vein.

Percutaneous extraction of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: As the population receiving cardiac device therapy ages, the number of extraction procedures performed in octogenarians is increasing. This group has more comorbidities and may be at higher risk of such procedures. OBJECTIVES: Document the safety and success of percutaneous lead extraction in octogenarians. METHODS: All extraction cases performed between January 2001 and April 2011 entered into a computer database were analyzed for patient characteristics and indications, extraction technique, procedural success, and complications. Success and complications were classified according to the Heart Rhythm Society consensus statement. Outcomes in octogenarians were compared to younger patients undergoing extraction during the same period. RESULTS: Four hundred and six cases were performed: 72 procedures in octogenarians (mean age 84, range 80-95) and 334 in younger adults (mean age 62, range 20-79). Octogenarians had a greater number of comorbidities per case. Infection was the commonest indication for extraction in both groups. One hundred forty-one leads were extracted in octogenarians and 657 in younger patients. Laser assistance was required in 51.4% of octogenarians versus 49.7% of younger patients. Procedural success was achieved in 71/72 (98.6%) octogenarians versus 329/334 (98.5%) younger patients. No procedural mortality occurred in either group. Overall, complications were more frequent in octogenarians with major and minor complications occurring in 2.8 and 8.3% of octogenarians versus 0.6 and 3.0% of younger patients (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Procedural success was equally high in octogenarians and younger patients. Percutaneous lead extraction can be performed effectively and safely in octogenarians and is associated with a higher complication rate but no increased mortality.

In vivo evaluation and proof of radiofrequency safety of a novel diagnostic MR-electrophysiology catheter.

An MR-electrophysiology (EP) catheter is presented that provides full diagnostic EP functionality and a high level of radiofrequency safety achieved by custom-designed transmission lines. Highly resistive wires transmit intracardiac electrograms and currents for intracardiac pacing. A transformer cable transmits the localization signal of a tip coil. Specific absorption rate simulations and temperature measurements at 1.5 T demonstrate that a wire resistance > 3 kΩ/m limits dielectric heating to a physiologically irrelevant level. Additional wires do not increase tip specific absorption rate significantly, which is important because some clinical catheters require up to 20 electrodes. It is further demonstrated that radiofrequency-induced and pacing-induced resistive heating of the wires is negligible under clinical conditions. The MR-EP catheters provided uncompromised recording of electrograms and cardiac pacing in combination with a standard EP recorder in MR-guided in vivo EP studies, and the tip coil enabled fast and robust catheter localization. In vivo temperature measurements during such a study did not detect any device-related heating, which confirms the high level of safety of the catheter, whereas unacceptable heating was found with a standard EP catheter. The presented concept for the first time enables catheters with full diagnostic EP functionality and active tracking and at the same time a sufficient level of radiofrequency safety for MRI without specific absorption rate-related limitations.

Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Problems with implanting a left ventricular (LV) lead during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures are not uncommon and may occur for a variety of reasons including phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) and high capture thresholds. We aimed to perform successful CRT in patients with previous LV lead problems using the multiple pacing configurations available with the St Jude Quartet model 1458Q quadripolar LV lead to overcome PNS or high capture thresholds. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four patients with previous failed attempts at LV lead implantation underwent a further attempt at CRT using a Quartet lead. In all four cases, successful CRT was achieved using a Quartet lead placed in a branch of the coronary sinus. Problems with PNS or high capture thresholds were seen in all four patients but were successfully overcome. Satisfactory lead parameters were seen at implant, pre-discharge, and at short-term follow-up (8.5±5 weeks). CONCLUSION: The Quartet lead allows 10 different pacing vectors to be used and may overcome common pacing problems because of the multiple pacing configurations available. Problems with either PNS or unsatisfactory pacing parameters experienced during CRT may be resolved simply by changing the pacing configuration using this quadripolar lead system.

Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has dramatically improved the symptoms and prognosis of patients with heart failure in large randomized clinical trials. Optimization of device settings may maximize benefit on an individual basis, although the best method for this is not yet established. We evaluated the use of cardiogenic impedance measurements (derived from intracardiac impedance signals) in CRT device optimization, using invasive left ventricular (LV) dP/dtmax as the reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent invasive haemodynamic assessment using a pressure wire placed in the LV cavity at the time of CRT device implantation. Intracardiac impedance measurements were made at different atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays and compared with LV dP/dtmax. We assessed the performance of patient-specific and generic impedance-based models in predicting acute haemodynamic response to CRT. In two patients, LV catheterization with the pressure wire was unsuccessful and in two patients LV lead delivery was unsuccessful; therefore, data were acquired for 13 out of 17 patients. Left ventricular dP/dtmax was 919±182 mmHg/s at baseline and this increased acutely (by 24%) to 1121±226 mmHg/s as a result of CRT. The patient-specific impedance-based model correctly predicted the optimal haemodynamic response (to within 5% points) for AV and VV delays in 90 and 92% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cardiogenic impedance measurements are capable of correctly identifying the maximum achievable LV dP/dtmax as measured by invasive haemodynamic assessment. This study suggests that cardiogenic impedance can potentially be used for CRT optimization and may have a role in ambulatory assessment of haemodynamics.

Initial single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: The Quartet model 1458Q (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) lead is a quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead with pace/sense capability from four electrodes (tip and three rings). The lead is capable of pacing in 10 different configurations rather than the three that are available in conventional bipolar pacing leads. We describe a single-center initial experience of the use of this lead in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients for a CRT with cardiac defibrillator were implanted between October 2009 and May 2010 with a Quartet lead . Lead position, pacing parameters, stability, complications, and presence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) data were collected at implant and predischarge. Follow-up data were collected at 15 ± 8 weeks for all patients. RESULTS: A Quartet lead was successfully implanted in 96% (27/28) of patients (age 61 ± 15 years; 82% male; ischemic etiology 50%; mean left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction 25 ± 7%; left bundle branch block 68%). PNS was seen at implant in 11 patients (41%) with at least one vector. In eight of these cases (72%), the need for lead repositioning was averted by programming LV pacing utilizing the additional vectors available with the Quartet lead. CONCLUSION: These initial data suggest that pacing with the Quartet lead is associated with a high implant success rate and stable pacing parameters acutely and at short-term follow-up. The 10 LV pacing vectors available with this lead may allow PNS and capture threshold problems to be easily overcome.

Advanced image fusion to overlay coronary sinus anatomy with real-time fluoroscopy to facilitate left ventricular lead implantation in CRT.

BACKGROUND: Failure rate for left ventricular (LV) lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is up to 12%. The use of segmentation tools, advanced image registration software, and high-fidelity images from computerized tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) of the coronary sinus (CS) can guide LV lead implantation. We evaluated the feasibility of advanced image registration onto live fluoroscopic images to allow successful LV lead placement. METHODS: Twelve patients (11 male, 59 ± 16.8 years) undergoing CRT had three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart imaging (six CT, six CMR). Eight patients had at least one previously failed LV lead implant. Using segmentation software, anatomical models of the cardiac chambers, CS, and its branches were overlaid onto the live fluoroscopy using a prototype version of the Philips EP Navigator software to guide lead implantation. RESULTS: We achieved high-fidelity segmentations of cardiac chambers, coronary vein anatomy, and accurate registration between the 3D anatomical models and the live fluoroscopy in all 12 patients confirmed by balloon occlusion angiography. The CS was cannulated successfully in every patient and in 11, an LV lead was implanted successfully. (One patient had no acceptable lead values due to extensive myocardial scar). CONCLUSION: Using overlaid 3D segmentations of the CS and cardiac chambers, it is feasible to guide CRT implantation in real time by fusing advanced imaging and fluoroscopy. This enabled successful CRT in a group of patients with previously failed implants. This technology has the potential to facilitate CRT and improve implant success.

