Variability in Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in a Large German Cohort With a Genetic Etiology of Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVES: The variability in outcomes of cochlear implantation is largely unexplained, and clinical factors are not sufficient for predicting performance. Genetic factors have been suggested to impact outcomes, but the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of hereditary hearing loss makes it difficult to determine and interpret postoperative performance. It is hypothesized that genetic mutations that affect the neuronal components of the cochlea and auditory pathway, targeted by the cochlear implant (CI), may lead to poor performance. A large cohort of CI recipients was studied to verify this hypothesis. DESIGN: This study included a large German cohort of CI recipients (n = 123 implanted ears; n = 76 probands) with a definitive genetic etiology of hearing loss according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines and documented postoperative audiological outcomes. All patients underwent preoperative clinical and audiological examinations. Postoperative CI outcome measures were based on at least 1 year of postoperative audiological follow-up for patients with postlingual hearing loss onset (>6 years) and 5 years for children with congenital or pre/perilingual hearing loss onset (≤6 years). Genetic analysis was performed based on three different methods that included single-gene screening, custom-designed hearing loss gene panel sequencing, targeting known syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss genes, and whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: The genetic diagnosis of the 76 probands in the genetic cohort involved 35 genes and 61 different clinically relevant (pathogenic, likely pathogenic) variants. With regard to implanted ears (n = 123), the six most frequently affected genes affecting nearly one-half of implanted ears were GJB2 (21%; n = 26), TMPRSS3 (7%; n = 9), MYO15A (7%; n = 8), SLC26A4 (5%; n = 6), and LOXHD1 and USH2A (each 4%; n = 5). CI recipients with pathogenic variants that influence the sensory nonneural structures performed at or above the median level of speech performance of all ears at 70% [monosyllable word recognition score in quiet at 65 decibels sound pressure level (SPL)]. When gene expression categories were compared to demographic and clinical categories (total number of compared categories: n = 30), mutations in genes expressed in the spiral ganglion emerged as a significant factor more negatively affecting cochlear implantation outcomes than all clinical parameters. An ANOVA of a reduced set of genetic and clinical categories (n = 10) identified five detrimental factors leading to poorer performance with highly significant effects ( p < 0.001), accounting for a total of 11.8% of the observed variance. The single strongest category was neural gene expression accounting for 3.1% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the relationship between the molecular genetic diagnoses of a hereditary etiology of hearing loss and cochlear implantation outcomes in a large German cohort of CI recipients revealed significant variabilities. Poor performance was observed with genetic mutations that affected the neural components of the cochlea, supporting the "spiral ganglion hypothesis."

Impedance development after implantation of hybrid-L24 cochlear implant electrodes.

OBJECTIVE: Shorter and thinner electrodes were developed for preserving residual hearing after cochlear implantation by minimising trauma. As trauma is regarded as one of the causes of fibrous tissue formation after implantation, and increase in impedance is considered to be connected to fibrous tissue formation, the aim of the current study was to evaluate impedance development after implantation of Hybrid-L electrodes. DESIGN: Impedance values were retrospectively collected from our clinical database and evaluated for all active contacts and basal, middle and apical contacts separately for up to 10 years. STUDY SAMPLES: All 137 adult patients received a Hybrid-L electrode and had to be implanted for at least 1 year. RESULTS: On average impedances increased to 13 kOhm before first fitting and dropped to 5-7 kOhm under electrical stimulation with lower values measured on apical contacts. Mean values remained stable over years, but variability increased. Values before first fitting were independent of age at implantation whereas lower values were found later in patients of higher age at implantation. CONCLUSION: Despite smaller contacts, impedance values after start of electrical stimulation were comparable to published values of Contour electrodes. This might suggest less tissue growth with the Hybrid-L electrode array.

