5-Year outcomes of the prospective and randomized CISTCERT study comparing steroid withdrawal to replacement of cyclosporine with everolimus in de novo kidney transplant patients.

Withdrawal of either steroids or calcineurin inhibitors are two strategies to reduce treatment-related side effects and improve long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation. The CISTCERT study compared the efficacy and safety of these two strategies. In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 151 incident kidney transplant recipients received cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolic acid (MPA), and steroids during three months, followed by either steroid withdrawal (CsA/MPA) or replacement of cyclosporine with everolimus (EVL) (EVL/MPA/steroids). 5-year patient survival (89% vs. 86%; P = NS) and death-censored graft survival (95% vs. 96%; P = NS) were comparable in the CsA/MPA and EVL/MPA/steroids arm, respectively. 51 CrEDTA clearance was comparable in the intention-to-treat analysis, but in the on-treatment population, the EVL/MPA/steroids arm exhibited a superior 51 CrEDTA clearance at 1 and 5 years after transplantation (61.6 vs. 52.4, P = 0.05 and 59.1 vs. 46.2ml/min/1.73 m2 , P = 0.042). Numerically more and more severe rejections were observed in the EVL/MPA/steroids arm, which also experienced a higher incidence of posttransplant diabetes (26% vs. 6%, P = 0.0016) and infections. No significant differences were observed in cardiovascular outcomes and malignancy. Both regimens provide an excellent long-term patient survival and graft survival. Regarding graft function, EVL/MPA/steroids is an attractive strategy for patients with good tolerability who remain free of rejection. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00903188; EudraCT Number 2007-005844-26).

Prospective randomized study of conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine A to improve glucose metabolism in patients with posttransplant diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation.

Tacrolimus (TAC) increases the risk of posttransplant diabetes (PTDM) compared with cyclosporine A (CYC). The present 12-month, multicenter, investigator-driven, prospective, randomized study was designed to assess whether conversion from tacrolimus to CYC can reverse PTDM after renal transplantation. Predominantly white patients with PTDM according to the 2005 American Diabetes Association criteria were randomized to either replacement of TAC with CYC or continuation of their TAC-based regimen after stratification for type of glucose-lowering therapy, steroid therapy, and hepatitis C status. At 12 months, 14 of 41 patients with complete data in the CYC arm (34%; 95%CI 19%-49%) were free of diabetes, whereas this was the case in only 4 of 39 patients (10%; 95%CI 3%-20%) in the TAC arm (P = .01). At 12 months, 39% of patients in the CYC arm were off glucose-lowering medication vs 13% of patients in the TAC arm (P = .01). The CYC group decreased glycated hemoglobin level during the 12-month follow-up, resulting in significantly lower levels compared with the TAC group (6.0 ± 0.9% vs 7.1 ± 1.7% at 12 months; P = .002). In conclusion, replacement of TAC with CYC significantly improves glucose metabolism and has the potential to reverse diabetes during the first year after conversion. (EU Clinical Trials Register No. 2006-001765-42).

Severe myoglobinuric acute kidney injury in a kidney recipient: rapid recovery after hemodialysis with the super high-flux membrane Theralite®â€©.

Myoglobinuric acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe condition requiring early therapeutic strategies. Early recognition and treatment are crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality rate. Here, we report a kidney recipient with severe rhabdomyolysis and AKI secondary to parvovirus B19 infection. Initiation of hemodialysis with the super high-flux filter Theralite® (Gambro, cut-off 45 kDa, 2.1 m2) resulted in the clearance of myoglobin from 61 to 71% after 3 hours. Elimination rates of IL-6 and ß2-microglobulin were ~ 30 - 64% and 55 - 71% after 3 hours, respectively. Renal graft function rapidly recovered. The place of this effective but expensive procedure still needs to be defined and validated in high-risk patients.
.

High-urgency kidney transplantation in the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System: success or waste of organs? The Eurotransplant 15-year all-centre survey.

