Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in diabetic macular oedema (PHOTON): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial.

BACKGROUND: A high-dose formulation of intravitreal aflibercept (8 mg) could improve treatment outcomes in diabetic macular oedema (DMO) by requiring fewer injections than the standard comparator, aflibercept 2 mg. We report efficacy and safety results of aflibercept 8 mg versus 2 mg in patients with DMO. METHODS: PHOTON was a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial performed at 138 hospitals and specialty retina clinics in seven countries. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with type 1 or 2 diabetes and centre-involved DMO. Patients were randomly assigned (1:2:1) to intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (2q8), aflibercept 8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12), or aflibercept 8 mg every 16 weeks (8q16), following initial monthly dosing. From week 16, dosing intervals for the aflibercept 8 mg groups were shortened if patients met prespecified dose regimen modification criteria denoting disease activity. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 48 (non-inferiority margin of 4 letters). Efficacy and safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04429503). FINDINGS: Between June 29, 2020, and June 28, 2021, 970 patients were screened for eligibility. After exclusions, 660 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive aflibercept 8q12 (n=329), 8q16 (n=164), or 2q8 (n=167); two patients were randomly assigned in error and did not receive treatment. 658 (99·7%) patients were treated and included in the full analysis set and safety analysis set (8q12 n=328, 8q16 n=163, and 2q8 n=167). Mean patient age was 62·3 years (SD 10·4). 401 (61%) patients were male. 471 (72%) patients were White. Aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 demonstrated non-inferior BCVA gains to aflibercept 2q8 (BCVA mean change from baseline 8·8 letters [SD 9·0] in the 8q12 group, 7·9 letters [8·4] in the 8q16 group, and 9·2 letters [9·0] in the 2q8 group). The difference in least squares means was -0·57 letters (95% CI -2·26 to 1·13, p value for non-inferiority <0·0001) between 8q12 and 2q8 and -1·44 letters (-3·27 to 0·39, p value for non-inferiority 0·0031) between aflibercept 8q16 and 2q8. Proportions of patients with ocular adverse events in the study eye were similar across groups (8q12 n=104 [32%], 8q16 n=48 [29%], and 2q8 n=46 [28%]). INTERPRETATION: Aflibercept 8 mg demonstrated efficacy and safety with extended dosing intervals and could decrease treatment burden in patients with DMO. FUNDING: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Bayer.

SUPRACHOROIDAL SPACE INJECTION TECHNIQUE: Expert Panel Guidance.

PURPOSE: To develop professional guidelines for best practices for suprachoroidal space (SCS) injection, an innovative technique for retinal therapeutic delivery, based on current published evidence and clinical experience. METHODS: A panel of expert ophthalmologists reviewed current published evidence and clinical experience during a live working group meeting to define points of consensus and key clinical considerations to inform the development of guidelines for in-office SCS injection. RESULTS: Core consensus guidelines for in-office SCS injection were reached and reported by the expert panel. Current clinical evidence and physician experience supported SCS injection as a safe and effective method for delivering retinal and choroidal therapeutics. The panel established consensus on the rationale for SCS injection, including potential benefits relative to other intraocular delivery methods and current best practices in patient preparation, pre- and peri-injection management, SCS-specific injection techniques, and postinjection management and follow-up. CONCLUSION: These expert panel guidelines may support and promote standardization of SCS injection technique, with the goal of optimizing patient safety and outcomes. Some aspects of the procedure may reasonably be modified based on the clinical setting and physician judgment, as well as additional study.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of OPT-302, a VEGF-C/D Inhibitor for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: Neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is driven by VEGFs A, C, and D, which promote angiogenesis and vascular permeability. Intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF-A drugs are the standard of care, but these do not inhibit VEGF-C and D, which may explain why many patients fail to respond fully. This trial aimed to test the safety and efficacy of OPT-302, a biologic inhibitor of VEGF-C and D, in combination with the anti-VEGF-A inhibitor ranibizumab. DESIGN: Dose-ranging, phase 2b, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with treatment-naive nAMD were enrolled from 109 sites across Europe, Israel, and the United States. METHODS: Participants were randomized to 6, 4-weekly, intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg OPT-302, 2.0 mg OPT-302, or sham, plus intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes (comparing baseline with week 24) were the proportion of participants gaining or losing ≥ 15 ETDRS BCVA letters; area under the ETDRS BCVA over time curve; change in spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) central subfield thickness; and change in intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid on SD-OCT. RESULTS: Of 366 participants recruited from December 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018, 122, 123, and 121 were randomized to 0.5 mg OPT-302, 2.0 mg OPT-302, and sham, respectively. Mean (± standard deviation) visual acuity gain in the 2.0 mg OPT-302 group was significantly superior to sham (+14.2 ± 11.61 vs. +10.8 ± 11.52 letters; P = 0.01). The 0.5 mg OPT-302 group was not significantly different than the sham group (+9.44 ± 11.32 letters; P = 0.83). Compared with sham, the secondary BCVA outcomes favored the 2.0 mg OPT-302 group, with structural outcomes favoring both OPT-302 dosage groups. Adverse events (AEs) were similar across groups, with 16 (13.3%), 7 (5.6%), and 10 (8.3%) participants in the lower-dose, higher-dose, and sham groups, respectively, developing at least 1 serious AE. Two unrelated deaths both occurred in the sham arm. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly superior vision gain was observed with OPT-302 2.0 mg combination therapy, versus standard of care, with favorable safety (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03345082). FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

