Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after the Ross procedure: a report from the German-Dutch Ross Registry.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to report major cardiac and cerebrovascular events after the Ross procedure in the large adult and pediatric population of the German-Dutch Ross registry. These data could provide an additional basis for discussions among physicians and a source of information for patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: One thousand six hundred twenty patients (1420 adults; 1211 male; mean age, 39.2±16.2 years) underwent a Ross procedure between 1988 and 2008. Follow-up was performed on an annual basis (median, 6.2 years; 10 747 patient-years). Early and late mortality were 1.2% (n=19) and 3.6% (n=58; 0.54%/patient-year), respectively. Ninety-three patients underwent 99 reinterventions on the autograft (0.92%/patient-year); 78 reinterventions in 63 patients on the pulmonary conduit were performed (0.73%/patient-year). Freedom from autograft or pulmonary conduit reoperation was 98.2%, 95.1%, and 89% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Preoperative aortic regurgitation and the root replacement technique without surgical autograft reinforcement were associated with a greater hazard for autograft reoperation. Major internal or external bleeding occurred in 17 (0.15%/patient-year), and a total of 38 patients had composite end point of thrombosis, embolism, or bleeding (0.35%/patient-year). Late endocarditis with medical (n=16) or surgical treatment (n=29) was observed in 38 patients (0.38%/patient-year). Freedom from any valve-related event was 94.9% at 1 year, 90.7% at 5 years, and 82.5% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although longer follow-up of patients who undergo Ross operation is needed, the present series confirms that the autograft procedure is a valid option to treat aortic valve disease in selected patients. The nonreinforced full root technique and preoperative aortic regurgitation are predictors for autograft failure and warrant further consideration. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00708409.

Autograft reinforcement to preserve autograft function after the ross procedure: a report from the german-dutch ross registry.

BACKGROUND: Autograft reinforcement interventions (R) during the Ross procedure are intended to preserve autograft function and improve durability. The aim of this study is to evaluate this hypothesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: 1335 adult patients (mean age:43.5+/-12.0 years) underwent a Ross procedure (subcoronary, SC, n=637; root replacement, Root, n=698). 592 patients received R of the annulus, sinotubular junction, or both. Regular clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed (mean:6.09+/-3.97, range:0.01 to 19.2 years). Longitudinal assessment of autograft function with time was performed using multilevel modeling techniques. The Root without R (Root-R) group was associated with a 6x increased reoperation rate compared to Root with R (Root+R), SC with R (SC+R), and without R (SC-R; 12.9% versus 2.3% versus 2.5%.versus 2.6%, respectively; P<0.001). SC and Root groups had similar rate of aortic regurgitation (AR) development over time. Root+R patients had no progression of AR, whereas Root-R had 6 times higher AR development compared to Root+R. In SC, R had no remarkable effect on the annual AR progression. The SC technique was associated with lower rates of autograft dilatation at all levels of the aortic root compared to the Root techniques. R did not influence autograft dilatation rates in the Root group. CONCLUSIONS: For the time period of the study surgical autograft stabilization techniques preserve autograft function and result in significantly lower reoperation rates. The nonreinforced Root was associated with significant adverse outcome. Therefore, surgical stabilization of the autograft is advisable to preserve long-term autograft function, especially in the Root Ross procedure.

Autograft regurgitation and aortic root dimensions after the Ross procedure: the German Ross Registry experience.

