The value of mammography in women with focal breast complaints in addition to initial targeted ultrasound.

PURPOSE: To determine the added value of mammography in women with focal breast complaints and the utility of initial targeted ultrasound in this setting. METHODS: Women with symptomatic breast disease who were evaluated by breast imaging (mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound) between January 2016 and December 2016 in the Radboud University Medical Centre were included. We retrospectively collected the following data: date of birth, indication of imaging, visibility on mammography/ultrasound, whether biopsy was taken, additional findings, BI-RADS-classification, pathology and follow-up results. RESULTS: A total of 494 women were included (mean age 46.5, range 30 to 93). In 49 women (9.9%), symptomatic breast cancer was diagnosed, all visible during targeted ultrasound. The negative predictive value of targeted ultrasound was very high (99.8%). Additional findings on mammography were significantly more often malignant when the symptomatic lesion was also malignant (3.8% vs 70%, P < 0.05). In only one patient with symptoms caused by a benign finding, an incidental malignancy was detected on mammography outside the area of complaint (detection rate 2.2/1000 examinations). CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of mammography for cancer detection in women with focal breast complaints is very low when targeted ultrasound is performed. Additional findings are most common in patients with symptomatic breast cancer. Our results suggest that initial targeted ultrasound is a more appropriate initial tool for the evaluation of focal breast complaints. Mammography could be performed on indication only.

Minimally invasive breast cancer excision using the breast lesion excision system under ultrasound guidance.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of completely excising small breast cancers using the automated, image-guided, single-pass radiofrequency-based breast lesion excision system (BLES) under ultrasound (US) guidance. METHODS: From February 2018 to July 2019, 22 patients diagnosed with invasive carcinomas ≤ 15 mm at US and mammography were enrolled in this prospective, multi-center, ethics board-approved study. Patients underwent breast MRI to verify lesion size. BLES-based excision and surgery were performed during the same procedure. Histopathology findings from the BLES procedure and surgery were compared, and total excision findings were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients, ten were excluded due to the lesion being > 15 mm and/or being multifocal at MRI, and one due to scheduling issues. The remaining 11 patients underwent BLES excision. Mean diameter of excised lesions at MRI was 11.8 mm (range 8.0-13.9 mm). BLES revealed ten (90.9%) invasive carcinomas of no special type, and one (9.1%) invasive lobular carcinoma. Histopathological results were identical for the needle biopsy, BLES, and surgical specimens for all lesions. None of the BLES excisions were adequate. Margins were usually compromised on both sides of the specimen, indicating that the excised volume was too small. Margin assessment was good for all BLES specimens. One technical complication occurred (retrieval of an empty BLES basket, specimen retrieved during subsequent surgery). CONCLUSIONS: BLES allows accurate diagnosis of small invasive breast carcinomas. However, BLES cannot be considered as a therapeutic device for small invasive breast carcinomas due to not achieving adequate excision.

Trends in pre-operative needle biopsy use in invasive breast cancer diagnosis: a Dutch nationwide population study.

INTRODUCTION: In recent decades, the use of pre-operative needle biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis has shifted. There is also an increased demand for availability of predictive factors. This study aims to quantify these changes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the Dutch nationwide pathology database (PALGA), all reports on breast cancer for five periods of 3 months between 1996 and 2016 were retrieved. Reports were categorised using automatic recognition of keywords. Classification was checked manually for the first 200 reports per period. The first 100 resected cases in each period underwent detailed investigation. RESULTS: For automatic analysis 34,639 reports were retrieved. Accuracy was 98% compared to manual assessment. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) decreased from 77% (1996) to 58% (2001), 34% (2006), 25% (2011), and 17% (2016). For detailed assessment, 498 cases were analysed. Diagnostic surgical excision decreased from 24% in 1996 to 3% in 2016, cases with only cytology from 65% to 1%, respectively. Cytology and core needle biopsy (CNB) were combined in 21% of cases in 2016. Pre-operative availability of ER status increased from 3% in 1996 to 36% in 2006 and 78% in 2016 (as compared to 47%, 92%, and 97% for post-operative availability, respectively) and for HER2 status from 0% to 13% and 66% (as compared to 1%, 89%, and 96% for post-operative availability, respectively). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that nationwide, clinics prioritise reliability and availability of ER and HER2 status, replacing FNAC by CNB. However, for optimal treatment planning for all patients, availability of pre-operative receptor status warrants further improvement.