Comparisons of electrophysiological and psychophysical fitting methods for cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared two different versions of an electrophysiology-based software-guided cochlear implant fitting method with a procedure employing standard clinical software. The two versions used electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds for either five or all twenty-two electrodes to determine sound processor stimulation level profiles. Objective and subjective performance results were compared between software-guided and clinical fittings. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, single-subject repeated-measures with permuted ABCA sequences. STUDY SAMPLE: 48 post linguistically deafened adults with ≤15 years of severe-to-profound deafness who were newly unilaterally implanted with a Nucleus device. RESULTS: Speech recognition in noise and quiet was not significantly different between software- guided and standard methods, but there was a visit/learning-effect. However, the 5-electrode method gave scores on the SSQ speech subscale 0.5 points lower than the standard method. Clinicians judged usability for all methods as acceptable, as did subjects for comfort. Analysis of stimulation levels and ECAP thresholds suggested that the 5-electrode method could be refined. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition was not inferior using either version of the electrophysiology-based software-guided fitting method compared with the standard method. Subject-reported speech perception was slightly inferior with the five-electrode method. Software-guided methods saved about 10 min of clinician's time versus standard fittings.

[Comparison of speech understanding taking into account the exact electrode position (SRA/MRA/CA)]. / Vergleich des Sprachverstehens unter Berücksichtigung der genauen Elektrodenposition (SRA/MRA/CA).

Cochlear implantation has been a routine hearing rehabilitation procedure for years. Nevertheless, not all parameters that influence speech understanding after implantation are known. We test the hypothesis whether there is a connection between speech understanding and the position of different electrode types in relation to the modiolus in the cochlea with identical speech processors. For this purpose, in this retrospective study, we compare the hearing results with different electrode types ("Straight Research Array" [SRA], "Modiolar Research Array" [MRA] and "Contour Advance" [CA]) from the manufacturer Cochlear in matched pair groups.After creating three groups using "matched pairs" (n=52 patients per group), the cochlear parameters (length of the outer wall, angle of insertion, insertion depth, cochlear coverage and total length of the electrode in the cochlea, wrapping factor) were measured in the routinely performed manner pre- and post-operative high-resolution CT or DVT. The Freiburg monosyllabic understanding was used as a target variable one year after implantation.In the Freiburg monosyllabic test one year postoperatively, patients with MRA had a monosyllabic understanding of 51.2%, patients with SRA 49.5% and patients with CA 58.0%. It could be shown that with increasing cochlear coverage with MRA and CA, the speech understanding of the patients decreases and with SRA it increases. In addition, it could be shown that the monosyllabic understanding increases with increasing "wrapping factor".The results show that the position of the electrode to the modiolus is not the only factor explaining differences in outcome after cochlear implantation.

Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.

OBJECTIVE: In cochlear implants (CIs), phantom stimulation can be used to extend the pitch range toward apical regions of the cochlea. Phantom stimulation consists of partial bipolar stimulation, in which current is distributed across two intracochlear electrodes and one extracochlear electrode as defined by the compensation coefficient σ. The aim of this study was, (1) to evaluate the benefit of conveying low-frequency information through phantom stimulation for cochlear implant (CI) subjects with low-frequency residual hearing using electric stimulation alone, (2) to compare the speech reception thresholds obtained from electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) and electric stimulation in combination with phantom stimulation (EPS), and (3) to investigate the effect of spectrally overlapped bandwidth of speech conveyed via simultaneous acoustic and phantom stimulation on speech reception thresholds. DESIGN: Fourteen CI users with ipsilateral residual hearing participated in a repeated-measures design. Phantom stimulation was used to extend the frequency bandwidth of electric stimulation of EAS users towards lower frequencies without changing their accustomed electrode-frequency allocation. Three phantom stimulation configurations with different σ's were tested causing different degrees of electric field shaping towards apical regions of the cochlea that may affect the place of stimulation. A baseline configuration using a moderate value of σ () for all subjects, a configuration that was equivalent to monopolar stimulation by setting σ to 0 () and a configuration that used the largest value of σ for each individual subject (). Speech reception thresholds were measured for electric stimulation alone, EAS and EPS. Additionally, acoustic stimulation and phantom stimulation were presented simultaneously (EAS+PS) to investigate their mutual interaction. Besides the spectral overlap, the electrode insertion depth obtained from cone-beam computed-tomography scans was determined to assess the impact of spatial overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation on speech reception. RESULTS: Speech perception significantly improved by providing additional acoustic or phantom stimulation to electric stimulation. There was no significant difference between EAS and EPS. However, two of the tested subjects were able to perform the speech perception test using EAS but not using EPS. In comparison to the subject's familiar EAS listening mode, the speech perception deteriorated when acoustic stimulation and phantom stimulation conveyed spectrally overlapped information simultaneously and this deterioration increased with larger spectral overlap. CONCLUSIONS: (1) CI users with low-frequency acoustic residual hearing benefit from low-frequency information conveyed acoustically through combined EAS. (2) Improved speech reception thresholds through low-frequency information conveyed via phantom stimulation were observed for EAS subjects when acoustic stimulation was not used. (3) Speech perception was negatively affected by combining acoustic and phantom stimulation when both stimulation modalities overlapped spectrally in comparison to the familiar EAS.

