Static Magnetic Field Stimulation over Parietal Cortex Enhances Somatosensory Detection in Humans.

The role of neuronal oscillations in human somatosensory perception is currently unclear. To address this, here we use noninvasive brain stimulation to artificially modulate cortical network dynamics in the context of neurophysiological and behavioral recordings. We demonstrate that transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) over the somatosensory parietal cortex increases oscillatory power specifically in the alpha range, without significantly affecting bottom-up thalamocortical inputs indexed by the early cortical component of somatosensory evoked potentials. Critically, we next show that parietal tSMS enhances the detection of near-threshold somatosensory stimuli. Interestingly, this behavioral improvement reflects a decrease of habituation to somatosensation. Our data therefore provide causal evidence that somatosensory perception depends on parietal alpha activity.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Artificially increasing alpha power by placing a powerful magnetic field over the somatosensory cortex overcomes the natural decline in detection probability of a repeated near-threshold sensory stimulus.

Consumption effect of a formula with extended release carbohydrates on the glycemic response and post prandial insulin in healthy individuals.

There are specific formulas of enteral nutrition to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients containing different types of carbohydrates which glycemic response should be investigated. The consumption effect of a formula with carbohydrates with extended release was determined on the glycemic response and postprandial insulin in 21 healthy individuals (11 men and 10 women) from 17 to 25 years old, who consumed in two different time the polymeric enteral formula for diabetics and the reference food (white bread) in a quantity of 50 g of available carbohydrates. The glycemia was measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 min and the insulin concentrations in fasting and within 120 min. The area in the glycemic curve was measured being the lowest the formula 11718.20. ± 1112.38 than in white bread 13269.18 ± 1351.05 (P<0.001). The glycemic index (GI) resulted to be intermediate (63.33±5.22) and lower when compared to the GT ranks published for the reference food (80-96). A lower concentration of glycemia occurred after the consumption of the formula, without increments in the insulin requirements; thus, assuming an adequate use in diabetic and a more extended feeling of fullness. This effect and the glycated hemoglobin should be studied after the extended consumption in people with diabetes.

Effect of Oral Nutritional Supplements with Sucromalt and Isomaltulose versus Standard Formula on Glycaemic Index, Entero-Insular Axis Peptides and Subjective Appetite in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomised Cross-Over Study.

Oral diabetes-specific nutritional supplements (ONS-D) induce favourable postprandial responses in subjects with type 2 diabetes (DM2), but they have not been correlated yet with incretin release and subjective appetite (SA). This randomised, double-blind, cross-over study compared postprandial effects of ONS-D with isomaltulose and sucromalt versus standard formula (ET) on glycaemic index (GI), insulin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and SA in 16 individuals with DM2. After overnight fasting, subjects consumed a portion of supplements containing 25 g of carbohydrates or reference food. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min; and SA sensations were assessed by a visual analogue scale on separate days. Glycaemic index values were low for ONS-D and intermediate for ET (p < 0.001). The insulin area under the curve (AUC0-180 min) (p < 0.02) and GIP AUC (p < 0.02) were lower after ONS-D and higher GLP-1 AUC when compared with ET (p < 0.05). Subjective appetite AUC was greater after ET than ONS-D (p < 0.05). Interactions between hormones, hunger, fullness and GI were found, but not within the ratings of SA; isomaltulose and sucromalt may have influenced these factors.

[Role of the stevia and L-carnitine of a nutritional supplement on glycemic impact in adults]. / Rol de la estevia y L-carnitina sobre el impacto glicémico de un suplemento nutricional en adultos.

Currently the food industry has generated interest in non-nutritive sweeteners, for example Stevia and in special components such as L-carnitine, used in formulations of nutritional supplements for glycemic control specific for diabetics. The present study evaluated the effect of stevia and L-carnitine on the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (CG) of a nutritional supplement in 19 healthy subjects (9 men and 10 women), who randomly completed 3 consumption tests, 1 for the supplement and 1 for each reference product: Glucose solution (SG) and white bread (PB), obtaining blood samples at the 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min times; for measurement of blood glucose, basal and postprandial insulin. The increase area under the glucose curve (IAUC) was lower for supplement 11,778.73 than for reference products (SG) 13,724.06; (PB) 13,153.56 α= p 0.005. IG = (62) and CG = (16) were intermediate and lower than white bread IG = (69) and CG = (18), with no difference in postprandial insulin. This demonstrates that this nutritional supplement formulated with stevia and L-carnitine is able to prolong the glycemic response without increasing the insulin requirements in healthy subjects. Specific studies are required in diabetics to validate whether the glycemic impact is lower than the standard product. The presence of other nutrients in the formula, influential in these indicators, does not allow to infer that the results are due only to the type of sweetener used and the L-carnitine.

Efecto del consumo de una fórmula con carbohidratos de liberación prolongada sobre la respuesta glicémica e insulina post-prandial en individuos sanos / Consumption effect of a formula with extended release carbohydrates on the glycemic response and post prandial insulin in healthy individuals

Existen fórmulas enterales específicas para mejorar el control glicémico en diabéticos; con carbohidratos cuya respuesta glicémica sería de interés indagar. Se determinó el efecto del consumo de una fórmula con carbohidratos de liberación prolongada sobre la respuesta glicémica e insulina post-prandial en 21 sujetos sanos; (11 hombres y 10 mujeres) entre (17 y 25 años), quienes consumieron en 2 ocasiones la fórmula enteral polimérica para diabéticos y el alimento de referencia (pan blanco), en una cantidad de 50 g de carbohidratos disponibles. La glicemia fue medida a los 0, 15, 30,45, 60, 75, 90, 105 y 120 min y las concentraciones de insulina en ayuno y a los 120 min. El área bajo la curva de glicemia fue calculada resultando más baja para la fórmula 11718,20. ± 1112,38 que para el pan blanco 13269,18 ± 1351,05, (p<0,001). El índice glicémico (IG) resultó intermedio (63,33±5,22), y más bajo al compararlo con los rangos de IG publicados para el alimento de referencia(80-96). Se produjo una menor concentración de glicemia posterior al consumo de la fórmula; sin incrementos en los requerimientos de insulina, presumiendo un uso adecuado en diabéticos y una respuesta de saciedad más prolongada. Este efecto y la hemoglobina glicosilada deberían estudiarse tras el consumo en períodos prolongados en sujetos con diabetes(AU)

There are specific formulas of enteral nutrition to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients containing different types of carbohydrates which glycemic response should be investigated. The consumption effect of a formula with carbohydrates with extended release was determined on the glycemic response and postprandial insulin in 21 healthy individuals (11 men and 10 women) from 17 to 25 years old, who consumed in two different time the polymeric enteral formula for diabetics and the reference food (white bread) in a quantity of 50 g of available carbohydrates. The glycemia was measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 min and the insulin concentrations in fasting and within 120 min. The area in the glycemic curve was measured being the lowest the formula 11718.20. ± 1112.38 than in white bread 13269.18 ± 1351.05 (P<0.001). The glycemic index (GI) resulted to be intermediate (63.33±5.22) and lower when compared to the GI ranks published for the reference food (80-96). A lower concentration of glycemia occurred after the consumption of the formula, without increments in the insulin requirements; thus, assuming an adequate use in diabetic and a more extended feeling of fullness. This effect and the glycated hemoglobin should be studied after the extended consumption in people with diabetes(AU)