Kidney transplantation during mass disasters - from COVID-19 to other catastrophes.

Mass disasters are characterized by a disparity between health care demand and supply, which hampers complex therapies like kidney transplantation. Considering scarcity of publications on previous disasters, we reviewed transplantation practice during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, and dwelled upon this experience for guiding transplantation strategies in the future pandemic and non-pandemic catastrophes. We strongly suggest continuing transplantation programs during mass disasters, if medical and logistic operational circumstances are appropriate. Postponing transplantations from living donors and referral of urgent cases to safe regions or hospitals are justified. Specific preventative measures in anticipated disasters (such as vaccination programs during pandemics or evacuation in case of hurricanes or wars) may be useful to minimize risks. Immunosuppressive therapies should consider stratifying risk status and avoiding heavy immune suppression in patients with a low probability of therapeutic success. Discharging patients at the earliest convenience is justified during pandemics, whereas delaying discharge is reasonable in other disasters, if infrastructural damage results in unhygienic living environments for the patients. In the outpatient setting, telemedicine is a useful approach to reduce the patient load to hospitals, to minimize the risk of nosocomial transmission in pandemics and the need for transport in destructive disasters. If it comes down to save as many lives as possible, some ethical principles may vary in function of disaster circumstances, but elementary ethical rules are non-negotiable. Patient education is essential to minimize disaster-related complications and to allow for an efficient use of health care resources.

Kidney transplantation during mass disasters - from COVID-19 to other catastrophes A Consensus Statement by the DESCARTES Working Group and Ethics Committee of the ERA.

Mass disasters are characterized by a disparity between health care demand and supply, which hampers complex therapies like kidney transplantation. Considering scarcity of publications on previous disasters, we reviewed transplantation practice during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, and dwelled upon this experience for guiding transplantation strategies in the future pandemic and non-pandemic catastrophes. We strongly suggest continuing transplantation programs during mass disasters, if medical and logistic operational circumstances are appropriate. Postponing transplantations from living donors and referral of urgent cases to safe regions or hospitals are justified. Specific preventative measures in anticipated disasters (such as vaccination programs during pandemics or evacuation in case of hurricanes or wars) may be useful to minimize risks. Immunosuppressive therapies should consider stratifying risk status and avoiding heavy immune suppression in patients with a low probability of therapeutic success. Discharging patients at the earliest convenience is justified during pandemics, whereas delaying discharge is reasonable in other disasters, if infrastructural damage results in unhygienic living environments for the patients. In the outpatient setting, telemedicine is a useful approach to reduce the patient load to hospitals, to minimize the risk of nosocomial transmission in pandemics and the need for transport in destructive disasters. If it comes down to save as many lives as possible, some ethical principles may vary in function of disaster circumstances, but elementary ethical rules are non-negotiable. Patient education is essential to minimize disaster-related complications and to allow for an efficient use of health care resources.

Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection: Report of the Phase I/II Clinical Trial Case Series.

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) therapy has already been studied in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and the available data showed that it is safe and well tolerated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous MSCs in combination with standard therapy in KTRs with biopsy-proven chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Patients with biopsy-proven chronic active AMR received treatment with autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (3 × 106 cells/kg iv) after completion of standard therapy and were followed for up to 12 months. The primary endpoints were safety by assessment of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included assessment of kidney graft function, immunological and histological changes related to AMR activity and chronicity assessed by conventional microscopy and molecular transcripts. A total of 3 patients were enrolled in the study before it was terminated prematurely because of adverse events. We found that AMR did not improve in any of the patients after treatment with MSCs. In addition, serious adverse events were observed in one case when autologous MSCs therapy was administered in the late phase after kidney transplantation, which requires further elucidation.

Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report.