Metastatic behavior and overall survival according to breast cancer subtypes in stage IV inflammatory breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Distant metastatic disease is frequently observed in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), with a poor prognosis as a consequence. The aim of this study was to analyze the association of hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) based breast cancer subtypes in stage IV inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) with preferential site of distant metastases and overall survival (OS). METHODS: For patients with stage IV IBC, diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2016, tumors were classified into four breast cancer subtypes: HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, and HR-/HER2-. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and sites of metastases were compared. OS of the subtypes was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Association between subtype and OS was assessed in multivariable models using logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 744 eligible patients were included: 340 (45.7%) tumors were HR+/HER2-, 148 (19.9%) HR-/HER2+, 131 (17.6%) HR+/HER2+, and 125 (16.8%) HR-/HER2-. Bone was the most common metastatic site in all subtypes. A significant predominance of bone metastases was found in HR+/HER2- IBC (71.5%), and liver and lung metastases in the HR-/HER2+ (41.2%) and HR-/HER2- (40.8%) subtypes, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the HR-/HER2- subtype was associated with significantly worse OS as compared to the other subtypes. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer subtypes in stage IV IBC are associated with distinct patterns of metastatic spread and display notable differences in OS. The use of breast cancer subtypes can guide a more patient-tailored staging directed to metastatic site and extend of disease.

The frequency of missed breast cancers in women participating in a high-risk MRI screening program.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of missed cancers on breast MRI in women participating in a high-risk screening program. METHODS: Patient files from women who participated in an increased risk mammography and MRI screening program (2003-2014) were coupled to the Dutch National Cancer Registry. For each cancer detected, we determined whether an MRI scan was available (0-24 months before cancer detection), which was reported to be negative. These negative MRI scans were in consensus re-evaluated by two dedicated breast radiologists, with knowledge of the cancer location. Cancers were scored as invisible, minimal sign, or visible. Additionally, BI-RADS scores, background parenchymal enhancement, and image quality (IQ; perfect, sufficient, bad) were determined. Results were stratified by detection mode (mammography, MRI, interval cancers, or cancers in prophylactic mastectomies) and patient characteristics (presence of BRCA mutation, age, menopausal state). RESULTS: Negative prior MRI scans were available for 131 breast cancers. Overall 31% of cancers were visible at the initially negative MRI scan and 34% of cancers showed a minimal sign. The presence of a BRCA mutation strongly reduced the likelihood of visible findings in the last negative MRI (19 vs. 46%, P < 0.001). Less than perfect IQ increased the likelihood of visible findings and minimal signs in the negative MRI (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: This study shows that almost one-third of cancers detected in a high-risk screening program are already visible at the last negative MRI scan, and even more in women without BRCA mutations. Regular auditing and double reading for breast MRI screening is warranted.

Discrepancies between biomarkers of primary breast cancer and subsequent brain metastases: an international multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Discordances between the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), expression between primary breast tumors and their subsequent brain metastases (BM) were investigated in breast cancer patients. METHODS: We collected retrospective data from 11 institutions in 8 countries in a predefined-standardized format. Receptor status (positive or negative) was determined according to institutional guidelines (immunohistochemically and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization). The study was subject to each institution's ethical research committee. RESULTS: A total of 167 breast cancer patients with BM were included. 25 patients out of 129 with a complete receptor information from both primary tumor and BM (ER, PR, HER2) available, had a change in receptor status: 7 of 26 (27%) ER/PR-positive/HER2-negative primaries (3 gained HER2; 4 lost expression of ER/PR); 10 of 31 (32%) ER/PR-positive/HER2-positive primaries (4 lost ER/PR only; 3 lost HER2 only; 3 lost both ER/PR and HER2); one of 33 (3%) ER/PR-negative receptor/HER2-positive primaries (gained ER); and 7 of 39 (18%) triple-negative primaries (5 gained ER/PR and 2 gained HER2). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of breast cancer patients with BM in this series had primary HER2-enriched tumors, followed by those with a triple-negative profile. One out of 5 patients had a receptor discrepancy between the primary tumor and subsequent BM. Therefore, we advise receptor status assessment of BM in all breast cancer patients with available histology as it may have significant implications for therapy.

