Racial Influences on Pediatric Tracheostomy Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the impact of race on outcomes after pediatric tracheostomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A case series of tracheostomies at an urban, tertiary care children's hospital between 2014 and 2019 was conducted. Children were grouped by race to compare neurocognition, mortality, and decannulation rate. RESULTS: A total of 445 children with a median age at tracheostomy of 0.46 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.97) years were studied. The cohort was 32% Hispanic, 31% White, 30% Black, 2.9% Asian, and 4.3% other race. Black compared to White children had a lower median birth weight (2,022 vs. 2,449 g, P = .005), were more often extremely premature (≤28 weeks gestation: 62% vs. 57%, P = .007), and more frequently had bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (35% vs. 17%, P = .002). Hispanic compared to Black children had higher median birth weight (2,529 g, P < .001), less extreme prematurity (44%, P < .001), and less BPD (21%, P = .04). The proportion of Black children was higher (30% vs. 19%, P < .001), while the proportion of Hispanic children with a tracheostomy was lower (32% vs. 42%, P = .003) compared to the racial distribution of all pediatric admissions. Racial differences were not seen for rates of severe neurocognitive disability (P = .51), decannulation (P = .17), or death (P = .92) after controlling for age, sex, prematurity, and ventilator dependence. CONCLUSION: Black children disproportionately underwent tracheostomy and had a higher comorbidity burden than White or Hispanic children. Hispanic children had proportionally fewer tracheostomies. Neurocognitive ability, decannulation, and mortality were similar for all races implying that health disparities by race may not change long-term outcomes after pediatric tracheostomy. Laryngoscope, 132:1118-1124, 2022.

Buccal Mucosa Graft Harvest in Children and Young Adults: Case Series and Harvest Technique.

Buccal mucosa is a great choice for urethroplasty for urethral stricture repair because of ease of harvesting, pliability of the graft, and minimal donor site morbidity. These procedures are performed at our institution as a combined case with Pediatric Otolaryngology and Urology. Harvesting buccal mucosal grafts in younger patients is more technically challenging due to limited oral cavity access and smaller area available for tissue harvest, but is able to be performed safely and with limited morbidity with the addition of parotid duct cannulation and use of retraction sutures to the graft harvest technique. This retrospective case series reports harvest technique, outcomes, and complications of children and young adult males undergoing buccal or lower lip mucosal graft harvesting to repair congenital urethral strictures. Outcome measures were perioperative bleeding, trismus, pain, numbness, parotid duct injury and lip deformity. Six patients underwent nine harvest procedures. Technique modifications included application of anterior graft margin stay sutures to help stabilize the graft mucosa and cannulation of the parotid duct with lacrimal probes to avoid duct injury and to maximize graft size. Overall, buccal mucosal graft harvesting is a well-tolerated procedure with minimal complications using proper harvest technique.