A Pediatric Intensive Care Checklist for Interprofessional Rounds: The R-PICniC Study.

BACKGROUND: The use of checklists in the pediatric intensive care unit can help improve the quality of care and patient safety. OBJECTIVES: To build and validate a checklist for use in interprofessional rounds in a pediatric intensive care unit. METHODS: This methodological study was conducted in a 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit serving children up to 14 years old. A checklist prototype was constructed through review of the literature and achievement of consensus among the professionals providing care in the unit. Content validation was performed using a modified Delphi technique involving specialists with more than 5 years of experience in pediatric intensive care, methodological studies, and patient safety. Content validity ratios were calculated for the elements of the checklist, which were considered valid when they reached values greater than 0.78. The checklist was tested for usability, application time, and effects on patient care, and feedback was obtained from potential users. RESULTS: Before content validation, the checklist contained 11 domains, 32 items, and 6 daily goals. The invitation to validate content was sent to 86 specialists, and content validity was achieved after 2 rounds of evaluation, with the checklist elements having content validity ratios ranging from 0.94 to 0.97. The mean application time of the checklist was 5 minutes. The final version consisted of 11 domains, 33 items, and 8 daily goals. CONCLUSIONS: This study resulted in a useful and valid instrument for application in interprofessional rounds that was tailored to the needs of local health care professionals.

Escala Humpty Dumpty: adaptação transcultural e validação para cultura brasileira / Escala Humpty Dumpty: adaptación transcultural y validación para la cultura brasileña / The Humpty Dumpty Scale: cross-cultural adaptation and validation for Brazilian culture

Resumo Objetivo Adaptar e validar a The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale para a cultura brasileira. Métodos Estudo metodológico, que seguiu, para a adaptação transcultural, os estágios de tradução, síntese, retrotradução, avaliação por especialistas, pré-teste e avaliação pela autora do instrumento original. Foram selecionadas 103 crianças/adolescentes internados em um hospital público do interior do estado de São Paulo. Foram utilizados ficha de caracterização, The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale e o Instrumento de Classificação de Pacientes Pediátricos, o qual foi utilizado para avaliar a validade de construto, com o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman. A confiabilidade interobservador foi avaliada pelo Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse e pelo coeficiente Kappa. Resultados O comitê de 12 especialistas avaliou as equivalências, a clareza e a relevância dos itens e, após três rodadas, foi alcançado o percentual de 100% de concordância. As reformulações tornaram os itens mais compreensíveis e, após avaliação da autora, foi obtida a versão final do instrumento. Correlações positivas e significantes foram encontradas entre a Escala Humpty Dumpty e os domínios Paciente (r=0,5184; p<0,0001) e Procedimentos terapêuticos (r=0,2143; p<0,0332) do instrumento de classificação de pacientes. Com o domínio Família (r=0,0676; p=0,5060), não foram alcançadas relações significantes. Evidências satisfatórias de confiabilidade (Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse de 0,93 e coeficiente Kappa de 0,80) foram observadas. Conclusão The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale foi adaptada transculturalmente, sendo denominada Ferramenta de Avaliação de Risco de Queda - Escala Humpty Dumpty. Demonstrou evidências satisfatórias de validade e confiabilidade para avaliar o risco de queda em crianças e adolescentes, no cenário brasileiro.

Resumen Objetivo Adaptar y validar The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale para la cultura brasileña. Métodos Estudio metodológico, en el que se realizaron las siguientes etapas para la adaptación transcultural: traducción, síntesis, retrotraducción, evaluación por especialistas, prueba piloto y evaluación por la autora del instrumento original. Se seleccionaron 103 infantes/adolescentes internados en un hospital público del interior del estado de São Paulo. Se utilizó la ficha de caracterización, The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale y el Instrumento de Clasificación de Pacientes Pediátricos, que se usó para evaluar la validad del constructo, con el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman. La fiabilidad interobservador fue evaluada por el coeficiente de correlación intraclase y por el coeficiente Kappa. Resultados El comité de 12 especialistas evaluó las equivalencias, la claridad y la relevancia de los ítems y, después de tres rondas, se llegó al 100 % de concordancia. Con las reformulaciones los ítems quedaron más comprensibles y, luego de la evaluación de la autora, se obtuvo la versión final de instrumento. Se observaron correlaciones positivas y significativas entre la Escala Humpty Dumpty y los dominios Paciente (r=0,5184; p<0,0001) y Procedimientos terapéuticos (r=0,2143; p<0,0332) del instrumento de clasificación de pacientes. En el dominio Familia (r=0,0676; p=0,5060) no se encontraron relaciones significativas. Se observaron evidencias satisfactorias de fiabilidad (coeficiente de correlación intraclase de 0,93 y coeficiente Kappa de 0,80). Conclusión The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale fue adaptada transculturalmente y se la denominó Herramienta de Evaluación de Riesgo de Caída - Escala Humpty Dumpty. Demostró evidencias satisfactorias de validez y de fiabilidad para evaluar el riesgo de caída en infantes y adolescentes, en el contexto brasileño.

Abstract Objective To adapt and validate The Humpty Dumpty Scale for Brazilian culture. Methods Methodological study that followed the steps of translation, synthesis, back-translation, evaluation by specialists, pre-test and evaluation by the author of the original instrument for the cross-cultural adaptation. A total of 103 children/adolescents admitted to a public hospital in the countryside of the state of Sao Paulo were selected. We used a characterization form, The Humpty Dumpty Scale and the Pediatric Patient Classification Instrument, which was used to assess construct validity, with Spearman's correlation coefficient. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the Kappa coefficient. Results The committee of 12 experts evaluated the equivalence, clarity and relevance of the items and after three rounds, the percentage of 100% agreement was reached. The reformulations made the items more understandable and, after the author's evaluation, the final version of the instrument was obtained. Positive and significant correlations were found between The Humpty Dumpty Scale and the Patient (r=0.5184; p<0.0001) and Therapeutic Procedures (r=0.2143; p<0.0332) domains of the patient classification instrument. With the Family domain (r=0.0676; p=0.5060), no significant relationships were achieved. Satisfactory evidence of reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.93 and Kappa coefficient of 0.80) was observed. Conclusion The Humpty Dumpty Scale was cross-culturally adapted and is now called (in Portuguese) the Ferramenta de Avaliação de Risco de Quedas - Escala Humpty Dumpty. It demonstrated satisfactory evidence of validity and reliability to assess the risk of falling in children and adolescents in the Brazilian context.