Transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from seroconverting donors is rare in England and Wales: results from HIV lookback, October 1995 through December 2008.

BACKGROUND: Lookback is considered when human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is detected in a repeat blood donor in case the immediately previous negative donation was donated in the infectious window period (IWP) or the assay(s) produced a false-negative result. HIV lookback investigations undertaken by NHS Blood and Transplant and the Welsh Blood Service between October 1995 and December 2008 are described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Investigations were undertaken into the previous negative donations of 113 HIV-infected donors, including retrospective testing of archive samples, tracing of components, and identification of recipients who were offered HIV testing when appropriate. Data were collated on HIV seroconverters and outcome of the lookback was summarized. RESULTS: Two previous negative donations given before the introduction of minipool nucleic acid testing (MP-NAT) screening were confirmed positive by individual retrospective polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of the archive specimen. Red blood cell components had been transfused from both donations. One recipient died after transfusion, and the other was alive and tested HIV positive. All 23 (20%) donations previously testing negative by MP-NAT were confirmed to be PCR negative on individual testing of an archive specimen and none of the tested recipients of these donations had evidence of transfusion-transmitted HIV. CONCLUSION: The yield of lookback was low with one positive recipient identified over 13 years of surveillance: HIV transmission occurred from a window period donation given before the introduction of MP-NAT screening and would have been detected using current testing methods. Current residual risk estimates for the United Kingdom predict that HIV lookback will be of limited benefit, as demonstrated by our data.

Hepatitis B and residual risk of infection in English and Welsh blood donors, 1996 through 2008.

BACKGROUND: Globally, of all infections that donations are tested for, hepatitis B has the highest residual risk of transfusion transmission, despite donor selection criteria and advances in testing. Every blood donation in England and Wales is tested for hepatitis B surface antigen. Knowledge of infections being detected can inform donor selection and testing strategies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on donation testing and infections detected are collated by the NHS Blood and Transplant and Health Protection Agency Epidemiology Unit. Infected donors are classified as having acute or chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) by a clinician; their demographic characteristics were described. The prevalence (by acute or chronic HBV status, ethnicity, and geography) and incidence of infection were calculated between 1996 and 2008. The residual risk was calculated for four periods using a modification of the incidence and window period model; the effects of modifying variables were investigated. RESULTS: Most infections (1047/1155) detected were chronic and seen in new donors. People with acute infections were more likely to be white and/or born in Western Europe. Prevalence was highest in donors from minority ethnic communities and in London. Incidence in repeat donors has halved in recent years. The estimated frequency of an infectious donation being missed was 1.37 per million donations (2006-2008), the lowest since surveillance began or three per year. CONCLUSION: Many HBV infections in England and Wales were detected among new donors, who had chronic infection and were born overseas. The residual risk of infection declined over the 13 study years, but is still higher for HBV than other viral infections for which testing is undertaken.

Can current national surveillance systems in England and Wales monitor sexual transmission of hepatitis C among HIV-infected men who have sex with men?

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest an increase in sexually-transmitted hepatitis C infection among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) in European cities. We investigated whether current national surveillance systems in England and Wales (E&W) are able to monitor sexual transmission of hepatitis C infection among HIV-infected MSM. METHODS: Routine laboratory reports of hepatitis C diagnoses and data from sentinel hepatitis C testing surveillance were matched to HIV diagnosis reports to determine: (i) the number of MSM diagnosed with HIV and hepatitis C (1996-2003); (ii) the number of HIV-diagnosed MSM tested for hepatitis C and found to be positive at sentinel sites (2003). RESULTS: (i) Between 1996-2003, 38,027 hepatitis C diagnoses were reported; 25,938 (68%) were eligible for matching with HIV diagnoses. Thirty-one men (four in London) had both a HIV and hepatitis C diagnosis where the only risk was sex with another man. Numbers of "co-diagnosed" MSM increased from 0 in 1996 to 14 in 2003. The majority of MSM (22/31) tested hepatitis C positive after HIV diagnosis. (ii) Of 78,058 test results from sentinel hepatitis C testing sites in 2003, 67,712 (87%) were eligible for matching with HIV diagnoses. We identified 242 HIV-diagnosed MSM who did not inject drugs who tested for hepatitis C in 2003; 11 (4.5%) tested hepatitis C positive (95% CI: 2.3%-8.0%). Applying this percentage to all MSM seen for HIV-related care in E&W in 2003, an estimated 680 MSM living with diagnosed HIV would have tested positive for sexually-transmitted hepatitis C (95% CI: 346-1208). CONCLUSION: Matching routine laboratory reports of hepatitis C diagnoses with HIV diagnoses only identified 31 HIV infected MSM with sexually-transmitted hepatitis C infection. Clinical studies suggest that this is an underestimate. On the other hand, matching sentinel surveillance reports with HIV diagnoses revealed that in E&W in 2003 nearly 5% of HIV-diagnosed MSM tested hepatitis C positive where the only risk was sex with another man. Reports of sexually-transmitted hepatitis C infection were not confined to London. Enhanced surveillance is needed to monitor sexually-transmitted hepatitis C among HIV-infected MSM in E&W.

Surveillance of transfusion-transmissible infections comparison of systems in five developed countries.

Most industrialized countries maintain surveillance programs for monitoring transmissible infection in blood donations, revising approaches to methodology and risk assessment as new threats emerge. A comparison of programs in the United States, Canada, France, the UK, and Australia indicates that they have similar function, although the structure of blood programs vary as does the extent and nature of formal ties with public health. The emergence of HIV in the late 1970s and early 1980s was key in recognizing that surveillance systems specific to blood transfusion were essential. Hence, most industrialized countries monitor transfusion-transmissible infections in donors and evaluate the impact of new testing and of predonation screening strategies. Emerging infections since HIV have had different transmission pathways and challenged blood programs to draw upon resources for a rapid and effective response, with recognition that the original focus on sexual/drug-related risk of HIV and hepatitis was inadequate. The focus of surveillance programs on new and emerging pathogens fulfills a key role in risk assessment and policy formulation. The precise nature of such activities varies by country because of the structure of the blood programs and surveillance systems, the strategic focus of the blood programs, and the epidemiology of disease in each country.

Planning for the healthcare burden of hepatitis C infection: Hepatitis C genotypes identified in England, 2002-2007.

BACKGROUND: Identification of HCV genotype is a prerequisite for anti-viral treatment in England. Treatment length and sustained virological response rates vary by genotype. Therefore knowledge of circulating HCV genotypes is important for health-care providers. OBJECTIVES: To describe the HCV genotypes identified in English laboratories and to investigate changes over time; sub-analysis of young adults (15-24 years) to provide information on recently circulating genotypes. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the national reference laboratory and 19 English laboratories participating in the sentinel surveillance of hepatitis testing study were analysed. Multinomial regression was used to investigate trends in genotypes identified between 2002 and 2007. RESULTS: HCV genotypes were available for 18,031 individuals. The majority (89%) of people were genotypes 1 and 3; 3a was the single largest subtype. Half of people born between 1960 and 1989 were genotype 3a and the majority of South Asian people were genotype 3a. People born pre-1940 were nine times more likely to have genotype 1b than 3a. The proportion of 1b infections, relative to 3a, declined over time, but, after adjusting for birth cohort, this effect disappeared. There was no evidence of a relative change in 1a infections. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of genotypes identified in England to date. Changes in genotypes over time were due to decreased genotyping of older individuals. As the population ages, the proportion of more difficult to treat genotypes may decline, leading to possible cost-savings for health-care providers, with a higher chance of achieving sustained virological response.