BACKGROUND: In the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS), transplant candidates can be considered for high-urgency (HU) status in case of life-threatening inability to undergo renal replacement therapy. Data on the outcomes of HU transplantation are sparse and the benefit is controversial. METHODS: We systematically analysed data from 898 ET HU kidney transplant recipients from 61 transplant centres between 1996 and 2010 and investigated the 5-year patient and graft outcomes and differences between relevant subgroups. RESULTS: Kidney recipients with an HU status were younger (median 43 versus 55 years) and spent less time on the waiting list compared with non-HU recipients (34 versus 54 months). They received grafts with significantly more mismatches (mean 3.79 versus 2.42; P < 0.001) and the percentage of retransplantations was remarkably higher (37.5 versus 16.7%). Patient survival (P = 0.0053) and death with a functioning graft (DwFG; P < 0.0001) after HU transplantation were significantly worse than in non-HU recipients, whereas graft outcome was comparable (P = 0.094). Analysis according to the different HU indications revealed that recipients listed HU because of an imminent lack of access for dialysis had a significantly worse patient survival (P = 0.0053) and DwFG (P = 0.0462) compared with recipients with psychological problems and suicidality because of dialysis. In addition, retransplantation had a negative impact on patient and graft outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Facing organ shortages, increasing wait times and considerable mortality on dialysis, we question the current policy of HU allocation and propose more restrictive criteria with regard to individuals with vascular complications or repeated retransplantations in order to support patients on the non-HU waiting list with a much better long-term prognosis.

Sirolimus and secondary skin-cancer prevention in kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients in whom cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas develop are at high risk for multiple subsequent skin cancers. Whether sirolimus is useful in the prevention of secondary skin cancer has not been assessed. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned transplant recipients who were taking calcineurin inhibitors and had at least one cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma either to receive sirolimus as a substitute for calcineurin inhibitors (in 64 patients) or to maintain their initial treatment (in 56). The primary end point was survival free of squamous-cell carcinoma at 2 years. Secondary end points included the time until the onset of new squamous-cell carcinomas, occurrence of other skin tumors, graft function, and problems with sirolimus. RESULTS: Survival free of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma was significantly longer in the sirolimus group than in the calcineurin-inhibitor group. Overall, new squamous-cell carcinomas developed in 14 patients (22%) in the sirolimus group (6 after withdrawal of sirolimus) and in 22 (39%) in the calcineurin-inhibitor group (median time until onset, 15 vs. 7 months; P=0.02), with a relative risk in the sirolimus group of 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.98). There were 60 serious adverse events in the sirolimus group, as compared with 14 such events in the calcineurin-inhibitor group (average, 0.938 vs. 0.250). There were twice as many serious adverse events in patients who had been converted to sirolimus with rapid protocols as in those with progressive protocols. In the sirolimus group, 23% of patients discontinued the drug because of adverse events. Graft function remained stable in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus had an antitumoral effect among kidney-transplant recipients with previous squamous-cell carcinoma. These observations may have implications concerning immunosuppressive treatment of patients with cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas. (Funded by Hospices Civils de Lyon and others; TUMORAPA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00133887.).

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy in non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma after renal transplantation for end-stage aristolochic acid nephropathy.

Intravesical instillation of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the treatment of choice for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) of high grade and/or carcinoma in situ. This study evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance of BCG instillations in eight kidney recipients for end-stage aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN), a condition at high risk of urothelial carcinoma, and diagnosed for NMIBC. Five of them had relapsed after mitomycin C treatment. Tolerance to BCG was evaluated clinically and regular follow-up with fluorescence cystoscopy was performed along with renal graft function monitoring. Immunosuppression doses were adjusted and prophylactic anti-tuberculous treatment given to reduce risks of graft rejection and infection. After a mean follow-up period of 50 months, seven of the eight patients are free of relapse and kidney graft function remained unchanged. Tolerance was good, except for one episode of fever and one early discontinuation because of subjective discomfort. No systemic tuberculous infection was observed. This is the first clinical observation of successful BCG therapy for NMIBC in patients given transplant for end-stage AAN. Under standardized conditions, immunotherapy based on intravesical BCG is feasible, effective, and well tolerated in renal transplantation.

