Accuracy and Reliability of Software Navigation for Acetabular Component Placement in THA: An In Vitro Validation Study.

Background and Objectives: Intraoperative fluoroscopy can be used to increase the accuracy of the acetabular component positioning during total hip arthroplasty. However, given the three-dimensional nature of cup positioning, it can be difficult to accurately assess inclination and anteversion angles based on two-dimensional imaging. The purpose of this study is to validate a novel method for calculating the 3D orientation of the acetabular cup from 2D fluoroscopic imaging. Materials and Methods: An acetabular cup was implanted into a radio-opaque pelvis model in nine positions sequentially, and the inclination and anteversion angles were collected in each position using two methods: (1) a coordinate measurement machine (CMM) was used to establish a digitalized anatomical coordinate frame based on pelvic landmarks of the cadaveric specimen, and the 3D position of the cup was then expressed with respect to the anatomical planes; (2) AP radiographic images were collected, and a mathematical formula was utilized to calculate the 3D inclination and anteversion based on the 2D images. The results of each method were compared, and interrater and intrarater reliably of the 2D method were calculated. Results: Interrater reliability was excellent, with an interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.988 (95% CI 0.975-0.994) for anteversion and 0.997 (95% CI 0.991-0.999) for inclination, as was intrarater reliability, with an ICC of 0.995 (95% CI 0.985-0.998) for anteversion and 0.998 (95% CI 0.994-0.999) for inclination. Intermethod accuracy was excellent with an ICC of 0.986 (95% CI: 0.972-0.993) for anteversion and 0.993 (95% CI: 0.989-0.995) for inclination. The Bland-Altman limit of agreement, which represents the error between the 2D and 3D methods, was found to range between 2 to 5 degrees. Conclusions: This data validates the proposed methodology to calculate 3D anteversion and inclination angles based on 2D fluoroscopic images to within five degrees. This method can be utilized to improve acetabular component placing intraoperatively and to check component placement postoperatively.

The effect of glenosphere lateralization and inferiorization on deltoid force in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: A medialized center of rotation (COR) in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) comes with limitations such as scapular notching and reduced range of motion. To mitigate these effects, lateralization and inferiorization of the COR are performed, but may adversely affect deltoid muscle force. The study purposes were to measure the effect of RTSA with varying glenosphere configurations on (1) the COR and (2) deltoid force compared with intact shoulders and shoulders with massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PS-RCT). We hypothesized that the highest deltoid forces would occur in shoulders with PS-RCT, and that RTSA would lead to a decrease in required forces that is further minimized with lateralization and inferiorization of the COR but still higher compared with native shoulders with an intact rotator cuff. METHODS: In this study, 8 cadaveric shoulders were dissected leaving only the rotator cuff muscles and capsule intact. A custom apparatus incorporating motion capture and a dynamic tensile testing machine to measure the changes in COR and deltoid forces while simultaneously recording glenohumeral abduction was designed. Five consecutive testing states were tested: (1) intact shoulder, (2) PS-RCT, (3) RTSA with standard glenosphere, (4) RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenosphere, and (5) RTSA with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere. Statistical Parametric Mapping was used to analyze the deltoid force as a function of the abduction angle. One-way repeated-measures within-specimens analysis of variance was conducted, followed by post hoc t-tests for pairwise comparisons between the states. RESULTS: All RTSA configurations shifted the COR medially and inferiorly with respect to native (standard: 4.2 ± 2.1 mm, 19.7 ± 3.6 mm; 4 mm lateralized: 3.9 ± 1.2 mm, 16.0 ± 1.8; 2.5 mm inferiorized: 6.9 ± 0.9 mm, 18.9 ± 1.7 mm). Analysis of variance showed a significant effect of specimen state on deltoid force across all abduction angles. Of the 10 paired t-test comparisons made between states, only 3 showed significant differences: (1) intact shoulders necessitated significantly lower deltoid force than specimens with PS-RCT below 42° abduction, (2) RTSAs with standard glenospheres required significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres above 34° abduction, and (3) RTSAs with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenospheres had significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm of glenosphere lateralization at higher abduction angles. CONCLUSIONS: RTSA with a 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere and no additional lateralization resulted in less deltoid force to abduct the arm compared with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres. Therefore, when aiming to mitigate downsides of a medialized COR, an inferiorized glenosphere may be preferable in terms of its effect on deltoid force.

