Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders and Impact of Treatment.

PURPOSE: Common variable immunodeficiency disorder (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) often associated with severe and chronic infections. Patients commonly receive immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment to reduce the cycle of recurrent infection and improve physical functioning. However, how Ig treatment in CVID affects quality of life (QOL) has not been thoroughly evaluated. The purpose of a recent Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) mail survey was to assess the factors that are associated with QOL in patients with CVID receiving Ig treatment. METHODS: A 75-question survey developed by the IDF and a 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) to assess QOL were mailed to adults with CVID. Mean SF-12 scores were compared between patients with CVID and the general US adult population normative sample. RESULTS: Overall, 945 patients with CVID completed the surveys. More than half of the patients (54.9%) received intravenous Ig and 44.9% received subcutaneous Ig treatment. Patients with CVID had significantly lower SF-12 scores compared with the general US population regardless of sex or age (p < 0.05). Route of IgG replacement did not dramatically improve QOL. SF-12 scores were highest in patients with CVID who have well-controlled PIDD, lacked physical impairments, were not bothered by treatment, and received Ig infusions at home. CONCLUSION: These data provide insight into what factors are most associated with physical and mental health, which can serve to improve QOL in patients in this population. Improvements in QOL can result from early detection of disease, limiting digestive system disease, attention to fatigue, and implementation of an individual treatment plan for the patient.

Pulmonologist perspectives regarding diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency diseases.

BACKGROUND: The time from symptom onset to diagnosis for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) is an average of 12 years, but prompt diagnosis and treatment can promote best outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Because the manifestations of PIDD are often sinopulmonary in nature, patients with undiagnosed PIDD are frequently referred to pulmonologists. This study sought to identify opportunities among these specialists to improve diagnosis and clinical management of patients with PIDD. METHODS: A survey was sent to American Medical Association and American Osteopathic Association members whose specialty was pulmonology. Responses were compared with those from a historical survey of 71 subspecialist immunologists (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma Immunology members who devoted 10% of their practice to patients with PIDD). RESULTS: The surveys were returned by 485 pulmonologists, 49% of whom had diagnosed at least one patient with PIDD. In comparison with subspecialist immunologists, fewer pulmonologists were aware of the professional PIDD diagnosis and management guidelines and fewer followed up patients with various PIDDs. Pulmonologists and subspecialist immunologists also differed in the practice of prescribing prophylactic antibiotics and immunoglobulin replacement and in avoiding live viral vaccines. CONCLUSION: Differences in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PIDD between these two groups of specialists revealed areas in which PIDD-focused educational initiatives may be helpful for pulmonologists.

Fertility, pregnancies and outcomes reported by females with common variable immune deficiency and hypogammaglobulinemia: results from an internet-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Issues of fertility and pregnancy place an extra burden on females with primary immunodeficiencies. Patients lack reliable information and providers lack guidelines to counsel patients on these anxiety-provoking matters. OBJECTIVE: To collate concerns and experiences related to fertility and pregnancy from females with humoral immune deficiencies. METHODS: We conducted an internet-based survey of female patients who self-identified as having a diagnosis of primary humoral immune deficiency. RESULTS: Responses from 490 women with common variable immune deficiency and 100 with hypogammaglobulinemia were evaluated. The reported fertility measure (% of women who had had a birth) was statistically significantly lower as compared to the general US population (70 % vs. 85 %, p < 0.0001) whereas the rates of spontaneous pregnancy loss were comparable. This group reported a total of 966 pregnancies; 72 % resulted in a live birth. A majority of the pregnancies progressed with no incident and with continuation of their IgG replacement therapy; 23 % reported an increase in IgG dosing during pregnancy. Only 15 % of those reporting a first pregnancy indicated that they had been diagnosed with immune deficiency prior to their first pregnancy; these women expressed concern regarding the effect of immune deficiency on their fertility, pregnancy and decision to have children. CONCLUSION: With inherent limitations of self-reported responses to surveys, females with humoral immune deficiencies reported relatively good rates of fertility and pregnancies ending in live births. Results of the survey will serve as peer support for patients and inform counseling guidelines for providers.

Perceived Health in Patients with Primary Immune Deficiency.

