A comparison of the prehospital motor component of the Glasgow coma scale (mGCS) to the prehospital total GCS (tGCS) as a prehospital risk adjustment measure for trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the prehospital motor component subscale of the Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS) to the prehospital total GCS (tGCS) score for its ability to predict the need for intubation, survival to hospital discharge, and neurosurgical intervention in trauma patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of an urban level 1 trauma registry. All trauma patients presenting to the trauma center emergency department via emergency medical services from July 2008 through June 2010 were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) analysis was used to compare the predictive ability of the prehospital mGCS to tGCS for three outcomes: intubation, survival to hospital discharge, and neurosurgical intervention. Two subgroups (patients with injury severity score [ISS] ≥ 16 and traumatic brain injury [TBI] [head abbreviated injury score (AIS) ≥ 3]) were analyzed. An a priori statistically significant absolute difference of 0.050 in AUC between mGCS and tGCS for these clinical outcomes was used as a clinically significant difference. Multiple imputation was used for missing prehospital GCS data. RESULTS: There were 9,816 patients, of which 4% were intubated, 3.8% had neurosurgical intervention, and 97.1% survived to hospital discharge. The absolute difference in AUC (prehospital tGCS minus mGCS) for all cases was statistically significant for all three outcomes but did not reach the clinical significance threshold: survival = 0.010 (95% CI: 0.002-0.018), intubation = 0.018 (95% CI: 0.011-0.024), and neurosurgical intervention = 0.019 (95% CI: 0.007-0.029). The difference in AUC between tGCS and mGCS for the subgroups ISS ≥ 16 (n = 1,151) and TBI (n = 1,165) did not reach clinical significance for the three outcomes. The discriminatory ability of the prehospital mGCS was good for survival (AUC: all patients = 0.89, ISS ≥ 16 = 0.84, traumatic brain injury = 0.86) excellent for intubation (AUC: all patients = 0.95, ISS ≥ 16 = 0.91, traumatic brain injury = 0.91), and poor for neurosurgical intervention (AUC: all patients = 0.67, ISS ≥ 16 = 0.57, traumatic brain injury = 0.60). CONCLUSION: The prehospital mGCS appears have good discriminatory power and is equivalent to the prehospital tGCS for predicting intubation and survival to hospital discharge in this trauma population as a whole, those with ISS ≥ 16, or TBI.

Subdural hematoma, retinal hemorrhage, and fracture triad as a clinical predictor for the diagnosis of child abuse.

OBJECTIVE: Nonaccidental trauma (NAT) is a major cause of traumatic death during infancy and early childhood. Several findings are known to raise the index of clinical suspicion: subdural hematoma (SDH), retinal hemorrhage (RH), fracture, and external trauma. Combinations of certain injury types, determined via statistical frequency associations, may assist clinical diagnostic tools when child abuse is suspected. The present study sought to assess the statistical validity of the clinical triad (SDH + RH + fracture) in the diagnosis of child abuse and by extension pediatric NAT. METHODS: A retrospective review of The University of Arizona Trauma Database was performed. All patients were evaluated for the presence or absence of the components of the clinical triad according to specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes. Injury type combinations included some variation of SDH, RH, all fractures, noncranial fracture, and cranial fracture. Each injury type was then correlated with the ICD-10 codes for child abuse or injury comment keywords. Statistical analysis via contingency tables was then conducted for test characteristics such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: There were 3149 patients younger than 18 years of age included in the quantitative analysis, all of whom had at least one component of the clinical triad. From these, 372 patients (11.8%) had a diagnosis of child abuse. When compared to a single diagnosis of either SDH, RH, all fractures, noncranial fracture, or cranial fracture, the clinical triad had a significantly greater correlation with the diagnosis of child abuse (100% of cases) (p < 0.0001). The dyad of SDH + RH also had a significantly greater correlation with a child abuse diagnosis compared to single diagnoses (88.9%) (p < 0.0001). The clinical triad of SDH + RH + fracture had a sensitivity of 88.8% (95% CI 87.6%-89.9%), specificity of 100% (95% CI 83.9%-100%), and positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI 99.9%-100%). The dyad of SDH + RH had a sensitivity of 89.1% (95% CI 87.9%-90.1%), specificity of 88.9% (95% CI 74.7%-95.6%), and positive predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.6%-100%). All patients with the clinical triad were younger than 3 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: When SDH, RH, and fracture were present together, child abuse and by extension pediatric NAT were highly likely to have occurred.

Damage control laparotomy: a vital tool once overused.

BACKGROUND: Trauma surgery is in constant evolution as is the use of damage control laparotomy (DCL). The purpose of this study was to report the change in usage of DCL over time and its effect on outcome. METHODS: Trauma patients requiring laparotomies during a 3-year (2006-2008) period were reviewed. DCL was defined as laparotomy when fascia was not closed at the first operation. RESULTS: There were 14,534 trauma patients evaluated, and 843 laparotomies were performed on 532 patients during the study period. The number of patients requiring open laparotomies slightly increased while the demographics and Injury Severity Score were similar during the study period. The number of patient requiring DCL significantly decreased from 36.3% (53 of 146) in 2006 to 8.8% (15 of 170) in 2008 (p < 0.001). During this same time period, the mortality rate for patients requiring open laparotomy significantly decreased from 21.9% in 2006 to 12.9% in 2008 (p = 0.05). The decreased use of DCL resulted in a 33.3% reduction in the number of laparotomies performed. The decrease in average costs and charges is projected to result in savings of $2.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DCL was significantly decreased by 78% during the study with significantly improved outcome. The improved outcome and decreased resource utilization can reduce health care costs and charges. Although DCL may be a vital aspect of trauma surgery, it can be used more selectively with improved outcome.