Medial Patellotibial Ligament Reconstruction Improves Patella Tracking When Combined With Medial Patellofemoral Reconstruction: An In Vitro Kinematic Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the isolated and combined effects of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) deficiency and reconstruction on patellofemoral kinematics. METHODS: Sixteen matched-paired female cadaveric knee specimens with a mean age of 53.5 years (range, 26-65) were tested in 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) MPFL or MPTL cut, (3) MPFL and MPTL combined cut, (4) MPFL or MPTL reconstruction, and (5) MPFL and MPTL combined reconstruction. Dynamic testing allowed continuous analysis of kinematics from 0° to 90° of knee flexion. Knees were also tested statically using a lateral load of 45 N at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. In both dynamic and static loading tests, a motion capture system detected patellar position for each testing state to distinguish changes in patellar kinematics. Random-intercepts linear mixed-effects models were used to compare patellar kinematics. RESULTS: The MPFL is the primary restraint to lateral translation of the patella at all knee flexion angles. MPTL deficiency alone did not create significant patella instability, but further increased instability when the MPFL was deficient. Isolated MPFL and combined reconstruction provided improved stability. Through full range of motion native patella tracking was best recreated with combined ligament reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The MPFL plays the greatest role in medial patellar stability, but the MPTL appears to have an influence on patella tracking. This study provides further understanding to the impact of the MPFL and MPTL on patellofemoral motion with implications for reconstruction to improve stability and optimize patellofemoral tracking. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides further understanding of the role of the MPFL and MPTL on patellofemoral motion with implications for reconstruction to improve stability and optimize patellofemoral tracking.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Knotless and Knotted All-Suture Anchor Repair Constructs in 4 Bankart Repair Configurations.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical performance of Bankart repair using 1.8-mm knotless all-suture anchors in comparison to 1.8-mm knotted all-suture anchors with both simple and horizontal mattress stitch configurations. METHODS: Thirty fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were dissected to the capsule, leaving the glenoid and humeral capsular insertions intact. A standardized anteroinferior labral tear was created and repaired using 3 anchors. A 2 × 2 factorial design was implemented, with 6 matched pairs randomized between knotless and knotted anchor repairs and 6 matched pairs randomized into simple and horizontal mattress stitch configurations. In addition, 6 unpaired shoulders were used to evaluate the native capsulolabral state. First failure load, ultimate load, and stiffness were assessed. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to compare endpoints. Digital image correlation was used to evaluate capsular strain throughout testing. Failure modes were reported qualitatively. RESULTS: The knotless all-suture anchor repair showed similar biomechanical strength to the knotted all-suture anchors for first failure load (coefficient, 142 N; 95% confidence interval [CI], -30 to 314 N; P = .12), ultimate load (coefficient, 11.1 N; 95% CI, -104.9 to 127.2 N; P = .847), and stiffness (coefficient, 3.4 N/mm2; 95% CI, -14.1 to 20.9 N/mm2; P = .697) when stitch configuration was held constant. No statistically significant differences were found on comparison of simple and mattress stitch configurations for first failure load (coefficient, -31 N; 95% CI, -205 to 143 N; P = .720), ultimate load (coefficient, 112 N; 95% CI, -321 to 97 N; P = .291), and stiffness (coefficient, -9.6 N/mm2; 95% CI, -27.3 to 8.1 N/mm2; P = .284) when anchor type was held constant. Specimens with knotless anchors and simple stitch techniques resulted in lower stiffness compared with the native state (P = .030). The knotless-mattress configuration resulted in significantly lower strain than the knotted-mattress (P = .037) and knotless-simple (P = .019) configurations and was the only configuration that did not result in a significant increase in strain compared with the intact specimens (P = .216). Fewer instances of suture slippage (loss of loop security) were observed with knotless anchors versus knotted anchors (11% vs 30%), and less soft-tissue failure was observed with the mattress stitch configuration versus the simple stitch configuration (36% vs 47%). CONCLUSIONS: Knotless and knotted all-suture anchor repairs with simple and mattress stitch configurations showed similar values of ultimate load, first failure load, and stiffness. However, the horizontal mattress stitch configuration proved to decrease capsular strain more similarly to the native state compared with the simple stitch configuration. Ultimate load and first failure load for all repairs were similar to those of the native state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knotless all-suture anchors have a smaller diameter than solid anchors, can be inserted through curved guides, and preserve glenoid bone stock. This study presents knotless, tensionable all-suture anchor repair for labral tears that displays high biomechanical fixation strength, similar to the native capsulolabral state.

Defining the three most responsive and specific CT measurements of ankle syndesmotic malreduction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and accuracy of existing computed tomography (CT) methods for measuring the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in uninjured, paired cadaveric specimens and in simulated malreduction models. It was hypothesized that a repeatable set of measurements exists to accurately and quantitatively describe the typical forms of syndesmotic malreduction using contralateral ankle comparison. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric lower-leg specimen pairs were imaged with CT to generate models for this study. Thirty-five measurements were performed on each native model. Next, four distinct fibular malreductions were produced via digital simulation and all measurements were repeated for each state: (1) 2-mm lateral translation; (2) 2-mm posterior translation; (3) 7-degree external rotation; (4) the previous three states combined. The modified standardized response mean (mSRM) was calculated for each measurement. To assess rater reliability and side-to-side agreements of the native state measurements, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) were calculated, respectively. RESULTS: The most responsive measurements for detecting isolated malreduction were the Leporjärvi clear space for lateral translation, the Nault anterior tibiofibular distance for posterior translation, and the Nault talar dome angle for external rotation of the fibula. These measurements demonstrated fair to excellent inter-rater ICCs (0.64-0.76) and variable side-to-side PCCs (0.14-0.47). CONCLUSIONS: The most reliable method to assess the syndesmosis on CT was to compare side-to-side differences using three distinct measurements, one for each type of fibular malreduction, allowing assessment of the magnitude and directionality of syndesmosis malreduction. Reliable evaluation is essential for assessing subtle syndesmosis injuries, malreduction and surgical planning.

Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Ligamentum Teres: A Guide to Safe Tunnel Placement.

PURPOSE: To provide a quantitative guide to tunnel placement concurrently through the femur and acetabulum during a ligamentum teres reconstruction, minimizing the risk of injury to the obturator neurovascular bundle. METHODS: Nine human cadaveric pelvises, complete with femurs (mean age, 59.6 years; age range, 47-65 years), were studied. Before dissection, a 3-dimensional coordinate-measuring device was used to record the neutral orientation of the femur in the acetabulum. The specimens were then dissected free of all extra-articular soft tissue, except for the ligamentum teres and the obturator neurovascular bundle, and digitized. An anatomic femoral reconstruction tunnel through the femoral neck was simulated and extended along its axis into the acetabulum. The femur was digitally rotated internally from 0° to 30° and externally from 0° to 40°, as well as abducted from 0° to 30° and adducted from 0° to 20°, in increments of 1°. At each position, the location of the simulated acetabular reconstruction tunnel was measured with respect to the obturator bundle and the edge of the acetabular fossa. RESULTS: The anatomic reconstruction tunnel entered the lateral side of the femur at a mean distance of 7.0 mm distal and 5.8 mm anterior to the center of the vastus ridge. By angling the femur at 15° of internal rotation and 15° of abduction, the obturator neurovascular bundle was avoided in 100% of specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The most important finding of this study was that a ligamentum teres reconstruction tunnel could be reamed through the femoral neck and safely positioned in the acetabulum by angling the femur at 15° of internal rotation and 15° of abduction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These quantitative descriptions of the ligamentum teres reconstruction tunnels can be used to guide arthroscopic surgical interventions designed to address ligamentum teres pathology.

Quantitative Assessment of the Coracoacromial and the Coracoclavicular Ligaments With 3-Dimensional Mapping of the Coracoid Process Anatomy: A Cadaveric Study of Surgically Relevant Structures.

PURPOSE: To perform a quantitative anatomic evaluation of the (1) coracoid process, specifically the attachment sites of the conjoint tendon, the pectoralis minor, the coracoacromial ligament (CAL), and the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments in relation to pertinent osseous and soft tissue landmarks; (2) CC ligaments' attachments on the clavicle; and (3) CAL attachment on the acromion in relation to surgically relevant anatomic landmarks to assist in planning of the Latarjet procedure, acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstructions, and CAL resection distances avoiding iatrogenic injury to surrounding structures. METHODS: Ten nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders (mean age 52 years, range 33-64 years) were included in this study. A 3-dimensional coordinate measuring device was used to quantify the location of pertinent bony landmarks and soft tissue attachment areas. The ligament and tendon attachment perimeters and center points on the coracoid, clavicle, and acromion were identified and subsequently dissected off the bone. Coordinates of points along the perimeters of attachment sites were used to calculate areas, whereas coordinates of center points were used to determine distances between surgically relevant attachment sites and pertinent bony landmarks. RESULTS: The CAL had a single consistent acromial attachment (mean area 77 mm [51.9, 102.2]) and then bifurcated into 2 bundles, anterior and posterior, that separately inserted on the lateral aspect of the coracoid. The footprint areas were 54.4 mm2 [31.7, 77.2] and 30.6 mm2 [23.4, 37.7] for the anterior and posterior CAL bundles, respectively. These anterior and posterior bundles attached 10.6 mm [8.4, 12.9] and 24.8 mm [12.3, 27.4] medial and proximal to the apex of the coracoid process, respectively. The minimum distance between the coracoid apex and the trapezoid ligament was 25.1 mm [22.1, 28.1] and was noted to be different in males (28.1 mm [25.1; 31.2]) and females (22.0 mm [18.2, 25.9]). The most lateral insertion of the CC ligaments on the clavicle the AC joint was 15.7 mm [13.1, 18.3]. The distance between the most medial to the most lateral point of the CC ligaments on the clavicle was 25.6 mm [22.3, 28.9], which accounted for 18.2% [15.8, 20.6] of the clavicle length. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous findings, 2 different coracoid attachments (anterior and posterior bundles) of the CAL were consistently identified in all specimens. Moreover, a coracoid osteotomy for a bone graft for the Latarjet procedure should be performed at less than 28.1/22 mm from the apex of the coracoid in male/female patients, respectively. The CC ligaments' attachments on the clavicle were located 15.7 mm from the AC joint, which should be considered for reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: During the Latarjet technique, to maintain the integrity of the CC ligaments, precise knowledge of differences between male and female anatomy is necessary during a coracoid osteotomy. Furthermore, when reconstructing the AC joint, the distance from the lateral aspect of the clavicle and the size of the attachments areas should be considered to better replicate the native anatomy.

