Measurement of renal cortical fibrosis by CT scan.

Rationale and objectives: The accurate, non-invasive, and rapid measurement of renal cortical fibrosis is needed for well-defined benchmarks of permanent injury and for use of anti-fibrotic agents. It is also needed for non-invasive and rapid assessment of the chronicity of human renal diseases. Materials and methods: We have used a non-human primate model of radiation nephropathy to develop a novel method of size-corrected CT imaging to quantify renal cortical fibrosis. Results: Our method has an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.96, which is superior to any other non-invasive method of measuring renal fibrosis. Conclusion: Our method is suitable for immediate translation to human clinical renal diseases.

Redefining and reinvigorating the role of physics in clinical medicine: A Report from the AAPM Medical Physics 3.0 Ad Hoc Committee.

Derived from 2 yr of deliberations and community engagement, Medical Physics 3.0 (MP3.0) is an effort commissioned by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) to devise a framework of strategies by which medical physicists can maintain and improve their integral roles in, and contributions to, health care and its innovation under conditions of rapid change and uncertainty. Toward that goal, MP3.0 advocates a broadened and refreshed model of sustainable excellence by which medical physicists can and should contribute to health care. The overarching conviction of MP3.0 is that every healthcare facility can benefit from medical physics and every patient's care can be improved by a medical physicist. This large and expansive challenge necessitates a range of strategies specific to each area of medical physics: clinical practice, research, product development, and education. The present paper offers a summary of the Phase 1 deliberations of the MP3.0 initiative pertaining to strategic directions of the discipline primarily but not exclusively oriented toward the clinical practice of medical physics in the United States.

Impact of systemic targeted agents on the clinical outcomes of patients with brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: To determine the clinical benefits of systemic targeted agents across multiple histologies after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2013, 737 patients underwent upfront SRS for brain metastases. Patients were stratified by whether or not they received targeted agents with SRS. 167 (23%) received targeted agents compared to 570 (77%) that received other available treatment options. Time to event data were summarized using Kaplan-Meier plots, and the log rank test was used to determine statistical differences between groups. RESULTS: Patients who received SRS with targeted agents vs those that did not had improved overall survival (65% vs. 30% at 12 months, p < 0.0001), improved freedom from local failure (94% vs 90% at 12 months, p = 0.06), improved distant failure-free survival (32% vs. 18% at 12 months, p = 0.0001) and improved freedom from whole brain radiation (88% vs. 77% at 12 months, p = 0.03). Improvement in freedom from local failure was driven by improvements seen in breast cancer (100% vs 92% at 12 months, p < 0.01), and renal cell cancer (100% vs 88%, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that use of targeted agents improved all cause mortality (HR = 0.6, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted agent use with SRS appears to improve survival and intracranial outcomes.

Is there a tumor volume threshold for postradiosurgical symptoms? A single-institution analysis.

BACKGROUND: Single-fraction radiosurgery may carry a higher risk of symptomatic peritumoral edema than conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, with a reported incidence of 2.5% to 37%. Previous research has shown that larger tumor volume and margin dose >14 Gy are associated with increased risk of toxicity. Parasagittal location has been associated with toxicity in some studies, but not in others. OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for and patterns of postradiosurgical symptoms (PRS). METHODS: This single-institution retrospective chart review included 282 stereotactic radiosurgery procedures for an intracranial meningioma from January 1999 to March 2011. PRS were assessed by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Version 4.0). Statistical analyses were conducted by using the 194 procedures for which treatment plans were available. RESULTS: PRS were observed after 65 procedures (23%); 35 (12%) were grade 2 or higher. Posttreatment edema occurred in 21% of grade I PRS, 68% of grade II PRS, and 71% of grade III PRS. Tumor volume ≥7.1 cc (adjusted hazards ratio = 4.9, P = .02), prior external beam radiotherapy (adjusted hazards ratio = 2.6, P = .03), and histological grade (P = .005) predicted PRS. On multivariate analysis, parasagittal location was not predictive of PRS, although skull base location predicted a lower risk of symptomatic posttreatment edema (adjusted hazards ratio = 0.133, P = .02). CONCLUSION: In our series, prior external beam radiotherapy, tumor volume, and tumor grade are risk factors for PRS, while pretreatment edema approached statistical significance. Peritumoral edema is the predominant mechanism of significant PRS, and skull base tumors have a lower risk of posttreatment edema.