PHASE 2 RANDOMIZED STUDY (ORION-1) OF A NOVEL, BIODEGRADABLE DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT (AR-1105) FOR THE TREATMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA DUE TO CENTRAL OR BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION.

PURPOSE: AR-1105 is a novel biodegradable sustained-release dexamethasone implant designed to deliver 6-month durability. This Phase 2 study evaluated two AR-1105 formulations with different release profiles in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Patients received a single intravitreal injection with 340 µg dexamethasone. In the initial phase, five patients received clinical formulation (CF) 1. In the randomized phase, 44 patients were randomized 1:1 to CF1 or CF2. The follow-up was 6 months. Patients had vision loss due to macular edema diagnosed ≥9 (central retinal vein occlusion) or ≥12 months (branch retinal vein occlusion) before screening, and could be treatment-naive or -experienced (if received prior steroids, must have demonstrated response). RESULTS: Both formulations improved vision and reduced retinal thickening from baseline across all visits. At Month 6, mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity were +4.3 and +8.0 letters, and mean changes in central subfield thickness were -93 µm and -211 µm in CF1 and CF2 randomized patients, respectively. Most common adverse events were reduced visual acuity, worsening macular edema, conjunctival hemorrhage, and increased intraocular pressure. No patients required surgery or laser for intraocular pressure control. CONCLUSION: Both formulations were well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful and sustained improvements in vision and retinal thickening in patients with retinal vein occlusion with longstanding edema.

INTRAVITREAL NESVACUMAB (ANTIANGIOPOIETIN 2) PLUS AFLIBERCEPT IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: Phase 2 RUBY Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare intravitreal nesvacumab (anti-angiopoietin 2) plus aflibercept with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in diabetic macular edema. METHODS: The eyes (n = 302) were randomized (1:2:3) to nesvacumab 3 mg + aflibercept 2 mg (LD combo), nesvacumab 6 mg + aflibercept 2 mg (HD combo), or IAI 2 mg at baseline, Weeks 4 and 8. LD combo continued every 8 weeks (q8w). HD combo was rerandomized at Week 12 to q8w or every 12 weeks (q12w); IAI to q8w, q12w, or HD combo q8w through Week 32. RESULTS: Week 12 best-corrected visual acuity gains for LD and HD combo versus IAI were 6.8, 8.5, and 8.8 letters; Week 36 changes were similar. Central subfield retinal thickness reductions at Week 12 were -169.4, -184.0, and -174.6 µm (nominal P = 0.0183, HD combo vs. IAI); Week 36 reductions for LD combo and HD combo q8w and q12w versus IAI were -210.4, -223.4, and -193.7 versus -61.9 µm (nominal P < 0.05). At Week 12, 13.3% and 21.3% versus 15.2% had ≥2-step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale improvement (LD and HD combos vs. IAI) and 59.6% and 66.3% versus 53.7% had complete foveal center fluid resolution. Safety was comparable across groups. CONCLUSION: Nesvacumab + aflibercept demonstrated no additional visual benefit over IAI. Anatomic improvements with HD combo may warrant further investigation.

