Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 38(6): 2974-2994, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is an extremely common disease with a variety of medical and surgical treatment approaches. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians and patients in decisions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted from 2010 to 2022 to answer 8 key questions relating to the diagnosis of appendicitis, operative or nonoperative management, and specific technical and post-operative issues for appendectomy. The results of this systematic review were then presented to a panel of adult and pediatric surgeons. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. RESULTS: Conditional recommendations were made in favor of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis being managed operatively, either delayed (>12h) or immediate operation (<12h), either suction and lavage or suction alone, no routine drain placement, treatment with short-term antibiotics postoperatively for complicated appendicitis, and complicated appendicitis previously treated nonoperatively undergoing interval appendectomy. A conditional recommendation signals that the benefits of adhering to a recommendation probably outweigh the harms although it does also indicate uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations should provide guidance with regard to current controversies in appendicitis. The panel also highlighted future research opportunities where the evidence base can be strengthened.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia , Apendicite , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/terapia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências
2.
Surg Endosc ; 37(7): 5583-5590, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36319897

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of macroporous synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repair has become more frequent. The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of ventral incisional hernia repair with permanent synthetic mesh in contaminated fields to those in a clean field. METHODS: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative registry, a prospectively updated longitudinal hernia-specific national database, was retrospectively queried for adults who underwent open ventral incisional hernia repair using light or medium-weight synthetic mesh and classified as clean (CDC Class I) or contaminated (CDC Class II/III). Univariate analysis was used to compare demographic information, hernia characteristics, and operative details. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression for the primary outcome of 30-day surgical site infection (SSI) and secondary outcomes of 30-day surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring procedural intervention (SSO-PI), and clinical recurrence at one year. RESULTS: 7219 cases met criteria for inclusion; 13.2% of these were contaminated. 83.4% of patients had follow-up data at 30 days and 20.8% at 1 year. The adjusted OR for 30-day SSI in contaminated fields compared to clean was 2.603 (95% CI 1.959-3.459). OR for 30-day SSO was 1.275 (95% CI 1.017-1.600) and 2.355 (95%CI 1.817-3.053) for 30-day SSO-PI. OR for recurrence at one year was 1.489 (95%CI 0.892-2.487). Contaminated cases had higher rates of mesh infection (3.9% vs 0.8%, p < 0.001) and mesh removal (7.3 vs 2.5%, p < 0.001) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for baseline differences, patients undergoing ventral incisional hernia repair using light or midweight synthetic mesh in contaminated fields have higher odds of 30-day SSI, SSO, and SSO-PI than those performed in clean wounds. The odds of recurrence did not statistically differ and further studies with long-term outcomes are needed to better evaluate the best treatment options for this patient population.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral , Hérnia Incisional , Adulto , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Recidiva
3.
Surg Endosc ; 37(12): 8933-8990, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914953

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis remains controversial. This systematic review details the evidence and current best practices for the evaluation and management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in adults and children. METHODS: Eight questions regarding the diagnosis and management of appendicitis were formulated. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov/NLM were queried for articles published from 2010 to 2022 with key words related to at least one question. Randomized and non-randomized studies were included. Two reviewers screened each publication for eligibility and then extracted data from eligible studies. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on all quantitative data. The quality of randomized and non-randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 or Newcastle Ottawa Scale, respectively. RESULTS: 2792 studies were screened and 261 were included. Most had a high risk of bias. Computerized tomography scan yielded the highest sensitivity (> 80%) and specificity (> 93%) in the adult population, although high variability existed. In adults with uncomplicated appendicitis, non-operative management resulted in higher odds of readmission (OR 6.10) and need for operation (OR 20.09), but less time to return to work/school (SMD - 1.78). In pediatric patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, non-operative management also resulted in higher odds of need for operation (OR 38.31). In adult patients with complicated appendicitis, there were higher odds of need for operation following antibiotic treatment only (OR 29.00), while pediatric patients had higher odds of abscess formation (OR 2.23). In pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, higher risk of reoperation at any time point was observed in patients who had drains placed at the time of operation (RR 2.04). CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis remains nuanced. A personalized approach and appropriate patient selection remain key to treatment success. Further research on controversies in treatment would be useful for optimal management.