Do Impedance Changes Correlate With a Delayed Hearing Loss After Hybrid L24 Implantation?

OBJECTIVES: Preservation of residual hearing is one of the main goals in present cochlear implantation surgery. Especially for this purpose, smaller and softer electrode carriers were developed that are to be inserted through the round window membrane to minimize trauma. By using these electrodes and insertion technique, residual hearing can be preserved in a large number of patients. Unfortunately, some of these patients with initially preserved residual hearing after cochlear implantation lose it later on. The reason for this is unknown but it is speculated about a correlation with an increase in impedance, since increased impedance values are linked to intracochlear inflammation and tissue reaction. Our hypothesis for this study design was that an increase in impedance predicts changes in residual hearing under clinical conditions. DESIGN: Data of all adult patients (N = 122) receiving a Hybrid-L24 cochlear implant at our center between 2005 and early 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Impedance values in Common Ground mode as measured during clinical routine and referring audiological test data (audiometric thresholds under headphones) were collected. Changes between consecutive measurements were calculated for impedance values and hearing thresholds for each patient. Correlations between changes in impedances and acoustic hearing thresholds were calculated. Average values were compared as well as patients with largest impedance changes within the observation period were evaluated separately. RESULTS: Group mean values of impedances were between 5 and 7 kΩ and stable over time with higher values on basal electrode contacts compared with apical contacts. Average hearing thresholds at the time of initial fitting were between 40 to 50 dB (250 Hz) and 90 dB (1 kHz) with a loss of about 10 dB compared with preoperative values. Correlation between impedance changes and threshold changes was found, but too inconsistently to imply a true relationship. When evaluating the 20 patients with the largest impedance changes during the observation period (all >1 kΩ from one appointment to the next one), some patients were found where hearing loss is timely connected and highly correlated with an unusual impedance change. But large impedance changes were also observed without affecting hearing thresholds and hearing loss was found without impedance change. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in impedance as measured during clinical routine cannot be taken as an indicator for a late acoustic hearing loss.

How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.

OBJECTIVES: Actively following a conversation can be demanding and limited cognitive resources must be allocated to the processing of speech, retaining and encoding the perceived content, and preparing an answer. The aim of the present study was to disentangle the allocation of effort into the effort required for listening (listening effort) and the effort required for retention (memory effort) by means of pupil dilation. DESIGN: Twenty-five normal-hearing German speaking participants underwent a sentence final word identification and recall test, while pupillometry was conducted. The participants' task was to listen to a sentence in four-talker babble background noise and to repeat the final word afterward. At the end of a list of sentences, they were asked to recall as many of the final words as possible. Pupil dilation was recorded during different list lengths (three sentences versus six sentences) and varying memory load (recall versus no recall). Additionally, the effect of a noise reduction algorithm on performance, listening effort, and memory effort was evaluated. RESULTS: We analyzed pupil dilation both before each sentence (sentence baseline) as well as the dilation in response to each sentence relative to the sentence baseline (sentence dilation). The pupillometry data indicated a steeper increase of sentence baseline under recall compared to no recall, suggesting higher memory effort due to memory processing. This increase in sentence baseline was most prominent toward the end of the longer lists, that is, during the second half of six sentences. Without a recall task, sentence baseline declined over the course of the list. Noise reduction appeared to have a significant influence on effort allocation for listening, which was reflected in generally decreased sentence dilation. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that recording pupil dilation in a speech identification and recall task provides valuable insights beyond behavioral performance. It is a suitable tool to disentangle the allocation of effort to listening versus memorizing speech.

Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing and different electrode insertion depths and to investigate the influence on speech reception. The effects of different fitting strategies-meet, overlap, and a newly developed masking adjusted fitting (UNMASKfit)-on speech reception are compared. If electric-acoustic masking has a detrimental effect on speech reception, the individualized UNMASKfit map might be able to reduce masking and thereby enhance speech reception. DESIGN: Fifteen experienced MED-EL Flex electrode recipients with ipsilateral residual hearing participated in a crosssover design study using three fitting strategies for 4 weeks each. The following strategies were compared: (1) a meet fitting, dividing the frequency range between electric and acoustic stimulation, (2) an overlap fitting, delivering part of the frequency range both acoustically and electrically, and (3) the UNMASKfit, reducing the electric stimulation according to the individual electric-on-acoustic masking strength. A psychoacoustic masking procedure was used to measure the changes in acoustic thresholds due to the presence of electric maskers. Speech reception was measured in noise with the Oldenburg Matrix Sentence test. RESULTS: Behavioral thresholds of acoustic probe tones were significantly elevated in the presence of electric maskers. A maximum of masking was observed when the difference in location between the electric and acoustic stimulation was around one octave in place frequency. Speech reception scores and strength of masking showed a dependency on residual hearing, and speech reception was significantly reduced in the overlap fitting strategy. Electric- acoustic stimulation significantly improved speech reception over electric stimulation alone, with a tendency toward a larger benefit with the UNMASKfit map. In addition, masking was significantly inversely correlated to the speech reception performance difference between the overlap and the meet fitting. CONCLUSIONS: (1) This study confirmed the interaction between ipsilateral electric and acoustic stimulation in a psychoacoustic masking experiment. (2) The overlap fitting yielded poorer speech reception performance in stationary noise especially in subjects with strong masking. (3) The newly developed UNMASKfit strategy yielded similar speech reception thresholds with an enhanced acoustic benefit, while at the same time reducing the electric stimulation. This could be beneficial in the long-term if applied as a standard fitting, as hair cells are exposed to less possibly adverse electric stimulation. In this study, the UNMASKfit allowed the participants a better use of their natural hearing even after 1 month of adaptation. It might be feasible to transfer these results to the clinic, by fitting patients with the UNMASKfit upon their first fitting appointment, so that longer adaptation times can further improve speech reception.

Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.

PURPOSE: Hearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels. CONCLUSIONS: In a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.

Amplitude growth of intracochlear electrocochleography in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.

In cochlear implant (CI) users with residual hearing, the electrode-nerve interface can be investigated combining electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) via electrocochleography (ECochG), a technique to record cochlear potentials evoked by acoustic stimulation. EAS interaction was shown in previous studies using psychoacoustic experiments. This work characterizes EAS interaction through psychophysical experiments and the amplitude growth of cochlear microphonics (CM) and auditory nerve neurophonics (ANN) derived from intracochlear ECochG recordings. Significant CM responses were recorded at psychoacoustic threshold levels. The mean difference between psychoacoustic and CM threshold was 17.5 dB. No significant ANN responses were recorded at the psychoacoustic threshold level. At the psychoacoustic most comfortable level, significant CM and ANN responses were recorded. In the presence of electrical stimulation, the psychoacoustic detection thresholds were elevated on average by 2.38 dB while the recorded CM amplitudes were attenuated on average by 1.15 dB. No significant differences in electrophysiological EAS interaction across acoustic stimulation levels were observed from CM recordings. The presence of psychophysical and electrophysiological EAS interaction demonstrates that some aspects of psychoacoustic EAS interaction can be measured via intracochlear ECochG.

Electric-acoustic interaction measurements in cochlear-implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing using electrocochleography.

Cochlear implantation is increasingly being used as a hearing-loss treatment for patients with residual hearing in the low acoustic frequencies. These patients obtain combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). Substantial residual hearing and relatively long electrode arrays can lead to interactions between the electric and acoustic stimulation. This work investigated EAS interaction through psychophysical and electrophysiological measures. Moreover, cone-beam computed-tomography data was used to characterize the interaction along spatial cochlear locations. Psychophysical EAS interaction was estimated based on the threshold of audibility of an acoustic probe stimulus in the presence of a simultaneously presented electric masker stimulus. Intracochlear electrocochleography was used to estimate electrophysiological EAS interaction via the telemetry capability of the cochlear implant. EAS interaction was observed using psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements. While psychoacoustic EAS interaction was most pronounced close to the electrical stimulation site, electrophysiological EAS interaction was observed over a wider range of spatial cochlear locations. Psychophysical EAS interaction was significantly larger than electrophysiological EAS interaction for acoustic probes close to the electrode position.

