Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
From expert-derived user needs to user-perceived ease of use and usefulness: a two-phase mixed-methods evaluation framework.
J Biomed Inform
; 52: 141-50, 2014 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24333875
2.
An Integrated Model for Patient Care and Clinical Trials (IMPACT) to support clinical research visit scheduling workflow for future learning health systems.
J Biomed Inform
; 46(4): 642-52, 2013 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23684593
3.
Leveraging the Expertise of the CTSA Program to Increase the Impact and Efficiency of Clinical Trials.
JAMA Netw Open
; 6(10): e2336470, 2023 10 02.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796498
4.
Impact of IMPACT: Longitudinal Analysis of an Integrated Participant Scheduling System in a Clinical Research Setting.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc
; 2020: 283-292, 2020.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33936400
5.
Using software to elicit user needs for clinical research visit scheduling.
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc
; 2014: 109-15, 2014.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25954586
6.
Using EHRs to integrate research with patient care: promises and challenges.
J Am Med Inform Assoc
; 19(5): 684-7, 2012.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22542813
7.
Comparing the effectiveness of a clinical registry and a clinical data warehouse for supporting clinical trial recruitment: a case study.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc
; 2010: 867-71, 2010 Nov 13.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21347102
8.
Barriers, enablers, and incentives for research participation: a report from the Ambulatory Care Research Network (ACRN).
J Am Board Fam Med
; 22(4): 436-45, 2009.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19587259