Qualitative and Quantitative Anatomy of the Proximal Humerus Muscle Attachments and the Axillary Nerve: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To provide a quantitative and qualitative anatomic analysis of the pectoralis major, teres major, and latissimus dorsi on the humerus, as well as the deltoid tendinous attachments on the proximal humerus and acromion, and to quantitatively characterize the humeral course of the axillary nerve. METHODS: Ten nonpaired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were analyzed. A portable coordinate-measuring device quantified the location of bony landmarks and tendon attachment areas. The tendon footprints were recorded by tracing their outlines and center points. The footprint areas of the tendons, the distances between the footprint areas and pertinent osseous and soft-tissue landmarks, and the distance between where the axillary nerve courses across the humerus relative to the acromion and greater tuberosity were measured. RESULTS: Of the 10 specimens, 9 (90%) had 5 distinct tendinous bands attaching the deltoid to the acromion; 1 specimen had 4 bands. The distances between the center of the deltoid footprint on the humerus and the centers of the pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, and teres major tendon footprints on the humerus were 43.5 mm, 58.5 mm, and 49.4 mm, respectively. The shortest distances from the perimeter of the pectoralis major to the latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon footprints were 3.9 mm and 9.5 mm, respectively. The distance from the superior aspect of the greater tuberosity to the axillary nerve on the humeral shaft was 50.3 mm (95% confidence interval, 47.0-53.5 mm). The distance from the lateral acromion to the axillary nerve was 69.3 mm (95% confidence interval, 64.1-74.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The deltoid muscle had 4 to 5 tendinous insertions on the acromion, and the axillary nerve was 50.3 mm from the tip of the greater tuberosity. The distance between the lower border of the pectoralis major and the axillary nerve was 9.4 mm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the quantitative anatomy of the tendons of the proximal humerus and axillary nerve can aid in identifying structures of interest during open shoulder surgery and in avoiding iatrogenic axillary nerve injury. Furthermore, this study provides direction to avoid injury to the deltoid tendons during open surgery.

The forgotten joint: quantifying the anatomy of the proximal tibiofibular joint.

PURPOSE: Limited objective data exist detailing the quantitative anatomy of the individual bundles of the proximal tibiofibular joint and their relation to surgically pertinent osseous landmarks. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively describe the ligamentous anatomy of the proximal tibiofibular joint and its relation to relevant bony landmarks. METHODS: Ten non-paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens were dissected to identify the proximal tibiofibular joint ligament bundles. Pertinent bony landmarks were identified and served as reference points for the tibial and fibular attachments for each bundle. Ligament bundle footprints, lengths and orientations were measured using a 3D coordinate measuring device. RESULTS: Up to four bundles were identified anteriorly and up to three bundles posteriorly. The inferior bundle was identified anteriorly and posteriorly in 60% and 20% of the cases, respectively. For the anterior complex, the centres of the tibial attachments were a mean distance of 12.5 mm (95% CI [10.7, 14.3]) and 25.3 mm (95% CI [21.6, 29.0]) from the tibial plateau for the superior and inferior bundles, respectively. The centres of the fibular attachments were 11.3 mm (95% CI [7.4, 15.1]) and 27.0 mm (95% CI [24.0, 30.0]) from the apex of the fibular styloid for the superior and inferior bundles, respectively. For the bundles of the posterior complex, the centres of the tibial attachments were 13.4 mm (95% CI [11.6, 15.2]) and 38.8 mm (95% CI [31.0, 46.6]) distal to the tibial plateau for the superior and inferior bundles, respectively, and the centres of the fibular attachments were 8.0 mm (95% CI [5.8, 10.1]) and 29.3 mm (95% CI [25.5, 33.1]) from the apex of the fibular styloid for the superior and inferior bundles, respectively. In the coronal plane, the mean 2D angle between the medial to lateral knee joint axis and the axis passing through the centre of the proximal tibiofibular joint and the centre of the tibial plateau was 16.9° (95% CI [12.8, 21.0]). CONCLUSION: The ligament bundles of the proximal tibiofibular joint were reproducibly identified between specimens in relation to surrounding bony landmarks. Up to four bundles were identified in the anterior ligament complex and up to three in the posterior complex. Variation in bundle orientation and footprint size was observed. Based on these findings, an anatomic reconstruction can be performed using surrounding reliable landmarks.

An Anatomic Analysis of Mid-anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for Hip Arthrocentesis: A Male Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and safety of non-image-guided modified mid-anterior and anterolateral approaches to the hip joint for arthrocentesis. METHODS: Six pairs (n = 12) of human cadaveric hemipelvises underwent methylene blue hip injections through either a mid-anterior or an anterolateral approach. The distance from the mid-anterior approach to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) was measured. Needle orientation was defined by a combination of 2 angles, calculated by the computer software analysis of digitized points. Distal Angle was defined as the angle between the lateral axis and an intermediate needle position, in the coronal plane, toward the distal axis. Anterior Angle was defined as the angle between the intermediate needle position of Distal Angle and the final position, toward the anterior axis. RESULTS: Methylene blue was successfully injected into the joint capsule in all specimens. The mean distances from the needle to the LFCN for both the mid-anterior and anterolateral approaches were 19.3 ± 7.9 and 80.3 ± 28.3 mm, respectively. For the mid-anterior approach, Distal AngleM was a mean of 53.9° ± 14.9° and Anterior AngleM was a mean of 33.4° ± 15.6°. For the anterolateral approach, Distal AngleL was a mean of 14.5° ± 14.2° and Anterior AngleL was a mean of 4.5° ± 13.6°. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that mid-anterior and anterolateral approaches for non-image-guided hip injections or arthrocentesis can avoid the LFCN and be effectively performed in males, despite the exhibited variability in the quantitative descriptions of these techniques. The landmarks and measurements presented can be used as general guidelines for clinical studies regarding hip arthrocentesis and injections. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The high variability of the needle placement and trajectory of the mid-anterior and anterolateral approaches performed in this study showed that these techniques were not easily quantitatively defined. However, both of these approaches appeared to be safe and effective.