Fine-grain recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth function in cochlear implant recipients.

BACKGROUND: In cochlear implants (CI) measuring the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) has become an important tool for verifying the electrode-nerve interface as well as establishing a basis for a map to program the speech processor. In a standard clinical setup recordings are averaged over 25-100 repetitions to allow for the detection of ECAPs within the noise floor. To obtain an amplitude growth function, these measurements are normally performed for 5-10 different stimulation levels. We evaluate a recording paradigm where the stimulation intensity is increased in quasi-continuous steps and instead of averaging repeated recordings with identical stimulation parameters, running averages over small intervals of stimulation levels are computed. The first visible nerve response was manually identified by two experts. RESULTS: Both recording paradigms were evaluated in 39 cochlear implants, showing an on average lower threshold of the first nerve response for the quasi-continuous measurement paradigm (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 6.2e-08) compared to the clinical standard paradigm. The mean maximal loudness over all implants and stimulation electrodes was 13% lower at the 80 pulses/s quasi-continuous paradigm compared to the 44 pulses/s clinical standard paradigm. CONCLUSIONS: Beside a more robust determination of the ECAP threshold, the proposed quasi-continuous stimulation paradigm results in a more robust behavioral feedback of the CI user upon the maximal acceptable loudness percept. Furthermore this paradigm can also reveal the fine-structure in the amplitude growth function.

Auditory and audio-visual processing in patients with cochlear, auditory brainstem, and auditory midbrain implants: An EEG study.

There is substantial variability in speech recognition ability across patients with cochlear implants (CIs), auditory brainstem implants (ABIs), and auditory midbrain implants (AMIs). To better understand how this variability is related to central processing differences, the current electroencephalography (EEG) study compared hearing abilities and auditory-cortex activation in patients with electrical stimulation at different sites of the auditory pathway. Three different groups of patients with auditory implants (Hannover Medical School; ABI: n = 6, CI: n = 6; AMI: n = 2) performed a speeded response task and a speech recognition test with auditory, visual, and audio-visual stimuli. Behavioral performance and cortical processing of auditory and audio-visual stimuli were compared between groups. ABI and AMI patients showed prolonged response times on auditory and audio-visual stimuli compared with NH listeners and CI patients. This was confirmed by prolonged N1 latencies and reduced N1 amplitudes in ABI and AMI patients. However, patients with central auditory implants showed a remarkable gain in performance when visual and auditory input was combined, in both speech and non-speech conditions, which was reflected by a strong visual modulation of auditory-cortex activation in these individuals. In sum, the results suggest that the behavioral improvement for audio-visual conditions in central auditory implant patients is based on enhanced audio-visual interactions in the auditory cortex. Their findings may provide important implications for the optimization of electrical stimulation and rehabilitation strategies in patients with central auditory prostheses. Hum Brain Mapp 38:2206-2225, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Toward Automated Cochlear Implant Fitting Procedures Based on Event-Related Potentials.

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing to the profoundly deaf by direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. To provide an optimal electrical stimulation pattern the CI must be individually fitted to each CI user. To date, CI fitting is primarily based on subjective feedback from the user. However, not all CI users are able to provide such feedback, for example, small children. This study explores the possibility of using the electroencephalogram (EEG) to objectively determine if CI users are able to hear differences in tones presented to them, which has potential applications in CI fitting or closed loop systems. DESIGN: Deviant and standard stimuli were presented to 12 CI users in an active auditory oddball paradigm. The EEG was recorded in two sessions and classification of the EEG data was performed with shrinkage linear discriminant analysis. Also, the impact of CI artifact removal on classification performance and the possibility to reuse a trained classifier in future sessions were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, classification performance was above chance level for all participants although performance varied considerably between participants. Also, artifacts were successfully removed from the EEG without impairing classification performance. Finally, reuse of the classifier causes only a small loss in classification performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide first evidence that EEG can be automatically classified on single-trial basis in CI users. Despite the slightly poorer classification performance over sessions, classifier and CI artifact correction appear stable over successive sessions. Thus, classifier and artifact correction weights can be reused without repeating the set-up procedure in every session, which makes the technique easier applicable. With our present data, we can show successful classification of event-related cortical potential patterns in CI users. In the future, this has the potential to objectify and automate parts of CI fitting procedures.