PURPOSE: Perceived health (PH) is a subjective measure of global health of individuals. While many studies have evaluated outcomes in patients with primary immune deficiency (PID), published literature evaluating PH among patients with PID is sparse. We evaluated the results of the largest self-reported survey of patients with PID to determine the factors that may contribute to differences in PH. METHODS: Data from a National Survey of Patients with Primary Immune Deficiency Diseases conducted by the Immune Deficiency Foundation was studied. Multivariate logistic regression was employed for data analysis. RESULTS: Thirty percent of the patients perceived their health status as excellent or very good (EVG), 31 % as good (G), and 39 % as fair, poor or very poor (P). Older patients were less likely to have EVG-PH compared to G-PH. Ones with college degrees were more likely to have P-PH compared to G-PH, and less likely to have EVG-PH. Patients who were acutely ill and hospitalized in the past 12 months, ones with limited activity, and chronic diseases, were more likely to have P-PH compared to G-PH. Patients with "on demand" access to specialty care and ones on regular IVIG had higher OR of having EVG-PH as opposed to G-PH. Patients cared for mostly by an immunologist were less likely to have P-PH compared to G-PH. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the importance of PH in clinical practice. We suggest that recognizing the factors that drive PH in patients with PID is important for the development of disease prevention and health promotion programs, and delivery of appropriate health and social services to individuals with PID.

Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) report.

The Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) is a network of 33 centers in North America that study the treatment of rare and severe primary immunodeficiency diseases. Current protocols address the natural history of patients treated for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, and chronic granulomatous disease through retrospective, prospective, and cross-sectional studies. The PIDTC additionally seeks to encourage training of junior investigators, establish partnerships with European and other International colleagues, work with patient advocacy groups to promote community awareness, and conduct pilot demonstration projects. Future goals include the conduct of prospective treatment studies to determine optimal therapies for primary immunodeficiency diseases. To date, the PIDTC has funded 2 pilot projects: newborn screening for SCID in Navajo Native Americans and B-cell reconstitution in patients with SCID after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ten junior investigators have received grant awards. The PIDTC Annual Scientific Workshop has brought together consortium members, outside speakers, patient advocacy groups, and young investigators and trainees to report progress of the protocols and discuss common interests and goals, including new scientific developments and future directions of clinical research. Here we report the progress of the PIDTC to date, highlights of the first 2 PIDTC workshops, and consideration of future consortium objectives.

USIDNET: a strategy to build a community of clinical immunologists.

OBJECTIVES: Information about patients with primary immune deficiencies can be scarce because of the rarity of the disorders. Individual centers rarely have sufficient patients to educate trainees and garner collective wisdom. Registries for many diseases have proven their worth by providing essential information on disease spectrum, treatments and natural history. This study describes the construction and use of a registry for patients with primary immune deficiencies and other efforts to improve knowledge and care for affected patients and their families. METHODS: Registry demographics and data were extracted using proprietary reporting tools. Educational efforts and cell repository data were collected from centralized source material. RESULTS: The USIDNET Registry contains 3,459 patients, with common variable immune deficiency being the most represented. Pilot studies identified strengths and weaknesses of the data. Visiting Professor and Visiting Scholar Programs have been successful, encouraging trainees at all levels to pursue a career in Immunology. CONCLUSIONS: USIDNET's comprehensive and integrated approach provides resources that strengthen the field of primary immune deficiencies, as shown by utilization by 312 distinct sites or individuals. The reach of USIDNET's efforts is extended through the educational resources.

Payor issues: barriers to optimal management of patients with primary immunodeficiency.

Since 2005, when changes in Medicare reimbursement for IgG replacement therapy went into effect, physicians and patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) have encountered a number of challenges to administering and receiving appropriate immunoglobulin therapy. A 2006 membership survey conducted by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology found that 95 % of responders thought that the health of their patients was at risk due to Medicare changes; many patient surveys also found a significant number adversely affected by these changes. Decisions critical for optimal care being made by third-party payors are often in conflict with guidelines on recommended standard of care. Many payors, for example, are dictating where infusions can occur despite evidence clearly demonstrating that choice of the site of care needs to be determined by the particular patient's circumstance and experience. Another critical issue is the lack of product availability due to the determination by payors of which IgG products appear on formularies. Patients, physicians, and payors all bring their own perspective to these issues, and finding a solution to these challenges requires balancing the needs of all three groups.

Local and national advocacy support.

