Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.

The goal of this study was to compare outcomes for robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer as well as to investigate whether specific patient demographic, comorbidity, and severity variables were associated with the type of hysterectomy performed. A retrospective review was conducted of hysterectomy procedures for patients discharged from October 1, 2008 and September 30, 2012. Preoperative characteristics included age, BMI, number of past abdominal surgeries, and comorbidities. Intraoperative and postoperative characteristics included uterine weight and diameter, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, lymph-vascular space involvement, FIGO stage and tumor grade. Outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, conversion to open, other intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmissions within 30 days and lymph node yield. The robotic and laparoscopic cohorts show no significant differences in patient or tumor characteristics, while the open cases represent patients with increased complexity. In general, laparoscopic cases were shorter than robotic and open cases. Laparoscopic cases had fewer conversions to open than robotic cases. Robotic and open cases had significantly higher lymph node yield than laparoscopic cases. The reduction in surgical time and conversion rates in the laparoscopic cohort may be related to the reduction in node dissection performed.

Institutional experience using interstitial brachytherapy for the treatment of primary and recurrent pelvic malignancies.

PURPOSE: The study assessed the outcomes of patients at a single institution with locally advanced primary and recurrent pelvic malignancies treated with interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT), using a modified Syed-Neblett template. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2010, 60 patients with primary or recurrent pelvic malignancies were treated with interstitial BT. Thirty three patients had primary malignancies with 6.1% being stage I, 33.3% stage II, 45.5% stage III, and 15.2% stage IV; the remaining 27 patients were recurrent malignancies. Fifty four patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as part of their treatment course. The median EBRT, BT, and EBRT + BT doses were 45 Gy, 20 Gy, and 65 Gy, respectively. Thirty eight patients received concurrent chemotherapy with EBRT. Complete response (CR) was defined by absence of clinical and radiographic disease on first follow-up. Toxicity was graded as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 37 months (4-234 months) and initial CR was achieved in 91%. For primary cancers at diagnosis, 5-year local control (LC), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), 5-year overall survival (OS) were 65%, 64%, and 42% respectively. For recurrent cancers at diagnosis, 5-year LC, 5-year PFS, and 5-year OS were 80%, 51%, and 37%, respectively. There was a significant difference in both OS and PFS among different tumor sites (p < 0.05), with vaginal cancers having the best 5-year OS (55%) and PFS (84%). There was a total of 1 acute toxicity ≥ grade 3, 6 late grade 3 toxicities, and late grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our series suggests that interstitial BT using a modified Syed-Neblett template is a safe and effective treatment for primary or recurrent pelvic malignancies. This technique allowed effective LC and 97% of patients had preservation of both bladder and rectal function.

Body mass index, conversion rate and complications among patients undergoing robotic surgery for endometrial carcinoma.

A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the relationship of BMI to conversion rate in patients undergoing robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. Secondary outcomes were operative times, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and complications. Women with endometrial cancer scheduled for robotic surgery from September 2008 to September 2012 were included. Women were divided into three groups based on BMI, and conversion rates to laparotomy were compared. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed among non-obese, obese, and morbidly obese women who completed robotic surgery. 298 women were scheduled for robotic surgery for endometrial carcinoma: 87 non-obese (BMI 19-29, µ 25.23), 110 obese (BMI 30-39, µ 34.21), and 101 morbidly obese (BMI 40-71, µ 47.38). Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 18 patients (6%), with no difference in conversion rate between BMI categories. Direct comparison between converted and completed robotic patients showed no significant differences in preoperative characteristics, except that patients who required conversion had a higher number of previous abdominal surgeries. Patients completing robotic surgery underwent node dissections at similar rates in all three BMI categories. Operating room time, but not surgical time, was increased in morbidly obese patients. There were no significant differences in complications, performance of lymphadenectomy, or lymph node yields between BMI categories. Increase in BMI was not associated with an increase in rate of conversion to laparotomy or complication rate in patients undergoing robotic surgery for endometrial carcinoma. Node dissections were pathologically equivalent between BMI categories.