Long-Term Outcomes, Education, and Occupational Level in Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Were Implanted in Childhood.

OBJECTIVES: To document the long-term outcomes of auditory performance, educational status, vocational training, and occupational situation in users of cochlear implants (CIs) who were implanted in childhood. DESIGN: This retrospective cross-sectional study of 933 recipients of CIs examined auditory performance, education and vocational training, and occupational outcomes. All participants received their first CI during their childhood between 1986 and 2000. Speech comprehension results were categorized using the categories of auditory performance (CAP) arranged in order of increasing difficulty ranging from 0 to 8. 174 of the 933 pediatric recipients of CIs completed a self-assessment questionnaire regarding their education and occupational outcomes. To measure and compare school education, qualifications were converted into International Standard Classification of Education levels (ISCED-97). Occupations were converted into International Standard Classification of Occupation-88 skill levels. Data from the German General Social Survey (Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften/ALLBUS) for 2012 were used as a basis for comparing some of the collected data with the general population in Germany. RESULTS: The results showed that 86.8% of the 174 participants who completed the survey used their devices more than 11 hr per day. Only 2% of the surveyed individuals were nonusers. Median CAP was 4.00 (0 to 8). Age at implantation was significantly correlated with CAP level (r = -0.472; p < 0.001). The mean ISCED level of the 174 surveyed recipients was 2.24 (SD = 0.59; range: 1 to 3). A significant difference (p = 0.001) between users' ISCED levels and those of respondents was found. Participants' ISCED levels and maternal educational levels were significantly correlated (r = 0.271; p = 0.008). The International Standard Classification of Occupation-88 skill levels were as follows: 5% achieved skill level 1; 77% skill level 2; 16% skill level 3; and 5% skill level 4. The average skill level achieved was 2.24 (range 1 to 4; SD = 0.57) which was significantly poorer (t(127) = 4.886; p = 0.001) than the mean skill level of the respondents (mean = 2.54; SD = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Data collection up to 17.75 (SD = 3.08; range 13 to 28) years post implant demonstrated that the majority of participants who underwent implantation at an early age achieved discrimination of speech sounds without lipreading (CAP category 4.00). Educational, vocational, and occupational level achieved by this cohort were significantly poorer compared with the German and worldwide population average. Children implanted today who are younger at implantation, and with whom more advanced up-to-date CIs are used, are expected to exhibit better auditory performance and have enhanced educational and occupational opportunities. Compared with the circumstances immediately after World War II in the 20th century, children with hearing impairment who use these implants have improved prospects in this regard.

Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors.

The RONDO is a single-unit cochlear implant audio processor, which omits the need for a behind-the-ear (BTE) audio processor. The primary aim was to compare speech perception results in quiet and in noise with the RONDO and the OPUS 2, a BTE audio processor. Secondary aims were to determine subjects' self-assessed levels of sound quality and gather subjective feedback on RONDO use. All speech perception tests were performed with the RONDO and the OPUS 2 behind-the-ear audio processor at 3 test intervals. Subjects were required to use the RONDO between test intervals. Subjects were tested at upgrade from the OPUS 2 to the RONDO and at 1 and 6 months after upgrade. Speech perception was determined using the Freiburg Monosyllables in quiet test and the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) in noise. Subjective perception was determined using the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19), and a RONDO device-specific questionnaire. 50 subjects participated in the study. Neither speech perception scores nor self-perceived sound quality scores were significantly different at any interval between the RONDO and the OPUS 2. Subjects reported high levels of satisfaction with the RONDO. The RONDO provides comparable speech perception to the OPUS 2 while providing users with high levels of satisfaction and comfort without increasing health risk. The RONDO is a suitable and safe alternative to traditional BTE audio processors.

Consequences of Stimulus Type on Higher-Order Processing in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.