Vulvar cancer: Two pathways with different localization and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Two etiologic pathways for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are described: in a background of lichen sclerosus and/or differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and related to high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) as precursor. The aim was to compare the predilection site and survival of HPV-related to non HPV-related vulvar SCCs. METHODS: Data of patients treated for primary vulvar SCC at the Radboudumc between March 1988 and January 2015 were analyzed. All histological specimens were tested for HPV with the SPF10/DEIA/LiPA25 system assay and p16INK4a staining was performed using CINtec® histology kit. Vulvar SCCs were considered HPV-related in case of either >25% p16INK4a expression and HPV positivity or >25% p16INK4a expression and HSIL next to the tumor without HPV positivity. Tumor localization, disease specific survival (DSS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with HPV-related and non HPV-related vulvar SCC were compared. RESULTS: In total 318 patients were included: 55 (17%) had HPV-related (Group 1) and 263 (83%) had non HPV-related vulvar SCC (Group 2). Tumors in Group 1 were significantly more often located at the perineum compared to Group 2, 30% and 14%, respectively (p=0.001). The DSS, DFS and OS were significantly better in HPV-related than in non HPV-related vulvar SCC patients. CONCLUSION: HPV-related vulvar SCCs are more frequently located at the perineum and have a favorable prognosis compared to non HPV-related vulvar SCCs. Both localization and HPV-relation could explain this favorable prognosis. HPV-related vulvar SCC seems to be a separate entity.

Quality assessment of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer using a tissue microarray-based approach.

Assessing hormone receptor status is an essential part of the breast cancer diagnosis, as this biomarker greatly predicts response to hormonal treatment strategies. As such, hormone receptor testing laboratories are strongly encouraged to participate in external quality control schemes to achieve optimization of their immunohistochemical assays. Nine Dutch pathology departments provided tissue blocks containing invasive breast cancers which were all previously tested for estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor expression during routine practice. From these tissue blocks, tissue microarrays were constructed and tested for hormone receptor expression. When a discordant result was found between the local and TMA result, the original testing slide was revised and staining was repeated on a whole-tissue block. Sensitivity and specificity of individual laboratories for testing estrogen receptor expression were high, with an overall sensitivity and specificity [corrected] of 99.7 and 95.4%, respectively. Overall sensitivity and specificity of progesterone receptor testing were 94.8 and 92.6%, respectively. Out of 96 discordant cases, 36 cases would have been concordant if the recommended cut-off value of 1% instead of 10% was followed. Overall sensitivity and specificity of estrogen and progesterone receptor testing were high among participating laboratories. Continued enrollment of laboratories into quality control schemes is essential for achieving and maintaining the highest standard of care for breast cancer patients.

The value of case reports in rare oncological scenarios: mixed method analysis of colorectal metastases from breast cancer.

With improved survival of cancer patients, we increasingly encounter infrequent metastatic locations. While for the common metastatic locations both prognostic information as well as evidence-based guidelines are available, for rare locations we have to rely on anecdotal case reports, the value of which is currently unknown. Therefore, we performed a systemic literature review and compare the results with a large national real-life cohort focussed on breast cancer patients with colorectal metastases. We performed a systematic literature search for breast cancer patients with colorectal metastases. Autopsy studies were excluded. Data on stage, histological factors, treatment and outcome were extracted. All identified cases were analysed as individual patients. The real-life cohort was extracted from the nationwide Dutch pathology databank. Linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry provided clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome data. Survival analyses and univariate regression were performed to identify relevant features for future treatment decisions. We identified 308 patients from 207 studies in the literature, and 454 patients in the real-life cohort. Colorectal metastases were the first metastatic event in 42.5% and 47.0% respectively. Cohorts were comparable for age, gender, location and hormone status, but differed in tumour type, stage and treatment. The time to colorectal metastases was similar in both cohorts (median of 68 months), and was dependent on presence of other metastases, nodal status, and primary breast surgery. The median overall survival after development of colorectal metastases was 20.6 months (95%CI 18.0-23.1 months). Despite a potential publication bias and lack of complete data for patients in the case report series, we have shown that an extensive systematic review can provide data that are comparable to real-life data, which can be used for decision-making and informing patients. Colorectal metastases are a late event in breast cancer patients, that is not associated with a detrimental survival.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant systemic therapy in low-risk breast cancer patients with nodal isolated tumor cells or micrometastases.