Reanalysis of the Posterior Oblique Ligament: Quantitative Anatomy, Radiographic Markers, and Biomechanical Properties.

Background: The posterior oblique ligament (POL) is the largest structure of the posteromedial knee that is at risk of injury in conjunction with the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Its quantitative anatomy, biomechanical strength, and radiographic location have not been assessed in a single investigation. Purpose: To evaluate the 3-dimensional and radiographic anatomy of the posteromedial knee and the biomechanical strength of the POL. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Ten nonpaired fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected and medial structures were elevated off bone, leaving the POL. The anatomic locations of the related structures were recorded with a 3-dimensional coordinate measuring machine. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken with radiopaque pins inserted into the pertinent landmarks, and the distances between the collected structures were calculated. Each knee was then mounted to a dynamic tensile testing machine, and pull-to-failure testing was performed to record the ultimate tensile strength, stiffness, and failure mechanism. Results: The POL femoral attachment was a mean of 15.4 mm (95% CI, 13.9-16.8 mm) posterior and 6.6 mm (95% CI, 4.4-8.8 mm) proximal to the medial epicondyle. The tibial POL attachment center was a mean of 21.4 mm (95% CI, 18.1-24.6 mm) posterior and 2.2 mm (95% CI, 0.8-3.6 mm) distal to the center of the deep MCL tibial attachment and a mean of 28.6 mm (95% CI, 24.4-32.8 mm) posterior and 41.9 mm (95% CI, 36.8-47.0 mm) proximal to the center of the superficial MCL tibial attachment. On lateral radiographs, the femoral POL was a mean of 17.56 mm (95% CI, 14.83-21.95 mm) distal to the adductor tubercle and 17.32 mm (95% CI, 14.6-21.7 mm) posterosuperior to the medial epicondyle. On the tibial side, the center of the POL attachment was a mean of 4.97 mm (95% CI, 3.85-6.79 mm) distal to the joint line on anteroposterior radiographs and 6.34 mm (95% CI, 5.01-8.48 mm) distal to the tibial joint line on lateral radiographs, at the far posterior tibial aspect. The biomechanical pull-to-failure demonstrated a mean ultimate tensile strength of 225.2 ± 71.0 N and a mean stiffness of 32.2 ± 13.1 N. Conclusion: The anatomic and radiographic locations of the POL and its biomechanical properties were successfully recorded. Clinical Relevance: This information is useful to better understand POL anatomy and biomechanical properties as well as to clinically address an injury with repair or reconstruction.

In situ repair of segmental loss posterior lateral meniscal root tears outperforms meniscofemoral ligament imbrication in the ACL reconstructed knee.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical effect of in-situ repair of posterior lateral meniscal root (PLMR) tear with segmental meniscal loss, with and without meniscofemoral ligament (MFL) imbrication, on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft force and knee joint kinematics. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens underwent kinematic evaluation in five states: 1) Native, 2) ACLR, 3) Segmental PLMR loss, 4) In-situ PLMR repair, and 5) MFL augmentation. Kinematic evaluation consisted of five tests, each performed at full extension and at 30° of flexion: 1) Anterior drawer, 2) Internal Rotation, 3) External Rotation, 4) Varus, and 5) Valgus. Additionally, a simulated pivot shift test was performed. Knee kinematics and ACL graft force were measured. RESULTS: PLMR tear did not significantly increase ACL graft force in any test. However, PLMR repair significantly reduced ACL graft force compared to the ACLR alone (over constraint -26.6 N, p = 0.001). PLMR tear significantly increased ATT during the pivot shift test (+ 2.7 mm, p = 0.0001), and PLMR repair restored native laxity. MFL augmentation did not improve the mechanics. CONCLUSIONS: In-situ PLMR repair eliminated pivot shift laxity through ATT and reduced force on the ACL graft, indicating that this procedure may be ACL graft-protective. MFL augmentation was not shown to have any effect on graft force or knee kinematics and untreated PLMR tears may place an ACL graft at higher risk. This study suggests concomitant repair to minimize additional forces on the ACL graft.

The Biomechanical Role of the Deltoid Ligament on Ankle Stability: Injury, Repair, and Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Deltoid ligament injuries occur in isolation as well as with ankle fractures and other ligament injuries. Both operative treatment and nonoperative treatment are used, but debate on optimal treatment continues. Likewise, the best method of surgical repair of the deltoid ligament remains unclear. PURPOSE: To determine the biomechanical role of native anterior and posterior components of the deltoid ligament in ankle stability and to determine the efficacy of simple suture versus augmented repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten cadaveric ankles (mean age, 51 years; age range, 34-64 years; all male specimens) were mounted on a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm. Each specimen underwent biomechanical testing in 8 states: (1) intact, (2) anterior deltoid cut, (3) anterior repair, (4) tibiocalcaneal augmentation, (5) deep anterior tibiotalar augmentation, (6) posterior deltoid cut, (7) posterior repair, and (8) complete deltoid cut. Testing consisted of anterior drawer, eversion, and external rotation (ER), each performed at neutral and 25° of plantarflexion. A 1-factor, random-intercepts, linear mixed-effect model was created, and all pairwise comparisons were made between testing states. RESULTS: Cutting the anterior deltoid introduced ER (+2.1°; P = .009) and eversion laxity (+6.2° of eversion; P < .001) at 25 degrees of plantarflexion. Anterior deltoid repair restored native ER but not eversion. Tibiocalcaneal augmentation reduced eversion laxity, but tibiotalar augmentation provided no additional benefit. The posterior deltoid tear showed no increase in laxity. Complete tear introduced significant anterior translation, ER, and eversion laxity (+7.6 mm of anterior translation, +13.8° ER and +33.6° of eversion; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A complete deltoid tear caused severe instability of the ankle joint. Augmented anterior repair was sufficient to stabilize the complete tear, and no additional benefit was provided by posterior repair. For isolated anterior tear, repair with tibiocalcaneal augmentation was the optimal treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Deltoid repair with augmentation may reduce or avoid the need for prolonged postoperative immobilization and encourage accelerated rehabilitation, preventing stiffness and promoting earlier return to preinjury activity.

Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Motion and ACL Graft Forces After ACLR With and Without LET at Varying Tibial Slopes.

BACKGROUND: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being performed more frequently with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) to decrease graft failure rates. The posterior tibial slope (PTS) affects ACL graft failure rates. The effect of ACLR + LET on tibial motion and graft forces with increasing PTS has not been elucidated. HYPOTHESIS: LET would decrease anterior tibial translation (ATT), tibial rotation, and ACL graft force versus ACLR alone with increasing tibial slope throughout knee range of motion. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (mean donor age, 40.5 years; all female) were tested in 4 conditions (intact, ACL cut, ACLR, and ACLR + LET) with varying PTSs (5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) at 3 flexion angles (0°, 30°, and 60°). Specimens were mounted to a load frame that applied a 500-N axial load with 1 N·m of internal rotation (IR) torque. The amount of tibial translation, IR, and graft force was measured. RESULTS: Increasing PTS revealed a linear and significant increase in graft force at all flexion angles. LET reduced graft force by 8.3% (-5.8 N) compared with ACLR alone at 30° of flexion. At the same position, slope reduction resulted in reduced graft force by 17% to 22% (-12.3 to -15.2 N) per 5° of slope correction, with a 46% (-40.7 N) reduction seen from 20° to 5° of slope correction. For ATT, ACLR returned tibial translation to preinjury levels, as did ACLR + LET at all flexion angles, except full extension, where ACLR + LET reduced ATT by 2.5 mm compared with the intact state (P = .019). CONCLUSION: Increased PTS was confirmed to increase graft forces linearly. Although ACLR + LET reduced graft force compared with ACLR alone, slope reduction had a larger effect across all testing conditions. No other clinically significant differences were noted between ACLR with versus without LET in regard to graft force, ATT, or IR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many authors have proposed LET in the setting of ACLR, revision surgery, hyperlaxity, high-grade pivot shift, and elevated PTS, but the indications remain unclear. The biomechanical performance of ACLR + LET at varying PTSs may affect daily practice and provide clarity on these indications.

Effect of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability.

BACKGROUND: Transsyndesmotic fixation with suture buttons (SBs), posterior malleolar fixation with screws, and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) augmentation using suture tape (ST) have all been suggested as potential treatments in the setting of a posterior malleolar fracture (PMF). However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for PMFs. PURPOSE: To determine which combination of (1) transsyndesmotic SBs, (2) posterior malleolar screws, and (3) AITFL augmentation using ST best restored native tibiofibular and ankle joint kinematics after 25% and 50% PMF. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric lower-leg specimens were divided into 2 groups (25% or 50% PMF) and underwent biomechanical testing using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm in 7 states: intact, syndesmosis injury with PMF, transsyndesmotic SBs, transsyndesmotic SBs + AITFL augmentation, transsyndesmotic SBs + AITFL augmentation + posterior malleolar screws, posterior malleolar screws + AITFL augmentation, and posterior malleolar screws. Four biomechanical tests were performed at neutral and 30° of plantarflexion: external rotation, internal rotation, posterior drawer, and lateral drawer. The position of the tibia, fibula, and talus were recorded using a 5-camera motion capture system. RESULTS: With external rotation, posterior malleolar screws with AITFL augmentation resulted in best stability of the fibula and ankle joint. With internal rotation, all repairs that included posterior malleolar screws stabilized the fibula and ankle joint. Posterior and lateral drawer resulted in only small differences between the intact and injured states. No differences were found in the efficacy of treatments between 25% and 50% PMFs. CONCLUSION: Posterior malleolar screws resulted in higher syndesmotic stability when compared with transsyndesmotic SBs. AITFL augmentation provided additional external rotational stability when combined with posterior malleolar screws. Transsyndesmotic SBs did not provide any additional stability and tended to translate the fibula medially. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Posterior malleolar fixation with AITFL augmentation using ST may be the preferred surgical method when treating patients with acute ankle injury involving an unstable syndesmosis and a PMF ≥25%.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Shoulder Instability With a Clinically Relevant Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss Model.