BACKGROUND: Autograft regurgitation and root dilatation after the Ross procedure is of major concern. We reviewed data from the German Ross Registry to document the development of autograft regurgitation and root dilatation with time and also to compare 2 different techniques of autograft implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2006 1014 patients (786 men, 228 women; mean age 41.2+/-15.3 years) underwent the Ross procedure using 2 different implantation techniques (subcoronary, n=521; root replacement, n=493). Clinical and serial echocardiographic follow up was performed preoperatively and thereafter annually (mean follow up 4.41+/-3.11 years, median 3.93 years, range 0 to 16.04 years; 5012 patient-years). For statistical analysis of serial echocardiograms, a hierarchical multilevel modeling technique was applied. Eight early and 28 late deaths were observed. Pulmonary autograft reoperations were required in 35 patients. Initial autograft regurgitation grade was 0.49 (root replacement 0.73, subcoronary 0.38) with an annual increase of grade 0.034 (root replacement 0.0259, subcoronary 0.0231). Annulus and sinus dimensions did not exhibit an essential increase over time in both techniques, whereas sinotubular junction diameter increased essentially by 0.5 mm per year in patients with root replacement. Patients with the subcoronary implantation technique showed nearly unchanged dimensions. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology did not have any consistent impact on root dimensions with time irrespective of the performed surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: The present Ross series from the German Ross Registry showed favorable clinical and hemodynamic results. Development of autograft regurgitation for both techniques was small and the annual progression thereof is currently not substantial. Use of the subcoronary technique and aortic root interventions with stabilizing measures in root replacement patients seem to prevent autograft regurgitation and dilatation of the aortic root within the timeframe studied.

Ross procedure and left ventricular mass regression.

BACKGROUND: Return of left ventricular mass to normal is considered to be a favorable result of aortic valve replacement. The Ross procedure provides near normal hemodynamics and thus allows studies of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling. LV mass regression may be influenced by surgical technique (subcoronary [SC] versus root replacement [RR]). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the German Ross Registry were analyzed. A total of 646 patients (mean age: 43.6+/-12.7 years, range: 16 to 71 years; SC technique n=295, RR technique n=351) underwent a Ross procedure in 7 participating centers from 1990 to 2004. The patients underwent preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic evaluations. Mean follow-up time was 3.5+/-2.5 years (range 0.12 to 13.7 years). Follow-up completeness was 97%. The LV mass index (LVMI) decreased significantly during follow-up in both groups (SC: 209+/-53 preoperatively to 154+/-48 at 1-year follow-up, [P<0.01 versus preoperative values] to 149+/-51 g/m2 at 2-year follow-up, [P=NS 1-year versus 2-year follow-up] versus RR: from 195+/-56 preoperatively to 144+/-51 at 1-year follow-up [P<0.01 versus preoperative values] to 140+/-49 g/m2 [P=NS 1-year versus 2-year follow-up]). LVMI regression remained stagnant 1 year after the Ross procedure in most patients in both groups. On the basis of multivariate analysis, predictors for incomplete LVMI regression after the autograft procedure were high preoperative LVMI, smoking, and uncontrolled diastolic hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: At mid-term echocardiographic follow-up, patients of both groups had favorable autograft hemodynamics. Risk factors for incomplete postoperative LVMI regression in our study were smoking and persistent diastolic hypertension. This emphasizes the importance of cessation of smoking and treatment of arterial hypertension, even in younger patients, after corrected aortic valve disease.

Older patients fare better with the Ross operation.

BACKGROUND: The Ross operation has an established position in young patients. We address the question of whether any age group profits most from the Ross operation, and we compare the results in various ages. METHODS: From February 1995 to August 2001 we performed 250 Ross operations. Group 1 consisted of 46 patients, ages 2 to 25 years (median age, 15 years). Group 2 consisted of 123 patients, ages 26 to 49 years (median age, 39 years). Group 3 consisted of 81 patients, ages 50 to 67 years (median age, 55 years). Echocardiography was performed perioperatively, at 2 to 6 months, and then yearly. RESULTS: Mean follow-up for the three groups was 32, 31, and 28 months, respectively (p = 0.36). One patient from group 2 died after 25 months caused by suppurative pneumonia and 3 patients from group 3 died (1 from suspected acute thoracic aorta dissection at 40 months, 1 from ventricular fibrillation after 25 months, and 1 from an undiagnosed sudden death at 5 months). Autograft replacement was necessary for 3 patients from group 2 and 1 from group 3. Autograft repair was necessary for 1 patient from group 2, and pulmonary homograft reoperation was necessary for 1 patient from group 1. All other autografts currently have physiologic gradients and clinically insignificant regurgitation. Median peak gradient across the right ventricular outflow tract was 23.6 +/- 18 mm Hg for group 1, 14.6 +/- 8 mm Hg for group 2, and 11.5 +/- 7 mm Hg, which was significantly lower for group 3 patients (p < 0.001). Eleven patients are under close follow-up for right ventricular outflow tract gradients > or = 40 mm Hg; eight of these patients are from group 1, 3 are from group 2, and there are none from group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Ross operation provides excellent results in all age groups, the problem of right ventricular outflow tract stenosis has not been seen in patients older than 50 years, which implies that it offers superior results for aortic valve disease in middle aged and older patients.

