Biological Glue as an Alternative to Suction Drainage in Tissue-Expanded Flaps in Children: Cost-Effectiveness Study.

INTRODUCTION: Biological glue is already used as a hemostatic agent and tissue adhesive in plastic surgery. This study evaluates the use of this glue as an alternative to suction drainage for the adhesion of tissue-expanded flaps in pediatric patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicenter case-control study on 48 flap procedures conducted on 42 children (5 months-12 years of age) between 2004 and 2017, comparing a "glue" group (n = 24) with a control group (n = 24), in which a classic redon drain was used. The control patients were matched according to age, etiology, location of the lesion, and the size of the expander. The primary end point was the duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: The conditions were 24 cases of congenital nevus, 14 of cicatricial alopecia, and 10 of sebaceous hamartoma. Twenty-nine lesions were located on the scalp, 15 on the back, 2 on the thigh, and 2 on the buttocks.The average surgical durations (48 ± 24 vs 63 ± 32 minutes, P = 0.13) and average room occupancy time (126 ± 21 vs 139 ± 44 minutes, P = 0.29) were similar between the glue group and the control group. However, the average duration of hospital stay was lower in the glue group (1.5 ± 1.5 days) than in the control group (3.6 ± 1.3 days, P < 0.0001). The complication rates between the groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The application of glue on expanded flaps is as reliable as suction drainage with the advantage of reducing the duration of hospital stay and potentially enabling outpatient treatment for certain patients.

Breastfeeding and respiratory, ear and gastro-intestinal infections, in children, under the age of one year, admitted through the paediatric emergency departments of five hospitals.

Background: Breastfeeding is a protective factor against respiratory and intestinal infections in developing countries. In developed countries, proof of this protection is more difficult to show. The objective of the study is to compare the proportion of children breastfed during their first year in groups of children with infectious pathologies supposedly prevented by breastfeeding and children free of these infectious pathologies. Method: Questionnaires about diet, socio-demographic data and the motive for consultation were given to the parents upon arrival in the paediatric emergency departments of 5 hospitals located in Pays de Loire (France) in 2018 and 2019. Children with lower respiratory tract infections, acute gastroenteritis and acute otitis media were included in the case group (A), children admitted for other reasons were included in the same control group (B). Breastfeeding was classified as exclusive or partial. Results: During the study period, 741 infants were included, of which 266 (35.9%) in group A. In this group, children were significantly less likely to have been breastfed at the time of admission than children in group B: for example, for children under 6 months, 23.3% were currently breastfed in group A, vs. 36.6% (weaned BF or formula diet) in group B [OR = 0.53 (0.34-0.82); p = 0.004]. Similar results were found at 9 and 12 months. After taking into account the age of the patients, the same results were confirmed with an aOR = 0.60 (0.38-0.94) (p = 0.02) at 6 months, but with when considering six variables six variables, aOR was not significative aOR = 0.65 (0.40-1.05); p = 0.08), meaning that factors such as the childcare out of home, socio-professional categories, and the pacifier decrease the protective effect of breastfeeding. Sensitivity analyses (age-matching, analysis by type of infection) showed the same protection effect provided by breastfeeding when it was pursued for at least 6 months and also that the protective effect of breastfeeding is especially true against gastro-enteritis. Conclusion: Breastfeeding is a protective factor against respiratory, gastrointestinal and ear infections when pursued at least 6 months after birth. Other factors such as collective childcare, pacifiers and low parental professional status can reduce the protective effect of breastfeeding.