BACKGROUND: Existing biomechanical studies of posterior glenoid bone loss and labral pathology are limited by their use of anterior instability models, which differ in both orientation and morphology and have been performed in only a single, neutral arm position. PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical effectiveness of a posterior labral repair in the setting of a clinically relevant posterior bone loss model in various at-risk arm positions. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested in 7 consecutive states using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm: (1) native, (2) posterior labral tear (6-9 o'clock), (3) posterior labral repair, (4) mean posterior glenoid bone loss (7%) with labral tear, (5) mean posterior glenoid bone loss with labral repair, (6) large posterior glenoid bone loss (28%) with labral tear, and (7) large posterior glenoid bone loss with labral repair. Bone loss was created using 3-dimensional printed computed tomography model templates. Biomechanical testing consisted of 75 N of posterior-inferior force and 75 N of compression at 60° and 90° of flexion and scaption. Posterior-inferior translation, lateral translation, and peak dislocation force were measured for each condition. RESULTS: Labral repair significantly increased dislocation force independent of bone loss state between 10.1 and 14.8 N depending on arm position. Dislocation force significantly decreased between no bone loss and small bone loss (11.9-13.5 N), small bone loss and large bone loss (9.4-14.3 N), and no bone loss and large bone loss (21.2-26.5 N). Labral repair significantly decreased posterior-inferior translation compared with labral tear states by a range of 1.0 to 2.3 mm. In the native state, the shoulder was most unstable in 60° of scaption, with 29.9 ± 6.1-mm posterior-inferior translation. CONCLUSION: Posterior labral repair improved stability of the glenohumeral joint, and even in smaller to medium amounts of posterior glenoid bone loss the glenohumeral stability was maintained with labral repair in this cadaveric model. However, a labral repair with large bone loss could not improve stability to the native state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study shows that larger amounts of posterior glenoid bone loss (>25%) may require bony augmentation for adequate stability.

Biomechanical Evaluation of the 2 Different Levels of Coracoid Graft Positions in the Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Background: In the Latarjet procedure, the ideal placement of the coracoid graft in the medial-lateral position is flush with the anterior glenoid rim. However, the ideal position of the graft in the superior-inferior position (sagittal plane) for restoring glenohumeral joint stability is still controversial. Purpose: To compare coracoid graft clockface positions between the traditional 3 to 5 o'clock and a more inferior (for the right shoulder) 4 to 6 o'clock with regard to glenohumeral joint stability in the Latarjet procedure. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested in a dynamic, custom-built robotic shoulder model. Each shoulder was loaded with a 50-N compressive load while an 80-N force was applied in the anteroinferior axes at 90° of abduction and 60° of shoulder external rotation. Four conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) 6-mm glenoid bone loss (GBL), (3) Latarjet procedure fixed at 3- to 5-o'clock position, and (4) Latarjet procedure fixed at 4- to 6-o'clock position. The stability ratio (SR) and degree of lateral humeral displacement (LHD) were recorded. A 1-factor random-intercepts linear mixed-effects model and Tukey method were used for statistical analysis. Results: Compared with the intact state (1.77 ± 0.11), the SR was significantly lower after creating a 6-mm GBL (1.14 ± 0.61, P = .009), with no significant difference in SR after Latarjet 3 to 5 o'clock (1.51 ± 0.70, P = .51) or 4 to 6 o'clock (1.55 ± 0.68, P = .52). Compared with the intact state (6.48 ± 2.24 mm), LHD decreased significantly after GBL (3.16 ± 1.56 mm, P < .001) and Latarjet 4 to 6 o'clock (5.48 ± 3.39 mm, P < .001). Displacement decreased significantly after Latarjet 3 to 5 o'clock (4.78 ± 2.50 mm, P = .04) compared with the intact state but not after Latarjet 4 to 6 o'clock (P = .71). Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure in both coracoid graft positions (3-5 and 4-6 o'clock) restored the SR to the values measured in the intact state. A more inferior graft position (fixed at 4-6 o'clock) may improve shoulder biomechanics, but additional work is needed to establish clinical relevance. Clinical Relevance: An inferior coracoid graft fixation, the 4- to 6-o'clock position, may benefit in restoring normal shoulder biomechanics after the Latarjet procedure.

A new understanding of radiographic landmarks of the greater trochanter that indicate correct femoral rotation for measurement of femoral offset.