Hemodynamic performance following the Ross operation: comparison of two different techniques.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The Ross operation as aortic valve replacement has undergone technical evolution. Originally described as a subcoronary implant, the full-root replacement technique is now more common worldwide. It remains unclear which of the two techniques has the better results. Hence, the hemodynamic performances of the two implantation methods, as applied by two experienced centers, were compared as part of the German Ross Registry. METHODS: In total, 132 (Group 1, root replacement, mean age 40 +/- 14 years) and 249 (Group 2, subcoronary implant, mean age 48 +/- 14 years) consecutively operated patients were compared clinically and echocardiographically. Data were analyzed focusing on pulmonary autograft and homograft function at mid-term (2.78 +/- 1.89 versus 2.26 +/- 2.11 years). RESULTS: Echocardiography revealed autograft peak systolic gradients of 5.0 +/- 2.7 mmHg for Group 1 and 6.7 +/- 3.7 mmHg for Group 2 (p < 0.05), and an indexed effective orifice area (EOA) of 1.98 +/- 0.57 cm2/m2 and 1.64 +/- 0.43 cm2/m2 (p < 0.05), respectively. Homograft peak systolic gradients were 15.6 +/- 9.0 mmHg and 11.7 +/- 6.8 mmHg for Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05) respectively, and the indexed EOA with regard to the homograft was 1.08 +/- 0.49 cm2/m2 and 1.26 +/- 0.50 cm2/m2 (p < 0.05). Autograft insufficiency grade > I was present in 1.5% (2/132) of Group 1 and 2.8% (7/249) of Group 2 patients. Pulmonary insufficiency grade > I was 17.4% (23/132) for Group 1 and 4.8% (12/249) for Group 2 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although both groups enjoyed excellent hemodynamics in the mid-term, the root replacement technique had the advantage of larger annulus diameters and greater aortic EOA. Clinically relevant autograft regurgitation in both groups was gratifyingly rare, and seemed to be independent of surgical technique. Long-term durability of the more demanding subcoronary technique versus the problems of larger dimensions of the sinus of Valsalva and sinotubular junction in the free-root technique, remains to be proven. Apparent differences in pulmonary homograft hemodynamics can most likely be explained by surgical differences, younger patients in Group 1, and by homograft variation.

A single-institution experience with the Ross operation over 11 years.

BACKGROUND: Although the Ross operation requires double-valve replacement for aortic valve pathology, it is the only autologous, aortic valve replacement available. We report a single-unit's 11-year experience. METHODS: Before August 2006, 467 patients (mean age, 41 +/- 15 years; 358 males) underwent a Ross operation. The right ventricular outflow tract was repaired with a cryopreserved pulmonary homograft. Follow-up was 94.4% complete. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 0.6%. The Kaplan-Meier survival estimate at 120 months was 94.4% +/- 2.9% (standard error [SE], 0.0146). Reoperation was due to autograft failure in 15 patients (7 repairs, 8 replacements), with a Kaplan-Meier freedom from autograft failure measured as reoperation or regurgitation exceeding grade II at 120 months of 94.2% +/- 2.8% (SE, 0.0142). Homograft replacement, mostly due to stenosis, occurred in 11 patients. Freedom from homograft dysfunction, defined as homograft reoperation or peak homograft gradient of 30 mm Hg or more, at 120 months was 79.3% +/- 7.3% (SE, 0.0372). Freedom from all autograft- and homograft-related reoperations at 120 months was 85.9% +/- 6.3% (SE, 0.0321). Autograft or homograft endocarditis occurred in 8 patients, and 1 patient had simultaneous endocarditis of both valves. CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival and freedom from prostheses-related events over 11 years still compares favorably with conventional heart valve prostheses. Mortality and morbidity remain low. Reoperation for autograft or homograft failure is higher than our previous reports, and endocarditis is also evident, 1.9% (9 of 467). Homograft dysfunction is higher in younger recipients.

Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents?

BACKGROUND: The Ross operation is increasingly accepted as an alternative to conventional valve prostheses for children, adolescents, and young adults. We review patients younger than 20 years of age. METHODS: Of 404 Ross operations done before November 2004, 60 were young patients with a median age of 12 years (range, 1 to 20 years). The pulmonary autograft technique universally was as a free root. A cryopreserved pulmonary homograft reconstructed the right ventricular outflow tract. RESULTS: Early postoperative complications were reentry for bleeding in 2 patients and one pacemaker insertion. No thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events occurred during the follow-up of 42 +/- 27 months. Two late deaths occurred, one from myocardial infarction after 3 months and another sudden death after 5 years, probably from critical pulmonary homograft stenosis. Echocardiographic follow-up revealed a median peak gradient of 6.3 +/- 3 mm Hg across the autograft. The median pulmonary homograft peak gradient of 19.1 +/- 13.7 mm Hg was increased to more than 30 mm Hg in 6 patients. Another 6 patients had moderate but clinically insignificant pulmonary homograft regurgitation. Altogether, 6 patients required reoperation for replacement of stenotic homografts. No autograft related reoperation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with the Ross operation had good mid-term autograft function and no perioperative mortality. Factors that justify the choice of the Ross operation for young patients are the normal physiologic hemodynamics and growth of the autograft as well as freedom from anticoagulation. A 10% reoperation rate, elevated pulmonary homograft gradients, and the surgical complexity remain limiting factors.

The Ross operation: utilization of the patient's own pulmonary valve as a replacement device for the diseased aortic valve.

Prosthetic heart valves have been outpaced by progress in cardiac surgery. Early biologic valve prostheses consisted of tissues mounted on a rigid stent, and did not require anticoagulation, but rarely survived two decades. Subsequently, durable mechanical valve prostheses dominated despite, the requisite anticoagulation. The mechanical design remains imperfect, with obstruction to flow, turbulence, hematological changes and also, occasionally audible clicks. Reports documenting superior function for cryopreserved human aortic heart valves (homografts) without these problems, albeit with limited durability, followed. The marketing of 'stentless biologic valves', mimicking these attributes was a reaction to the shortage of homografts. These imperfections explain the rediscovery of the Ross operation, in which the patient's pulmonary valve (autograft) is excised to replace the aortic valve. The autograft is living tissue, complete with attributes of a healthy heart valve, including growth and durability. The pulmonary valve, where lower pressure and oxygen saturation retards degeneration, is substituted with a pulmonary homograft. The Ross operation is exacting and leaves the patient with two potentially malfunctioning valves.

Replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with an extended root stentless xenograft.

PURPOSE: We present an early series to determine the technical feasibility of simultaneous aortic valve and complete ascending aortic replacement using a longer stentless aortic xenograft, harvested with an extended root. DESCRIPTION: The stentless xenograft valved conduits commercially available are too short for complete ascending aorta replacement, and usually a prosthetic tube graft is required distally. EVALUATION: To avoid this extra prosthetic conduit distally a number of stentless aortic xenografts with extended conduit were obtained from a supplier (Medtronic Inc). They were inserted in 6 elderly patients (67.8 +/- 7.1 years) who all required aortic valve and ascending aorta replacements owing to pathologic dilation. CONCLUSIONS: In all cases an extra prosthetic conduit was avoided, and the length of the available biological conduit comfortably allowed total ascending aortic replacement without tension. The advantages therefore were one less suture line, cost saving regarding the prosthetic conduit, shorter cross-clamping time, and possibly shorter time spent on hemostasis.