Assuntos
Apendicite , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicectomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Drenagem/métodos
4.
Surg Endosc ; 28(3): 767-76, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24196549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the most commonly performed robotic-assisted general surgery (RAGS) procedures in a nationwide database and compare them with their laparoscopic counterparts. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from October 2008 to December 2010 for patients undergoing elective, abdominal RAGS procedures. The two most common, robotic-assisted fundoplication (RF) and gastroenterostomy without gastrectomy (RG), were individually compared with the laparoscopic counterparts (LF and LG, respectively). RESULTS: During the study, 297,335 patients underwent abdominal general surgery procedures, in which 1,809 (0.6 %) utilized robotic-assistance. From 2009 to 2010, the incidence of RAGS nearly doubled from 573 to 1128 cases. The top five RAGS procedures by frequency were LG, LF, laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, other anterior resection of rectum, and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. Eight of the top ten RAGS were colorectal or foregut operations. RG was performed in 282 patients (0.9 %) and LG in 29,677 patients (99.1 %). When comparing RG with LG there was no difference in age, gender, race, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), postoperative complications, or mortality; however, length of stay (LOS) was longer in RG (2.5 ± 2.4 vs. 2.2 ± 1.5 days; p < 0.0001). Total cost for RG was substantially higher ($60,837 ± 28,887 vs. $42,743 ± 23,366; p < 0.0001), and more often performed at teaching hospitals (87.2 vs. 50.9 %; p < 0.0001) in urban areas (100 vs. 93.0 %; p < 0.0001). RF was performed in 272 patients (3.5 %) and LF in 7,484 patients (96.5 %). RF patients were more often male compared with LF (38.2 vs. 32.3 %; p < 0.05); however, there was no difference in age, race, CCI, LOS, or postoperative complications. RF was more expensive than LF ($37,638 ± 21,134 vs. $32,947 ± 24,052; p < 0.0001), and more often performed at teaching hospitals (72.4 vs. 54.9 %; p < 0.0001) in urban areas (98.5 vs. 88.7 %; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study of RAGS exemplifies its low but increasing incidence across the country. RAGS is regionalized to urban teaching centers compared with conventional laparoscopic techniques. Despite similar postoperative outcomes, there is significantly increased cost associated with RAGS.


Assuntos
Fundoplicatura/normas , Gastrectomia/normas , Gastos em Saúde , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Robótica/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Fundoplicatura/economia , Gastrectomia/economia , Gastrectomia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/normas , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
J Surg Res ; 184(1): 169-77, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23768769

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine if ventral hernia defect length, width, or area predict postoperative pain and quality of life following ventral hernia repair (VHR). METHODS: The International Hernia Mesh Registry, a prospective database from 40 institutions worldwide, was queried for patients undergoing VHR from October 2007 to June 2012. Laparoscopic and open VHR were evaluated separately. Width and length were stratified into large, ≥10 cm and small, <10 cm, along with area as large, ≥100 cm(2) and small, <100 cm(2). RESULTS: In total, 865 International Hernia Mesh Registry patients underwent VHR. Large defect width, length, and area had no association with hernia recurrence or reoperation in both open and laparoscopic VHR. There was a significant increase in operating room time and length of stay for large compared with small width, length, and area for open and laparoscopic VHR patients (P < 0.05). Large area was associated with increased seroma and ileus in open and laparoscopic VHR (P < 0.05). There was greater pain and activity limitation at 1 mo for large versus small width and area whether repaired laparoscopically or open (P < 0.05). When comparing large to small length, there was no difference in pain for all follow-up time points when repaired laparoscopically, but there is significantly increased odds of pain and activity limitation at 1, 6, and 12 mo when repaired open (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic or open VHR with large defect widths and total area have a greater chance of pain and activity limitation at 1-mo follow-up, but not long term. Large defect lengths are associated with increased early and chronic discomfort in open VHR only.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/patologia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Nível de Saúde , Hérnia Ventral/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Surg Technol Int ; 22: 113-9, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23292674