OBJECTIVES: To establish and validate a novel method for aligning femoral rotation to accurately measure femoral offset for preoperative templating and component sizing, and to identify the physical location of two radiographic lines utilized in the described method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaveric proximal femurs were skeletonized and mounted to a biaxial load frame. Two radiographic lines along the greater trochanter were identified fluoroscopically. The femurs were rotated, and images were taken when the lines appeared superimposed, then in 2-degree increments to 10° of internal and external rotation, and at 30°. Radiographic femoral offset was calculated at each angle, and the maximum and aligned offsets were compared. Bone was removed until the radiographic lines disappeared, then a metal wire was inserted in place of the bone to confirm that the lines reappeared. RESULTS: The physical locations of the radiographic landmarks were on the anterior and posterior aspects of the greater trochanter. The mean true femoral offset was 38.2 mm (range, 30.5-46.3 mm). The mean aligned femoral offset was 37.3 mm (range, 29.3-46.3 mm), a 2.4% underestimation. The mean angle between aligned and true offset was 3.6° of external rotation (range, 10°ER-8°IR). Intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.991. CONCLUSION: Alignment of the radiographic lines created by the anterior and posterior aspects of the greater trochanter is a reliable and accurate rotational positioning method for measuring true femoral offset when using plain films or fluoroscopy, which can aid surgeons with preoperative templating and intraoperative component placement for total hip arthroplasty.

Neurovascular Anatomic Locations and Surgical Safe Zones When Approaching the Posterior Glenoid and Scapula: A Quantitative and Qualitative Cadaveric Anatomy Study.

Purpose: To characterize the qualitative anatomy of posterior scapula structures encountered with the Judet approach and to perform a quantitative evaluation of these structures' anatomic locations, including their relationships to osseus landmarks to identify safe zones. Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 55.2 years; range 41-64 years; 5 left, 7 right) were dissected. A coordinate measuring machine was used to collect the coordinates of anatomic landmarks, structures at risk during surgical approach to the posterior scapula, and the footprints of muscle attachments on the posterior scapula. These coordinates were analyzed for their relationships with clinically relevant anatomy. Results: The suprascapular nerve was a mean of 20.3 mm (18.9-21.7 mm) medial to the glenoid 9-o'clock position. The posterior circumflex artery and vein were a mean of 100.0 mm (92.2-107.7 mm) lateral to along the lateral border of the scapula from the inferior angle of the scapula and a mean of 41 mm (34.2-47.9 mm) medial along the lateral scapular border from the 6-o'clock position on the glenoid rim. The long head of the triceps covers a mean of 132 mm2, and it was found to be contiguous with the glenoid capsule at the 6-o'clock position. Conclusions: A safe zone exists 19 mm medially from the glenoid 9-o'clock position to the suprascapular nerve and a minimum of 34.2 mm medially along the lateral scapular border from the glenoid 6 o'clock to the posterior circumflex scapular artery. Clinical Relevance: The modified Judet approach is a minimally invasive surgery that reduces surgical trauma but necessitates precise knowledge of scapular neurovascular anatomy. Surgeons should be aware of these intervals to help avoid these structures when working near the posterior shoulder. This study may allow us to define neurovascular safe zones when this approach is used.

Biomechanical Evaluation of 4 Suture Techniques for Hip Capsular Closure.

Background: The most reliable suture technique for capsular closure after a capsulotomy remains unknown. Purpose: To determine which suture technique best restores native stability after a 5-cm interportal capsulotomy. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten human cadaveric hip specimens were tested using a 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic arm in 7 states: intact, capsular laxity, 5-cm capsulotomy, standard suture, shoelace, double shoelace, and Quebec City slider (QCS). Rotational range of motion (ROM) was measured across 9 tests: flexion, extension, abduction, abduction at 45° of flexion, adduction, external rotation, internal rotation, anterior impingement, and log roll. Distraction (ie, femoral head translation [FHT]) was measured across a range of flexion and abduction angles. Results: When compared with the native state, the 5-cm capsulotomy state showed the largest laxity increases on all tests, specifically in external rotation ROM (+13.4°), extension ROM (+11.5°), and distraction FHT (+4.5 mm) (P < .001 for all). The standard suture technique was not significantly different from the 5-cm capsulotomy on any test and demonstrated significantly more flexion ROM than the double shoelace suture (+1.41°; P = .049) and more extension ROM (+5.51°; P = .014) and external rotation ROM (+6.03°; P = .021) than the QCS. The standard suture also resulted in significantly higher distraction FHT as compared with the shoelace suture (+1.0 mm; P = .005), double shoelace suture (+1.4 mm; P < .001), and QCS (+1.1 mm; P = .003). The shoelace, double shoelace, and QCS techniques significantly reduced hip laxity when compared with the 5-cm capsulotomy state, specifically in external rotation ROM (respectively, -8.1°, -7.8°, and -10.2°), extension ROM (-6.3°, -7.3°, and -8.1°), and distraction FHT (-1.8, -2.2, and -1.9 mm) (P ≤ .003 for all). These 3 techniques restored native stability (no significant difference from intact) on some but not all tests, and no significant differences were observed among them on any test. Conclusion: Hip capsule closure with the standard suture technique did not prevent postoperative hip instability after a 5-cm capsulotomy, and 3 suture techniques were found to be preferable; however, none perfectly restored native stability at time zero. Clinical Relevance: The shoelace, double shoelace, and QCS suture techniques are recommended when closing the hip capsule.