Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Brief Bioinform ; 21(3): 753-761, 2020 05 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30863848

RESUMO

Population stratification is usually corrected relying on principal component analysis (PCA) of genome-wide genotype data, even in populations considered genetically homogeneous, such as Europeans. The need to genotype only a small number of genetic variants that show large differences in allele frequency among subpopulations-so-called ancestry-informative markers (AIMs)-instead of the whole genome for stratification adjustment could represent an advantage for replication studies and candidate gene/pathway studies. Here we compare the correction performance of classical and robust principal components (PCs) with the use of AIMs selected according to four different methods: the informativeness for assignment measure ($IN$-AIMs), the combination of PCA and F-statistics, PCA-correlated measurement and the PCA weighted loadings for each genetic variant. We used real genotype data from the Population Reference Sample and The Cancer Genome Atlas to simulate European genetic association studies and to quantify type I error rate and statistical power in different case-control settings. In studies with the same numbers of cases and controls per country and control-to-case ratios reflecting actual rates of disease prevalence, no adjustment for population stratification was required. The unnecessary inclusion of the country of origin, PCs or AIMs as covariates in the regression models translated into increasing type I error rates. In studies with cases and controls from separate countries, no investigated method was able to adequately correct for population stratification. The first classical and the first two robust PCs achieved the lowest (although inflated) type I error, followed at some distance by the first eight $IN$-AIMs.


Assuntos
Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Seleção Genética , População Branca/genética , Europa (Continente) , Genética Populacional , Humanos
2.
Hepatology ; 73(5): 1783-1796, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32893372

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a neglected disease with substantial geographical variability: Chile shows the highest incidence worldwide, while GBC is relatively rare in Europe. Here, we investigate the causal effects of risk factors considered in current GBC prevention programs as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) level as a marker of chronic inflammation. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We applied two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) using publicly available data and our own data from a retrospective Chilean and a prospective European study. Causality was assessed by inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, and weighted median estimates complemented with sensitivity analyses on potential heterogeneity and pleiotropy, two-step MR, and mediation analysis. We found evidence for a causal effect of gallstone disease on GBC risk in Chileans (P = 9 × 10-5 ) and Europeans (P = 9 × 10-5 ). A genetically elevated body mass index (BMI) increased GBC risk in Chileans (P = 0.03), while higher CRP concentrations increased GBC risk in Europeans (P = 4.1 × 10-6 ). European results suggest causal effects of BMI on gallstone disease (P = 0.008); public Chilean data were not, however, available to enable assessment of the mediation effects among causal GBC risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Two risk factors considered in the current Chilean program for GBC prevention are causally linked to GBC risk: gallstones and BMI. For Europeans, BMI showed a causal effect on gallstone risk, which was itself causally linked to GBC risk.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/complicações , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Chile/epidemiologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/genética , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Variação Genética , Humanos , Masculino , Análise da Randomização Mendeliana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Urol Int ; 105(5-6): 490-498, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33706322

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and robotic-assisted PN (RAPN) based on a propensity score-matched sample and to test the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) as an end point for complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing PN from 2010 to 2018 at a university care center were included. OPN and RAPN cases were matched in a 2:1 ratio using propensity score-matching with age, gender, BMI, RENAL score, and tumor size as confounders. The primary end point was complications measured with the CCI as continuous score (0-100, 100 indicating death). RESULTS: Data of 570 patients were available. After matching, both cohorts (OPN = 166; RAPN = 83) showed no baseline differences. For the primary end point, CCI, RAPN was superior (RAPN 2.6 ± 7.9 vs. OPN 8.7 ± 13.9; p < 0.001). Additionally, RAPN was superior for length of stay (RAPN 6.5 ± 4.0 vs. OPN 7.4 ± 3.5 days; p < 0.001), hemoglobin drop (RAPN 2.8 ± 1.4 vs. OPN 3.8 ± 1.6 g/dL; p < 0.001), and drop of glomerular filtration rate (RAPN 11.4 ± 14.2 vs. OPN 19.5 ± 14.3 mL/min; p < 0.001). OPN had shorter operating times (RAPN 157 ± 43 vs. OPN 143 ± 45 min; p = 0.014) and less ischemia (RAPN 13% vs. OPN 28%; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: RAPN provides superior short-term results regarding overall complications without compromising renal function for small and less complex tumors. However, OPN remains an important option for more complex and larger tumors.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 46(5): 948-953, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724686