Ticlopidine and clopidogrel, sometimes combined with aspirin, only minimally increase the surgical risk in renal transplantation: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing kidney transplantation are sometimes being treated with antiplatelet agents such as ticlopidine or clopidogrel. Some teams refuse to wait-list these patients for fear of bleeding during transplant surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 702 adult patients with a kidney transplant alone between 2000 and 2010. Nineteen (2.7%) patients were taking clopidogrel or ticlopidine when called in for transplantation. Furthermore, 10 of these 19 patients were also taking low-dose aspirin (ASA). We compared the risk of bleeding peri- and postoperatively, and the occurrence of cardiovascular complications within 30 days after renal transplantation between 19 cases and 39 controls randomly selected within the cohort. RESULTS: Platelets were administered to 7 cases (37%) versus 0 controls (P<0.001). A single case (5.3%) presented with significant bleeding during surgery following an implantation biopsy, and required 4 red bood cell (RBC) units. During the first day, 3 of the 19 cases (16%) and 1 of the 39 controls required RBC (P=0.1). No reoperation was performed for bleeding. After the transplant, clopidogrel or ticlopidine was resumed in only two patients. The platelet count and haemoglobin were similar between cases and controls at Day 30. No cardiovascular event occurred in cases or controls during the first month post-transplantation. At 5 years, graft and patient survival was similar in cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel and ticlopidine, sometimes in combination with ASA, are associated with a low risk of bleeding during renal transplantation and does not seem to be a contraindication for renal transplant surgery.

Combined introduction of anti-IL2 receptor antibodies, mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus: effect on malignancies after renal transplantation in a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest that the introduction of tacrolimus (TRL), mycophenolic acid (MPA) and interleukin 2 receptor antibodies (IL2Ra) as single drugs more than a decade ago has not increased the risk of malignancy after renal transplantation. However, only limited data are available on their carcinogenic effects when used in combination as a potent immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre cohort study on 929 adult renal transplant recipients. Investigation of the effect of two consecutive immunosuppressive regimens [1993-98, N = 405, anti-lymphocyte antibodies, cyclosporine and azathioprine (AZA); 1999-2007, N = 524, predominantly IL2Ra, TRL and MPA] on the incidence rate of skin cancer, solid tumours and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). RESULTS: In total, 365 malignancies developed among 113 patients. As compared to the previous cyclosporine and AZA-based immunosuppression, the introduction of the new immunosuppressive regimen did not increase the incidence rate of skin cancer [rate ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-1.46], solid tumours (0.89; 95% CI 0.46-1.67) and PTLD (0.82; 95% CI 0.28-2.21). Patients treated with the more recent regimens less frequently developed multiple skin cancers and invasive squamous cell cancer. Skin cancer after transplantation was strongly associated with the development of solid tumours (odds ratio 5.2; P < 0.0001). The introduction of the new immunosuppressive drugs reduced the incidence of first year acute rejection from 34.8 to 13.2% (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Although significantly more efficient in the prevention of acute rejection, the introduction of TRL, MPA and IL2Ra-based immunosuppression after kidney transplantation was not associated with an increased incidence of skin cancer, solid tumours or PTLD.

Shipping donor kidneys within Eurotransplant: outcomes after renal transplantation in a single-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Shipment of organs during the allocation process aims to improve human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching but can also have a detrimental effect by prolonging cold ischaemia. The overall effect of organ exchange on post-transplant outcomes in the Eurotransplant (ET) region has not been investigated. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre cohort study to investigate the effect of shipment of renal allografts on cold ischaemia times and the incidence of acute rejection (AR) and graft survival in 661 transplantations of deceased donor kidneys. RESULTS: Forty-six per cent (N = 301) of the patients received a locally procured and 54% (N = 360) a shipped donor kidney. Locally procured donors tended to be older, more often hypertensive and had less frequently died from trauma. Recipients of shipped kidneys were at higher immunological risk, being younger, more frequently retransplanted and immunized against HLA antigens. Shipped kidneys had a 2.2-h prolongation of cold ischaemia time (18.0 versus 20.2 h; P < 0.0001) but significantly less HLA A, B and DR mismatches (2.20 versus 2.84; P < 0.0001). Recipients of shipped kidneys had an increased incidence of first-year AR [19 versus 13%; odds ratio 1.62 (1.06-2.49); P = 0.026] and death-censored graft loss [hazard ratio 1.6 (1.1-2.4); P = 0.01] that was no longer statistically significant after adjustments for risk factors by multivariable modelling. CONCLUSIONS: Shipment of kidneys in the ET region is associated with a modest increase in cold ischaemia time and significantly better HLA matching. This allows for successful transplantation of higher risk patients with no significant penalty with regard to AR rates or death-censored graft survival.