BACKGROUND: Regional citrate anticoagulation during hemodialysis provides an immediate and complete anticoagulant effect, which is limited to the extracorporeal circuit. Citrate has become the standard anticoagulant in acute renal replacement therapy and is widely used in various intermittent hemodialysis modalities, especially for patients with contraindications for heparin. With the increased adoption of medium cut-off membranes, experience with regional citrate anticoagulation is needed. To our knowledge, this is the first report to assess the feasibility of regional citrate anticoagulation in expanded hemodialysis. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 5 expanded hemodialysis procedures in 5 patients in which a medium cut-off membrane (Theranova®) was used. We followed our standard citrate protocol developed and tested for high-flux membrane. Anticoagulation was performed with a continuous infusion of 8% trisodium citrate into the arterial line and supplementation of 1 M calcium chloride into the venous line. We monitored ionized calcium and magnesium, sodium and blood gas analysis. Anticoagulation effectiveness was assessed by post-filter ionized calcium and by visual inspection of the anticoagulation in the circuit. RESULTS: There were no prematurely terminated procedures due to anticoagulation-related complications. With a blood flow of 250 mL/min and a dialysate flow of 500 mL/min, we were able to maintain serum ionized calcium in the range of 0.89-1.29 mmol/L and serum sodium in the range of 136-144 mmol/L. The mean pre- and post-dialysis arterial circuit pH was 7.42 (± 0.04) and 7.53 (± 0.23), respectively. The mean pre- and post-dialysis serum ionized magnesium was 0.54 (± 0.04) mmol/L and 0.43 (± 0.03) mmol/L, respectively (measurements were done on a point-of-care ionometer with a lower normal range for ionized magnesium). CONCLUSION: We have shown that our standard citrate protocol for high-flux hemodialysis membrane could be successfully adopted for use in expanded hemodialysis with a medium cut-off membrane. Overall, electrolyte and acid-base balances were relatively well-controlled and anticoagulation effectiveness was excellent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This is a pilot report with results taken from a larger ongoing trial (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on October 25, 2019 under number NCT04139525) comparing citrate and heparin anticoagulation during expanded hemodialysis.

Temporal trends in the quality of deceased donor kidneys and kidney transplant outcomes in Europe: an analysis by the ERA-EDTA Registry.

BACKGROUND: We investigated 10-year trends in deceased donor kidney quality expressed as the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and subsequent effects on survival outcomes in a European transplant population. METHODS: Time trends in the crude and standardized KDRI between 2005 and 2015 by recipient age, sex, diabetic status and country were examined in 24 177 adult kidney transplant recipients in seven European countries. We determined 5-year patient and graft survival probabilities and the risk of death and graft loss by transplant cohort (Cohort 1: 2005-06, Cohort 2: 2007-08, Cohort 3: 2009-10) and KDRI quintile. RESULTS: The median crude KDRI increased by 1.3% annually, from 1.31 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.08-1.63] in 2005 to 1.47 (IQR 1.16-1.90) in 2015. This increase, i.e. lower kidney quality, was driven predominantly by increases in donor age, hypertension and donation after circulatory death. With time, the gap between the median standardized KDRI in the youngest (18-44 years) and oldest (>65 years) recipients widened. There was no difference in the median standardized KDRI by recipient sex. The median standardized KDRI was highest in Austria, the Netherlands and the Basque Country (Spain). Within each transplant cohort, the 5-year patient and graft survival probability were higher for the lowest KDRIs. There was no difference in the patient and graft survival outcomes across transplant cohorts, however, over time the survival probabilities for the highest KDRIs improved. CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of deceased donor kidneys transplanted between 2005 and 2015 has decreased and varies between age groups and countries. Overall patient and graft outcomes remain unchanged.

A national cohort study on hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas after kidney transplantation - long-term patency, use and complications.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) patency, incidence of AVF use, incidence and nature of AVF complications and surgery in patients after kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the AVF outcome and complications in all adult kidney allograft recipients transplanted between January 1st, 2000 and December 31, 2015 with a functional AVF at the time of transplantation. Follow-up was until December 31, 2019. RESULTS: We included 626 patients. Median AVF follow-up was 4.9 years. One month after kidney transplantation estimated AVF patency rate was 90%, at 1 year it was 82%, at 3 years it was 70% and at 5 years it was 61%; median estimated AVF patency was 7.9 years. The main cause of AVF failure was spontaneous thrombosis occurring in 76% of AVF failure cases, whereas 24% of AVFs were ligated or extirpated. In a Cox multivariate model female sex and grafts were independently associated with more frequent AVF thrombosis. AVF was used in about one third of our patients. AVF-related complications occurred in 29% of patients and included: growing aneurysms, complicated thrombosis, high-flow AVF, signs of distal hypoperfusion, venous hypertension, trauma of the AVF arm, or pain in the AVF/arm. CONCLUSIONS: AVFs remain functional after kidney transplantation in the majority of patients and are often re-used after graft failure. AVF-related complications are common and require proper care.

