OCT Guidance in Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Coronary bifurcation is defined by the European Bifurcation Consensus as a coronary artery stenosis adjacent to the origin of a significant side branch. Its anatomy is composed of 3 different segments: proximal main vessel, distal main vessel and side branch. Coronary artery bifurcation lesions are encountered in approximately 15-20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions and constitute a complex subgroup of lesions characterized by lower procedural success rates and higher rates of adverse outcomes. In recent years, a growing focus in the European and Japanese bifurcation club meetings has been the emerging role of intravascular imaging, in guiding successful bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In this review we will present the main ways optical coherence tomography (OCT) can be used to improve outcomes during bifurcation PCI.

Duration of dual antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher ischemic and bleeding risk compared with patients with normal renal function. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare shortened (≤3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with longer DAPT in patients with CKD undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. We systematically screened three major databases (Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) searching for randomized-controlled trials or subanalyses of them, which compared shortened (S-DAPT) to longer (L-DAPT) regimens of DAPT in patients with CKD. The primary endpoint is the net adverse clinical events (NACE) and the secondary is major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and bleedings. Subgroup analyses included studies using only P2Y12 monotherapy, ticagrelor-based regimens, 1- and 3-month duration of DAPT. A total of 10 studies and 6688 patients were included in our analysis. No significant differences regarding NACE (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.84-1.12, I2 = 0%), MACE (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.85-1.117, I2 = 0%), and bleedings (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.59-1.03, I2 = 25%) were observed between S-DAPT and L-DAPT in our meta-analysis. The findings from the subgroup analyses were in accordance with total findings; bleedings were significantly reduced in S-DAPT when only studies with 3-month duration of DAPT were analyzed (RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40-0.85, I2 = 0%). Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that no significant differences were observed between patients treated with S-DAPT or L-DAPT in the terms of MACE, NACE, and bleedings in patients with CKD. When it is required, S-DAPT could be considered in patients with CKD.

Efficacy and Safety of Thirty-Day Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The optimal duration of DAPT after complex PCI remains under investigation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the safety and efficacy of a one-month therapy period versus a longer duration of DAPT after complex PCI. We systematically screened three major databases, searching for randomized controlled trials or sub-analyses of them, which compared shortened DAPT (S-DAPT), namely, one month, and longer DAPT (L-DAPT), namely, more than three months. The primary endpoint was any Net Adverse Clinical Event (NACE), and the secondary was any MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event), its components (mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis), and major bleeding events. Three studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 6275 patients. Shortening DAPT to 30 days after complex PCI did not increase the risk of NACEs (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52-1.14), MACEs, mortality, myocardial infractions, stroke, or stent thrombosis. Pooled major bleeding incidence was reduced, but this finding was not statistically significant. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that one-month DAPT did not differ compared to a longer duration of DAPT after complex PCI in terms of safety and efficacy endpoints. Further studies are still required to confirm these findings.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and COVID-19: A Review of the Literature.

SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While the cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 have been thoroughly described, there are limited published studies in the literature establishing a connection between spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and COVID-19. Cardiovascular manifestations include, among others, myocarditis, acute myocardial infraction, and thrombosis. In general, SCAD is an uncommon and underdiagnosed cause of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly in younger women and in patients with underlying fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). Many patients with SCAD often report significant emotional stress, especially in relation with job loss, during the week preceding their cardiac event. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to societal stress and increased unemployment, factors that have been associated with cardiovascular morbidity. SCAD emerges as a rare manifestation of coronary artery disease, which a few recent case reports link to COVID-19. The aim of this article is to summarize the relevant data on the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and SCAD along with a review of the reported cases on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) following SARS-CoV2 infection and, thus, to provide insights about the relationship between COVID-19 and SCAD.