Thrombophilic factors in Stage V chronic kidney disease patients are largely corrected by renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of acquired thrombophilic factors in Stage V chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients according to dialysis modality, the rate of correction of these factors 1 month after renal transplantation and their impact on cardiovascular or thromboembolic events at 1 year. METHODS: Three hundred and ten patients were prospectively screened for seven thrombophilic factors at transplantation; 215 of them were also assayed 1 month after. All the patients received prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid, started before transplantation. RESULTS: The prevalence of thrombophilic factors was significantly higher in patients under dialysis (n = 289) than in patients not yet on dialysis (n = 21) (74 versus 52.4%; P = 0.03) but was similar in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients (74.2 versus 73.2%). One month after transplantation, the global prevalence of thrombophilic factors had dropped from 74.4 to 44.7% (P < 0.001). Most thrombophilic factors had disappeared after transplantation: antithrombin deficiency: 13.5 versus 0.9%; P < 0.001, protein C deficiency: 12.1 versus 1.9%; P < 0.001, protein S deficiency: 3.7 versus 1.4%; P = 0.1, lupus anticoagulant: 37.7 versus 8.4%; P < 0.001 and antiphospholipid antibodies: 29.3 versus 12.6%; P < 0.001. The prevalence of activated protein C resistance, which reflects inherited factor V (FV) Leiden, was unchanged (1.9%), while the prevalence of elevated factor VIIIc increased from 20.9 to 30.7%, P < 0.001. The incidence of cardiovascular or thromboembolic events 1 year after transplantation was similar in patients with more than or equal to one thrombophilic factor at 1 month (5.2%) versus thrombophilic-free patients (6.7%). CONCLUSION: Acquired thrombophilic factors are highly prevalent among Stage V CKD patients. Most thrombophilic factors are corrected 1 month after transplantation.

Cold ischemia is a major determinant of acute rejection and renal graft survival in the modern era of immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to examine, in a recent cohort of kidney transplant recipients who have received modern immunosuppressive therapy, the respective role of cold ischemia time (CIT) and delayed graft function (DGF) on acute rejection (AR) rates and long-term graft survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 611 renal transplantations between 1996 and 2005. Most patients received a calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance therapy, either cyclosporine (43%) or tacrolimus (52%) and 76% of the patients received an antilymphocyte induction therapy. Study endpoints were DGF, first-year AR, and long-term graft survival. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors that may have influenced the study outcomes. RESULTS: DGF was observed in 16.2% of patients. Both older donor age and longer CIT were significant risk factors for DGF. DGF rates were similar whether patients received a calcineurin inhibitor before transplantation or not. AR occurred in 16.5% of grafts during the first year. Independent predictors of AR by multivariate analysis were duration of dialysis, CIT, current panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5%, and the number of human leukocyte antigen-A, B, and DR mismatches. Each hour of cold ischemia increases the risk of rejection by 4%. With respect to death-censored graft survival, three pretransplant parameters emerged as independent predictors of graft loss: younger recipient age, peak panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5% and longer CIT. The detrimental effect of CIT on graft survival was entirely because of its propensity to trigger AR. When AR was added to the multivariate Cox model, CIT was no longer significant whereas first-year AR became the most important predictor of graft loss (Hazards ratio, 4.6). CONCLUSION: Shortening CIT will help to decrease not only DGF rates but also AR incidence and hence graft loss. Patients with prolonged CIT should receive adequate immunosuppression, possibly with antilymphocyte preparations, to prevent AR occurrence.

HLA mismatches remain risk factors for acute kidney allograft rejection in patients receiving quadruple immunosuppression with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies.

BACKGROUND: New immunosuppressive drugs such as anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (aIL2R) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have reduced the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Whether matching donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens is still relevant in patients receiving modern immunosuppression has been questioned. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and risk factors of acute rejection during the first posttransplant year and the impact of acute rejection on long-term graft survival in a cohort of 208 renal transplant patients treated with aIL2R (basiliximab, n=166; daclizumab, n=42), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, n=180; cyclosporin, n=28), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Graft and patient survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for acute rejection were analyzed by logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated for acute rejection (26 biopsy-proven) during the first posttransplant year. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of first-year acute rejection was 13.2%. The number of HLA mismatches (odds ratio [OR] 1.65 per HLA mismatch) and long periods of dialysis before transplantation (OR 3.1 for more than 4 years of dialysis) were the only independent risk factors for first-year acute rejection. First-year acute rejection was associated with a significant reduction in overall and death-censored graft survival at 5 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequent in patients receiving modern immunosuppressive drugs, acute rejection remains an important risk factor for graft loss after renal transplantation. Our results suggest that better HLA matching and shorter periods of dialysis before transplantation could reduce acute rejection rates and further improve outcomes under current immunosuppressive regimens.