PHASE 2 STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BRIMONIDINE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM (BRIMO DDS) GENERATION 1 IN PATIENTS WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Brimonidine Drug Delivery System (Brimo DDS), a biodegradable intravitreal implant, in the treatment of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Phase 2, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, 24-month study. Study eyes were treated (Day 1; Month 6 retreatment) with Brimo DDS 132 µg (n = 49), Brimo DDS 264 µg (n = 41), or sham procedure (n = 23). The primary timepoint for efficacy analysis was Month 12. RESULTS: Mean GA area growth at Month 12 was 1.78 mm2, 1.59 mm2, and 2.19 mm2 in the Brimo DDS 132 µg, 264 µg, and sham groups, respectively. Geographic atrophy area growth was consistently smaller with Brimo DDS 132 and 264 µg than sham; between-group differences were significant (P ≤ 0.032) at Month 3. In patients with baseline lesion area ≥6 mm2 (two-thirds of patients), GA lesion area and effective radius growth was reduced with Brimo DDS 132 and 264 µg at Month 12 (P ≤ 0.050 vs. sham). Treatment-related adverse events were usually injection procedure-related. CONCLUSION: Brimo DDS demonstrated a favorable safety profile and reduced GA lesion area growth at Month 3. Lesion growth at Month 12 was reduced in patients with baseline GA lesion area ≥6 mm2. The results support Phase 3 development.

Complement C3 Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan for Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: Geographic atrophy (GA), a late stage of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), is a major cause of blindness. Even while central visual acuity remains relatively well preserved, GA often causes considerable compromise of visual function and quality of life. No treatment currently exists. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of pegcetacoplan, a complement C3 inhibitor, for treatment of GA. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled phase 2 study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-six patients with GA. METHODS: Patients with GA were assigned randomly in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive intravitreal injections of 15 mg pegcetacoplan monthly or every other month (EOM) or sham intravitreal injections monthly or EOM for 12 months with follow-up at months 15 and 18. Area and growth of GA were measured using fundus autofluorescence imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was mean change in square root GA lesion area from baseline to month 12. Secondary outcome measures included mean change from baseline in GA lesion area without the square root transformation, distance of GA lesion from the fovea, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance BCVA, and low-luminance visual acuity deficit. The primary safety end point was the number and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: In patients receiving pegcetacoplan monthly or EOM, the GA growth rate was reduced by 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-49; P = 0.008) and 20% (95% CI, 0-40; P = 0.067) compared with the sham treatment group. Post hoc analysis showed that the effect was greater in the second 6 months of treatment, with observed reductions of 45% (P = 0.0004) and 33% (P = 0.009) for pegcetacoplan monthly and EOM, respectively. Two cases of culture-positive endophthalmitis and 1 case of culture-negative endophthalmitis occurred in the pegcetacoplan monthly group. New-onset investigator-determined exudative AMD was reported more frequently in pegcetacoplan-treated eyes (18/86 eyes [20.9%] and 7/79 eyes [8.9%] in monthly and EOM groups, respectively) than in sham-treated eyes (1/81 eyes [1.2%]). CONCLUSIONS: Local C3 inhibition with pegcetacoplan resulted in statistically significant reductions in the growth of GA compared with sham treatment. Phase 3 studies will define the efficacy and safety profile further.

SUPPLEMENTAL SCLERAL BUCKLE IN THE ERA OF SMALL INCISION VITRECTOMY AND WIDE-ANGLE VIEWING SYSTEMS.

PURPOSE: To evaluate trends and outcomes of scleral buckle as adjunct to pars plana vitrectomy for management of retinal detachment. METHODS: Retrospective case series including 300 consecutive cases of retinal detachment that underwent pars plana vitrectomy. The series was divided into three consecutive groups: Group A (first 100 cases), Group B (second 100 cases), and Group C (third 100 cases). RESULTS: Three hundred eyes of 289 patients, mean age 61.0 years, were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 31.3 months for Group A, 28.5 months for Group B, and 12.0 months for Group C (P < 0.001). The baseline mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution equivalent was 1.58 for Group A, 1.31 for Group B, and 1.33 for Group C (P = 0.15). Supplemental scleral buckle was performed in 53% of Group A, 35% of Group B, and 17% of Group C (P < 0.001). Single surgery reattachment rate was 93% for Group A, 95% for Group B, and 97% for Group C (P = 0.48). The mean change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution equivalent was -0.84 for Group A, -0.81 for Group B, and -0.71 for Group C (P = 0.50). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates decreasing use of supplemental scleral buckle in the era of small gauge vitrectomy surgery and wide-angle viewing systems while the outcomes remain stable. Selective, less frequent use of supplemental scleral buckle is compatible with good anatomical and visual outcomes.

Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study).

PURPOSE: To describe the natural history of diabetic macular edema (DME) with respect to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) outcomes and to identify baseline patient characteristics and systemic factors associated with improvement or worsening of outcomes in sham-treated patients. METHODS: The study population was sham-treated patients (n = 350) in the 3-year MEAD registration study of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of DME. Patients had center-involved DME and received sham intravitreal injections in the study eye at ≥ 6-month intervals. Potential prognostic factors for outcomes were evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Visual and anatomic outcomes were poorer in patients who left the study early (n = 198) than in study completers (n = 152). Mean change in BCVA from baseline at the last visit with available data was + 0.9 letters; 37.5% of patients had no change in BCVA, 23.2% had gained > 10 letters, and 16.0% had lost > 10 letters. Older age and baseline diabetic retinopathy score > 6 were associated with worse BCVA outcomes; thicker baseline CRT and larger number of hypertension medications used were associated with larger reductions in CRT during the study. CONCLUSIONS: BCVA and CRT outcomes were variable in this population of DME patients with generally good glycemic control. In DME patients without active treatment, older age and baseline diabetic retinopathy score > 6 were associated with less improvement in BCVA; thicker baseline CRT and a larger number of antihypertensive medications used predicted better improvement in CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The MEAD study trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifiers NCT00168337 and NCT00168389.

Mitochondrial DNA variants can mediate methylation status of inflammation, angiogenesis and signaling genes.

Mitochondrial (mt) DNA can be classified into haplogroups representing different geographic and/or racial origins of populations. The H haplogroup is protective against age-related macular degeneration (AMD), while the J haplogroup is high risk for AMD. In the present study, we performed comparison analyses of human retinal cell cybrids, which possess identical nuclei, but mtDNA from subjects with either the H or J haplogroups, and demonstrate differences in total global methylation, and expression patterns for two genes related to acetylation and five genes related to methylation. Analyses revealed that untreated-H and -J cybrids have different expression levels for nuclear genes (CFH, EFEMP1, VEGFA and NFkB2). However, expression levels for these genes become equivalent after treatment with a methylation inhibitor, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Moreover, sequencing of the entire mtDNA suggests that differences in epigenetic status found in cybrids are likely due to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the haplogroup profiles rather than rare variants or private SNPs. In conclusion, our findings indicate that mtDNA variants can mediate methylation profiles and transcription for inflammation, angiogenesis and various signaling pathways, which are important in several common diseases.

Randomized Trial of Treat and Extend Ranibizumab with and without Navigated Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema: TREX-DME 1 Year Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare monthly dosing with a treat and extend algorithm using ranibizumab 0.3 mg with and without angiography-guided macular laser photocoagulation for center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 150 eyes from 116 subjects were randomized into 3 cohorts: Monthly (n = 30), TReat and EXtend without macular laser photocoagulation (TREX; n = 60), and treat and extend with angiography-GuIded macular LAser photocoagulation (GILA; n = 60). METHODS: Monthly cohort eyes received ranibizumab 0.3 mg every 4 weeks. Eyes in the TREX and GILA cohorts received 4 monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.3 mg followed by a treat and extend algorithm based on disease activity. Eyes in the GILA cohort also received angiography-guided macular laser photocoagulation at month 1 and again every 3 months for microaneurysm leakage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean central retinal thickness (CRT), number of injections from baseline to 1 year, and percentage gaining/losing 2 and 3 lines of vision. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were well balanced among the cohorts. A total of 137 eyes (91%) completed the 1-year end point visit. At 1 year, the mean BCVA improved by 8.6, 9.6, and 9.5 letters in the Monthly, TREX, and GILA cohorts, respectively (P = 0.8). There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the percentage gaining/losing 2 and 3 lines of vision. The CRT improved by 123 µm, 146 µm, and 166 µm in the Monthly, TREX, and GILA cohorts, respectively (P = 0.47). The mean number of macular laser treatments in the GILA cohort at 1 year was 2.9 (range, 1-4). The number of injections was significantly reduced in both the TREX (10.7) and GILA (10.1) cohorts compared with the Monthly cohort (13.1, P < 0.001). There were no cases of endophthalmitis, and the total incidence of Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration events was 4.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized trial found that treat and extend dosing of ranibizumab 0.3 mg with and without angiography-guided macular laser photocoagulation significantly decreased the number of injections given while providing similar visual and anatomic outcomes compared with monthly dosing at 1 year. Adding angiography-guided laser photocoagulation to this dosing algorithm did not significantly improve outcomes at 1 year.

THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION AND THE COMPLEMENT PATHWAY AS A THERAPEUTIC TARGET.

PURPOSE: Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced, vision-threatening form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) affecting approximately five million individuals worldwide. To date, there are no approved therapeutics for GA treatment; however, several are in clinical trials. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of GA, particularly the role of complement cascade dysregulation and emerging therapies targeting the complement cascade. METHODS: Primary literature search on PubMed for GA, complement cascade in age-related macular degeneration. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for natural history studies in GA and clinical trials of drugs targeting the complement cascade for GA. RESULTS: Cumulative damage to the retina by aging, environmental stress, and other factors triggers inflammation via multiple pathways, including the complement cascade. When regulatory components in these pathways are compromised, as with several GA-linked genetic risk factors in the complement cascade, chronic inflammation can ultimately lead to the retinal cell death characteristic of GA. Complement inhibition has been identified as a key candidate for therapeutic intervention, and drugs targeting the complement pathway are currently in clinical trials. CONCLUSION: The complement cascade is a strategic target for GA therapy. Further research, including on natural history and genetics, is crucial to expand the understanding of GA pathophysiology and identify effective therapeutic targets.

Increased expression of ApoE and protection from amyloid-beta toxicity in transmitochondrial cybrids with haplogroup K mtDNA.

Mitochondrial (mt) DNA haplogroups, defined by specific single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) patterns, represent populations of diverse geographic origins and have been associated with increased risk or protection of many diseases. The H haplogroup is the most common European haplogroup while the K haplogroup is highly associated with the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Transmitochondrial cybrids (cell lines with identical nuclei, but mtDNA from either H (n=8) or K (n=8) subjects) were analyzed by the Seahorse flux analyzer, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cybrids were treated with amyloid-ß peptides and cell viabilities were measured. Other cybrids were demethylated with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) and expression levels for APOE and NFkB2 were measured. Results show K cybrids have (a) significantly lower mtDNA copy numbers, (b) higher expression levels for MT-DNA encoded genes critical for oxidative phosphorylation, (c) lower Spare Respiratory Capacity, (d) increased expression of inhibitors of the complement pathway and important inflammasome-related genes; and (e) significantly higher levels of APOE transcription that were independent of methylation status. After exposure to amyloid-ß1-42 peptides (active form), H haplogroup cybrids demonstrated decreased cell viability compared to those treated with amyloid-ß42-1 (inactive form) (p<0.0001), while this was not observed in the K cybrids (p=0.2). K cybrids had significantly higher total global methylation levels and differences in expression levels for two acetylation genes and four methylation genes. Demethylation with 5-aza-dC altered expression levels for NFkB2, while APOE transcription patterns were unchanged. Our findings support the hypothesis that mtDNA-nuclear retrograde signaling may mediate expression levels of APOE, a key factor in many age-related diseases. Future studies will focus on identification of the mitochondrial-nuclear retrograde signaling mechanism(s) contributing to these mtDNA-mediated differences.