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) and associated risk factors after parotid gland surgery including the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis. DESIGN: Retrospective single-centre clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre for head and neck surgery. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred and fifty four patients who underwent parotid gland surgery at the University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, between 2007 and 2014 were enrolled in this study. Data on patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, operation time, and antibiotic prophylaxis were collected. Additionally, the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) risk index was calculated. Association of these factors with SSI was evaluated in univariate analyses and a multivariate logistic regression model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of SSI. RESULTS: Twenty four patients (3.2%) had an SSI according to the NHSN definition. In univariate analyses, only smokers (P = .048) and male patients (P = .01) had a significantly higher rate of SSI. Since the majority of smokers were men (62.3%), the effect of male gender, smoking, together with the NHSN risk index was further investigated as predictors of SSI within a logistic regression model. All three predictors showed a significant effect on SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Parotid gland surgery has a low rate of SSI. In our cohort, male gender, smoking and high NHSN risk index scores were significantly associated with SSI, whereas antibiotic prophylaxis had no protective effect.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Doenças Parotídeas/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
5.
Oral Dis ; 25(7): 1744-1750, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31295368

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Though xerostomia is a frequent oral symptom, there is no validated disease-specific questionnaire in German. The purpose of this study was to translate and validate versions of the Xerostomia Inventory and the Summated Xerostomia Inventory in a German-speaking population. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients including 18 patients suffering from radiation-induced xerostomia enrolled in this study. Both questionnaires were translated into German language according to international accepted guidelines. For validation, we evaluated reliability, validity, and responsiveness using the COSMIN manual for cross-cultural adaptation. RESULTS: Cronbach's α was 0.92 for XI and 0.91 for SXI, showing both high internal consistency. Patients suffering from xerostomia showed significantly higher average scores demonstrating its discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent "goodness-of-fit" values for SXI and good to moderate values for XI, confirming the assumed factor structures. The Xerostomia Inventory and its summated version both showed excellent test-retest reliability in the non-xerostomia group (ICC = 0.85 and 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: The XI and SXI in their cross-cultural adapted versions are the first validated self-report assessments for xerostomia in German language. They are characterized by practical design and can be easily interpreted by the treating physician.


Assuntos
Saúde Bucal , Psicometria/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Traduções , Xerostomia/diagnóstico , Endoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Idioma , Masculino , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Xerostomia/etiologia , Xerostomia/psicologia
6.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 1694, 2019 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31847898

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health care employees in Germany and worldwide are exposed to a variety of stressors. However, most of the hospitals in Germany lack a systematic workplace health management. Thus, this study aims at the evaluation of the effects of a behavioural as well as organisational (´complex´) intervention on the mental health and well-being of hospital staff. METHODS: Mental health in the hospital workplace (SEElische GEsundheit am Arbeitsplatz KrankeNhaus - SEEGEN) is an unblinded, multi-centred cluster-randomised open trial with two groups (intervention group (IG) and waitlist control group (CG)). Study participants in the intervention clusters will receive the complex intervention; study participants in the waitlist control clusters will receive the complex intervention after the last follow-up measurement. The intervention consists of five behavioural and organisational intervention modules that are specifically tailored to hospital employees at different hierarchical and functional levels. Hospital staff may select one specific module according to their position and specific needs or interests. Towards the end of the intervention roundtable discussions with representatives from all professional groups will be held to facilitate organisational change. Primary outcome is the change in emotional and cognitive strain in the working environment, from baseline (T0) to 6 month-follow up (T1), between IG and CG. In addition, employees who do not participate in the modules are included in the trial by answering shorter questionnaires (cluster participants). Furthermore, using mixed methods, a process evaluation will identify uptake of the intervention, and mediators and moderators of the effect. DISCUSSION: There seems to be growing psychological strain on people working in the health care sector worldwide. This study will examine whether investing directly in the hospital staff and their interpersonal relationship may lead to measurable benefits in subjective well-being at the workplace and improved economic performance indicators of the hospital. In case of a positive outcome, health promotion strategies looking at behavioural as well as organisational components within the hospital may gain additional importance, especially in regard of the growing financial pressure within the health sector. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS: The SEEGEN study is registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) under the DRKS-ID DRKS00017249. Registered 08 October 2019, URL. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00017249.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Ocupacional , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
7.
BMC Bioinformatics ; 19(1): 78, 2018 03 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29499647

