The influence of hours worked prior to delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Long continuous periods of working contribute to fatigue, which is an established risk factor for adverse patient outcomes in many clinical specialties. The total number of hours worked by delivering clinicians before delivery therefore may be an important predictor of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine how rates of adverse delivery outcomes vary with the number of hours worked by the delivering clinician before delivery during both day and night shifts. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 24,506 unscheduled deliveries at an obstetrics center in the United Kingdom from 2008-2013. We compared adverse outcomes between day shifts and night shifts using random-effects logistic regression to account for interoperator variability. Adverse outcomes were estimated blood loss of ≥1.5 L, arterial cord pH of ≤7.1, failed instrumental delivery, delayed neonatal respiration, severe perineal trauma, and any critical incident. Additive dynamic regression was used to examine the association between hours worked before delivery (up to 12 hours) and risk of adverse outcomes. Models were controlled for maternal age, maternal body mass index, parity, birthweight, gestation, obstetrician experience, and delivery type. RESULTS: We found no difference in the risk of any adverse outcome that was studied between day vs night shifts. Yet, risk of estimated blood loss of ≥1.5 L and arterial cord pH of ≤7.1 both varied by 30-40% within 12-hour shifts (P<.05). The highest risk of adverse outcomes occurred after 9-10 hours from the beginning of the shift for both day and night shifts. The risk of other adverse outcomes did not vary significantly by hours worked or by day vs night shift. CONCLUSION: Number of hours already worked before undertaking unscheduled deliveries significantly influences the risk of certain adverse outcomes. Our findings suggest that fatigue may play a role in increasing the risk of adverse delivery outcomes later in shifts and that obstetric work patterns could be better designed to minimize the risk of adverse delivery outcomes.

Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the factors associated with selection of rotational instrumental vs cesarean delivery to manage persistent fetal malposition, and to assess differences in adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes following delivery by rotational instruments vs cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study over a 5-year period in a tertiary United Kingdom obstetrics center. In all, 868 women with vertex-presenting, single, liveborn infants at term with persistent malposition in the second stage of labor were included. Propensity score stratification was used to control for selection bias: the possibility that obstetricians may systematically select more difficult cases for cesarean delivery. Linear and logistic regression models were used to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes for delivery by rotational forceps or ventouse vs cesarean delivery, adjusting for propensity scores. RESULTS: Increased likelihood of rotational instrumental delivery was associated with lower maternal age (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; P < .01), lower body mass index (OR, 0.94; P < .001), lower birthweight (OR, 0.95; P < .01), no evidence of fetal compromise at the time of delivery (OR, 0.31; P < .001), delivery during the daytime (OR, 1.45; P < .05), and delivery by a more experienced obstetrician (OR, 7.21; P < .001). Following propensity score stratification, there was no difference by delivery method in the rates of delayed neonatal respiration, reported critical incidents, or low fetal arterial pH. Maternal blood loss was higher in the cesarean group (295.8 ± 48 mL, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Rotational instrumental delivery is often regarded as unsafe. However, we find that neonatal outcomes are no worse once selection bias is accounted for, and that the likelihood of severe obstetric hemorrhage is reduced. More widespread training of obstetricians in rotational instrumental delivery should be considered, particularly in light of rising cesarean delivery rates.

Factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes among obstetrics trainees.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine whether UK obstetrics trainees transitioning from directly to indirectly supervised practice have a higher likelihood of recording adverse patient outcomes in operative deliveries compared with other indirectly supervised trainees, and to examine whether performing more procedures under direct supervision is associated with fewer adverse outcomes in initial practice under indirect supervision. METHODS: We examined all deliveries (13 856) conducted by obstetricians at a single centre over 6 years (2008-2013). Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to compare estimated blood loss (EBL), maternal trauma, umbilical arterial pH, delayed neonatal respiration, failed instrumental delivery, and critical incidents for trainees in their first indirectly supervised year with those for trainees in all other years of indirect supervision. Outcomes for trainees in their first indirectly supervised 3 months were compared with their outcomes for the remainder of the year. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship between number of procedures performed under direct supervision and initial outcomes under indirect supervision. RESULTS: Trainees in their first indirectly supervised year had a higher likelihood of recording EBL of > 2 L at any delivery (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.64; p < 0.05) and of failed instrumental delivery (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.37-3.29; p < 0.05) compared with other indirectly supervised trainees. Other measured outcomes showed no significant differences. In the first 3 months of indirect supervision, the likelihood of operative vaginal deliveries with EBL of > 1 L (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.88-3.20; p < 0.05) was higher than in the remainder of the first year. Performing more deliveries under direct supervision prior to beginning indirectly supervised training was associated with decreased risk for recording EBL of > 1 L (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Obstetrics trainees in their first year of indirectly supervised practice have a higher likelihood of recording immediate adverse delivery outcomes, which are primarily maternal rather than neonatal. Undertaking more directly supervised procedures prior to transitioning to indirectly supervised practice may reduce adverse outcomes, which suggests that experience is a key consideration in obstetrics training programme design.