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with low-risk breast cancer and nodal isolated tumor cells or micrometastases is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant systemic therapy was carried out using the costs per 1% event prevented after 5 years of follow-up as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Secondary objective was to establish when adjuvant systemic therapy becomes cost saving. Patients included in the MIRROR study with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases who had a complete 5-year follow-up and who either did or did not receive systemic therapy were eligible. Sensitivity analyses were carried out. RESULTS: In the no adjuvant therapy cohort (N = 366), 24.9% of patients had an event within 5 years versus 16.8% of patients in the adjuvant therapy cohort (N = 483) (P < 0.01). The ICER was €363 per 1% event prevented. Beyond 18 years after diagnosis, the extrapolated mean cumulative costs per patient in the no adjuvant therapy cohort exceeded those of the adjuvant therapy cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of breast cancer patients with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases, €36 300 had to be invested to prevent one event in 5 years of follow-up. Adjuvant systemic therapy was cost saving beyond 18 years after diagnosis.

Relevant impact of central pathology review on nodal classification in individual breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: In the MIRROR study, pN0(i + ) and pN1mi were associated with reduced 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared with pN0. Nodal status (N-status) was assessed after central pathology review and restaging according to the sixth AJCC classification. We addressed the impact of pathology review. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Early favorable primary breast cancer patients, classified pN0, pN0(i + ), or pN1(mi) by local pathologists after sentinel node procedure, were included. We assessed the impact of pathology review on N-status (n = 2842) and 5-year DFS for those without adjuvant therapy (n = 1712). RESULTS: In all, 22% of the 1082 original pN0 patients was upstaged. Of the 623 original pN0(i + ) patients, 1% was downstaged, 26% was upstaged. Of 1137 patients staged pN1mi, 15% was downstaged, 11% upstaged. Originally, 5-year DFS was 85% for pN0, 74% for pN0(i + ), and 73% for pN1mi; HR 1.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-2.27] and HR 1.57 (95% CI 1.16-2.13), respectively, compared with pN0. By review staging, 5-year DFS was 86% for pN0, 77% for pN0(i + ), 77% for pN1mi, and 74% for pN1 + . CONCLUSION: Pathology review changed the N-classification in 24%, mainly upstaging, with potentially clinical relevance for individual patients. The association of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases with outcome remained unchanged. Quality control should include nodal breast cancer staging.

The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery(BCS) of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are high.Preoperative breast MRI has the potential to reduce re-excision rates, but may lead to an increased rate of mastectomies. Hence, we assessed the influence of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate and the rate of mastectomies. We performed a retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients with ILC who presented in one of two dedicated tertiary cancer centers between 1993 and 2005. We assessed the initial type of surgery(BCS or mastectomy), the re-excision rate and the final type of surgery. Patients were stratified into two groups:those who received preoperative MRI (MR? group) and those who did not (MR- group). In the MR- group, 27%of the patients underwent a re-excision after initial BCS. In the MR? group, this rate was significantly lower at 9%.The odds ratio was 3.64 (95% CI: 1.30-10.20, P = 0.010).There was a trend towards a lower final mastectomy rate in the MR? group compared to the MR- group (48 vs. 59%,P = 0.098). In conclusion, preoperative MRI in patients with ILC can reduce re-excision rates without increasing the rate of mastectomies.

In primary breast cancer the mitotic activity yields similar prognostic information as the histological grade: a study with long-term follow-up.