Functional training added to intradialytic cycling lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and improves dialysis adequacy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Exercise has various positive effects on hemodialysis patients. However, there is no clear evidence which type of exercise yields better results. This study aimed to determine the effects of guided functional training added to the intradialytic cycling on dialysis adequacy and biochemical parameters in hemodialysis patients. Additionally, we aimed to investigate if patients could transfer functional exercise to an unsupervised home environment and retain gained improvements. METHODS: Randomization was done to a functional training intervention group (INT) (n = 20) or intradialytic cycling control group (CON) (n = 20). The INT attended a pre-dialysis functional training in the first 8 weeks. In the second 8 weeks, they performed functional exercises at unsupervised home environment on non-dialysis days. During the whole study, both groups participated in the intradialytic cycling program. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated a significant increase in dialysis adequacy (Kt/V) in the eight (0.15, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.24; p = 0.003 for INT and 0.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.3; p < 0.001 for CON) and the 16th study week (0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.24; p = 0.017 for INT and 0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.22; p = 0.013 for CON) compared to their baseline values with no significant between-group differences. At week eight, the total cholesterol was significantly lowered in the INT (- 0.34 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.6 to - 0.07; p = 0.016) and remained lower at week 16 (- 0.32 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.01; p = 0.049) with no significant changes in the CON. Low-density lipoprotein levels in the INT were significantly reduced after 8 weeks (- 0.35 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.06; p = 0.022) and remained reduced after 16 weeks (- 0.28 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.52 to - 0.03; p = 0.030). There were no significant differences found for albumin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and hemoglobin in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that functional training added to intradialytic cycling improved lipid profile and dialysis adequacy. Additionally, the effects of the unsupervised, home-based program were preserved during the second study phase. This study supports the assumption that combined training is more effective compared to solely intradialytic exercise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03334123 . Registered 07 November 2017.

Paricalcitol versus placebo for reduction of proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Proteinuria after kidney transplantation is accompanied by an increased risk of graft failure. In this single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial we studied whether vitamin D receptor activator paricalcitol might reduce proteinuria. Patients with urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) ≥20 mg/mmol despite optimization of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade were randomly assigned to receive 24 weeks' treatment with 2 µg/day paricalcitol or placebo. Primary endpoint was change in UPCR, and main secondary endpoints were change in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and 24-h proteinuria. Analysis was by intention to treat. One hundred and sixty-eight patients undergo randomization, and 83 were allocated to paricalcitol, and 85 to placebo. Compared with baseline, UPCR declined in the paricalcitol group (-39%, 95% CI -45 to -31) but not in the placebo group (21%, 95% CI 9 to 35), with a between group difference of -49% (95% CI -57 to -41; P < 0.001). UACR and 24-h proteinuria decreased only on paricalcitol therapy and significantly differed between groups at end-of-treatment (P < 0.001). Paricalcitol was well tolerated but incidence of mild hypercalcemia was higher than in placebo. In conclusion, addition of 2 µg/day paricalcitol lowers residual proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients. Long-term studies are needed to determine if the reduction in proteinuria improves transplant outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01436747).

The role of single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP3A and ABCB1 on tacrolimus predose concentration in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic drug window but high inter- and intrapatient variability. Our aim is to construct a model able to predict optimal maintenance tacrolimus predose concentration (C0) in kidney transplant patients. Here we present our study design and genotype and variant allele frequencies for the selected single nucleotide polymorphisms of genes involved in tacrolimus metabolism in our national cohort of kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: In the observational part of the study, we intend to determine allelic variants of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 gene in a national cohort of 700 kidney transplants recipients. Clinical and laboratory data of this historic cohort will be added to assess patient's immunologic risk. Based on these data, a prediction model will be constructed that will be validated in a prospective randomized study in 60 de-novo kidney transplant recipients. RESULTS: Our interim cross-sectional observational results show higher variability of ABCB1 genotypes when compared to CYP3A genes, with more than two thirds of the population carrying at least one polymorphic allele. On the other hand, less than 1% of our transplant recipients possess the CYP3A genotype, which requires high daily tacrolimus dose. CONCLUSIONS: Due to high inter- and intrapatient tacrolimus variability, a patient-tailored approach to define the optimal maintenance tacrolimus C0 for each individual patient is needed. Our model will rely on individual pharmacogenomic and clinical data to cover different patient-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes.
.