The NTplus method of screening for Down syndrome: achieving the 2010 targets?

INTRODUCTION: The performance of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) as a first trimester trisomy 21 marker is hypothesized to improve below 11 weeks, whereas beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) is better after 14 weeks. We audited a model combining early PAPP-A (9-10 weeks) with NT (11-13 weeks and 6 days) and early triple test (>14 weeks). METHODS: A total of 1507 women with viable ongoing pregnancies were screened during 2007-2008. First-stage 'screen-positive' risk was based on combined PAPP-A and NT cut-off >or=1 : 100. Where first-stage risk was <1 : 100 or invasive testing declined, triple test was performed and a combined second-stage risk given with cut-off >or=1 : 250 being screen positive. RESULTS: Median age of women was 35.4 years. Sixty-four (4.2%) were 'screen positive'. Of these, 11 had a fetus with trisomy 21. Twelve pregnancies were affected with trisomy 21, giving a detection rate of 11/12 (92%) with a false-positive rate (FPR) of 3.2%. The screen-positive rate (SPR) and FPR were 1.93 and 1.44%, respectively, standardized to median maternal age 29. CONCLUSIONS: Early PAPP-A, NT and later triple testing offers comparable detection for trisomy 21 to published data for first trimester combined testing but feasibly achieve the national target for 2010 of 90% detection of trisomy 21 for < 2% SPR.

Weekend working: a retrospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal outcomes in a large NHS delivery unit.

OBJECTIVES: Mandatory weekend working for NHS consultants is currently the subject of intense political debate. The Secretary of State for Health's proposed 7-day contract policy is based on the claim that such working patterns will improve patient outcomes. We evaluate this claim by taking advantage of as-if-at-random presentation of women for non-elective deliveries throughout the week. We examine (i) whether consultants currently perform fewer deliveries during weekends versus weekdays, and (ii) whether adverse outcomes increase during weekends. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data on all non-elective deliveries from January 2008 to December 2013 in a large UK obstetrics centre (n=27,466). We used Pearson's chi-squared tests to make direct comparisons of adverse outcome rates during weekdays versus weekends. Outcomes included: estimated maternal blood loss ≥1.5l; severe perineal trauma; delayed neonatal respiration; umbilical arterial pH <7.1; and critical incidents at delivery. RESULTS: Consultants currently perform the same proportion of non-elective deliveries on weekends and weekdays (2.3% versus 2.6%, p=0.25). We found no increase in any adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes during weekends versus weekdays, despite high statistical power to detect such differences. Moreover, adverse outcomes are no higher during periods of the weekend when consultants are not routinely present compared to equivalent periods during weekdays. CONCLUSIONS: Under current working arrangements, women who would benefit from consultant-led delivery are equally likely to receive one on weekends compared to weekdays. Weekend delivery has no effect on maternal or neonatal morbidity. Adopting mandatory 7-day contracts is unlikely to make any difference to either consultant-led delivery during weekends or to patient outcomes.

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is elevated in women with preeclampsia.

A leading theory of the pathophysiology of preeclampsia is that oxidative stress induces vascular endothelial cell dysfunction. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) form when aldose sugars react nonenzymatically with proteins under conditions of oxidative stress. AGEs are circulating molecules and can generate reactive oxygen species and vascular dysfunction (in diabetes and atherosclerosis) through an association with cell surface receptors (RAGE). RAGE is a multiligand receptor, expressed in vascular tissue, which is upregulated by its own ligands. Insulin resistance and obesity are risk factors for developing preeclampsia, as well as being conditions that would increase RAGE levels. Thus, we hypothesized that women with preeclampsia will have elevated levels of RAGE protein compared with normal pregnant women. Biopsies of nonlaboring myometrium as well as omentum were taken from normal pregnant and preeclamptic women. Nonpregnant samples were obtained at the time of hysterectomy. Tissue sections were immunostained with anti-RAGE as well as anti-alpha-actin and anti-von Willebrand factor (to identify blood vessels and intact endothelial cells). Staining intensity was qualitatively described as well as given an intensity score, with the identity of the section concealed. Nonpregnant myometrial and omental vessels showed very low to undetectable levels of RAGE staining. Pregnancy induced a significant increase in RAGE protein levels in both myometrium and omental vasculature. Blood vessels from women with preeclampsia consistently had intense staining for RAGE in both vessel beds. Thus, our data suggest that since RAGE activation can induce similar pathophysiologic changes to those observed in women with preeclampsia (including NFkappaB activation, increased TNFalpha and endothelin), elevated RAGE protein may be contributing to the vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia.

Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors for unsuccessful instrumental delivery when variability between individual obstetricians is taken into account. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of attempted instrumental deliveries over a 5-year period (2008-2012 inclusive) in a tertiary United Kingdom center. To account for interobstetrician variability, we matched unsuccessful deliveries (case group) with successful deliveries (control group) by the same operators. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare successful and unsuccessful instrumental deliveries. RESULTS: Three thousand seven hundred ninety-eight instrumental deliveries of vertex-presenting, single, term newborns were attempted, of which 246 were unsuccessful (6.5%). Increased birth weight (odds ratio [OR] 1.11; P<.001), second-stage labor duration (OR 1.01; P<.001), rotational delivery (OR 1.52; P<.05), and use of ventouse compared with forceps (OR 1.33; P<.05) were associated with unsuccessful outcome. When interobstetrician variability was controlled for, instrument selection and decision to rotate were no longer associated with instrumental delivery success. More senior obstetricians had higher rates of unsuccessful deliveries (12% compared with 5%; P<.05) but were used to undertake more complicated cases. Cesarean delivery during the second stage of labor without previous attempt at instrumental delivery was associated with higher birth weight (OR 1.07; P<.001), increased maternal age (OR 1.03; P<.01), and epidural analgesia (OR 1.46; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that birth weight and head position are the most important factors in successful instrumental delivery, whereas the influence of instrument selection and rotational delivery appear to be operator-dependent. Risk factors for lack of instrumental delivery success are distinct from risk factors for requiring instrumental delivery, and these should not be conflated in clinical practice.

Cardiac function in early onset small for gestational age and growth restricted fetuses.

OBJECTIVE: To examine cardiac function in appropriately grown, small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restricted fetuses and investigate the relationship between cardiac function and fetal arterial and venous Doppler parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Myocardial performance index, isovolumetric contraction time, isovolumetric relaxation time, ejection time, and umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery and ductus venosus Doppler pulsatility index were measured for women between 24 and 32 weeks with small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restricted fetuses. Forty-eight appropriately grown, 11 small for gestational age and 12 intrauterine growth restricted cases were included. The relationship between cardiovascular parameters and gestation was defined and Doppler values converted to Z-scores in relation to gestational age. RESULTS: In small for gestational age fetuses and fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction the myocardial performance index was 0.66 (0.63-0.7) and 0.64 (0.60-0.67), respectively, and compared to appropriately grown fetuses, at 0.45 (0.43-0.47), was significantly increased (p=0.001). No relationship was found between the myocardial performance index and arterial and venous Doppler Z-score. CONCLUSION: Small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restricted fetuses demonstrate altered cardiac function in the late second and early third trimester of pregnancy. Importantly, the myocardial performance index is raised in small for gestational age fetuses before the arterial and venous Doppler abnormalities that characterize hypoxia are evident.

A case of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax during pregnancy treated with video assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Pneumothorax during pregnancy is uncommon. Recently ambulatory chest drainage has been advised to treat the pneumothorax and to cover the delivery period. This imposes restrictions on the mother with associated co-morbidity. The authors present a case of recurrent chest-tube resistant pneumothorax during pregnancy which had persisted for 4-weeks. To guide management of a patient referred in the third trimester of pregnancy the authors undertook a systematic review. This led to definitive video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for bullectomy and pleurodesis which was successful without either peri-operative or peri-partum complications or recurrence of pneumothorax. Our review suggests that a VATS approach during pregnancy is both safe and effective.