RESUMO

Physiomesh is a novel, lightweight, large pore, polypropylene mesh designed to have flexibility that matches the compliance of the abdominal wall in an effort to improve patient quality of life (QOL). The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for ventral hernia repair (VHR) and inguinal hernia repair (IHR) with Physiomesh. Demographics, operative and postoperative details, and the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) as a measure of QOL were recorded. Physiomesh was used in 100 patients, 29 IHR and 71 VHR. Their average age was 56.8 +/- 13.7, and BMI was 34.0 +/- 21.0 kg/m2. For IHR, preoperative pain (CCS > or = 2) was present in 41%, but decreased at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to 25.9%, 0%, and 1.6%, while movement limitation decreased from 42.9% to 18.5%, 1.6%, and 3.1%. There were no complications or recurrences. The average VHR measured 66.4 cm2; 93% underwent a laparoscopic repair. Pain was present in 59.1% preoperatively but 21% at 12 months. Movement limitations reduced from 43.2% to 15.8% at 12 months. Mesh sensation was reported in only 10.5% at 1 year. There was 1 recurrence. Physiomesh is well tolerated by patients undergoing IHR and VHR. It is associated with a very favorable long-term QOL.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/epidemiologia , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Telas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Austrália/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Herniorrafia/instrumentação , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Am Surg ; 88(9): 2230-2232, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35503030

RESUMO

Radiation-associated sarcomas (RASs) are rare entities that tend to have an aggressive course and poor prognosis. Criteria for diagnosis of radiation-associated sarcoma include therapeutic radiation preceding the development of sarcoma, sarcoma arising within or near the irradiated field, and tumor histology that is distinct from the primary tumor necessitating radiation. Despite their relatively uncommon occurrence, RASs are a well-established complication of radiation therapy. We present the complex, multidisciplinary surgical management of a patient with multi-compartmental radiation-associated sarcoma of the left retroperitoneum occurring nearly 25 years after undergoing whole trunk radiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma.


Assuntos
Doença de Hodgkin , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles , Humanos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/complicações , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/cirurgia , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Sarcoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia
9.
J Trauma ; 70(1): 46-8; discussion 48-50, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21217480

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: ACKGROUND:: Cervical spine fractures are common in traumatically injured patients. The halo-vest brace is a common treatment used for these fractures. We hypothesize that the use of halo-vest fixation is associated with a high incidence of dysphagia in trauma patients. METHODS: All trauma patients at our Level I Trauma Center from August 2005 to August 2007 were analyzed retrospectively via the trauma registry (N=3,702). Included were adult patients with cervical spine fractures treated with halo-vests and evaluated formally by speech-language pathologists for dysphagia and aspiration. Patients were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe dysphagia. RESULTS: Of the 3,702 patients, 369 (10%) had cervical spine fractures from blunt trauma and 56 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 19 (34%) had no evidence of swallowing dysfunction and the remaining 37 (66%) had evidence of dysphagia. Thirteen (23%) exhibited symptoms of aspiration. There were no significant differences in age, gender, Injury Severity Score, arrival Revised Trauma Score, or arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score on presentation. Dysphagia is associated with longer intensive care unit stays (p=0.019) and trends toward a longer hospital stay (p=0.083). In trauma patients with halo-vests, increasing severity of dysphagia from mild to moderate is associated with longer ventilator days (p=0.005), intensive care unit days (p=0.001), and hospital length of stay (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervical fractures treated with halo-vest fixation have a significantly high incidence of dysphagia and aspiration. Dysphagia in trauma patients treated with halo-vests for c-spine fractures is common, associated with worse outcomes, and difficult to predict. Therefore, all of these patients should be formally evaluated for dysphagia.


Assuntos
Braquetes , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Adulto , Deglutição/fisiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/fisiopatologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/terapia , Feminino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/fisiopatologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia
10.
Am J Surg ; 210(5): 801-13, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26362202

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to set criteria for massive ventral hernia and to compare surgical outcomes and quality of life after ventral hernia repair (VHR). METHODS: The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for patients undergoing VHR from 2007 to 2013. Defect was categorized as massive if the width or length was greater than 15 cm or area greater than 150 cm(2). Massive VHR was compared to regular VHR. RESULTS: A total of 878 patients underwent VHR: 436 open, 442 laparoscopic with 13 deaths (1.5%) and 45 hernia recurrences (5.1%). Of those, 158 patients (18%) met criteria for massive VHR. Massive VHR patients had longer length of stay (LOS) and operative time and more hematomas, wound infections, wound complications, and pneumonias (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, LOS was longer, and early postoperative pain and activity limitation were greater in massive VHRs (P < .01). Massive VHR in the laparoscopic approach resulted in greater long-term mesh sensation (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: VHR in massive hernias have increased rates of complications and longer LOS.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hematoma/epidemiologia , Hérnia Ventral/epidemiologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Limitação da Mobilidade , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Telas Cirúrgicas
11.
Am J Surg ; 210(3): 456-61, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26070377