We evaluated with long-term follow-up, the prognostic value of the mitotic activity index (MAI) and the volume corrected mitotic index (M/V-index) compared with that of the histological grade in breast cancer patients not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy. Of 739 consecutive patients living in the city of Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 477 patients with primary unilateral breast cancer were not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy and eligible for the study. In multivariate survival analyses the MAI and M/V-index showed similar hazard ratios (HRs) compared to HRs of histological grade for overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.45, 1.48, and grade II versus grade I (GII/GI) 1.34, grade III versus grade I (GIII/GI) 1.53, respectively) and for breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) (HR: 1.27, 1.57, and (GII/GI) 1.57 (GIII/GI) 2.32, respectively). Other independent prognostic variables for OS and BCSS were age at diagnosis, tumour size, and number of positive lymph nodes. In the present study with long term follow-up, we compared the prognostic value of mitotic activity with that of histological grade and found no advantage for the mitotic activity in predicting either BCSS or OS and concluded that histological grade and the mitotic activity were equally informative in predicting patient outcome. As histological grade is a well established and widely used prognosticator we do not have arguments to replace the histological grade by the mitotic indices MAI or M/V-index.

Reliability of MRI tumor size measurements for minimal invasive treatment selection in small breast cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the shift towards minimal invasive treatment, accurate tumor size estimation is essential for small breast cancers. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of MRI-based tumor size measurements with respect to clinical, histological and radiomics characteristics in small invasive or in situ carcinomas of the breast to select patients for minimal invasive therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive cases of cT1 invasive breast carcinomas that underwent pre-operative MRI, treated in two hospitals between 2005 and 2016, were identified retrospectively from the Dutch cancer registry and cross-correlated with local databases. Concordance between MRI-based measurements and final pathological size was analyzed. The influence of clinical, histological and radiomics characteristics on the accuracy of MRI size measurements were analyzed. RESULTS: Analysis included 343 cT1 breast carcinomas in 336 patients (mean age, 55 years; range, 25-81 years). Overall correlation of MRI measurements with pathology was moderately strong (ρ = 0.530, P < 0.001), in 42 cases (12.2%) MRI underestimated the size with more than 5 mm. Underestimation occurs more often in grade 2 and grade 3 disease than in low grade invasive cancers. In DCIS the frequency of underestimation is higher than in invasive breast cancer. Unfortunately, none of the patient, imaging or biopsy characteristics appeared predictive for underestimation. CONCLUSION: Size measurements of small breast cancers on breast MRI are within 5 mm of pathological size in 88% of patients. Nevertheless, underestimation cannot be adequately predicted, particularly for grade 2 and grade 3 tumors, which may hinder patient selection for minimal invasive therapy.

Better survival after surgery of the primary tumor in stage IV inflammatory breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Information regarding the effects of resection of the primary tumor in stage IV inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is scarce. We analyzed the impact of resection of the primary tumor on overall survival (OS) in a large stage IV IBC population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage IV IBC between 2005 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, excluding patients without any treatment. To correct for immortal time bias, we performed a landmark analysis including patients alive at least six months after diagnosis. With propensity score matching, patients undergoing surgery of the primary tumor were matched to patients not receiving surgery. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to determine the association between treatment strategy and OS in the non-matched and matched cohort. RESULTS: Of the 580 included patients after landmark analysis, 441 patients (76%) received only non-surgical treatments and 139 (24%) underwent surgery (96% mastectomy). Median follow-up was 28.8 and 20.0 months in the surgery and no surgery group, respectively. Surgery in the non-matched cohort was independently associated with better survival (HR0.56[95%CI:0.42-0.75]). In the matched cohort (n = 202), surgically treated patients had improved survival over nonsurgically treated patients (p < 0.005). Multivariable analysis of the matched cohort revealed that surgery was still associated with better survival (HR0.62[95%CI:0.44-0.87]). CONCLUSION: Although residual confounding and confounding by severity cannot be ruled out, this study suggests that surgery of the primary tumor is associated with improved OS and should be considered as part of the treatment strategy in stage IV IBC.

The impact of a false-positive MRI on the choice for mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers is limited.