Inherited mitochondrial DNA variants can affect complement, inflammation and apoptosis pathways: insights into mitochondrial-nuclear interactions.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss in developed countries. While linked to genetic polymorphisms in the complement pathway, there are many individuals with high risk alleles that do not develop AMD, suggesting that other 'modifiers' may be involved. Mitochondrial (mt) haplogroups, defined by accumulations of specific mtDNA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which represent population origins, may be one such modifier. J haplogroup has been associated with high risk for AMD while the H haplogroup is protective. It has been difficult to assign biological consequences for haplogroups so we created human ARPE-19 cybrids (cytoplasmic hybrids), which have identical nuclei but mitochondria of either J or H haplogroups, to investigate their effects upon bioenergetics and molecular pathways. J cybrids have altered bioenergetic profiles compared with H cybrids. Q-PCR analyses show significantly lower expression levels for seven respiratory complex genes encoded by mtDNA. J and H cybrids have significantly altered expression of eight nuclear genes of the alternative complement, inflammation and apoptosis pathways. Sequencing of the entire mtDNA was carried out for all the cybrids to identify haplogroup and non-haplogroup defining SNPs. mtDNA can mediate cellular bioenergetics and expression levels of nuclear genes related to complement, inflammation and apoptosis. Sequencing data suggest that observed effects are not due to rare mtDNA variants but rather the combination of SNPs representing the J versus H haplogroups. These findings represent a paradigm shift in our concepts of mt-nuclear interactions.

Fellow Eye Comparisons for 7-Year Outcomes in Ranibizumab-Treated AMD Subjects from ANCHOR, MARINA, and HORIZON (SEVEN-UP Study).

PURPOSE: To compare study and fellow eyes in subjects with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) for 7-year outcomes arising from contrasting treatment histories and disease statuses. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study, predetermined secondary analysis. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 65 participants from the ranibizumab-treatment arms of the Anti-VEGF Antibody for the Treatment of Predominantly Classic Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ANCHOR), Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab In the Treatment of Neovascular AMD (MARINA), and Open-Label Extension Trial of Ranibizumab for Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (HORIZON) trials, recruited for an update evaluation from 14 study sites. METHODS: Seven-year visual outcomes and retinal imaging data were compared with the ANCHOR, MARINA, and HORIZON databases. Under the ANCHOR and MARINA protocols, study eyes had received monthly ranibizumab injections for the initial 2 years, during which fellow eyes were prohibited from anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of subjects with study eye vision better than fellow eye, vision change from baseline to year 7, and mean area of macular atrophy (MA) were predetermined secondary end points. RESULTS: Fellow eyes with exudative AMD had received a mean 7.3 total injections of anti-VEGF agents in the mean 3.4 years off-study. For the 35% of subjects with exudative AMD in both eyes at baseline, within-patient comparisons at year 7 showed better vision in the study eye in 82%, with better mean final vision in study eyes (54.7 vs. 27.3 letters in fellow eyes, P < 0.001). Also in this subgroup, study eyes, which had received 2 years of high-frequency ranibizumab, had less severe MA than the respective fellow eye at year 7 in 88% of patients (mean area ± standard deviation 2.8±2.2 mm(2) vs. 5.8±2.5 mm(2) in the fellow eyes, P = 0.0013). Final fellow eye vision outcome was significantly correlated with MA severity (coefficient -6.95, P < 0.001), and patients' inter-eye vision difference corresponded to the degree of MA asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: Exudative fellow eyes remained at risk for further vision decline in later years under management with low-frequency anti-VEGF therapy. In patients with bilateral exudative AMD at baseline, final vision at year 7 was significantly better in study eyes than in fellow eyes, and MA was less severe. Macular atrophy area correlated with final visual outcomes, determined inter-eye vision differences, and was not attributable to high-frequency ranibizumab therapy.

Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Diabetic Macular Edema Patients with and without Prior Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment: Outcomes from the Phase 3 Program.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) versus laser in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with and without prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for DME. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of eyes from 2 similarly designed, phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (eyes) with DME with central involvement from VISTA (n = 461) and VIVID (n = 404). METHODS: Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This study reports exploratory outcomes through week 100. Analyses focused on VISTA because more patients received prior anti-VEGF therapy in VISTA (42.9%) versus VIVID (8.9%). RESULTS: Of 42.9% of patients in VISTA who received prior anti-VEGF treatment, 83.3% to 92.6% received ≥ 1 prior injections of bevacizumab, and 71.4% to 82.4% received bevacizumab only as prior anti-VEGF treatment for a duration ranging from 28 days to 3.9 years. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes from baseline in the IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser groups were +10.4 letters, +10.5 letters, and -0.7 letters at week 52 and +10.9 letters, +10.8 letters, and -0.8 letters at week 100, respectively. Corresponding changes in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were +14.1 letters, +11.0 letters, and +0.9 letters at week 52 and +12.0 letters, +11.3 letters, and +2.1 letters at week 100. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 180.2 µm, 192.2 µm, and 90.9 µm at week 52 and 180.1 µm, 196.4 µm, and 94.1 µm at week 100. Corresponding reductions in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were 190.3 µm, 175.7 µm, and 61.0 µm at week 52 and 200.0 µm, 186.7 µm, and 76.9 µm at week 100. The most frequent serious ocular adverse event was vitreous hemorrhage (1.3%, 0.7%, and 1.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Visual and anatomic improvements over laser with both IAI regimens were significant and similar through week 100 in subgroups of patients in VISTA with and without prior anti-VEGF treatment for DME.

Comprehensive Review of Ocular and Systemic Safety Events with Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: To assess the ocular and systemic safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) compared with controls in IAI trials in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion (MEfCRVO), macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion (MEfBRVO), and diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Comprehensive review of 10 phase II and III trials of IAI in retinal diseases. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included from IAI trials in nAMD (CLEAR-IT 2 [52 weeks], VIEW 1 [96 weeks], VIEW 2 [96 weeks], VIEW 1 extension [208 weeks]); MEfCRVO (COPERNICUS [100 weeks], GALILEO [76 weeks]); MEfBRVO (VIBRANT [52 weeks]); and DME (DA VINCI [52 weeks], VIVID [100 weeks], VISTA [100 weeks]). METHODS: Rates were calculated as events/100 person-years at risk (PYR). When applicable, rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were provided. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included rates for intraocular inflammation, endophthalmitis, serious adverse events (SAEs), wound-healing complications, hypertension (HTN), adjudicated Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC)-defined arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and vascular death), and death from all causes. RESULTS: More than 4000 patients contributed >7000 PYR. For all outcomes, there were no meaningful differences between evaluated adverse event rates for IAI and controls. Overall intraocular inflammation rates were 2.37 (control) and 2.06 (IAI); overall RR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.61-1.27). Overall endophthalmitis rates were 0.52 (control) and 0.22 (IAI); overall RR was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.18-1.03). Overall SAE rates were 23.09 (control) and 20.80 (IAI); overall RR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-1.02). Overall rates of wound-healing complications were 0.17 (control) and 0.15 (IAI); overall RR was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.24-3.86). Overall HTN rates were 14.87 (control) and 11.27 (IAI), with an overall RR of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65-0.89); HTN rates were highest in MEfBRVO and lowest in nAMD. For adjudicated APTC-defined ATEs, rates were 2.04 (control) and 2.19 (IAI), with an RR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.73-1.61). Overall death rates were 1.16 (control) and 1.49 (IAI); overall RR was 1.28 (95% CI, 0.80-2.15). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of selected ocular and systemic adverse events with IAI were similar to those of controls and similar across disease states in evaluated IAI trials. Intravitreal aflibercept injection was generally well tolerated in the patients evaluated.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 52-Week Results of the VIBRANT Study.

