[AZF gene microdeletions in azoospermic-oligozoospermic males]. / Microdeleciones del gen AZF en varones azoospérmicos-oligozoospérmicos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The presence of microdeletions in the Y-chromosome azoospermia factor (AZF) region (YCMs) is considered the most frequent genetic cause of male infertility along with Klinefelter syndrome. The objective of this study was to investigate the frequencies and type of YCMs in infertile men in Aragon and to analyze the relationship between sex hormones, sperm count and microdeletions in them. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study of 644 men who during 2006-2019 were screened for YCMs using YChromStrip (Operón, Spain) by PCR+reverse hybridization, spermiogram, karyotype and quantification of sex hormones. RESULTS: The frequency of YCMs was 3.88% (25/644), not being detected in any patient with mild or normospermic oligozoospermia, that is, in sperm counts higher than 5×106/mL. The group of azoospermic patients was the one that presented a higher frequency of YCMs (14.58%, 14/96). Deletions in the AZFc region were the most frequent (68%). 20% (5/25) of patients with YCMs also presented some type of karyotype abnormality that included aneuploidies, deletions, duplications and/or translocations. Sperm count was significantly lower and FSH and LH concentrations significantly higher in the group of patients with YCMs. CONCLUSIONS: YCMs screening is a key test in the diagnostic approach to male infertility. Obtaining an adequate result allows choosing suitable assisted reproduction techniques, preventing unnecessary treatments and the transmission of genetic defects to offspring.

Beyond the method change in clinical practice: evaluation of insulin-like growth factor I assay.

Objectives: Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is the preferred biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring growth-related disorders but its serum quantification presents several difficulties since different IGF-I assays still leads to different IGF-I concentrations, especially when results are either above or below the normal range. Methods: We conducted a prospective study between November and December 2020 at a tertiary University Hospital with 212 serum samples to determine the analytical performance of the IGF-I assay on the Cobas e411 (Roche Diagnostics) and compare it with that of the Immulite 2000XPi (Siemens). Results: In this work, we report for the first time the existence of discrepancies between IGF-I levels measured by Immulite 2000XPi and Cobas e411. Deming regression model provided a slope of 1.570 (95% CI: 1.395-1.745) and an intercept of -58.591 (95% CI: -89.151 to -28.030), with R2=0.967 and average bias of +53.061 with overestimation of IGF-I. It was found that Cobas e411 provides abnormally high IGF-I concentrations, but further studies are required to elucidate the cause of the discrepancies. Conclusions: Our data can alert clinicians and laboratory professionals of this situation and avoid misinterpretation of increased IGF-I levels as a therapeutic failure rather than as a problem associated with this method change.