Effects of paricalcitol on biomarkers of inflammation and fibrosis in kidney transplant recipients: results of a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: Paricalcitol, a selective vitamin D activator, decreases proteinuria and may reduce graft failure risk in kidney transplant recipients. In this study, we evaluated the effect of paricalcitol on renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity as well as interleukin (IL)-6 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß plasma concentrations as biomarkers of inflammation and fibrosis. METHODS: This placebo-controlled, double-blind trial enrolled a national cohort of kidney transplant recipients with urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) ≥ 20 mg/mmol despite optimization of the RAS blockade. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 24 weeks of treatment with 2 µg/day paricalcitol or placebo. The primary endpoint was the percent change in geometric mean UPCR. In this secondary analysis, we examined the effect of paricalcitol on plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone levels as well as IL-6 and TGF-ß plasma concentrations from baseline to last measurement during treatment. RESULTS: Of the 168 patients with UPCR ≥ 20 mg/mmol who consented to undergoing randomization, 83 were allocated to paricalcitol and 85 to placebo. Baseline patient demographics, clinical characteristics, PRA, and aldosterone levels were similar between groups. Mean change in IL-6 was -29% (from 2.53 to 2.02 pg/mL) in the paricalcitol group and 23% (from 2.07 to 2.54 pg/mL) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Mean change in TGF-ß was -12% (from 8,011 to 6,935 pg/mL) in the paricalcitol group and 21% (from 7,418 to 8,992 pg/mL) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In kidney transplant recipients, the addition of 2 µg/day paricalcitol to RAS inhibition lowers IL-6 and TGF-ß concentrations, which may be beneficial for reducing graft inflammation and fibrosis.
.

Anticoagulation assessment methods in plasma exchange with regional citrate anticoagulation: evaluation of post-filter and filtered plasma ionized calcium.

AIM: To assess the possibility of using filtered plasma instead of postfilter ionized calcium (iCa) for the assessment of anticoagulation in plasma exchange (PE) with citrate anticoagulation. METHODS: 140 PE treatments were performed using either 4% or 15% citrate at a comparable dose. Paired samples of postfilter blood and filtered plasma were taken for iCa measurements with a point-of-care analyzer. Anticoagulation was also assessed with a bedside clotting time and visual assessment of the circuit after procedures. RESULTS: In 490 paired samples, mean postfilter iCa was 0.39 ± 0.14 mmol/L, and filtered plasma iCa was 0.33 ± 0.11 mmol/L. Mean bedside clotting time was 18 ± 7 minutes. Neither the postfilter (r = 0.03, p = 0.73) nor the filtered plasma iCa (r = 0.09, p = 0.25) correlated significantly with bedside clotting time. Bland-Altman analysis showed a modest agreement between filtered plasma and postfilter iCa values (mean difference -0.07 mmol/L, upper and lower 95% limits of agreement 0.10 and -0.23 mmol/L). Median visual assessment score was excellent at all three checkpoints. CONCLUSIONS: A modest agreement between filtered plasma and postfilter iCa values could be acceptable if only a confirmation of anticoagulant effect is required. Measuring filtered plasma instead of postfilter iCa would reduce blood loss with sampling, which could be important in some settings.
.

Increase in spot urine protein excretion is associated with late kidney graft rejection and predicts rejection phenotype.

AIMS: A noninvasive test that foretells kidney graft rejection before loss of kidney function would be desirable. We hypothesized that an increase in estimated protein excretion rate (ePER) from spot urine samples is associated with graft rejection and predicts rejection phenotype. METHODS: 151 patients who had undergone first-indication kidney biopsy due to graft dysfunction beyond 3 months after transplant were identified from a national cohort of 616 transplant recipients between 2000 and 2012 (25%). ePER were calculated from spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratios at baseline, 3 months before biopsy (ePER-3m), and at the time of biopsy (ePERbiopsy) and were correlated with histologic biopsy findings. RESULTS: Levels of ePER 3 months before biopsy and at the time of biopsy were greater in 32 patients with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) than in 77 patients with T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and 42 patients with other findings (median ePER-3m 912 vs. 320 vs. 232 mg/day/1.73m2; and median ePERbiopsy 1,672 vs. 356 vs. 268 mg/day/1.73m2; p < 0.001). Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analyses demonstrated that ePER-3m and ePERbiopsy had good diagnostic accuracy to discriminate between biopsy specimens showing ABMR vs. those showing TCMR or other histologic findings (area under the ROC curve 0.84, 95% CI 0.75 - 0.93 and 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 - 0.97, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in ePER before kidney graft dysfunction appears to be associated with graft rejection and predicts ABMR phenotype.
.

Treatment Efficacy and Safety During Plasma Exchange With Citrate Anticoagulation: A Randomized Study of 4 Versus 15% Citrate.

In plasma exchange (PE), contrary to dialysis, there is no ultrafiltration, and the volume of anticoagulant contributes to volume overload of the patient and might also reduce PE efficiency through dilution. To reduce the volume of citrate, we compared 4 and 15% citrate anticoagulation protocols in PE in a randomized study, aiming to evaluate PE efficacy, anticoagulation efficiency, and overall safety. In addition to standard biochemical analyses during PE treatments, the elimination rate (ER) of immunoglobulins was calculated to evaluate PE efficacy. Anticoagulation was evaluated by postfilter ionized calcium, visual evaluation of the extracorporeal system, and change in the sieving coefficient (SC) during PE. Accumulation of citrate was determined by calculating the total-to-ionized calcium ratio and measuring the citrate concentration after PE. One hundred forty procedures (70 in each group) were performed in 37 patients. The mean citrate infusion rate was 197 ± 10 mL/h in the 4% and 59 ± 5.5 mL/h in the 15% groups, respectively; the total volume of infused citrate was 502 ± 77 mL versus 164 ± 52 mL (P < 0.001). ER for immunoglobulin G (0.57 ± 0.06 vs. 0.55 ± 0.1, P = 0.18), M, and A were comparable. Ionized calcium was stable during the procedures, and there were no significant side effects. Although postfilter ionized calcium was on the upper limit of the target range (0.41 ± 0.16 vs. 0.37 ± 0.14 mmol/L, P = 0.38), the visual assessment score was excellent, and even a rise in SC was observed during the procedures in both groups. The total-to-ionized calcium ratio was increased in 20 versus 22% of procedures, and citrate concentrations after PE were also similar (1306 ± 441 vs. 1263 ± 405 µmol/L). To conclude, we were unable to show superior PE efficacy in the 15% citrate group, but we significantly reduced the infused volume, which is important in patients with fluid overload. Both citrate protocols were found to provide excellent anticoagulation without significant metabolic disturbances or other side effects, confirming the safety of 15% citrate as anticoagulant during PE.

Use of vascular access for haemodialysis in Europe: a report from the ERA-EDTA Registry.

BACKGROUND: Although arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are actively promoted, their use at the start of haemodialysis (HD) seems to be decreasing worldwide. In this paper, we describe recent trends in incidence and prevalence of vascular access types in Europe from 2005 to 2009 and their relationship with patient characteristics and survival. METHODS: Ten European renal registries participating in the ERA-EDTA Registry provided data on incidence (n = 13,044) and/or prevalence (n = 75,715) of vascular access types. We used logistic regression to assess which factors influence the likelihood to be treated with an AVF rather than another type. RESULTS: The use of AVFs at the start of HD showed a significant decreasing trend from 42% in 2005 to 32% in 2009 (P < 0.0001), while the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) increased from 58 to 68% (P < 0.0001). A similar evolution pattern was observed for the prevalence; use of AVFs decreased from 66 to 62% and use of CVCs increased from 28 to 32%. There was a large international variation in the use of the different vascular access types. Female patients [adjusted odds ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.90] and those ≥80 years (0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90) were least likely to start HD with an AVF. CONCLUSION: In Europe, there is a decreasing trend in the use of AVFs and an increasing trend in the use of CVCs at the start and after the start of HD. We cannot explain all between-country variations we found, and more research is needed to clarify how healthcare around vascular access is organized in Europe.

Very old patients on hemodialysis: how they start and can we predict survival?