PURPOSE: To determine week 52 efficacy and safety outcomes in eyes with macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) compared with grid laser. DESIGN: VIBRANT was a double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eyes randomized and treated in VIBRANT were followed to week 52. METHODS: In the IAI group, eyes received IAI every 4 weeks through week 24 and IAI every 8 weeks through week 48 with rescue grid laser if needed at week 36. In the grid laser group, all eyes received grid laser at baseline and, if prespecified rescue criteria were met, 1 additional laser from week 12 to 20 and IAI every 8 weeks after 3 monthly doses from week 24 onward (the laser/IAI group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was percentage of eyes with improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score ≥15 at week 24. All outcome measures at week 52 were exploratory, and P values are considered nominal. RESULTS: The percentage of eyes with improvement from baseline letter score ≥15 in the IAI and laser/IAI groups was 52.7% versus 26.7% (P = 0.0003) at week 24 and 57.1% versus 41.1% (P = 0.0296) at week 52. The corresponding mean change from baseline BCVA letter score was 17.0 versus 6.9 (P < 0.0001) at week 24 and 17.1 versus 12.2 (P = 0.0035) at week 52. The mean reduction from baseline central retinal thickness was 280.5 µm versus 128.0 µm (P < 0.0001) at week 24 and 283.9 µm versus 249.3 µm (P = 0.0218) at week 52. In the IAI group, 10.6% of eyes received rescue laser at week 36, and in the laser/IAI group, 80.7% received rescue IAI from week 24 to week 48. Traumatic cataract in 1 eye (1.1%) in the IAI group was the only ocular serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 monthly IAI, injections every 8 weeks maintained control of macular edema and visual benefits through week 52. In the laser group, rescue IAI given from week 24 onward resulted in substantial visual improvements at week 52.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME) over 3 years. DESIGN: Two similarly designed phase 3 trials: VISTADME and VIVIDDME. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (eyes; n = 872) with central-involved DME. METHODS: Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or laser control. From week 24, if rescue treatment criteria were met, IAI patients received active laser, and laser control patients received IAI 2q8. From week 100, laser control patients who had not received IAI rescue treatment received IAI as needed per retreatment criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 52. We report the 148-week results. RESULTS: Mean BCVA gain from baseline to week 148 with IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser control was 10.4, 10.5, and 1.4 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 10.3, 11.7, and 1.6 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters from baseline at week 148 was 42.9%, 35.8%, and 13.6% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 41.2%, 42.2%, and 18.9% (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. Greater proportions of eyes treated with IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 versus those treated with laser control had an improvement of ≥2 steps in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score in both VISTA (29.9% and 34.4% vs. 20.1% [P = 0.0350, IAI 2q4; P = 0.0052, IAI 2q8]) and VIVID (44.3% and 47.8% vs. 17.4% [P < 0.0001 for both]). In an integrated safety analysis, the most frequent ocular serious adverse event was cataract (3.1%, 2.1%, 0.3% for 2q4, 2q8, and control). CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvements observed with both IAI regimens (over laser control) at weeks 52 and 100 were maintained at week 148, with similar overall efficacy in the IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 groups. Treatment with IAI also had positive effects on the DRSS score. Over 148 weeks, the incidence of adverse events was consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

PROGRESSION OF MACULAR ATROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION UNDERGOING ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY.

PURPOSE: To define the frequency and quantify the progression of macular atrophy (MA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration undergoing treatment with antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy for >2 years. METHODS: Fifty-four eyes of 46 patients (86.7 ± 6.8 years, 53.7% women) diagnosed with wet age-related macular degeneration were included in this retrospective study. Eyes that received photodynamic therapy or laser treatment were excluded. All eyes were imaged at baseline and after 2 years with the Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography using a 512 × 128 macular cube scan protocol centered on the fovea. Optical coherence tomography en face fundus images were obtained for each 3-dimensional data set using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-cleared Advanced RPE Analysis software, which automatically identifies atrophic areas by segmenting regions of increased reflectivity in en face choroidal slab images. Segmentation errors were manually corrected by trained Doheny Image Reading Center graders using a standardized grading protocol. The prevalence rates of atrophy at baseline and at 2-years follow-up and enlargement rates were computed. Baseline demographic factors and types and numbers of antivascular endothelial growth factor injections received over time were correlated with the development and enlargement of atrophy. RESULTS: Macular atrophy was noted at baseline in 32 (59.3%) eyes and progressed in all eyes over the next 2 years. Among the 28 eyes without atrophy at baseline, MA developed by 2 years in 6 eyes (21.4% of eyes without MA at baseline). Of note, 22 eyes (40.7% of overall cohort) never developed atrophy during the course of the study. Among eyes with atrophy at baseline, the annual growth rate of MA was found to be 0.89 ± 0.93 mm. A multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of gender, age, smoking status, medication injected, and number of injections on MA. Except for the number of total injections (R = 0.3, P < 0.01), the studied variables could not significantly predict development or progression of MA (F [0.73, 13] = 0.378, P = 0.86, R = 0.05). However, the study was not powered to detect small effects. CONCLUSION: Macular atrophy is a frequent finding in eyes with wet age-related macular degeneration both before and after antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. The frequency of new optical coherence tomography-defined atrophy (21% at 2 years) after starting therapy was close to the rates reported in CATT, IVAN, and HARBOR. The rate of MA enlargement was positively correlated with the number of injections, but did not appear to be greater than that reported for atrophy in the absence of choroidal neovascularization.