Conversion to sirolimus for chronic renal allograft dysfunction: risk factors for graft loss and severe side effects.

We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 45 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) that were switched from CNI to SRL, mainly for chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) (41/45). The mean serum creatinine at switch was 2.5 +/- 0.8 mg/dl. At 1 year, patient survival was 93%. Death-censored graft survival was 67% at 1 year and 54% at 2 years. SRL was stopped because of severe side effects in 15 patients. Among these, eight patients developed 'de novo' high-grade proteinuria. Univariate analysis revealed that (1) a higher SRL level at 1 month was a predictor of SRL withdrawal due to severe side effects (P = 0.006), and (2) predictors of graft failure after SRL conversion were low SRL loading dose (P = 0.03) and a higher creatinine level at conversion (P = 0.003). In conclusion, the therapeutic index of SRL in patients suffering from CAD is narrow, with high exposure triggering serious adverse events that may mandate SRL discontinuation, while too low exposure may expose patients to under-immunosuppression and graft loss.

Sirolimus for Secondary Prevention of Skin Cancer in Kidney Transplant Recipients: 5-Year Results.

Purpose Transplant recipients who develop cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas are at high risk for multiple subsequent skin cancers. Sirolimus has been shown to reduce the occurrence of secondary skin cancers, but no study included a follow-up exceeding 2 years. We extended at 5 years the TUMORAPA randomized trial of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen versus calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. Methods Kidney transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitors who had at least one cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive sirolimus as a substitute for calcineurin inhibitors (n = 64) or to maintain their initial treatment (n = 56). The primary end point was survival free of squamous cell carcinoma at 5 years. Secondary end points included the occurrence of other skin cancers, renal function, patient and graft survival, and treatment tolerance. Results Survival free of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma was significantly longer in the sirolimus group than in the calcineurin inhibitor group ( P = .007). In the sirolimus group, the number of patients with new skin cancers was significantly lower compared with the calcineurin inhibitor group: 22% versus 59% for squamous cell carcinomas ( P < .001), 34% versus 66% for other skin cancers ( P < .001), and 20% versus 37.5% for basal cell carcinomas ( P < .05). Kidney graft function, patients, and graft survival were similar in both groups. In the sirolimus group, the mean number of serious adverse effects per patient decreased from 1.16 during the first 2 years, to 0.83 between years 2 and 5. Conclusion In kidney transplant recipients with previous cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, the antitumoral effect of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus was maintained at 5 years, and sirolimus tolerance was satisfactory.

Effect of atorvastatin therapy and conversion to tacrolimus on hypercholesterolemia and endothelial dysfunction after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hypercholesterolemia is a frequent complication in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine A (CsA). Whether it is preferable to treat hypercholesterolemia with statins or to switch patients from CsA to tacrolimus (TRL) has not been investigated. METHODS: Twelve CsA-treated kidney transplant recipients with hypercholesterolemia were successively crossed over from CsA alone to: CsA plus atorvastatin; TRL alone; and TRL plus atorvastatin. Total cholesterol (C), Low density lipoprotein (LDL)-C, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-C, LDL and HDL alpha-tocopherol content, lag-time of LDL oxidation, plasma levels of oxidized LDL and the percentage of small dense LDL were assayed at the end of each treatment period. Endothelial function was assessed by high resolution ultrasound measurement of flow-mediated brachial artery vasodilatation (FMD). RESULTS: Atorvastatin therapy was more efficient in reducing total cholesterol and LDL-C levels than conversion from CsA to TRL. Combining TRL with atorvastatin further reduced LDL-C levels as compared to TRL alone, but was no more efficient than the CsA-statin combination. Neither atorvastatin therapy nor conversion to TRL significantly changed the proportion of dense LDL, lipoprotein alpha-tocopherol contents or the lag time of LDL oxidation. Addition of atorvastatin to CsA increased FMD from 4.0+/-1.8% to 6.5+/-4.0% (P<0.05 vs. CsA). Conversion from CsA to TRL caused a slight improvement in FMD (5.1+/-2.1%, P<0.05 vs. CsA). Adding atorvastatin to TRL had no detectable effect on FMD (5.5+/-2.3%, P=NS vs. TRL). CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin was more efficient in reducing total and LDL cholesterol levels of CsA-treated renal transplant patients than conversion to TRL and significantly improved endothelial dysfunction.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium by limited sampling strategies is associated with a high rate of failure.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid (MPA) is usually performed with a limited sampling strategy (LSS), which relies on a limited number of blood samples and subsequent extrapolation of the global exposure to MPA. LSS is usually performed successfully with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), but data on enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) are scarce. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of 6-h LSS therapeutic drug monitoring with EC-MPS compared with MMF monitoring among kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Sixty-two patients who received EC-MPS during the first 6 months of transplantation were compared with a matched group of 64 MMF-treated kidney transplant recipients. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed by LSS using multiple concentration time points (0, 1, 2, 3 and 6 h post-dose) and a trapezoidal rule. Patients had MPA therapeutic drug monitoring performed on two occasions, one within 2 weeks and the second after 3-4 months of transplantation. RESULTS: EC-MPS monitoring and MMF therapeutic drug monitoring were not interpretable in 34.5% (n = 40/116) and 1.8% (n = 2/112) of patients, respectively {relative risk [RR] 19.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8-78.0]; P < 0.0001}. The main cause of abnormal EC-MPS therapeutic drug monitoring was delayed absorption of both the previous evening and the morning dose, resulting in MPA plasma levels before the next morning dose being higher than MPA plasma levels measured at 1, 2 and 3 h after taking EC-MPS. Cyclosporin in association with MMF significantly increased the risk of low AUC values (<30 mg h/L) in comparison with tacrolimus [55% (n = 11/20) and 10% (n = 9/88), respectively; RR 5.4 (95% CI 2.6-11.2); P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of therapeutic drug monitoring failure with EC-MPS is >30% during the first 6 months of renal transplantation. Delayed pharmacokinetics was the main reason. In contrast, the risk of therapeutic drug monitoring failure was substantially lower with MMF.

A controlled study of vitamin D3 to prevent bone loss in renal-transplant patients receiving low doses of steroids.

BACKGROUND: New and potent immunosuppressive regimens allow for reduced doses of corticosteroids after renal transplantation. The aims of our study were to investigate whether the use of low-dose corticosteroids is associated with a reduction in posttransplant bone loss and to assess the ability of cholecalciferol supplementation to further decrease bone loss in this setting. METHODS: Ninety patients admitted for renal transplantation and scheduled to be treated per protocol with low doses of prednisolone were randomized to receive either 400 mg daily oral calcium (Ca group, n=44) or the same dose of calcium in association with a monthly dose of 25,000 IU of vitamin D3 (CaVitD group, n=46). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy absorptiometry at baseline and at 1 year. RESULTS: The overall population experienced a moderate but significant -2.3+/-0.9% loss of lumbar spine BMD (P<0.01) but no bone loss at the femoral neck and shaft during the first posttransplant year. Bone loss tended to be slightly higher in the CaVitD group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Patients in the CaVitD group had significantly higher 25(OH) but not 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D levels. We observed a highly significant negative correlation between 25(OH) vitamin D and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) serum levels. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney-transplant recipients receiving modern immunosuppressive regimens with low doses of corticosteroids experience only minimal loss of BMD during the first posttransplant year. Cholecalciferol supplementation did not prevent posttransplant bone loss but contributed to the normalization of iPTH levels after renal transplantation.

Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplants: Time Evolution, Role of Acute Rejection, Risk Factors, and Impact on Patient and Graft Outcome.

Background. Although numerous risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) have been identified, the role of ischemia-reperfusion injury and acute rejection episodes (ARE) occurring during the DGF period is ill-defined and DGF impact on patient and graft outcome remains controversial. Methods. From 1983 to 2014, 1784 kidney-only transplantations from deceased donors were studied. Classical risk factors for DGF along with two novel ones, recipient's perioperative saline loading and residual diuresis, were analyzed by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results. Along with other risk factors, absence of perioperative saline loading increases acute rejection incidence (OR = 1.9 [1.2-2.9]). Moreover, we observed two novel risk factors for DGF: patient's residual diuresis ≤500 mL/d (OR = 2.3 [1.6-3.5]) and absence of perioperative saline loading (OR = 3.3 [2.0-5.4]). Area under the curve of the ROC curve (0.77 [0.74-0.81]) shows an excellent discriminant power of our model, irrespective of rejection. DGF does not influence patient survival (P = 0.54). However, graft survival is decreased only when rejection was associated with DGF (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Perioperative saline loading efficiently prevents ischemia-reperfusion injury, which is the predominant factor inducing DGF. DGF per se has no influence on patient and graft outcome. Its incidence is currently close to 5% in our centre.