RESUMO
Updated data on genital Mollicutes prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility can help provide guidance for antibiotic stewardship and set up effective strategies for infection control policies. In this multicentre study, we assessed the prevalence and the resistance profile of Mycoplasma hominis (MH) and Ureaplasma species (U. parvum/U. urealyticum), analyzing data from 21,210 subjects who provided urogenital samples for Mollicutes detection by culture over a 5-year period (2017-2021) in two high-density urban areas in the North of Italy (i.e., Bologna and Lecco). Overall prevalence of Mollicutes infection was 22.3%, with women showing a significantly higher detection rate than men (p < 0.00001). The prevalence decreased with age (highest prevalence <30 years) and over the years considered. Ureaplasma strains were much more frequently detected (62.3%) compared to MH (8.3%) and to mixed infections (29.4%). Ureaplasma species showed high levels of ciprofloxacin resistance (39.5%), whereas MH strains were nonsusceptible to azithromycin and roxithromycin in about 60% of cases. Over time, a significant decrease of resistance to azithromycin and doxycycline was detected (p < 0.0001 and 0.0004, respectively), in parallel with an important increase of ciprofloxacin-resistance levels (p < 0.0001). Overall, our results revealed that minocycline and josamycin can be first-line drugs for Mollicutes empirical treatment.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Infecções por Mycoplasma , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Ureaplasma , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/epidemiologia , Ureaplasma urealyticum , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mycoplasma hominis , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Genitália , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, pose a major threat for patients, especially for those who are immunosuppressed. Rapid pathogen detection and characterization from positive blood cultures are crucial in the management of patients with BSI to enable an adequate and timely antimicrobial therapy. This study aimed to investigate the potential role of the Molecular Mouse system, a new CE IVD molecular test designed to rapidly detect the causative agents of bacteremia and their resistance determinants, in the management of the therapy in critically ill patients. Agreement between the results of the Molecular Mouse and the conventional routine method was also considered. Overall, 100 positive blood cultures were collected from septic critically ill patients from May 2023 to January 2024 and analyzed with Molecular Mouse and routine protocols. The new instrument consistently agreed with the routine protocols in the case of monomicrobial blood cultures, while some discrepancies were obtained in the polymicrobial samples. Antimicrobial resistance genes were detected in 35 samples, with vanA and CTX-M-1/9 groups being the most frequently detected targets. Therapy was adjusted in 42 critically ill patients confirming the importance of new rapid molecular tests in the management of positive blood cultures, to adjust empirical therapy and use new antibiotics accurately.
RESUMO
Rapid pathogen detection and characterization from positive blood cultures are crucial in the management of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) and in achieving their improved outcomes. In this context, the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID2) panel is an FDA approved molecular test, which can quickly identify different species and resistance determinants, thus making an impact in antimicrobial practice. In this study, we analyzed 136 positive blood cultures collected from septic critically ill patients from April 2021 to March 2023 by using the FilmArray BCID2 panel, and results obtained by fast molecular analysis were compared to those obtained by routine protocols. Overall, the BCID2 panel showed a strong concordance with conventional methods, particularly in the case of monomicrobial samples, whereas some discrepancies were found in 10/32 polymicrobial samples. Of note, this technique allowed us to identify a significant number of yeasts (37/94 samples) and to unravel the presence of several resistance markers, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. These findings strongly support the potential use of the BCID2 panel as an adjunct to the conventional microbiology methods for the management of critically ill septic patients, thus accelerating blood pathogen and resistance genes identification, focusing antibiotic therapy, and avoiding inappropriate and excessive use of drugs.