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Complications of bariatric surgeries are common, can occur throughout the patient's lifetime, and can be life-threatening. We examined bariatric surgical complications presenting to our acute care surgery service. METHODS: Records were reviewed from January 2007 to June 2013 for patients presenting with a complication after bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the most common index operation (n = 20), followed by open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 6), laparoscopic gastric band (n = 4), and vertical banded gastroplasty (n = 3). Diagnoses included internal hernia (n = 10), small bowel obstruction (n = 5), lap band restriction (n = 4), biliary disease (n = 3), upper GI bleeding or ulcer (n = 3), ischemic bowel (n = 2), marginal ulcer (n = 2), gastric outlet obstruction (n = 2), perforated ulcer (n = 2), intussusception (n = 1), and incarcerated ventral hernia (n = 1). Operations were required in 91% of the patients. Laparoscopic outcomes were similar to open; however, open cases were more emergent (23.5% vs 69.2%) and had longer hospital length of stay (4.8 ± 3.5 vs 11.0 ± 10.3 days, P < .05). All patients survived. CONCLUSIONS: The acute care surgeon will encounter complications of bariatric surgery. Internal hernias or obstructive etiologies are the most common presentations and often require emergent or urgent surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Hérnia/etiologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Am Surg ; 81(2): 172-7, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25642880

RESUMO

Our objective was to assess the effect of implementing an electronic health record (EHR) on surgical resident work flow, duty hours, and operative experience at a large teaching hospital. In May 2012, an EHR was put into effect at our institution replacing paper documentation and orders. Resident time to complete patient documentation, average duty hours, and operative experience before EHR and afterward (at 1, 4, 6, 8, and 24 weeks) were surveyed. We obtained 100 per cent response rate from 15 surgical residents at all time intervals. The average time spent documenting before EHR was 9 ± 2 minutes per patient document and at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 24 after EHR implementation was 22 ± 10, 15 ± 7, 15 ± 7, 14 ± 8, and 12 ± 4 minutes, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of variance demonstrated a difference among the means (P < 0.0001). Discharge summary and operative note remained significantly longer to complete at Week 24 compared with paper documentation (P < 0.05). Average resident work hours and operative cases per week before EHR were 77 ± 5 hours and 12 ± 5 cases, respectively, which were similar at all time points after EHR implementation (P > 0.05). At 24 weeks after EHR, 74 per cent of residents felt their risk of performing a medical error using electronic documentation and order entry was higher compared with paper charting and orders. Transition to EHR led to a significant doubling in resident time spent performing documentation for each patient. It improved over 6 months after implementation but never reached the pre-EHR baseline for operative notes and discharge summaries. Average resident work hours and case logs remained similar during this transition.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Fluxo de Trabalho , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , North Carolina , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
13.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 42(2): 121-5, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12659384

RESUMO

National asthma guidelines recommend assessment and documentation of asthma severity at each clinic visit. A cross-sectional medical record review was conducted, which found that only 34% of records had any documentation of severity in the previous 2 years. However, severity documentation is associated with other indicators of quality care such as receipt of an action plan, spacer device, peak flow meter, asthma education, and influenza vaccination. These results suggest that use of a system for classifying asthma severity compels the physician to consider the long-term management of asthma, rather than just acute treatment of the disease. Interventions to improve physician practice should continue to emphasize severity assessment.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Asma/terapia , Documentação/estatística & dados numéricos , Documentação/normas , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
14.
Am J Surg ; 208(3): 350-62, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24933665

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to perform a national review of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who undergo pancreatic debridement (PD) to evaluate for risk factors of in-hospital mortality. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients with AP who underwent PD between 1998 and 2010. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2010, there were 585,978 nonelective admissions with AP, of which 1,783 (.3%) underwent PD. From 1998 to 2010, the incidence of PD decreased from .44% to .25% (P < .01) and PD in-hospital mortality decreased from 29.0% to 15% (P < .05). Of patients undergoing PD, independent factors associated with increased odds of mortality were increased age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.05; P < .01), sepsis with organ failure (OR 1.76, CI 1.24 to 2.51; P < .01), peptic ulcer disease (OR 1.83, CI 1.02 to 3.30; P < .05), liver disease (OR 2.27, CI 1.36 to 3.78; P < .01), and renal insufficiency (OR 1.78, CI 1.14 to 2.78; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and operative mortality of PD have decreased significantly over the last decade in the United States with higher odds of dying in patients who are older, with chronic liver, renal, or ulcer disease, and higher rates of sepsis with organ failure.


Assuntos
Desbridamento , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Pancreatite/cirurgia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
15.
Pediatrics ; 133(6): 1158-62, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24864168

RESUMO

The majority of public and private payers in the United States currently use the Medicare Resource-Based Relative Value Scale as the basis for physician payment. Many large group and academic practices have adopted this objective system of physician work to benchmark physician productivity, including using it, wholly or in part, to determine compensation. The Resource-Based Relative Value Scale survey instrument, used to value physician services, was designed primarily for procedural services, leading to current concerns that American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) surveys may undervalue nonprocedural evaluation and management services. The American Academy of Pediatrics is represented on the RUC, the committee charged with maintaining accurate physician work values across specialties and age groups. The Academy, working closely with other primary care and subspecialty societies, actively pursues a balanced RUC membership and a survey instrument that will ensure appropriate work relative value unit assignments, thereby allowing pediatricians to receive appropriate payment for their services relative to other services.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Pediatria/economia , Pediatria/legislação & jurisprudência , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Academias e Institutos , Criança , Current Procedural Terminology , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços , Humanos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Terminologia como Assunto , Estados Unidos
16.
Am Surg ; 79(8): 786-93, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23896245

RESUMO

A transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) approach has become a common technique for inguinal hernia repair. Our goal was to compare the impact of the two mesh designs for this operation: a flat mesh with a memory ring device (MRD) or a three-dimensional device (3DD) containing both onlay and preperitoneal mesh components. The prospective International Hernia Mesh Registry (2007 to 2012) was queried for MRD and 3DD inguinal hernia repairs. Outcomes and patient quality of life (QOL), using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), were examined at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. Standard statistical methods were used, and multivariate logistic regression was performed using a forward stepwise selection method. TIPP was performed in 956 patients. Their average age 57.4 ± 15.3 years, 94.0 per cent were male, and mean body mass index was 25.7 ± 3.2 kg/m(2). MRD was used in 131 and 3DD in 825. Follow-up was 97, 82, 87, and 80 per cent at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Complications were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Recurrence was 0.8 per cent for MRD and 2.1 per cent for 3DD (P = 0.45). Comparing patient outcomes of MRD with 3DD at 1 month, 18.9 versus 11.5 per cent had symptoms of mesh sensation (P = 0.02); 28.7 versus 14.8 per cent had movement limitations (P < 0.01). MRD use was a significant independent predictor of movement limitation (odds ratio, 2.3; confidence interval, 1.4 to 3.7). No significant differences in CCS scores were seen at 6, 12, and 24 months. TIPP repair is safe and has a low recurrence rate. Early postoperative QOL is significantly improved with a 3DD mesh compared with MRD.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/instrumentação , Qualidade de Vida , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Sistema de Registros , Autorrelato , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 2(2): 70-6, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22811833

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a promising modality for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Splenectomy is frequently required, however effect upon hematotoxicity is unknown. METHODS: 195 patients undergoing the procedure were evaluated and granulocyte colony stimulating factor administered for white blood cell counts <4.0. RESULTS: 52% of 195 underwent splenectomy; average white blood cell and platelet nadirs were 6.1,172. Non-splenectomy patients averaged white blood cell nadir 4.6, platelet nadir 164.1. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor administered in 29% of splenectomy, 43% of non-splenectomy (P=0.043). CONCLUSION: Splenectomy ameliorates hematotoxicity of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and significantly reduces post-operative granulocyte colony stimulating factor requirements.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA