Evaluation of computed tomography in the diagnosis of ultrasound-proven diaphragm dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) is routinely employed on the evaluation of dyspnea, yet limited data exist on its assessment of diaphragmatic muscle. This study aimed to determine the capability of CT in identifying structural changes in the diaphragm among patients with ultrasound-confirmed diaphragmatic dysfunction. METHODS: Diaphragmatic ultrasounds conducted between 2018 and 2021 at our center in Marseille, France, were retrospectively collected. Diaphragmatic pillars were measured on CT scans at the L1 level and the celiac artery. Additionally, the difference in height between the two diaphragmatic domes in both diaphragmatic dysfunction cases and controls was measured and compared. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were included, comprising 24 with diaphragmatic paralysis, 13 with diaphragmatic weakness, and 28 controls. In the case group (paralysis and weakness) with left dysfunctions (n = 24), the CT thickness of the pillars at the level of L1 and the celiac artery was significantly thinner compared with controls (2.0 mm vs. 7.4 mm and 1.8 mm vs. 3.1 mm, p < 0.001 respectively). Significantly different values were observed for paralysis (but not weakness) in the right dysfunction subgroup (n = 15) (2.6 mm vs. 7.4 mm and 2.2 mm vs. 3.8 mm, p < 0.001 respectively, for paralysis vs. controls). Regardless of the side of dysfunction, a significant difference in diaphragmatic height was observed between cases and controls (7.70 cm vs. 1.16 cm and 5.51 cm vs. 1.16 cm, p < 0.001 for right and left dysfunctions, respectively). Threshold values determined through ROC curve analyses for height differences between the two diaphragmatic domes, indicative of paralysis or weakness in the right dysfunctions, were 4.44 cm and 3.51 cm, respectively. Similarly for left dysfunctions, the thresholds were 2.70 cm and 2.48 cm, respectively, demonstrating good performance (aera under the curve of 1.00, 1.00, 0.98, and 0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: In cases of left diaphragmatic dysfunction, as well as in paralysis associated with right diaphragmatic dysfunction, CT revealed thinner pillars. Additionally, a notable increase in the difference in diaphragmatic height demonstrated a strong potential to identify diaphragmatic dysfunction, with specific threshold values.

Interest of thoracic ultrasound after cardiac surgery or interventional cardiology.

Thoracic ultrasound has attracted much interest in detecting pleural effusion or pulmonary consolidation after cardiac surgery. In 2016, Trovato reported, in the World Journal of Cardiology, the interest of using, in addition to echocardiography, thoracic ultrasound. In this editorial, we highlight the value of assessing diaphragm function after cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology procedures. Various factors are able to impair diaphragm function after such interventions. Diaphragm motion may be decreased by chest pain secondary to sternotomy, pleural effusion or impaired muscle function. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis may be secondary to phrenic nerve damage complicating cardiac surgery or atrial fibrillation ablation. Diagnosis may be delayed. Indeed, respiratory troubles induced by diaphragm dysfunction are frequently attributed to pre-existing heart disease or pulmonary complications secondary to surgery. In addition, elevated hemidiaphragm secondary to diaphragm dysfunction is sometimes not observed on chest X-ray performed in supine position in the intensive care unit. Analysis of diaphragm function by ultrasound during the recovery period appears essential. Both hemidiaphragms can be studied by two complementary ultrasound methods. The mobility of each hemidiaphragms is measured by M-mode ultrasonography. In addition, recording the percentage of inspiratory thickening provides important information about the quality of muscle function. These two approaches make it possible to detect hemidiaphragm paralysis or dysfunction. Such a diagnosis is important because persistent diaphragm dysfunction after cardiac surgery has been shown to be associated with adverse respiratory outcome. Early respiratory physiotherapy is able to improve respiratory function through strengthening of the inspiratory muscles i.e. diaphragm and accessory inspiratory muscles.

Diagnosis of hemidiaphragm paralysis: refine ultrasound criteria.

Background: Ultrasound has demonstrated its interest in the analysis of diaphragm function in patients with respiratory failure. The criteria used to diagnose hemidiaphragm paralysis are not well defined. Methods: The aim of this observational retrospective study was to describe the ultrasound findings in 103 patients with diaphragm paralysis, previously diagnosed by conventional methods after various circumstances such as trauma or surgery. The ultrasound study included the recording of excursions of both diaphragmatic domes and the measurement of inspiratory thickening. Results: On paralyzed hemidiaphragm, thickening was less than 20% in all patients during deep inspiration. Thinning was recorded in 53% of cases. In some cases, the recording of the thickening could be difficult. The study of motion during voluntary sniffing reported a paradoxical excursion in all but one patient. During quiet breathing, an absence of movement or a paradoxical displacement was observed. During deep inspiration, a paradoxical motion at the beginning of inspiration followed by a reestablishment of movement in the cranio-caudal direction was seen in 82% of cases. In some patients, there was a lack of movement followed, after an average delay of 0.4 s, by a cranio-caudal excursion. Finally, in 4 patients no displacement was recorded. Evidence of hyperactivity (increased inspiratory thickening and excursion) of contralateral non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm was observed. Conclusion: To accurately detect hemidiaphragm paralysis, it would be interesting to combine the ultrasound study of diaphragm excursion and thickening. The different profiles reported by our study must be known to avoid misinterpretation.