Decisions by third-party payors that are restricting delivery of appropriate IgG treatment for primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) are summoning action from patients, physicians, and their organizations to ensure that high quality treatment remains accessible. Some of the strongest advocacy to date is from patient organizations, such as the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF), which strive to educate stakeholders on key issues that determine patient access to appropriate IgG treatment. These issues include the ability to choose the appropriate site of care based on a patient's experience and circumstance and greater awareness of product choice. Advocacy by physicians on these issues at the local level is needed, as are national efforts by organizations such as the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and their regional societies.

Early vs. delayed diagnosis of severe combined immunodeficiency: a family perspective survey.

Infants affected with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) are susceptible to severe and recurrent infections and do not survive unless provided with immune reconstituting treatments. In the absence of population-based newborn screening, infants with SCID who do not have an affected older relative are ascertained only after they have developed infections. However, only limited data are available from the perspective of patients and families to indicate what proportion of SCID cases might benefit from earlier detection by pre-symptomatic screening, whether adequate treatment facilities are available, and how screening could improve SCID treatment outcomes. A survey of parents of children with SCID evaluated family history, pre- and post-diagnosis events, outcomes, and impact of SCID on families. Affected infants diagnosed with SCID as neonates had better survival, demonstrating the potential benefit of universal newborn screening.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin and adjunctive therapies in the treatment of primary immunodeficiencies: A working group report of and study by the Primary Immunodeficiency Committee of the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology.

There are an expanding number of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs), each associated with unique diagnostic and therapeutic complexities. Limited data, however, exist supporting specific therapeutic interventions. Thus, a survey of PIDD management was administered to allergists/immunologists in the United States to identify current perspectives and practices. Among 405 respondents, the majority of key management practices identified were consistent with existing data and guidelines, including the provision of immunoglobulin therapy, immunoglobulin dosing and selective avoidance of live viral vaccines. Practices for which there are little specific data or evidence-based guidance were also examined, including evaluation of IgG trough levels for patients receiving immunoglobulin, use of prophylactic antibiotics and recommendations for complementary/alternative medicine. Here, variability applied to PIDD patients was identified. Differences between practitioners clinically focused upon PIDD and general allergists/immunologists were also identified. Thus, a need for expanded clinical research in PIDD to optimize management and potentially improve outcomes was defined.

Family Physician Perspectives on Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases.

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) include over 250 diverse disorders. The current study assessed management of PID by family practice physicians. The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Primary Immunodeficiency Committee and the Immune Deficiency Foundation conducted an incentivized mail survey of family practice physician members of the American Medical Association and the American Osteopathic Association in direct patient care. Responses were compared with subspecialist immunologist responses from a similar survey. Surveys were returned by 528 (of 4500 surveys mailed) family practice physicians, of whom 44% reported following ≥1 patient with PID. Selective immunoglobulin A deficiency (21%) and chronic granulomatous disease (11%) were most common and were followed by significantly more subspecialist immunologists (P < 0.05). Use of intravenously administered immunoglobulin and live viral vaccinations across PID was significantly different (P < 0.05). Few family practice physicians were aware of professional guidelines for diagnosis and management of PID (4 vs. 79% of subspecialist immunologists, P < 0.05). Family practice physicians will likely encounter patients with PID diagnoses during their career. Differences in how family practice physicians and subspecialist immunologists manage patients with PID underscore areas where improved educational and training initiatives may benefit patient care.

Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: An Opportunity in Pediatrics for Improving Patient Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) are caused by inherent deficits in immune defenses that result in abnormal susceptibility to infection. In most cases, early and appropriate diagnosis can improve patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate understanding, recognition, and diagnosis of PIDD among pediatricians. METHODS: A mail survey sent to a sample of pediatricians obtained from the American Medical Association and American Osteopathic Association. Results were compared with a similar survey of specialists who are members of the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology. RESULTS: More than a third (35%) of pediatricians were uncomfortable with the recognition and diagnosis of PIDD despite 95% having ordered screening tests or referring patients to specialists to be evaluated for PIDD, and 77% having followed at leastone patient with PIDD. In all, 84% of pediatricians were unaware that professional guidelines for PIDD exist. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PIDD would benefit from improved recognition of the diseases by pediatricians in order to facilitate earlier diagnosis and optimize ongoing therapy.