Single-sided deaf subjects with a cochlear implant (CI) provide the unique opportunity to compare central auditory processing of the electrical input (CI ear) and the acoustic input (normal-hearing, NH, ear) within the same individual. In these individuals, sensory processing differs between their two ears, while cognitive abilities are the same irrespectively of the sensory input. To better understand perceptual-cognitive factors modulating speech intelligibility with a CI, this electroencephalography study examined the central-auditory processing of words, the cognitive abilities, and the speech intelligibility in 10 postlingually single-sided deaf CI users. We found lower hit rates and prolonged response times for word classification during an oddball task for the CI ear when compared with the NH ear. Also, event-related potentials reflecting sensory (N1) and higher-order processing (N2/N4) were prolonged for word classification (targets versus nontargets) with the CI ear compared with the NH ear. Our results suggest that speech processing via the CI ear and the NH ear differs both at sensory (N1) and cognitive (N2/N4) processing stages, thereby affecting the behavioral performance for speech discrimination. These results provide objective evidence for cognition to be a key factor for speech perception under adverse listening conditions, such as the degraded speech signal provided from the CI.

Optimization of a Spectral Contrast Enhancement Algorithm for Cochlear Implants Based on a Vowel Identification Model.

Speech intelligibility achieved with cochlear implants (CIs) shows large variability across different users. One reason that can explain this variability is the CI user's individual electrode nerve interface which can impact the spectral resolution they can achieve. Spectral resolution has been reported to be related to vowel and consonant recognition in CI listeners. One measure of spectral resolution is the spectral modulation threshold (SMT), which is defined as the smallest detectable spectral contrast in a stimulus. In this study we hypothesize that an algorithm that improves SMT may improve vowel identification, and consequently produce an improvement in speech understanding for CIs. With this purpose we implemented an algorithm, termed spectral contrast enhancement (SCE) that emphasizes peaks with respect to valleys in the audio spectrum. This algorithm can be configured with a single parameter: the amount of spectral contrast enhancement entitled "SCE factor". We would like to investigate whether the "SCE factor" can be individualized to each CI user. With this purpose we used a vowel identification model to predict the performance produced by the SCE algorithm with different "SCE factors" in a vowel identification task.In five CI users the new algorithm has been evaluated using a SMT task and a vowel identification task. The tasks were performed for SCE factors of 0 (no enhancement), 2 and 4. In general it seems that increasing the SCE factor produces a decrease in performance in both the SMT threshold and vowel identification.

Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants.

Spectral smearing causes, at least partially, that cochlear implant (CI) users require a higher signal-to-noise ratio to obtain the same speech intelligibility as normal hearing listeners. A spectral contrast enhancement (SCE) algorithm has been designed and evaluated as an additional feature for a standard CI strategy. The algorithm keeps the most prominent peaks within a speech signal constant while attenuating valleys in the spectrum. The goal is to partly compensate for the spectral smearing produced by the limited number of stimulation electrodes and the overlap of electrical fields produced in CIs. Twelve CI users were tested for their speech reception threshold (SRT) using the standard CI coding strategy with and without SCE. No significant differences in SRT were observed between conditions. However, an analysis of the electrical stimulation patterns shows a reduction in stimulation current when using SCE. In a second evaluation, 12 CI users were tested in a similar configuration of the SCE strategy with the stimulation being balanced between the SCE and the non-SCE variants such that the loudness perception delivered by the strategies was the same. Results show a significant improvement in SRT of 0.57 dB (p < 0.0005) for the SCE algorithm.

Effect of Channel Envelope Synchrony on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.

OBJECTIVES: For a periodic acoustic input signal, the channel envelopes coded by current bilateral cochlear implant sound processors can be asynchronous. The effect of this asynchrony on sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) was assessed. DESIGN: ITD sensitivity was measured in six bilateral cochlear implant listeners for single- and three-electrode stimuli. The three-electrode stimuli contained envelope modulations, either synchronous or asynchronous across electrodes, with delays of 1.25 up to 5.00 ms. Each individual electrode carried the same ITD. Either neighboring electrodes were chosen or a separation of four electrodes to investigate the effect of electrode distance. RESULTS: With synchronous envelopes, no difference in ITD sensitivity was found among single-electrode, adjacent three-electrode, and spaced three-electrode stimuli. A decrease in ITD sensitivity was found with increasing across-channel envelope asynchrony, which was consistent with the use of the across-electrode aggregate stimulation pattern rather than individual information channels for ITDs. No consistent effect of electrode separation was found. CONCLUSIONS: While the binaural system was resilient to small delays between envelopes, larger delays significantly deceased ITD sensitivity, both for adjacent and further spaced electrodes.