PURPOSE: To assess the false-positive rate of breast cancer surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in BRCA mutation carriers and the impact of an abnormal mammography or breast MRI on the patients' decision for prophylactic mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 196 BRCA mutation carriers were included with a median follow-up of 2 years (range 1-9) with annual mammography and MRI. Preference for prophylactic mastectomy was registered at first surveillance after the mutation carriership was revealed. RESULTS: In all, 41% (81 of 196) of the women had at least one positive MRI or mammography. Malignancy was detected in 17 women: 11 at surveillance, 4 at an intended prophylactic mastectomy and 2 had an interval cancer. Imaging by mammography and MRI had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 90%. The probability that a positive MRI result is false positive was 83%. In the group with a prior preference for mastectomy with and without a false-positive imaging, prophylactic mastectomy was carried out in 89% and 66%, respectively (P = 0.06), in the group with prior preference for surveillance these percentages were 15% and 11%, respectively (P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Although the rate of false-positive MRI results is high, the impact on the choice for prophylactic mastectomy is limited and is determined by the woman's preference before the establishment of a BRCA mutation.

[Palliation in patients with metastatic breast cancer often better with antitumour treatment than with only symptomatic treatment]. / Palliatie bij patiënten met gemetastaseerd mammacarcinoom vaak beter door antitumorbehandeling dan door alleen symptoombestrijding.

Two women, aged 57 and 55 years, with metastatic breast cancer were admitted for uncontrolled pain due to bone metastases. Despite the fact that progressive disease was evident, a change in antitumour therapy had not been recommended. The pain control was optimised in both patients. In one patient, palliative chemotherapy was installed, combined with trastuzumab because of HER2/neu overexpression. She was still alive after one and a half year of treatment. The other patient could not adjust mentally to the fact that her palliative therapy was changed to antitumour therapy; she died one month later. It is important to be aware of the various kinds of therapy in metastatic breast cancer because palliative treatment is more than just symptomatic treatment. Systemic antitumour therapy includes hormone therapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Furthermore, in patients with bone metastases, radiotherapy combined with bisphosphonates results in pain relief and can reduce skeletal complications. Because of the ensuing complexity of the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, these patients should be regularly managed by a breast-cancer care team in order to improve the quality of care.

Numerous high-risk epithelial lesions in familial breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the occurrence of high-risk epithelial lesions in women of breast cancer families with and without a BRCA mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study of women at very high risk of breast cancer undergoing prophylactic mastectomy (68 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 14 BRCA2 mutation carriers and 24 non-BRCA mutation carriers). RESULTS: The prevalence of high-risk lesions is equal in women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation, but is higher in non-BRCA mutation carriers: all lesions 43% versus 71% (p=0.02), atypical lobular hyperplasia 26% versus 67% (p=0.001), atypical ductal hyperplasia 17% versus 42% (p=0.01), lobular carcinoma-in situ 15% versus 29% (p=0.10) and ductal carcinoma-in situ 9% versus 17% (p=0.25). The presence of high-risk lesions is related to absence of a BRCA mutation and to age over 40 years. CONCLUSION: Women with an autosomal dominant family history for breast cancer, with and without a BRCA mutation are prone to develop high-risk epithelial lesions, especially over 40 years.

Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although breast cancer screening is recommended to start at a younger age for women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer, the sensitivity of mammography for these women is reduced. We compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with mammography to determine which is more sensitive and whether MRI could play a role in the early detection of breast cancer for these women. METHODS: We constructed a retrospective cohort of all breast MRI and mammography surveillance reports made in our department from November 1994 to February 2001. All of the 179 women in the cohort had received biannual palpation in addition to annual imaging by MRI, mammography, or both. The 258 MRI images and the 262 mammograms were classified with the use of the BI-RADS (i.e., Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) scoring system, which has five categories to indicate the level of suspicion of a lesion. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated for MRI and mammography, and the area under each curve (AUC) was assessed for the entire cohort of 179 women and for a subset of 75 women who had received both an MRI and a mammographic examination within a 4-month period. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: In the cohort of 179 women, we detected 13 breast cancers. Seven cancers were not revealed by mammography, but all were detected by MRI. For the entire cohort, the AUC for mammography was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68 to 0.79), and the AUC for MRI was 0.99 (95% CI = 0.98 to 1.0). For the subset of women who had both examinations, the AUC for mammography was 0.70 (95% CI = 0.60 to 0.80), and the AUC for MRI was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.95 to 1.0). CONCLUSION: MRI was more accurate than mammography in annual breast cancer surveillance of women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. Larger prospective studies to examine the role of MRI in screening programs are justified.