RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature. METHODS: A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Fissura Anal , Humanos , Fissura Anal/diagnóstico , Fissura Anal/cirurgia , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Colo , Doença Crônica , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal laser procedure consists of sutureless closure of terminal branches of the superior hemorrhoidal artery by laser energy. Clinical results of patients treated with this procedure were analyzed at the completion of 2-year follow-up. Primary endpoint was resolution of symptoms and secondary endpoints were recurrence rate, type of recurrences, re-operation rate, and potential predictive factors for failure. METHODS: Bleeding was assessed on a score from 0 to 4 (none = 0; < 1/month = 1; 1/week = 2; > 1/week = 3; 3-4/week = 4), frequency of hemorrhoid-related symptoms with a score of 0-3 (2/year = 1; 3-5/year = 2; < 5/year = 3). Constipation and fecal incontinence were assessed by means of validated scores. Quality of life and pain at defecation were assessed using a visual analog scale of 0-10 (0 = worst possible-10 = best possible quality of life and 0 = no pain-10 = worst pain imaginable, respectively). Recurrence rate and need for re-operation were reported. Potential predictive factors of failure were analyzed by means of univariate analysis. RESULTS: Two-hundred-eighty-four patients (183 males, 101 females; mean age: 47.5 years) were included in the trial; 8 patients were lost at follow-up. Analysis of 276 patients who completed the 2-year follow-up showed an overall resolution of symptoms in 89.9% (248/276) of patients. Statistically significant improvement of quality of life, pain reduction, bleeding and frequency of acute symptoms were reported. Of 28 patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms, 12 had pain (4.35%), 10 had bleeding (3.6%) and 6 had increasing prolapse at defecation (2.2%). Eleven out of twenty-eight patients required additional surgery. Constipation and III-IV grade hemorrhoids were associated with statistically significant higher failure rates (p = 0.046 and 0.012, respectively). Better results were reported in patients reporting preoperative high-grade pain at evacuation. CONCLUSIONS: The Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal laser procedure showed efficacy at long-term follow-up. It can be considered as 'first-line' treatment in patients with low-grade hemorrhoids suffering from bleeding, pain and recurrent acute symptoms in whom conservative treatment failed.
Assuntos
Hemorroidectomia , Hemorroidas , Feminino , Hemorroidectomia/efeitos adversos , Hemorroidectomia/métodos , Hemorroidas/complicações , Hemorroidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorroidas/cirurgia , Humanos , Lasers , Ligadura/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Permacol paste injection is a novel treatment approach for complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas. This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of treatment with Permacol paste for complex cryptoglandular fistulas. METHODS: Patients with primary or recurrent complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas treated with Permacol paste from 2014 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (median age, 41.3 years; 21 female) underwent Permacol paste injection; 20 patients (43%) had previously undergone failed fistula surgery. The patients had experienced anal fistula-related symptoms for a median of 10 weeks (range, 3-50 weeks). All patients had a draining seton in situ for a median of 10 weeks (range, 4-46 weeks). The median follow-up time was 24 months (range, 1-25 months). At the 1-month follow-up, 2 patients had paste extrusion and 2 had anal abscesses. The mean preoperative Continence Grading Scale score was 1.10 ± 1.40, and that at 3 months postoperatively was 1.13 ± 1.39 ( P = .322). There was a significant difference in the preoperative and the 1- and 3-month postoperative pain scores ( P < .001). At the 24-month follow-up, the healing rate was 50% (n = 23). A total of 19 patients (41%) with a recurrent fistula after failed Permacol paste injection required additional operative procedures. The satisfaction rate at the 2-year follow-up was 65%. CONCLUSION: Permacol paste injection is minimally invasive and technically easy to perform. It can be considered as a viable and reasonable option for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas in patients with fecal continence disorders.
Assuntos
Colágeno/uso terapêutico , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Fístula Retal/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Colágeno/administração & dosagem , Incontinência Fecal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.
RESUMO
No detailed information is currently available about the management of pregnancy and delivery in patients with a stoma after colectomy for ulcerative colitis. We describe the case of a young pregnant woman with terminal ileostomy after toxic megacolon. Episodes of stoma occlusion, determined by the enlargement of the uterus, were treated with endoscopic decompression and daily assumption of oral laxatives, making possible to avoid surgery and carry pregnancy on until caesarean section was performed at week 37. Fertility issues, facing pregnancy with ileostomy rather than with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and choice of caesarean section rather than vaginal delivery are discussed.