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: When many (up to millions) of statistical tests are conducted in discovery set analyses such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS), approaches controlling family-wise error rate (FWER) or false discovery rate (FDR) are required to reduce the number of false positive decisions. Some methods were specifically developed in the context of high-dimensional settings and partially rely on the estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses. However, these approaches are also applied in low-dimensional settings such as replication set analyses that might be restricted to a small number of specific hypotheses. The aim of this study was to compare different approaches in low-dimensional settings using (a) real data from the CKDGen Consortium and (b) a simulation study. RESULTS: In both application and simulation FWER approaches were less powerful compared to FDR control methods, whether a larger number of hypotheses were tested or not. Most powerful was the q-value method. However, the specificity of this method to maintain true null hypotheses was especially decreased when the number of tested hypotheses was small. In this low-dimensional situation, estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses was biased. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of a sizeable data set for a reliable estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses. Consequently, methods relying on this estimation should only be applied in high-dimensional settings. Furthermore, if the focus lies on testing of a small number of hypotheses such as in replication settings, FWER methods rather than FDR methods should be preferred to maintain high specificity.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Empírica , Algoritmos , Simulação por Computador , Reações Falso-Positivas , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/genética
8.
BMC Genet ; 19(Suppl 1): 79, 2018 09 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30255814

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This paper summarizes the contributions from the Genome-wide Association Study group (GWAS group) of the GAW20. The GWAS group contributions focused on topics such as association tests, phenotype imputation, and application of empirical kinships. The goals of the GWAS group contributions were varied. A real or a simulated data set based on the Genetics of Lipid Lowering Drugs and Diet Network (GOLDN) study was employed by different methods. Different outcomes and covariates were considered, and quality control procedures varied throughout the contributions. RESULTS: The consideration of heritability and family structure played a major role in some contributions. The inclusion of family information and adaptive weights based on data were found to improve power in genome-wide association studies. It was proven that gene-level approaches are more powerful than single-marker analysis. Other contributions focused on the comparison between pedigree-based kinship and empirical kinship matrices, and investigated similar results in heritability estimation, association mapping, and genomic prediction. A new approach for linkage mapping of triglyceride levels was able to identify a novel linkage signal. CONCLUSIONS: This summary paper reports on promising statistical approaches and findings of the members of the GWAS group applied on real and simulated data which encompass the current topics of epigenetic and pharmacogenomics.


Assuntos
Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla/métodos , Mapeamento Cromossômico , Metilação de DNA , Humanos , Hipertrigliceridemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertrigliceridemia/genética , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Fenótipo , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Triglicerídeos/sangue
9.
World Neurosurg ; 158: e429-e440, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34767992

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Fiber tractography (FT) has become an important noninvasive tool to ensure maximal safe tumor resection in eloquent glioma surgery. Intraoperatively applied FT is still predominantly based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). However, reconstruction schemes of high angular resolution diffusion imaging data for high-resolution FT (HRFT) are gaining increasing attention. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the accuracy of sophisticated HRFT models compared with DTI-FT. METHODS: Ten patients with eloquent gliomas underwent surgery under awake craniotomy conditions. The localization of acquisition points, representing deteriorations during intraoperative electrostimulation (IOM) and neuropsychological mapping, were documented. The offsets of acquisition points to the respective fiber bundle were calculated. Probabilistic Q-ball imaging (QBI) and constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD)-FT were compared with DTI-FT for the major language-associated fiber bundles (superior longitudinal fasciculus [SLF] II-IV, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, and inferior longitudinal fasciculus/medial longitudinal fasciculus). RESULTS: Among 186 offset values, 46% were located closer than 10 mm to the estimated fiber bundle (CSD, 36%; DTI, 40% and QBI, 60%). Moreover, only 10 offsets were further away than 30 mm (5%). Lowest mean minimum offsets (SLF, 7.7 ± 7.9 mm; inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, 12.7 ± 8.3 mm; inferior longitudinal fasciculus/medial longitudinal fasciculus, 17.7 ± 6.7 mm) were found for QBI, indicating a significant advantage compared with CSD or DTI (P < 0.001), respectively. No significant differences were found between CSD-FT and DTI-FT offsets (P = 0.105), albeit for the compound SLF exclusively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing HRFT techniques QBI and CSD with DTI, QBI delivered significantly better results with lowest offsets and good correlation to IOM results. Besides, QBI-FT was feasible for neurosurgical preoperative and intraoperative applications. Our findings suggest that a combined approach of QBI-FT and IOM under awake craniotomy is considerable for best preservation of neurological function in the presented setting. Overall, the implementation of selected HRFT models into neuronavigation systems seems to be a promising tool in glioma surgery.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Craniotomia , Imagem de Tensor de Difusão/métodos , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioma/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Vigília
10.
JMIR Ment Health ; 8(3): e22569, 2021 Mar 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33709931

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most people affected by depression or anxiety disorders are treated solely by their primary care physician. Access to specialized mental health care is impeded by patients' comorbidity and immobility in aging societies and long waiting times at the providers' end. Video-based integrated care models may leverage limited resources more efficiently and provide timely specialized care in primary care settings. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of mental health specialist video consultations with primary care patients with depression or anxiety disorders. METHODS: Participants were recruited by their primary care physicians during regular practice visits. Patients who had experienced at least moderate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety disorders were considered eligible for the study. Patients were randomized into 2 groups receiving either treatment-as-usual as provided by their general practitioner or up to 5 video consultations conducted by a mental health specialist. Video consultations focused on systematic diagnosis and proactive monitoring using validated clinical rating scales, the establishment of an effective working alliance, and a stepped-care algorithm within integrated care adjusting treatments based on clinical outcomes. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, rate of loss to follow-up, acceptability of treatment, and attendance at sessions. Effectiveness outcomes included depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), burden of specific somatic complaints (Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale-12), recovery (Recovery Assessment Scale-German [RAS-G]), and perception of chronic illness care (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care), which were measured at baseline and 16 weeks postallocation by assessors blinded to the group allocation. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders were randomized, 23 in the intervention group and 27 in the treatment-as-usual group. The recruitment yield (number randomized per number screened) and the consent rate (number randomized per number eligible) were 69% (50/73) and 86% (50/58), respectively. Regarding acceptability, 87% (20/23) of the participants in the intervention group completed the intervention. Of the 108 planned video consultations, 102 (94.4%) were delivered. Follow-up rates were 96% (22/23) and 85% (23/27) for the intervention and control groups, respectively. The change from baseline scores at postmeasurement for the No Domination by Symptoms domain of recovery (RAS-G) was somewhat higher in the intervention group than in the control group (Mann-Whitney U test: rank-biserial r=0.19; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.46; P=.18). We did not detect any notable differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of other effectiveness outcomes. We did not observe any serious adverse events related to the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention and study procedures were found to be feasible for patients, primary care practice staff, and mental health specialists. A sufficiently powered pragmatic trial on mental health specialist video consultations should be conducted to investigate their effectiveness in routine care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00015812; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00015812.

11.
World Neurosurg ; 134: e596-e609, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31678440

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: As a result of the resolution of intravoxel fiber crossing, high-resolution fiber tractography (HRFT) provides advantages over conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for fiber tractography (FT). Nevertheless, neurosurgically applied FT is still predominantly based on DTI. Although the application of HRFT is evolving, there is still a lack of data about which method should be preferred. With this prospectively designed study, we present our initial experience comparing an analytical Q-ball imaging (QBI) approach with constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) and conventional DTI-FT considering a particularly neurosurgical perspective. METHODS: For 18 patients with eloquent gliomas in the dominant hemisphere, probabilistic FT based on QBI, CSD, and DTI was performed for the major components of the language-associated pathways using a routine diffusion-weighted sequence. Quantitative analysis evaluated tract density, tract volume (TV), tract length (TL), number of fibers, and tract surface (TS) of the fiber object. RESULTS: Both HRFT models showed a significantly larger mean TV, TL, and TS compared with DTI (for QBI vs. DTI: TV (P = 0.0000), TL (P = 0.0048), and TS (P = 0.0129); for CSD vs. DTI: TV (P = 0.0000), TL (P = 0.0008), and TS (P = 0.0010)). However, results of QBI versus CSD did not differ significantly for these variables: TV (P = 0.1415), TL (P = 0.2837), and TS (P = 0.3692). Bland-Altman analysis supports these findings, suggesting systematically higher values for TV, TL, and TS with HRFT but no relevant differences of either QBI or CSD. Neither tumor volume nor peritumoral edema influenced FT results. CONCLUSIONS: Our quantitative analysis showed no significant differences regarding TV, TL, and TS for the HRFT methods; however, it suggested advantages over DTI-FT in terms of the display of marginal and terminal fibers. In our recently established setting, QBI-FT shows greater potential for integration into the clinical workflow.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Imagem de Tensor de Difusão/métodos , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioma/cirurgia , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Adulto , Idoso , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/cirurgia , Edema Encefálico/diagnóstico por imagem , Craniotomia , Feminino , Humanos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Estudos Prospectivos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA