[Evaluation of efficacy of ketoconazole 800 mg-clindamycin 100 mg tablets vaginal against ketoconazole 800 mg- clindamycin 100 mg vaginal capsules in candida vaginitis and vaginosis]. / Evaluación de la eficacia de ketoconazol 800 mg-clindamicina 100 mg tabletas vaginales, contra ketoconazol 800 mg-100 mg de clindamicina cápsulas vaginales en vaginitis candidiásica y vaginosis.

BACKGROUND: pharmaceutical forms (presentations) influence treatment compliance and therefore the effectiveness. Here we present the results in the relief of vaginitis and vaginosis with two different dosage forms. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of ketoconazole 800 mg + clindamycin in soft vaginal gel capsules 100 mg (vaginal capsules) against ketoconazole 800 mg + 100 mg clindamycin vaginal tablets (TV) in the management of vaginitis by C. albicans and/or vaginosis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a randomized, multicenter, comparative open label study, patients between 18 and 60 years with a diagnosis of vaginitis by C. albicans and/or vaginosis were included. Patients were evaluated clinically and direct exam of genital discharge and culture were performed. Patients were randomized to one of two treatments vaginal tablets or vaginal capsules, for 3 days. RESULTS: one hundred an sitxty nine patients were included, 85 in TV Group and 84 in vaginal capsules group. We found significant statistical difference in clinical response for tablet group at day three for burning p = 0.032 and itching p = 0.043. Microbiological cure was observed in patients with vaginitis by C. albicans, 92.5% in Group TV vs. 90.47% vaginal capsules group, all patients with G. vaginalis at baseline were negative for the organism at the end of the study, cure in patients with mixed infections were 78.94% for TV group vs. 78.26% vaginal capsules; group no adverse events were reported during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of vaginitis/vaginosis with vaginal tablets is clinically better than vaginal soft gelatin capsules both treatments were well tolerated.

Morbilidad extrema (near-miss) en obstetricia. Revisión de la literatura / Severe morbidity (near-miss) in obstetrics. Literature review

Resumen: Objetivo: Presentar la evidencia científica más reciente referente a la definición, diagnóstico y consecuencias de morbilidad extrema en obstetricia (MEO). Metodología de búsqueda: Búsqueda en PubMed, The Cochrane Library, OVID, Science Direct, Google Académico, Artemisa, LILACS e Imbiomed de artículos publicados en inglés y español entre los años 2005 a 2018 con las siguientes palabras clave: severe maternal morbidity, near miss morbidity, severe acute maternal morbidity, obstetric near miss and maternal near miss. Se excluyeron estudios cualitativos. Resultados: La MEO (o near miss) se refiere a cualquier complicación aguda que puede presentarse en el embarazo, labor o hasta seis semanas después de haber concluido el embarazo, estas complicaciones ponen en riesgo la vida de la madre, pero no resulta en su muerte. Los indicadores de MEO fueron desarrollados con base a la incidencia y presencia de trastornos hemorrágicos, hipertensivos y otras alteraciones sistémicas y condiciones maternas graves que pueden tener un impacto en la salud de la madre. En la actualidad, se sugiere que el estudio de los indicadores de MEO son de más utilidad que los de muerte materna. Conclusiones: El ejercicio de la práctica médica con base en la mejor evidencia científica, el estudio y la mejora de la calidad de la práctica clínica, de la planificación familiar, la asesoría prenatal y los programas hospitalarios son estrategias que permitirán ayudar a disminuir los casos de MEO.

Abstract. Objective: To provide the most recent scientific evidence about definitions, diagnosis and consequences of severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Research methodology: We searched databases in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, OVID, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Artemisa, LILACS and Imbiomed from 2005 to 2018 with the following keywords: severe maternal morbidity, near miss morbidity, severe acute maternal morbidity, obstetric near miss and maternal near miss. The search was restricted to articles written in the English and Spanish language and published from 2005 to 2018. Qualitative studies were excluded. Results: SMM or maternal near miss event refers to any acute obstetric complication that immediately threatens a woman's survival but does not result in her death either by chance or because of hospital care she receives during pregnancy, labor or within six weeks of termination of pregnancy. The indicators for SMM were developed and based on the incidence and presence of hemorrhagic disorders, hypertensive disorders, other systemic disorders and severe maternal conditions which could have an impact on maternal health. Nowadays it is suggested that the study of indicators for SMM is a more useful indicator of obstetric care than mortality. Conclusions: Use of best evidence-based practices, studying and improving the effectiveness and quality of clinical practice, family planning, prenatal check-up, and hospital obstetric care programs are strategies that could help to reduce cases of SMM.

[Cabergoline for inhibition of lactation]. / Cabergolina para inhibición de la lactancia.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in prevention inhibition of lactation, only administration of estrogens or these combined with androgens show variable effectiveness and are indirectly associated with high percentage for lactation rebound, thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism or both of the later during puerperium; in addition, bromocriptine, also used indirectly for inhibition of lactation, is associated with lactation, rebound in 18-40%. Cabergolin is a new ergoline with efficient and durable prolactin reducer effect with fewer adverse effects. PROBLEM: Which will the smallest cabergolin dosage be to inhibit lactation? OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate clinical effectiveness with smallest cabergolina dosage in lactation inhibition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried on a the Service Clinical test on patients hospitalization with an indication to inhibit lactation as the Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Infantil Maternal Institute of the State of Mexico (IMIEM). The study was done 80 patients to who we administered oral 0.5 mg cabergoline to 40 patients and another group of 40 whom we administered 1.0 mg of cabergoline orally at random and blinded by means of out-patient consultation. We studied correlation between dose and inhibition of lactation as well as presence of adverse effects. RESULTS: In the group of patients to whom administered 0.5 mg, we found 65% (n = 26) with lactation inhibition; adverse effects in this group appeared in 32.5% (n = 13) the second group with a dose of 1.0 mg; 95% with adverse effects in 25% P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of lactation with unique dose of 1.0 has satisfactory clinical effectiveness, this being the smaller dose to inhibit lactation at a suitable percentage.