RESUMO
A limited ileocaecal resection is the most frequently performed procedure for ileocaecal CD and different anastomotic configurations and techniques have been described. This manuscript audited the different anastomotic techniques used in a national study and evaluated their influence on postoperative outcomes following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD from June 2018 May 2019. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. 427 patients were included. The side to side anastomosis was the chosen configuration in 380 patients (89%). The stapled anastomotic (n = 286; 67%), techniques were preferred to hand-sewn (n = 141; 33%). Postoperative morbidity was 20.3% and anastomotic leak 3.7%. Anastomotic leak was independent of the type of anastomosis performed, while was associated with an ASA grade ≥ 3, presence of perianal disease and ileocolonic localization of disease. Four predictors of LOS were identified after multivariate analysis. The laparoscopic approach was the only associated with a reduced LOS (p = 0.017), while age, ASA grade ≥ 3 or administration of preoperative TPN were associated with increased LOS. The side to side was the most commonly used anastomotic configuration for ileocolic reconstruction following primary CD resection. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity according to anastomotic technique and configuration. Anastomotic leak was associated with ASA grade ≥ 3, a penetrating phenotype of disease and ileo-colonic distribution of CD.
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Ceco/cirurgia , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Íleo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The treatment of peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon is yet to be universally regarded as established practice and major differences in management are to be noted in the various surgical institutions. In the emergency setting, the minimally invasive approach is used by few surgeons and the most frequent therapeutic options are sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis (with or without a diverting stoma) and Hartmann's procedure. The Authors report their preliminary experience (13 cases) with laparoscopic lavage and drainage without colonic resection in diverticulitis complicated by peritonitis and describe the technical details of the surgical procedure. They conduct a systematic review of the literature and, on the basis of their latest experience, compare the results of the traditional resective operations (resection with primary anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure) with those of laparoscopic conservative and non-resective treatment. Laparoscopic non-resective procedures reduce the frequency and severity of the surgical complications, as well as the hospital stay and costs of treatment. In conclusion, laparoscopic lavage and drainage can be used in the majority of patients, with excellent prospects of recovery, without disabling stomas, in a single operative stage.
Assuntos
Diverticulose Cólica/complicações , Diverticulose Cólica/cirurgia , Drenagem/métodos , Laparoscopia , Peritonite/etiologia , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , HumanosRESUMO
Peritonitis complicating diverticular disease may be treated by sigmoid resection (with or without primary anastomosis) or by a conservative surgical approach, either laparoscopically or by open surgery. The choice depends on the severity of the peritonitis (Hinchey), the patient's conditions (ASA) and the surgeon's experience. Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis has a lower morbidity and mortality vs Hartmann's procedure. After the introduction of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery, exploratory laparoscopy combined with drainage has been proposed to treat acute episodes, followed by laparoscopic resection. Since 1982, over 1000 patients have been operated on for colorectal disease: 119 for complicated diverticulitis, 55 of which complicated by peritonitis. In the latter, we performed conservative surgery (25 patients) and resection (30 patients) laparoscopically or by open surgery. Our results show a higher morbidity and mortality for the Hartmann procedure vs sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis and a lower specific morbidity in patients undergoing laparoscopic exploration and drainage. Moreover, there was a low percentage (52%) of re-canalisations with the Hartmann procedure, with a morbidity of 32% associated with this procedure. In conclusion, we believe that a conservative laparoscopic surgical approach may be advocated in selected cases (Hinchey II and III without clear perforation), followed by laparoscopic sigmoidectomy, resection with primary anastomosis in Hinchey I or in cases of evident perforation with purulent or faecal peritonitis (possibly combined with a stoma), reserving the Hartmann procedure for compromised patients.
Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Doenças do Colo/complicações , Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Divertículo/complicações , Divertículo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Peritonite/etiologia , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/mortalidade , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Drenagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritonite/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The authors present two cases of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms complicated by an aorto-caval fistula in one case and by an aorto-duodenal fistula in the other. The aetiology of such aneurysms is still debatable, the histological features are typical, and the preoperative clinical and instrumental findings do not always allow them to be differentiated from atherosclerotic ones. The complications may be rapidly fatal or asymptomatic, as in the case of occult aorto-caval fistulas. The surgical approach is technically more difficult because of inflammation and adhesions between the aneurysmal sac and contiguous structures which make dissection and aorto-iliac clamping more demanding. In the case of aorto-caval fistulas, clamping of the vein should be avoided and manual compression preferred to assure haemostasis; with aorto-enteric fistulas, it is necessary to reduce the contamination of the operative field. Ureterolysis is not always necessary in patients with hydronephrosis. Endovascular devices may be an alternative also for a number of complications.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Aortite/complicações , Idoso , Doenças da Aorta/complicações , Doenças do Colo/complicações , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/complicações , Masculino , Fístula Vascular/complicações , Veia Cava InferiorRESUMO
The authors present their initial experience with minimally invasive surgery of the oesophagus. Two emblematic cases of benign and malignant oesophageal pathology, treated by laparoscopic transhiatal oesophagectomy, are reported. The surgical procedure is described in detail and compared with other techniques reported in the literature. Its advantages in terms of postoperative pain and morbidity are stressed. The role of the procedure in neoplastic diseases of the oesophagus is still debated, above all with regard to the accuracy of the mediastinal node dissection.