BACKGROUND: We describe circumstances of dialysis initiation, dialysis prescription and factors affecting survival in elderly patients. METHODS: We included all incident patients ≥ 80 years old from a National Registry for which clinical and laboratory data at dialysis initiation could retrospectively be obtained. RESULTS: Of 170 patients included, 24% had diabetes, 30% ischemic heart disease, 13% peripheral arterial disease, 15% active malignancy and 60% prior nephrology care. Mean creatinine was 672 ± 225 µmol/l, eGFR 7.3 ± 3.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, 81% started dialysis in hospital and 78% with a catheter. 32% had < 2 sessions/week and 29% had single-needle dialysis. One-year survival was 74% (median 26 months). In multivariate analysis only age (HR 1.10) and prior nephrology care (HR 0.48) were significant predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of elderly patients started dialysis with a catheter and in hospital setting. We estimate observed survival as good. Only age and prior nephrology care were independent predictors of survival.

Transmission of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by a single multiorgan donor to two kidney transplant recipients: A case report.

We present two cases of transmission of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma from a single donor to two kidney transplant recipients. Autopsy of the donor revealed a pancreatic adenocarcinoma that had already spread locally to the regional lymph nodes and had not been detected at the time of organ procurement. Both recipients were carefully monitored, as neither consented to graft nephrectomy. In one patient, the tumor was discovered on surveillance biopsy of the graft approximately 14 months after transplantation, and in the second patient, ultrasound-guided aspiration needle biopsy of a growing formation in the lower pole of the graft revealed poorly differentiated metastatic adenocarcinoma. Both patients were successfully treated with graft nephrectomy and complete discontinuation of immunosuppression. None of the follow-up imaging showed persistent or recurrent malignancy, and both patients were candidates for re-transplantation. These exceptional cases of donor-derived pancreatic adenocarcinoma suggest that removal of the donor organ and restoration of immunity may lead to complete recovery.

Intermittent high-volume predilution on-line haemofiltration versus standard intermittent haemodialysis in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal modality of dialysis treatment in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear. Intermittent high-volume predilution on-line haemofiltration (HF) is not a well-established dialysis modality. The purpose of the study was to compare clinical outcomes between HF and standard intermittent haemodialysis (HD) in this specific population. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled single-centre clinical study, we compared mortality and recovery of kidney function between HF and HD in critically ill adult patients with AKI. The primary study outcome was 60-day all-cause mortality. Secondary study outcomes included 30-day and in-hospital all-cause mortality along with recovery of kidney function. Time to kidney function recovery and the number of required dialysis procedures were analyzed in the subgroup of patients with in-hospital recovery of kidney function. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the 273 patients in the two study groups were similar. All-cause mortality by Day 60 was 65.0% in the HF group and 65.5% in the HD group (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.33; P = 0.87). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in 30-day and in-hospital all-cause mortality or recovery of kidney function. Time to kidney function recovery and the number of required dialysis procedures were similar between the HF and the HD subgroup of patients with in-hospital recovery of kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis treatment with intermittent high-volume predilution on-line HF in critically ill patients with AKI did not decrease mortality, improve recovery of kidney function or reduce the need for dialysis support compared to standard intermittent HD.

Ethical and medical dilemmas in paid living kidney donor transplantation.

Due to the shortage of deceased and genetically- or emotionally-related living donors, living unrelated paid donor (LURpD) kidney transplantation has been considered; however, this practice may result in medical, ethical and social dilemmas, induce organ trading (commodification), and even criminal activities. Commodification also risks undermining public trust in the transplant system and impeding the development of proper altruistic or deceased donor programs by ignoring altruism, volunteerism, and dignity. However, despite many objections by authoritative organizations, black market practices are involved in up to 10% of all transplants worldwide. The authors strongly discourage any payment or rewards for organ donation, and instead urge the governments of all countries to provide adequate and accessible kidney health care. However, it is an undeniable fact that paid-living donor transplantation is increasing despite all objections, disapprovals and regulations. We feel it as our responsibility not to ignore this uncertain and undesirable practice, but rather to underline the necessity for strict rules and prohibitions to minimize unacceptable medical, social and ethical risks as long as it exists. Furthermore, economic profit, be it direct or indirect, must not be the goal of those involved, and the employment of intermediaries must be avoided entirely. Additionally, the donor should be in a position where not donating has no detrimental effect on his/her future in any way (free agency). In our view, every country has the obligation and responsibility to provide adequate kidney health care and to make kidney transplantation accessible to those in need. This provision is key to stop transplant tourism and commercialization of kidney transplantation. The nephrology community has a duty to establish structures that optimize organ availability within strict ethical limits. The legal position of LURpD varies considerably worldwide. Strictly respecting each country's legislation and local values is mandatory to minimize medical and ethical risks and controversies.