Mitigation translocation as a management tool.

Mitigation translocation is a subgroup of conservation translocation, categorized by a crisis-responsive time frame and the immediate goal of relocating individuals threatened with death. However, the relative successes of conservation translocations with longer time frames and broader metapopulation- and ecosystem-level considerations have been used to justify the continued implementation of mitigation translocations without adequate post hoc monitoring to confirm their effectiveness as a conservation tool. Mitigation translocations now outnumber other conservation translocations, and understanding the effectiveness of mitigation translocations is critical given limited global conservation funding especially if the mitigation translocations undermine biodiversity conservation by failing to save individuals. We assessed the effectiveness of mitigation translocations by conducting a quantitative review of the global literature. A total of 59 mitigation translocations were reviewed for their adherence to the adaptive scientific approach expected of other conservation translocations and for the testing of management options to continue improving techniques for the future. We found that mitigation translocations have not achieved their potential as an effective applied science. Most translocations focused predominantly on population establishment- and persistence-level questions, as is often seen in translocations more broadly, and less on metapopulation and ecosystem outcomes. Questions regarding the long-term impacts to the recipient ecosystem (12% of articles) and the carrying capacity of translocation sites (24% of articles) were addressed least often, despite these factors being more likely to influence ultimate success. Less than half (47%) of studies included comparison of different management techniques to facilitate practitioners selecting the most effective management actions for the future. To align mitigation translocations with the relative success of other conservation translocations, it is critical that future mitigation translocations conform to an established experimental approach to improve their effectiveness. Effective mitigation translocations will require significantly greater investment of time, expertise, and resources in the future.

La Translocación para Mitigación como una Herramienta de Gestión Resumen La translocación para mitigación es un subgrupo de la translocación para la conservación, caracterizada por un marco de tiempo que responda a la crisis y la meta inmediata de reubicar a individuos amenazados de muerte. Sin embargo, el éxito relativo de las traslocaciones para conservación con marcos de tiempo mayores y consideraciones a nivel metapoblación y ecosistema más amplias han sido utilizadas para justificar la implementación de translocaciones para mitigación sin monitoreo post hoc adecuado para confirmar su efectividad como herramienta de conservación. Las translocaciones para mitigación ahora son más numerosas que otras translocaciones, por lo que es fundamental entender la efectividad de las translocaciones para mitigación debido a las limitaciones en el financiamiento para la conservación global - especialmente si las translocaciones para mitigación socavan la conservación de la biodiversidad al fallar en salvar individuos. Evaluamos la efectividad de translocaciones para mitigación mediante una revisión cuantitativa de la literatura global. Revisamos un total de 59 translocaciones para mitigación para analizar su adhesión al método científico adaptativo esperado de otras translocaciones de conservación y para probar las opciones de gestión para mejorar las técnicas en el futuro. Encontramos que las mitigaciones para translocación no han alcanzado su potencial como una ciencia aplicada efectiva. La mayoría de las translocaciones se centraron predominantemente en preguntas relacionadas con el establecimiento y nivel de persistencia de la población, como se observa en translocaciones más generales, y menos en resultados a nivel metapoblación y ecosistema. Aspectos relacionados con los impactos a largo plazo sobre el ecosistema recipiente (12% de los artículos) y la capacidad de carga de los sitios de translocación (24% de los artículos) fueron poco abordados, no obstante que es más probable que estos factores influyan en el éxito final. Menos de la mitad (47%) de los estudios incluyó la comparación de métodos de gestión diferentes para facilitar que los practicantes selecciones las acciones de gestión más efectivas para el futuro. Para alinear las translocaciones para mitigación con el éxito relativo de otras translocaciones para conservación, es crítico que las futuras translocaciones para mitigación se apeguen a un método experimental establecido para incrementar su efectividad. Para ser efectivas, las translocaciones para mitigación requerirán una inversión de tiempo, conocimientos técnicos y recursos significativamente mayores.

Ecological Considerations When Designing Mitigation Translocations: An Australian Reptile Case Study.

Translocation science has made considerable progress over the last two decades; however, reptile translocations still frequently fail around the world. Major knowledge gaps surround the basic ecology of reptile species, including basic factors such as habitat preference, which have a critical influence on translocation success. The western spiny-tailed skink (Egernia stokesii badia) is used here as a case study to exemplify how empirical research can directly inform on-ground management and future translocation planning. A combination of studies, including LiDAR scanning of microhabitat structures, camera trapping, plasticine replica model experiments and unbounded point count surveys to assess predation risk, and visual and DNA analysis of dietary requirements, were all used to better understand the ecological requirements of E. s. badia. We found that the skinks have specific log pile requirements, both native and non-native predator management requirements, and a largely herbivorous, broad diet, which all influence translocation site selection and management planning. The use of E. s. badia as an Australian case study provides a clear strategic framework for the targeted research of meaningful ecological factors that influence translocation decision-making. Similar approaches applied to other reptile species are likely to fundamentally increase the capacity for effective management, and the likelihood of future successful translocations.

Revealing microhabitat requirements of an endangered specialist lizard with LiDAR.

A central principle of threatened species management is the requirement for detailed understanding of species habitat requirements. Difficult terrain or cryptic behaviour can, however, make the study of habitat or microhabitat requirements difficult, calling for innovative data collection techniques. We used high-resolution terrestrial LiDAR imaging to develop three-dimensional models of log piles, quantifying the structural characteristics linked with occupancy of an endangered cryptic reptile, the western spiny-tailed skink (Egernia stokesii badia). Inhabited log piles were generally taller with smaller entrance hollows and a wider main log, had more high-hanging branches, fewer low-hanging branches, more mid- and understorey cover, and lower maximum canopy height. Significant characteristics linked with occupancy were longer log piles, an average of three logs, less canopy cover, and the presence of overhanging vegetation, likely relating to colony segregation, thermoregulatory requirements, and foraging opportunities. In addition to optimising translocation site selection, understanding microhabitat specificity of E. s. badia will help inform a range of management objectives, such as targeted monitoring and invasive predator control. There are also diverse opportunities for the application of this technology to a wide variety of future ecological studies and wildlife management initiatives pertaining to a range of cryptic, understudied taxa.