Percutaneous lead and system extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices and coronary sinus leads.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device and coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction is required due to the occurrence of system infection, malfunction, or upgrade. Published series of CS lead extraction are limited by small sample sizes. We present a 10-year experience of CRT device and CS lead extraction. METHODS: All lead extractions between 2000 and 2010 were entered into a computer database. From these, a cohort of 71 cases involving a CRT device or CS lead was analyzed for procedural method, success, and complications. RESULTS: Sixty coronary sinus leads were extracted in 71 cases (median age 71 years; 90% male) by manual traction/locking stylets (n = 54) or using a laser sheath (n = 6). Procedural success was achieved in 98% of CS leads. A total of 143 non-CS leads were extracted, with laser required in 46% of cases. The mean duration of lead implantation was 35.8 months (range 1-116 months) and 2.86 ± 1.07 leads were extracted per case. CRT extraction case load increased significantly over time. Minor complications occurred in four (5.6%) cases and major complications in one (1.4%) case. There were no intraprocedural deaths, but two deaths occurred within 30 days of extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Our 10-year experience confirms that percutaneous removal of CS leads can be achieved with high procedural success. Our recorded complication rates are no higher than those of non-CS lead extraction series, and should be taken in the context of the frail nature of CRT patients. Ongoing audit of procedure success and complications will be required to further guide best practice in CS lead extraction.

Initial experience of a cohort of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy undergoing biventricular pacing.

BACKGROUND: Dual chamber pacing improves functional status and reduces left ventricular outflow tract gradients in some, but not all patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) by altering ventricular depolarisation. We investigated the use of biventricular (BIV) pacing in symptomatic patients with HCM. METHOD: 8 patients aged 58±7yrs with symptomatic HCM underwent BIV pacing. 5 patients had LVOT gradients >30mmHg. Ventricular electrodes were placed in the right ventricle (RV) and a branch of the coronary sinus. An atrial electrode was inserted to achieve BIV pacing with a short AV delay. The short-term effects of different pacing modalities were assessed using 2-D and Doppler echocardiography. Symptoms and exercise tolerance were assessed after a month of each pacing mode. Long-term follow up data was available for 5 years. RESULTS: Baseline EF was 67±14% and mean QRS duration was 132±26msecs. BIV pacing reduced QRS duration compared to RV pacing (129±46 vs. 205±54msecs, p<0.005). Five of the seven patients had baseline LVOT gradients (mean 67±25mmHg) that decreased to 41±15mm Hg with RV pacing (p<0.01) and 25±15mmHg with BIV pacing (p<0.005). Improvements in exercise time with active pacing occurred in six out of eight patients (75%), three (37.5%) had optimal exercise times with RV pacing and three with BIV pacing. Of the three patients with short term improvements with BIV pacing, one died 4 years post implant, one deteriorated with LV dilatation and one had the system explanted for infection. CONCLUSION: BIV pacing showed short-term beneficial effects in some patients over and above RV pacing alone.

Extraction of chronic pacemaker and defibrillator leads from the coronary sinus: laser infrequently used but required.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an accepted treatment for heart failure but it may be necessary to explant these systems along with their leads. The evidence base for coronary sinus (CS) lead extractions is limited. We aimed to evaluate the percutaneous removal of these leads and the utility of laser extraction when necessary. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 265 patients referred for lead extraction between January 2004 and June 2008, 32 (12.1%) involved CS leads (30 males, mean age 67 years). Mean implantation time was 26.5 +/- 28.7 months (range 1-116 months). Indications for extraction were pocket infection (34.4%), lead malfunction (43.8%), skin erosion (15.6%), and endocarditis (6.2%). Twenty-eight (87.5%) CS leads were removed with manual traction, with laser utilized in four cases (12.5%). No major complications of CS laceration, pericardial effusion, emergency surgery, or death occurred. CONCLUSION: Our experience supports the percutaneous extraction of CS leads as a safe and effective procedure including the utility of laser when necessary.